It seems that some of the cast of Friends (1994-2004) are cursed to be remembered by it, Matthew Perry being among them. Go on is an attempt to leave this legacy behind and is partially successful.
The episodes are short, which is at the same time Go on's advantage and disadvantage. Advantage, because it can never become boring. Disadvantage, because a lot of jokes have to be told in a short time frame. This leads to fast delivery of lines and occasional over-the-top performance.
I would call Go on small, not because of its qualities, but because it won't be remembered as a groundbreaking comedy. Despite that it is a relaxing show that will make you laugh a lot. In my opinion, this is not easy and nowadays not a lot of shows can do that over a longer period...
The episodes are short, which is at the same time Go on's advantage and disadvantage. Advantage, because it can never become boring. Disadvantage, because a lot of jokes have to be told in a short time frame. This leads to fast delivery of lines and occasional over-the-top performance.
I would call Go on small, not because of its qualities, but because it won't be remembered as a groundbreaking comedy. Despite that it is a relaxing show that will make you laugh a lot. In my opinion, this is not easy and nowadays not a lot of shows can do that over a longer period...