Reviews

31 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Wire (2002–2008)
10/10
Best. Show. Ever.
13 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
For whatever reason, I had completely missed Season 3 of the Wire. Maybe I was in school or something. Just finished it for the first time...wow.

Amazing, just like every other season. The theme of this one was clearly reform, and how futile it can be when there's an established program. So flawlessly executed, and such amazing character arcs...every film and television director/writer needs to see this...this is how you make drama.

Was particularly moved by Bunny Colvin. The whole series, you knew that his amazing Hamsterdam experiment was going to end badly, and when the **** hit the fan it got on everyone. Humiliated, demoted, loss of a high paying job after retirement. And all because he knew what had to be done, and knew that it was the right thing to do.

Also surprisingly moved by Stringer. Hard to believe that I was feeling a level of sympathy for the despised, cold-blooded killer. I mean, he ordered the death of kids...and I still felt for him when his time came. He honestly wanted to get out of the game, and was doing it in the best way he thought possible. What he didn't realize, and what Avon did, was that you can't be a semi-gangster. You have to go all the way, or completely get out the way Cutty did. Avon thought he could bring order to chaos, and in the end it cost him everything.

I can't say enough about the acting/directing/writing/general feel of this show. Nothing like it on television, and doubt there will ever be again. Truly genius in every sense of the word. Funny, heartbreaking, intellectual, technical, true-to-life, and above all, engrossing. I will miss the Wire the way I don't even miss my favorite other shows that got canceled, like the Sopranos, and the Shield. Television is worse off without the Wire.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Terminator 4: The Legend of Marcus Wright
30 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoyed Terminator: Salvation for what is was: an exciting, decently-acted (could have actually been better, in my opinion, considering the quality of actors that are Christian Bale and Sam Worthington), action-filled Terminator movie. While not as enjoyable as T2, Terminator: Salvation tells an intriguing story that draws on elements of the first 2 Terminator movies stylishly.

The most intriguing aspect of 'Salvation' is the story it tells of Marcus Wright, a convicted murderer who is given a second chance at redemption. Marcus Wright's subtly powerful performance (well, not so subtle at some points, but overall...) is the best thing about the movie. Recommended for fans of the action genre, and extremely recommended for fans of the Terminator series of movies. This movie far exceeds T3 in every aspect.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watchmen (2009)
10/10
A completely faithful superhero movie for adults
6 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Watchmen is one of the greatest novels I have ever read, certainly one of the greatest Graphic Novels in the history of the genre (personally, I think From Hell may have been the superior work by the author, but that's neither here nor there). From the moment I first read this inspired piece of literature, I imagined the Watchmen Movie. I heard the characters voices, Rorshach staring down the surrounding inmates at Sing-Sing prison, while declaring "None of you understand. I'm not locked up in here with you. You're all locked up in here with me!" Dr. Manhattan monotonely asking Laurie Jupiter/Juspeczyk "Why should I save a world I no longer have any stake in?" Dan Dreiberg absent-mindedly reminiscing about past battles with ally Rorshach: "Those were great times, huh Rorshach? Whatever happened to them", and the simple and callous reply from his old friend as he walks away: "You quit".

I would hear these voices, but I resigned myself to the fact that Watchmen was, as Alan Moore has said, unfilmable. The superheroes are made up for this one particular story, based on golden and silver-age heroes that most of the Spider-Man/X-Men movie-going crowd has never heard of. The story is awash in brutality, sex, philosophy...and there is no catharsis; no simple solution to humanity's problems at the end. The real enemy is not a purse-snatch or a "serial supervillian" that can be defeated through superior fighting skill, but rather the ever-growing spectre of nuclear destruction. The enemy in Watchmen is the complete and utter destruction of the human race! What role can a costumed vigilante possibly play in such a scenario? And how can this be made into a live-action movie?!?! The brilliant Zack Snyder has answered these questions for me, and turned me into a lifelong fan and admirer for the faithful, classy, stylish, and overall brilliant way he has brought Watchmen to the movie screen. This is a movie with tons of heart, and you can feel the love in each and every scene. Snyder's passion for the source material is evident in each frame, each action scene, each line of dialogue. The characters sound like I imagined they would sound, and they look the way that Dave Gibbons drew them. From the god-like Dr. Manhattan, to the uncompromising (in every sense of the word) Rorshach, to the beautiful Silk Spectre, I may have never seen a truer translation of a graphic novel, at least not since Sin City.

Bravo and congratulations to Zack Snyder for not dumbing down a complex and sophisticated graphic novel to satisfy mainstream audiences. And though the ending, and the main villain's plan was slightly different than in the original graphic novel, the outcome and effect was the same.

Bottom line: This is the best that anyone could have possibly done in creating a Watchmen movie. I would not have changed a thing. Well, other than make the film run 5 hours. But that might be pushing it.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent movie on all fronts
11 August 2008
David Cronenberg is in top form with Eastern Promises, an expertly acted, tightly directed thriller/mystery. Naomi Watts is excellent, if somewhat ordinary, in the lead role as a nurse who seeks to unravel the mystery of a 14 year-old Russian prostitute who died in childbirth, leaving a baby with no family and no name. Only a diary written by her mother, detailing the horrors inflicted upon her by the Russian mafia who lured her out of Russia to London with promises of a better life, only to be placed in a brothel and forced to commit unimaginable acts.

Viggo Mortensen is Nikolai, "The Driver". At first, he appears to be every bit as cold-blooded and sadistic as his Comrades, but, as is often the case in a Cronenberg movie, not everything is as it seems. As Mortensen's character becomes more fleshed-out, so does the story. As he does in so many films, Mortensen makes the movie his own. If there is a more underrated actor in the film industry, I would be hard-pressed to name him.

The plot is very good, but not great. What puts Eastern Promises on a higher tier is the incredible acting. From the violin-playing, restaurant-owner/Mafia boss Semyan, to the profanity-spewing, self-aggrandizing uncle Stepan, to the always incredible Mortensen as Nikolai, Eastern Promises will keep you tense and expectant, as you never are sure where Cronenberg is leading you, and the characters make the voyage a memorable one.

Very highly recommended. 8/10.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Horrible? Nononononononono...
15 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Let me just start by saying that if you're a BIG Adam Sandler fan then you'll love this movie. If you're a casual Adam Sandler fan and an Israeli or Arab with a sense of humor, you will love this movie. If you are sensitive to Jew/Israeli jokes, humor at the expense of Arabs or Middle-Easterns, then this movie will give you lots to complain about.

************SPOILERS BELOW****************** Zohan is an Israeli Mossad Agent/Counterterriorist. He is the best there is at what he does...but he has a gentle soul, and is tired and exasperated with all the fighting. He longs for a simple life where nobody knows him and he can do what he loves: cut and style women's hair.

That's it. That's the movie. And along the way there's lots of Jew/Israei/Arab humor and an overall positive message at the end. It's silly, filled with toilet-humor, and completely over-the-top so as not to be anywhere near the country called reality. In short, it's a hilarious Adam Sandler movie and I laughed my ass off. And John Turturro plays the Arab Terrorist villain...which is just so great and funny.

********************Spoilers end***************** Go see this movie if you have a sense of humor. YOU DON'T MESS WITH THE ZOHAN!!!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very good! Much better than the original.
20 June 2007
I didn't think much of the original FF, but this one is far better in every aspect. Better writing, more exciting storyline, and better acting, as well. The special effects are amazing, as everyone can probably already tell from the previews, particularly the Silver Surfer. His scenes were incredible.

I laughed quite a bit at this movie, surprisingly, as I didn't find the last one very funny. The humor in this movie was a little more mature, particularly when Johnny Storm is asking Ben Grimm about how he and his girlfriend have "relations (which is something I always wondered as well)." My favorite scenes were the ones in which Ben and Johnny interacted, as Michael Chiklis' Thing is my favorite character to watch. He really captured the spirit of the comic in both appearance and attitude.

There are many things to like about FF: ROSS, just don't expect Shakespeare, or even deep comic book movies like Batman Begins or X-Men. This movie is rated PG, and rightfully so. While there are mature moments, FF is at heart a movie for younger people.

The reason that I gave this movie a 6, despite my seemingly high praise of it, is the ending/last 15-20 minutes. While not enough to ruin my enjoyment of this movie, the ending definitely rubbed me the wrong way, particularly as a comic book fan. I don't want to give anything away, so I won't go into detail. But it's easy to see how the producers painted themselves into a corner by needing an easy way to finish a movie that could potentially have an extremely vast scope.

Bottom line: if you're a FF fan, or just a comic book fan in general, this is one that you won't want to miss. Just, like I said, don't go in expecting to think deep thoughts.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Platoon (1986)
10/10
Great Oliver Stone movie about Vietnam
1 June 2006
I saw this about 29 years after it came out. I have to say that I've seen lots of Vietnam movies and this one, though slightly pretentious at times, qualifies as one of the top 4-5. Scholars researching Oliver Stone 30 years from now should definitely look at Platoon as being the rare vehicle that brings the best out of a skilled director.

Platoon has a message to get across, and it indeed does; it beats you over the head with the message. You accept it though, because the tone of the voice delivering the message is so strong and powerful. You watch this movie like you watch a drunk driver whose crash is inevitable on the freeway.

Anyway, the coolest thing about this movie is that Charlie Sheen virtually mirrors his father's performance from Apocalypse Now. Same theme, same story arc-both brought out beautifully in what may be Charlie Sheen's finest performance in film (it was all downhill from here). It's basically been a story told before...Charlie Sheen's character, Chris, comes to Vietnam wide eyed and idealistic, but the war turns him. That's all you really need to know about this movie. So watch the movie if you like movies of this genre.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Batman Begins (2005)
10/10
I'm forced to give this movie a "10"
5 July 2005
While Batman Begins is not a perfect movie, it is the closest the Batman franchise has ever come to touching and translating the should and essence of what is truly Batman: his character, his psyche, his passion, and his rage.

"Batman Begins" is, as most know, the story of Bruce Wayne, not Batman. This is an ironic statement however, because as the movie transitions it becomes clear that Bruce Wayne is in fact the mask. Batman is what Bruce Wayne became the moment that his parents were shot. Rather than possessing a focus for his rage as in the first "Batman", Batman is forced to take his vengeance upon the general criminal element in Gotham City.

"batman Begins" captures the essence of the character in rare fashion. When the movie ended, I clapped...and I haven't done that for a while.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Very De Palma
24 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
One thing I really like about Brian De Palma is that he'll sacrifice cold realism for artistic and creative pleasure. There are lots of cool things going on in the Untouchables, both visually and verbally. All the actors do a very good job, but the standout (as he usually is) is Sean Connery. Every second that he was on screen made this movie more thrilling and enjoyable. Highlights for me: spoiler warning Kevin Costner throwing Frank Nitti off the building, the horses in Canada, and Sean Connery's death scene: one of the most touching scenes I've seen in movies.

Excellent movie, on several levels.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent comic performances
24 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
What sets "Meet the Fockers" above the level of standard comic shtick is the wonderful original performances of Hoffman, Streisand, and De Niro (and De Niro's wife as well, her name escapes me). Hoffman and Streisand completely sell the role of Gaylord Focker's parents. Hoffman in particular is brilliant. He brilliantly conveys the sensitivity, quirkiness and eccentricity that must be inherent in two people who would bestow the moniker "Gaylord Focker" upon their son.

Possible spoilers...

Hoffman's ex-attorney turned stay-at-home father completely fits his comic persona, while Streisand is hilarious as a sex-therapist without going completely over the edge. "Meet the Fockers" is, as its name implies, mostly centered on Gaylord's parents, but Robert De Niro delivers one of the best comic performances of his career as the deadpan, overly serious, control-freak father of Gaylord's fiancé. Suffice it to say, the story itself is not all that spectacular, but the director wisely allows the characters to dictate the comic element of the movie. Good job. I was laughing at every word that came out of Hoffman's mouth.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fight Club (1999)
10/10
Incredible movie about life, fighting, and masculinity/femininity
26 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Fight Club's simple title, aptly chosen by the author, betrays the extremely relevant tones that the film conveys. The film, one of the better adapted movies from a novel, offers social commentaries so scathing and obvious that they will most likely force you to reconsider your daily routine and lifestyle.

Possible spoilers.

The movie's main character, quite appropriately, has no name. He is instead referred to by the pseudonyms that he provides while crashing various self-help groups. His motive for doing so, insomnia, serves as the focal point for the film's plot. The narrator/main character, while seemingly asleep, actually becomes the founder of a national organization of everyday people who defy society in multiple ways: picking fights with innocent people, setting up underground fight clubs, and even destruction of corporate symbols.

The main goal of the film is to take society's clichés and stereotypes and reexamine them, hoping to decipher the truth about why we have so quickly and wholeheartedly embraced them. The places this movie takes you will shock and astonish you in several ways. The plot is only increased by the perfectly appropriate and understated performances of Brad Pitt and Edward Norton, respectively. One movie that everyone should watch once before they die.

10/10
6 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Life of Brian (1979)
10/10
Best...comedy...ever
15 October 2004
When this movie was recommended to me as "funnier than the Holy Grail", I laughed. Just to prove this person wrong I bought a copy on DVD for $9 and watched it as I called in sick from work. This movie was hilarious. The humor will have you rolling on the floor in fits of hysteria. It's like a snakebite. It creeps up on you until you're on the floor dying. All the Python members are beyond comedic. Of course, you have to recommend Pontius Pilate, Reg, and Mandy. But the list is too long to even recite. Words can't express how funny this movie is. Just see it. It's the best Monty Python movie that they made and they made some great ones. ("Camelot...it's only a model")

Just remember, if you're punished by crucifixion, it could be worse.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gandhi (1982)
10/10
Perfect performance by Kingsley
4 June 2004
Gandhi is not a perfect movie.

Far from it. Cliches are multiple. Story, despite being based on historical events, is nevertheless predictable. The use of background is hardly original. However, the movie is still entertaining on its own merits. Richard Attenborough did a very good, if not great, directing job.

What forces me to give this movie a 10/10 is one man: Kingsley. In his impassioned, restrained, and accurate portrayal of one of the most amazing men who ever lived, Kingsley, a relative unknown at the time, provides one of the most awe-inspiring performances that I have ever had the privilege to see, and most likely ever will see. I recently read a post for this movie that stated that the viewer will forget that he is observing an actor portraying Gandhi and believe that he is viewing the Mahatma himself. This is entirely accurate. Ben Kingsley plays the Mahatma Gandhi with such heart and emotion that I, just for a second, found myself believing that I was watching a documentary.

With his portrayal of Gandhi, Ben Kingsley has placed himself, along with Marlon Brando in the Godfather, Roberto Beignini in Life is Beautiful, Liam Neeson in Schindler's List, Bogart in Casablanca, Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia, upon a pedestal reserved only for the most magnificent actors ever to grace the screen with their presence. I honestly believe that Kingsley may have provided the greatest performance ever seen in any movie. If that does not merit a 10/10, I don't know what does.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My God
12 May 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Possible spoilers:

I just finished this movie. I was touched not by the graphic displays of violence and murder, but by the humanity displayed in the face of monstrosities too horrible to even consider. Possibly the most moving film I have ever seen. I'm sure that the film takes liberties, but the truly frightening thing is that I am sure that they are few and far between. The scene in the showers may have been the most horrific moment I have ever witnessed in cinema. The violence is so hideous and dehumanizing that it puts the displays of kindness in a unique perspective. The scene on the trains, where Schindler provides water is one example. I knew precisely what to expect from this movie. What I did not expect was the portrait of kindness and humanity that it provides. Everyone in the world should watch this movie at least once.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hulk (2003)
8/10
Definitely above most comic book movies
9 May 2004
The first thing that struck me about the Hulk, prior to its beautiful CGI special effects, was its ambition. Ang Lee, in bringing the Incredible Hulk to life, has created a rather original movie. It is impossible not to compare the movie to the comic book itself in its format, as I am sure was intentional. For those unfamiliar with the extremely long-running comic book, Ang Lee's film captures the Hulk in his purest form: pure, unadulterated rage. Without giving away too much of the plot, Bruce Banner becomes the Hulk when he loses control of his anger. Chaos ensues. Now for the details:

The Hulk looks great. Even for those not very enamored with CGI, the amount of emotion portrayed by the Hulk's computer generated face is magnificent. The animation flawlessly blends with reality, and one forgets that there is even a mixture of the two. There are moments in the film where I was struck by the beauty of the setting, particularly in the desert scenes. Watching the monster glide through the air made me think of Crouching Tiger, even though the similarities are minimal. Ang Lee has created art, an original piece of film-making about an old, overdone story.

Now for the rest: the acting is good, if not great. Jennifer Garner is a wonderful actress, and her skills are a bit under-utilized here. The actor playing Banner is good, and conveys the self-anguish inherent in his character well. The plot is very good, often surprising even Marvel enthusiasts.

This film caught a lot of flack for many reasons, but I think that is the result of this film being so over-publicized. Ang Lee has made a film worthy of his talents, and even non-Marvel fans should be able to appreciate this original movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Angel Eyes (2001)
2/10
Jennifer Lopez is hot....oh, and the movie sucks
19 April 2004
Can you believe how gorgeous J-Lo is? I mean, damn! That girl got it going on in every way possible, the total package no doubt. I mean, just check out the way her lower back curves into her butt and I guarantee you'll have to cross your legs.

Oh, too bad the movie's TERRIBLE. God, J-Lo needs to stop making movies and go into a business where she can keep her mouth shut and display her obvious assets. But it's not Just her fault. Caviezel, who I thought was incredible in Frequency, is simply awful here. Yeah, we get it, he's disturbed, traumatized, but does he have to be so annoying while he's doing it? I felt no compassion or sympathy for his character the whole movie. Maybe he should stick to playing Jesus in every movie. 2/10, just because JLo's hot.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent, atypical WWII film
19 April 2004
Guns of Navarone is an incredible movie. It is not the action, the special effects, or the plot that make it so; what puts it above 99% of other movies of the similar genre is the simply amazing acting. Everyone is just amazing in their own way. Peck is perfect as the officer who takes charge of the mission once the CO is incapacitated, Quinn is humorous and intriguing as the Greek corporal who is set on revenge against the enemy and Peck, Niven is extremely entertaining as the extremely facetious, cynical explosives expert, and the rest give the performances of their lives, particularly Darren and Irene Papas. You would be hard pressed to watch this movie and not identify with the vast array of personalities you witness. I've never seen Anthony Quinn better. 10/10.
21 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fraught with irony, tragedy, and Hanks
14 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Possible spoilers ahead...

Saving Private Ryan is a movie about World War II. In this it is not original. Hundreds or perhaps thousands of films have been made about this subject. What makes this film stand out besides the magnificent acting of Tom Hanks (possibly his best role, and that's saying a lot) is the film's plot. A dozen men risk their life and put service to their country on hold in order to retreive a single officer. Not one that is crucial to the war effort, indeed, not one that is even in enemy hands. Just one that is the last surviving son of a mother that has lost all her children in the war. The irony and contradictions of a dozen men risking their lives to locate and retreive a single officer is almost paralyzing, and surely secures Speilberg's masterpiece a place, in my opinion, among the finest movies ever made. Everything about this movie is spectacular, from the acting to the effects, to the dramatic qualities. Possibly the finest of all the World War II films ever made.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Williams, very good; movie, not so much
17 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Robin Williams, as always is a pleasure to watch; normal, weird, creepy, goofy, serious, insane; the guy just glues you to the screen. This is one of those where you are transfixed on his character and have no idea what he'll do next. Great performance, like usual. That said, the movie ain't that great.

Possible spoiler ahead.... - 0 0 0 0 -

Okay, it's about this creepy cat who works at the one hour photo department of an everyday drug store and gets obsessed with this one family who keeps bringing him photos. That's about it. He gets fired, goes a little crazy, finally snaps, and gets stopped before he does anything that terrible. See what I mean? There's not too much this movie can do. It's a little flat, and the only thing exceptional about it is Mr. Williams. Worth seeing once, I guess. 6/10.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magnificent: Gets better as the story progresses
6 February 2004
I'll admit...when I first saw the opening movie with Dean Erickson behind the typewriter, I chuckled to myself and thought "who the hell is this joker?" Indeed, as the game began, Erickson did little to change this sentiment. But then something happened: he got better and better as the game went on. Don't get me wrong, he's not exactly the same Gabe that was written for Tim Curry, but Erickson has a personality all his own. In the hunting lodge, Erickson reaches the apex of his character. He just seemed so cool and natural, a regular guy (albeit a schattenjager) caught up in an extremely horrendous situation.

But the rest of the acting is also superb. I've played a few FMV games and they were TERRIBLE. God, even the one with Christopher Walken was a disaster. But this game, filled with unknowns, delivers the best acting that I have ever seen in a video game. Kudos to all involved.

The oscar goes to: Peter Lucas. A 200 year old werewolf with homo-erotic tendencies. This guy was great. Funny, charming, likeable, and very cool. You never know exactly what he's thinking.

Also, the girl that played Grace was excellent, which is good because you control her for half the game. In fact, nobody really stunk. Wait a minute, this is a game we're talking about right?

Oh yeah. Great story, great puzzles, great sound/music/video/everything. Jane Jensen is GOD.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ali (2001)
5/10
Boring and exaggerated
22 November 2003
Nope, Will Smith can't play Ali. Nice try though. He almost had it at the Press conference scene. But, the exagerrated scenes ill-behoove the Ali legend. If you want to see the true Ali, watch WHEN WE WERE KINGS. Best Boxing Documentary of this century.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
True Grit (1969)
9/10
The Duke at his best
22 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
An older Duke, bet not a lesser Duke. Don't be fooled by this movie being made in the latter stages of Wayne's career. This performance is one of Wayne's best. He's tough, strong, and hilarious all in one.

Spoiler--plot summary

The movie centers around Mattie Ross. She is played by Kim Darby. I don't know what I really think of her performance. In some ways, I like it, but it seems way over the top for the most part. Her father gets shot and she goes to a nearby town to enlist aid in tracking down the killer: Rooster Cogburn! One of the greatest characters in Western movie history. They team up with a Texas Marshall named LeBouef. Okay, kill me but I thought the Marshall, Glen Campbell, was really cool in his performance. He's pretentious, quick-witted, and funny.

They eventually find the assassin, and John Wayne shows that he's still got the old Duke grit. He puts the reins in his teeth, shouts "FILL YOUR HAND YOU SONOFABITCH", and charges the 4 gunslingers, reins in mouth, gun in each hand. The outcome is never in doubt.

After beating the bad guys and saving the girl, Wayne returns to the town. Darby remarks "you're too old and fat to jump horses". Wayne, in a classic display, responds "Well, come see a fat old man sometime!" Next, with a "yaa", he jumps the gate and rides off into the sunset.

Again, one of Wayne's best performances ever in a very good movie. A definitive Wayne must-see. The Duke will live forever in beautiful pictures such as this one. 10/10.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thirteen Days (2000)
9/10
Excellent
16 November 2003
Fraught with tension, this movie contains great performances from Costner and Greenwood that really let you feel the strain and pressure that's coming down on them. Put yourself in that situation and you'll find yourself acting no different than they would. Great plot, great acting, a much overlooked winner.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Overlooked gangster classic
16 November 2003
This is the Coens' take on gangster flicks, and it's mesmerizing. Memorable characters, magnificent acting, and most importantly, an incredible plot make this movie a must see for movie fans. Along with "the Usual Suspects", this is Byrne's best movie. Also, who knew Albert Finney could act this tough?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Mediocre movie, fantastic ending
16 November 2003
Warning: Spoilers
If not for the brilliance of the ending, I would have rated this move a 5 instead of a 7.

Spoiler--

The ending with Sofia getting shot was kind of subpar, but what came after it was breathtaking. Pacino's silent scream and the expression on Diane Keaton's face was great, but the true artistry came afterwards. The flashbacks of Pacino dancing with Appolonia, Kay, and Mary suggest that Michael, for all his strength and self-sacrifice to ensure the safety of his family, has lost all the women in his life. Essentially, his whole life has meant nothing because he has lost everything he has ever loved. Then, the death scene was shattering. Michael, great man that he was, ends up dying alone and blind with only a small animal to witness his passing. And the music playing throughout this last scene, magnifico!

Possibly the greatest and most moving ending I have ever seen in any movie. Just a shame that the film itself couldn't live up to it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed