Reviews

24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Intolerance (1916)
9/10
Amazing three hour epic
23 July 2011
Amazing and totally epic film. Four different stories and 3 hours of character development and plot.

I'm more of a horror guy but I found this to be a very entertaining experience. There's just a unique atmosphere in silent films and I've seen most of the popular silent horror movies so I kinda had do move away from horror to get my weekly dose of silent film. I wasn't disappointed though.

The cinematography is stunning yet dated(duh) and the acting is obviously over the top as is always the case with silent films.

The main focus of the film is surprisingly...Intolerance through the ages. Basically its about accepting diversity ideologically,culturally and politically which is of course fine. Live and let live and such. The four stories revolve around this theme and basically present 4 situations in different periods of history where intolerance reigns, 1914 America, 1572 ad Paris, 27 ad Jerusalem and 500 bc Babylonia.

Basically what you get for you're money is tons of characters tons of sets tons of costumes and a huge spectacle. Fights, dancing, market places full of people etc. Its awesome to see so many actual actors in a film and not cg copies of a few people.

The main focus is the plot or plots and it carries the film through nicely even though I think it suffers slightly from the length and it is pretty redundant with the theme of intolerance. The story is also really idealistic and naive but I can live with that. Some times you want to see a movie like that.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vital (2004)
8/10
Neat j-horror drama
23 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Disturbing and creepy in a psychological way. Probably the most f****d up love story(spoiler?) I've ever watched and also a neat little mystery.

The acting is excellent especially Tadanobu Asano's and it makes the film very easy to watch and you also tend to care about the characters and to be genuinely interested in finding out the truth. Its really fun to see the story come together and solve the mystery.

I wouldn't say its that much of a horror film, its more of a drama but its definitely creepy and sometimes disgusting and I'd still define it as a Japanese horror film or a horror-drama. Its a horror film in the same way Der Todesking (The Death King) is.

Recommended for J-horror fans and anyone who wants some psychological creepiness.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1984 (1956)
7/10
True to the book
23 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The only film version of 1984 I've seen so far and for some reason I have a feeling that the never versions are gonna suck.

Having read the book I can say that the film is very accurate and true to the novel. The acting is solid and the characters are enjoyable and again true to the book.

Obviously the plot is the key factor here and very clever but if you have read the book you wont be surprised except for the fact that they changed the ending to be a happier one. I guess not to upset the audience since the ending the book gives is so dystopian and hopeless(and excellent).

The small change to the plot doesn't affect the movie that much and you really have to give the makers credit for being so accurate to most of the book. Many of the of the most memorable parts of the book can also be found in the movie such as "5 minute hate" and the jail scene with the other prisoners(if you've read the book you know what I mean).

Even though slightly merrier then the novel its really not happy at all. Its very grim and the clinical look of the sets just creates a very convincing dystopian big brother future with no escape and no one to ask for help.

Recommended for anyone into scifi or fans of Orwell.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stereotypical 40s Monster Movie with Lon Chaney Jr.
22 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I wasn't expecting much when started watching this and it didn't really surprise me at all. Its a cheezy and clichèd 40s monster movie with Lon Chaney Jr. playing a guy who becomes immune to electricity and eventually a mindless thug controlled by a mad scientist.

It offers some of the goodness that people are looking for in this type of films. Fog mist thunder and shots of forests and moors in the moonlight and awesome looking pseudo scientific gadgets. The fact that it uses the original wolfman score is also a neat bonus.

When it comes to plot is pretty basic, and it also tries a little bit to go for that tragic ending like wolfman did but it doesn't go all the way even though its essentially the same thing. Its overall a very mediocre and unmemorable monster movie with things that have been done over and over again before it and since but it still succeeds in what its trying to do.

You wanna watch a 40s monster movie? Hell yeah I do. Let's roll the picture.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The First Film Adaptation Of The Jules Verne Sci-fi Classic
22 July 2011
Its looks awesome as many other Melies' films do but its hardly very true to the book.

Obviously you can't go that deep into the book in such a short time but as some other films like Frankenstein(1910) managed to do it so I don't see why Melies couldn't other than the fact that this is from a time when title cards were not used yet.

Basically what we get is a montage of Melies style painted backgrounds and creatures which keeps you interested for a few minutes.

Recommended for fans of OLD sci-fi and fans Melies or Verne, or if you just have a few minutes to spare
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Grotesque (2009)
8/10
A clever torture-flick type thriller with a J-horror twist
22 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This was pretty much what I had expected i.e Saw with a J-horror angle.

The story revolves around a man and a woman who are captured by a sadistic fucktard right after their first date. It turns out to be one of the sickest love stories I've seen ヴィタール(Vital) taking 1st place.

The plot provides a lot of twists and turns as one would expect from a Japanese horror flick(obviously excluding the guinea pig films) and keeps you on the edge of your seat. The acting is very good and you actually care about the characters which makes watching them suffer so much more effective. Its also a step more gruesome in the torture department compared to Saw or other American films or that nature and it also deliberately and explicitly sexualises violence the. It is mostly a horror film but the love story sub-plot is quite interesting, maybe even the main focus of the film.

(slight spoiler) I also have to mention that there is a ridiculously hilarious scene near the end where a decapitated head bites a guys neck and its really out of place and that made it even more funny.

It delivers the violence and gore but the plot is also interesting on its own so it doesn't really matter if you're watching because you want gore or because you like Asian horror.

If you like something different or just more torture this should be a satisfactory watch.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Caligula (1979)
Biopic?
22 July 2011
Too much sex and too little violence for my taste but its all good fun. Even if the sex gets a bit old eventually.

The life story of Caligula seems to be quite astonishing(I'm not sure exactly how accurate the movie is but according to wikipedia it seems to be at least somewhat accurate).

The movie was pretty much what I had heard, a sword and sandal movie with TONS of nudity and gruesome violence. It was actually even more extreme than I expected with orgies,anal fisting and "wall of death" but still nothing mind blowing. I guess nothing surprises me after seeing Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma (Salo, or the 120 Days of Sodom)

I was drawn to this movie because of the exploitative elements but while watching I have to say the plot was really what kept my interest during the film. So plot wise it was good. Acting was also very solid with Malcolm McDowell as Caligula which was a nice surprise.

Overall its kinda neat, sure it has boobs & gore but the plot is also there and its a well made film.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
70s exploitation
22 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
A Sleazy badly acted exploitation slasher about a killer performing human sacrifices to his Aztec god.

The killer lures prostitutes into his apartment and after tying them to a table and oiling them he removes their hearts from their chests. Mildly enjoyable, for the first time but oh boy we're gonna see the same procedure over and over again. Acting is terribly special effects are tolerable but what makes it so bad is how poorly its scripted and edited. Its booooring. No amount of naked women getting butchered is going to make it feel anything but dull.

Only for the hardcore sleaze and exploitation fan or if you're a slasher fan and have already seen everything else.

Oh yeah it would probably be good to mention that this is a Video Nasty so any nasty completionist (like myself)is unfortunately going to have to bare though this.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
August Underground (2001 Video)
5/10
Snuff?
16 July 2011
Pretty much every review of this I've read has been very negative which is surprising but I kinda understand though I don't share that opinion. Don't get me wrong its not the "sickest film ever" either. Not even close.

I think the film wasn't actually that boring even though mockumentary films can easily be very tedious. There was a lot of stuff happening though some of it was kinda pointless. The concert scene and the statue scene mostly(the statue part was actually kinda funny). It probably would've been a lot more tedious if they had just spent the entire film with the torture. Its an interesting look into the life of these two guys who are some what believable. At least the acting is decent.

Another big thing that people are whining about is the mockumentary style of shooting i.e shaky hand-held camera with shitty video quality. It doesn't make me sick but if you get motion sickness easily then I don't see you enjoying this movie. I actually am a big fan of that style but I guess its a matter of taste.

Overall it seems to be popular to hate this movie even though it really doesn't deserve that much hate. The acting is good and the special effects are well done. Its not bad, its pretty average and has something different to offer. Don't expect a deep plot or social commentary though, just sit back and enjoy some mockumentary fun!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Night Ripper! (1986 Video)
4/10
boring
14 July 2011
A super cheap shot on video slasher from the 80s with crappy music. The story is about a killer who is referred to as the "ripper"(very original) who stalks and kills female fashion models.

The story is very basic but It could be good. Unfortunately its not, there's a sub plot about a photographer and his love troubles which takes way too much time and the film is mostly just boring mush.

Even the kills aren't that good. Sure there's some blood but they seem to screw up every kill with either some kind of silly gimmick(like using still shots only or some really weird filters and such) and of course there's a 'twist' at the end but its very predictable.

The movie is really dated and some people like myself like that but I don't think that even the most hardcore 80s slasher fans would like this. Its boring and as mediocre as it gets.
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Danish Sci-fi Classic
15 June 2011
It was good. Now I'll just have to watch Himmelskibet (A Trip to Mars).

Basically the story is very simple. Some scientists notice a comet that is going to hit the earth and they release this information and it causes a panic. The main focus of the film is not the event of "the end of the world" itself but how the people cope with that. It is very much a drama with scientific speculative fiction on the background.

Overall the film was nicely paced, not too long although it stayed in some places a bit too long for no good reason and acting was solid. The story was also quite interesting although slightly predictable and I enjoyed it. It also has a pretty uplifting ending.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nasty
13 June 2011
This definitely should be on the video nasties list "NOT". Visiting hours is a well made non-exploitative and non-graphic slasher that is actually more of a thriller than a slasher flick. A lot of the times the censors banned films like Day of the Woman (I Spit on Your Grave) and The Witch Who Came From the Sea because of graphic content while totally ignoring the artistic value and symbolism behind the brutality and just labeling them as cheap exploitation but with Visiting Hours its the exact opposite.

The story is pretty much what it seems like and there isn't much going on in the background. Its just a guy with a knife chasing a woman but there's practically no gore and not even boobs so I dunno what they were thinking. By these standards every hammer Dracula film should be a video-nasty.

Anyway as a film Visiting hours is a forgettable 80s slasher but its one of the better ones and keeps your interest till the end of the film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Diary Of A Madman?
7 June 2011
Interestingly enough this is not based on Nikolai Gogol's short story Diary Of A Madman but on a short story by Guy de Maupassant called The Horla.

The film is very different from the short story and takes a totally different direction with the plot while expanding on some things already established in the short story.

The acting is decent(and of course there is Vincent Price who is awesome as always). The cinematography is pretty bland and there are some nice yet sparingly used special effects. The Horla is one of my favorite short stories so I just had to look this up but instead of being a study of a very deluded mind this adaptation was a cheesy 60s supernatural horror film with Vincent Price.

Not terribly and not even that bad but it just could and should have been a lot better.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Solid Remake
1 May 2011
I was actually quite skeptical of this even though I had heard a lot of good things about this. This time the rumors were right, it was good.

The remake tones the rape down a bit but it makes up for it in gruesome revenge(and I have always preferred the revenge part). Even the famous dick slicing is there (a lot more graphic than in the original I might add) but not as intense because the victim already knows whats coming unlike the original. The kills in this one are actually really f***ing cool and funny as well(like the one with the shotgun and the dick- slicing)

This movie was maybe a bit more believable then the original because the characters aren't so over the top but than again it doesn't have the charm of the 70s one.

I spit on your grave(2010) is a gorier and less original re-imagining with an OK cast and nice special effects. Also I think the phasing was great and it was really fun.

I'd recommend this for fans of horror/exploitation and fans of the original. Check it out
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nosferatu (1922)
10/10
Nosferatu: A symphony of horror
27 April 2011
I made this short review for school English class but I might just as well post it here.

F.W Murnau's 1922 silent horror film Nosferatu is a true master piece and one of the biggest horror classics ever. It is also the oldest surviving movie adaptation of Bram Stoker's Dracula although the names of the characters in the movie were changed due to copyright reasons. Nosferatu was actually considered lost for a long time because Prana Studios who distributed the film got sewed by Bram Stoker's widow and were ordered to destroy every copy of the film and it was thought that no copy of the film had survived. Luckily that was not the case and horror fans can still enjoy this cinematic master piece. The film tells the basic story of "Dracula" (a Transylvanian vampire buys a house from England...) but makes slight changes to the story and actually changes the way Dracula (or "Count Orlac" as the vampire is called in the film) is killed since in the Bram Stoker novel he is simply stabbed but Nosferatu invents an entirely knew and innovative weapon "sunlight". Its funny that what is considered to be one of the most well know facts about vampires and is a huge part of the modern vampire mythology is actually not from the Dracula novel but from the film adaptation. Being the original Dracula film Nosferatu is a must see and an essential film for every horror fan's movie collection. Watch it if you dare!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Grudge (2004)
6/10
Unnecessary but not the worst thing ever
19 April 2011
Its not terrible but its totally pointless. Its just like The Omen(2006) a shot by shot remake of the original. I personally liked the original 呪怨 (Ju-on: The Curse) more than 呪怨 (Ju-on: The Grudge) because of the lo-fi look and atmosphere so this was even less likely to satisfy me and since 呪怨 (Ju-on: The Grudge) was already a sort of remake of 呪怨 (Ju-on: The Curse) that makes this a remake of a remake...(sigh). Basically every thing in this movie was either as good or worse than in the original(nothing was improved) and every thing that was good was basically copied from the original.

If you haven't seen the original Ju-On:The Curse or Ju-On:The Grudge go watch them rather than this but if you've already seen all other Ju-On movies and want more I suppose this ain't that bad. It's not A Nightmare on Elm Street(2010) after all.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A must see for fans of sci-fi
4 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
NOTE: only very slight spoilers

Stanley Kubrick's amazing science fiction epic 2001: A Space Odyssey will blow your mind. Its one of those movies that everyone should see.

The main plot is about a group of astronauts sent to investigate a beacon in space... and that's about it. The main story itself is very simple but there's just so much other stuff going on.

The movie is really artsy and confusing and uses a minimal amount of dialog. Its also full of really long and slow shots of stuff flying in space. It starts with a weird scene with a bunch of primates(SLIGHT SPOILER: the movie is supposedly about evolution and an evolutionary breakthrough is apparently symbolized by a monolith) but after that it seems quite normal when the astronauts are doing astronaut stuff in their space shuttle which is controlled by HAL-9000 a sentient talking super computer that never makes mistakes. The middle part of the movies is my favorite its just so fun to look at the crew of the space ship do their stuff and the sets are probably best in sci-fi history, the ship's interior and the miniatures look amazing although very dated(if they had made the movie now HAL would probably be a laptop instead of huge 10x10 feet computer).

The atmosphere of the movie reminds me of Alien and is quite claustrophobic and besides being and obvious inspiration for Alien it also must have inspired Star Wars. Just look at the space ships, they're like straight from 2001.

Towards the end it gets really weird and trippy and to be honest I really don't get it (SLIGHT SPOILER I've heard an interpretation that the aliens(that are never seen) captured the guy and built a cage that resembles his "natural habitat" which sounds kinda right but you'r guess is as good as mine).

If you want to see a visually stunning really well made,well acted movie with a great atmosphere then definitely check this out but remember its 2/½ hours long and quite slow + its an acid trips.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Classic
3 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
My second favorite Rape/Revenge movie originally titled "Day of the woman" which is probably the most notorious one of them all. It certainly is the one that set the standard for this type of flick and it perfectly fits the criteria of rape and revenge in every way since its the woman who does the revenge and she is actually raped instead of being tortured or something like that.

The movie starts with author Jennifer Hill leaving her New York place to go to a cabin in the woods to finish her first novel. Well it doesn't turn out that well and she gets gang raped by a bunch of retarded red- necks with to much time on their hands and as you all know there will be a revenge(oh what an awesome revenge that is).

I'd rather not spoil anything but there's one scene that I have to mention and that is the infamous dick slicing scene. Before seeing this I had just watched Hostel: Part II and that also has a castration scene(in high-definition all gory details 100% visible) but that didn't really have much of an effect on me(aside from a comic effect) cause it happened so suddenly and there wasn't really any build up. But with I Spit on Your Grave the scene is just so tense and a perfect example of less is more because you don't actually see any wounds being inflicted you only see blood which makes it just so much more horrible.

The movie also holds the unofficial record of the longest on-screen rape with 25 minutes which is probably the main reason its so hated among certain people (they actually had to cut 17 minutes of footage for an R- rating).

Acting in this film is a lot better than you'd expect and its also very well made especially for an exploitation flick and its actually kind of artsy. The film also has a strong feminist undertone and is mostly shot in the rape victim's perspective.

I Spit on Your Grave has gotten way too much censorship compared to other similar films like "Ms .45", "The Last House on the Left" or "Thriller - en grym film (Thriller: A Cruel Picture)" not to mention "Jungfrukällan (The Virgin Spring)". Highly recommended for fans of exploitation,horror and rape/revenge. Watch it if you dare!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A positive surprise
2 April 2011
Not even nearly as bad as people have let me know. I'd definitely say this is one of the better slasher remakes along with Halloween and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre although there were several things I didn't like.

The original Black Christmas was just so good that its hard to top being extremely creepy and atmospheric and also with the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre the first slasher film.

The remake makes numerous changes to the story but I don't want to spoil anything so I'll leave that for you to find out (basically they just wanted to expand on the story of the original) its just a gorier,more straight forward less eerie version of the original and it also makes it exclusively clear who the killer is which is a real shame since one of the original film's great innovations was to make it a total mystery that never gets solved (although I understand they had to do something different from the original). Also the killer "Billy" looks retarded. He's supposed to have some rare disease or something that makes his skin yellow and that just looks silly.

The remake doesn't have the same charm and class as the original but it does try to capture some of that and also re-create the eerie atmosphere. It was pretty fun but I wouldn't really recommend it unless you're a hardcore fan of the original Black Christmas like I am.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Meadowoods (2010 Video)
8/10
Interesting
2 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
It was something different thats for sure. Reminds me of Peeping Tom where the killer is making a movie of his victims while he's killing them.

In the movie 3 kids that are bored with their normal life in this small sleepy town decide to plan and commit a murder by choosing a random person and putting him/her in a box and burying the person alive(with cameras,microphones and speakers inside the box of course).

It seems like a really low budget movie and is also apparently the first movie for everyone in it, so you can imagine it has it's flaws. Anyway the acting is surprisingly good and the plot isn't as bad as you might think(its certainly something I haven't seen before). I've heard people complain about the same things that people always complain about with mockumentary horror, which is there's "too little happening"(there's actually a 5 minute section of total darkness and mostly just screaming and shoveling noises) but I think it just helps to build up suspense and adds to realism, although I understand the criticism. The movie is a little slow but I had no problem watching through and thoroughly enjoyed it. Recommended for mockumentary fans and anyone who wants to see something different.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cut (I) (2000)
6/10
Scream rip-off
2 April 2011
Its just another unoriginal slasher parody with less parody and more clichéd slasher action and a supernatural リング (Ringu) twist.

A bunch of film students who want to complete an old slasher flick titled "Hot blooded" go into a desolate area in the woods to shoot some missing scenes for the movie and mysterious slashing starts. It also shows what happened the first time someone tried to make the film and also some clips from the film itself.

I just love these slasher flicks within movies like "Stab" in Scream 2 "Vera" in Nekromantik and "Hot Blooded" in this one(not to mention the one they're watching in the remake of The Blob)

Cut is pretty much your average Scream rip-off. Average acting average special effects and a silly plot. The movie is director Kimble Rendall's first feature in the crew's credit I must say that it looks quite good for a first feature film and really the only thing that seems really cheap is the story. Its just so dumb.

I enjoyed it and will probably check out some other stuff by the cast and crew of Cut some day but I wouldn't really recommend it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The boy must die...
2 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The original Omen was awesomely creepy fast moving and well made thriller about a married couple who adopt a boy who happens to be the son of Satan. Thats pretty much all you need to know about the first film to enjoy this one and all that is made clear pretty early on in the film.

Damien: Omen II is an enjoyable sequel doing pretty much what its supposed to, going deeper into the character of Damien and continuing where the first film ended its also creepy and atmospheric like the first one and very well made with good acting and special effects (even though they are used sparingly which probably just enhances the effect). It drags on a bit from time to time but is generally an easy watch and also quite thrilling at times(mostly due to the great soundtrack).

The movie's biggest faults are the length of almost 2 hours and the fact that it lacks the originality and surprise of the first omen.

I'd recommend this to horror fans even if you haven't seen the first Omen.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lipstick (1976)
7/10
Rape while synth is playing...
1 April 2011
wikipedia:"it contains one of the most infamous scenes in motion picture history, showing an extremely graphic rape scene" wtf?

A music teacher rapes a fashion model and gets freed by the court...you can guess the rest but I don't want to spoil anything. The film is well phased(even though the revenge action takes place pretty late in the movie) and quite entertaining even though its not your typical I Spit on Your Grave type rape/revenge flick but more of a crime-thriller drama. Its well acted and nicely shot and genuinely a well made film, but I wouldn't recommend it for everyone.

Its not gory or horribly violent or anything and thats kind of the downfall of the movie, its nothing special so you don't miss much if you haven't seen this. Its just another take on the revenge flick, one of the better made ones but not one of the more memorable ones. Anyway if you like Rape 'n' Revenge like I do check it out but don't expect I Spit on Your Grave or The Last House on the Left.

Oh yeah I also have to mention the trippy synth neo-classical soundtrack. Its pretty cool, especially in the 1st rape scene.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Faust (1926)
9/10
Breathtaking
31 March 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The special effects in F.W Murnau's expressionism masterpiece Faust - Eine deutsche Volkssage (Faust) are just astonishing. I was really surprised when I saw the flying sequence with the weird bird creatures and inventive camera angles, it looks so modern compared to other films of the time and even many films made after it. Its also very creepy at times(mainly in the beginning) and tells a classic tragic story of love and the battle between good and evil(even though it doesn't at all times make a clear distinction between the two).

(Slight spoilers ahead) The moral dilemma is probably the greatest when Faust says he'll "help the people in Satan's name" and as he is trying to save a child from the plague he is stopped by the crucifix the child is holding and then is almost stoned to death by the townspeople (who he is trying to help in the first place) because he can't bare to look at the cross and is in league with the devil.

Acting in Faust is great same with cinematography and the story is just so captivating. Highly recommended for fans of silent horror,silent cinema and German expressionism.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed