Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Octagon (1980)
8/10
One of Norris's more interesting films
19 June 2016
Has a more complicated plot than most of his films, with more subplots than usual gradually merging together, and an effective inter-cutting between Norris and the Ninja training camp. Particularly effective are the initial scenes with Norris and Karen Carlson. They have a good rapport and her getting him to come back to her house has a mysterious, intriguing quality. Carol Bagdasarian is particularly beautiful, too. The main criticisms are that the women all seem to immediately fall in love with Norris, and he also is way too quick in winning all the Ninjas that he's fighting towards the end. However, Lee Van Cleef brings a certain authority to his scenes, and Norris delivers a better performance than usual. One of his better films.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Spooky, haunting, vibe with excellent performances
16 January 2013
Rural thriller about a young woman and her friends being stalked by an unknown presence and dealing with an intimidating cult-like group of religious fanatics. First of all, this movie has a genuinely spooky vibe that is maintained throughout the entire movie. It never lets up for a minute, and holds the audience in it's spell. The photography and music is very effective and atmospheric, and all the actors maintain the seriousness, never giving way to campy self-awareness. Ernest Borgnine has an intensity that comes off very well, and the other actors similarly aren't afraid to be very emotional and revealing. There's some excellent scary scenes and some other ones that are just very intense. My only criticism is that the ending seems too abrupt. I wish the movie had gone on longer. This is the kind of film that can get inside your subconscious and haunt your dreams if you open yourself up to it's spell. A one of a kind movie that effectively presents a memorably haunting atmosphere.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Thing (I) (2011)
9/10
Thoroughly entertaining with some very good performances
15 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Much better than I expected, and a worthy follow-up to the '82 classic. Some observations:

Eric Christian Olsen, who plays the assistant Adam Finch, is very funny in some of his reactions. When he says "what are you, some kind of a**hole?" and "so I'm guilty because I floss?" he adds some much-needed humor to the movie. Too bad he isn't in more of the film. At the beginning, I assumed he'd be the second-main character next to Mary Elizabeth Winstead.

Ulrich Thomsen, as Dr. Sander Halvorson, is also very impressive as the somewhat condescending scientist, he seems genuinely serious about the science aspects of the monster and adds some Max Von Sydow-like old-school authority.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead has a subtle kind of eye-rolling sarcasm in some of her scenes that make her character seem more human and unique than the typical boring heroine role.

Kim Bubbs, as Juliette, has a great scene where she cries for one of the victims. That was one of the problems I had with the '82 version where no one seemed sad when someone died.

Very entertaining movie with a child-like enthusiasm for the scariness of the monster and a surprisingly intelligent and measured sense of pacing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Trust (I) (2010)
8/10
Great subject, but overly earnest and clinical
22 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, this movie is refreshingly realistic, with no easy answers, and has some sensitive, emotional performances. But as the movie progressed, it seemed too "on the nose", with some of the characters stating their feelings and frustration so directly that it seemed more like a clinical case study than a real-life story. It reminded me of those overly earnest ABC afterschool specials, but with a more realistic ending. I appreciate this movie, because it tackles a very topical subject, but it could have been much better. The acting is mostly impressive, with the main character effectively conveying the vulnerability mixed with anger, but the villain is directed to talk too much like a cheerful little leprechaun when he's trying to sweet-talk the girl. He overdoes it with the nice-guy way of talking.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining and unpredictable
15 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I've seen this movie a few times, and have always enjoyed it. Morgan Freeman is always fun to watch. He has a zen-like calmness and wisdom that's like an inspiring teacher. But the real find is Monica Potter. She has a sincere sense of focus and seriousness that becomes genuinely scary when she's trying to kill the little girl at the end. Michael Wincott is also very impressive as the villain, and Penelope Ann Miller is more intense and emotional than usual. There's some plot holes, but the movie is so effective that I don't mind them. I haven't read the book, so I can't compare it to that, but I find the film to be very entertaining every time I see it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Juror (1996)
1/10
Overly talky and annoying
10 July 2010
Alec Baldwin's character talks so much and is so self-righteous that I wanted one of the other characters to yell "Shut up already!". It's hard to think of a more annoying character in movies. James Gandolfini is good, Anne Heche is also enjoyable, and Demi Moore is okay. Baldwin just seems way too impressed with himself and his monologues for this movie to be successful in any way. The story itself has interesting possibilities, but they're overwhelmed by the unconvincing Baldwin character and the submissive way the other characters react to him. One of those movies that I was glad to see end. Very unpleasant movie with an annoying, self-impressed main character.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
surprisingly dull and cheapens the first Omen film
17 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
More interesting as a time capsule than a movie, Damien: Omen II alternates between monotonous, bloody and laughable, with the emphasis on monotonous.

The first scenes, with Leo McKern and a guy who reminds me of David Niven, are among the best. McKern is always very full of life and he speaks his final lines like he's King Lear cursing the heavens. If the movie would have continued with McKern and the Niven-type guy (and if they had lived, of course), the movie ultimately would have been far more interesting.

Once the movie gets started on Damien, it is very boring and lifeless. Lee Grant acts angry, Jonathan Scott Taylor, as Damien, seems like he should be in the Dead Poet's Society, and William Holden tries to be a good sport about the whole thing.

The death scenes are suitably graphic, drawn-out and imaginative, but the film is a complete repeat of the first movie (although more uneven and less interesting). This movie actually cheapens the memories of the first Omen film, since it's emphasis on death scenes makes the whole movie series seem like an excuse for such unsubtle exploitation.

The first Omen film had a subtlety in the characterizations and some genuinely scary characters (Mrs. Baylock was memorably sinister and had a mysterious sense of danger). This movie, on the other hand, has forgettable and boring characters. One of the villains, played by Robert Foxworth, looks and acts just like Mike Brady from the television show The Brady Bunch. Another character is played by Alan Arbus, who played the psychiatrist on M*A*S*H. He plays his character the same way in this film, talking like an ethnic Alan Arkin. The lack of scary characters and the addition of generic ones make the film boring and unintentionally funny. Damien himself seems like a cuddly little kid going to prep school and wearing oversize military outfits. It seems like he's playing at being a grownup. Needless to way, there's no sense of evil from him at all.

There's some first-rate actors involved in this (Elizabeth Shepherd, who plays one of the victims, is a very well-regarded actress), and it's not a little dis-spiriting that they didn't use their talents on something more worthy of them.

A staleness and lifelessness hangs over the whole movie, and it ends up leaving the viewer feeling depressed, and not in a scary way.

There are some good scenes, which show what the movie could have been. Besides the scenes with McKern, Jonathan Scott Taylor has an effective scene where he tries to talk his cousin into joining him on his satanic mission. It has a certain intensity that stands out and seems genuine. But ultimately, this movie is just an empty, deadening cash machine, written to squeeze the most out of the Omen franchise.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A bit dated but good acting and some creepy moments
7 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Very enjoyable occult/action thriller with a genuinely creepy devil worship scene (the chanting is very scary), an effectively downbeat ending, and a sense of paranoia and dread throughout. You're never sure when the devil worshipers will strike next, or which supporting character might be one. There is a scene at a swimming pool that is very effective in showing the justified paranoia of the main characters when they sense they're being stared at and they grow increasing uncomfortable. The music and stillness of the scene works very well.

Fonda has his usual earnest, freewheeling, and laid back personality which disguises a fast-witted man of action, Oates has a somewhat tired, "just woke up" quality that is very watchable and easy to relate to, but he is also capable of getting righteously angry and ready to fight, and the two female characters...well, they just kind of stay in the background, look pretty, flash their toothpaste-ad smiles and do some research into Satan. They could have been better written.

The background music, while very effective in the scary parts, has a generic, TV-movie quality in the slower scenes, and some of the supporting characters are kind of silly (like the sheriff, deputy and librarian).

There is a good sense of action, with lots of chase scenes and some motorcycle riding (although there maybe should have been a motorcycle chase scene with the satanists).

All in all, a somewhat dated, but much better than average occult/action film which still holds up very well today.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Uneven but makes good points about jealousy and trust
7 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The film is at it's best in the scenes where Woody Harrelson is feeling jealous about Demi Moore's lovemaking with Robert Redford. When he's struggling with his obsessions about it, there is a certain validity that rings true, and he has a great scene near the end where he tells Moore that he was insecure about himself, but isn't anymore. The romance between Harrelson and Moore has a genuine quality that is sweet and sincere.

There are problems, however, with Redford's character and Redford himself. Moore is so obviously not attracted to Redford that their romantic scenes together look uncomfortable. Her character is supposed to be attracted to him, but it isn't convincing. You can tell she's turned off by him, and when she kisses him, she looks like she's kissing her dad. Redford plays the role with his usual mellow likability and smoothness, but it doesn't match the character he's playing. It doesn't seem believable that he'd offer money to sleep with someone's wife. He seems too easy-going and amiable to make such an offer. It seems like Redford is having fun playing the role, and being a good sport about it, but not really connecting with the darker side of the character. Overall, an interesting film with some valid comments about overcoming jealousy and having trust in the love you share with your partner, but it falls short of being truly successful.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Best when it's being spooky and mystical
1 March 2010
"Why, said the clouds to the stars in the sky" whispers a cryptic, singsong voice while a lone rider gallops through a desolate landscape. The speaker reads some more lines and a tone is set which is spooky, mystical and dark. Scenes like this stand out the most to me. This movie has some timeless, unforgettable images and some of the characters are very real, particularly the youngest Burns brother. It's hard not to relate to him, cowering and crying in his cell. There's a variety of interesting characters in the movie, and although it isn't totally successful (the oldest Burns brother, while a refreshingly offbeat and literate character, is too sketchy and Stanley's wife has dialogue that seems more unconvincing than other characters) it is an intriguing moodpiece with some genuine, unsettling and mythical qualities.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Swamp Thing (1982)
7/10
Barbeau and especially Reggie Batts steal the show
17 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This is an okay version of the comic book classic, and has some fun parts, but by far the best thing about it is the relationship between Reggie Batts and Adrienne Barbeau. The character Jude is played by Reggie Batts, and he inadvertently steals the whole movie with his humor, warmth and subtle, funny reactions. His interplay with Adrienne Barbeau is especially warm and natural. When they hug towards the end of the movie, you can tell by their expressions how much then genuinely like each other. The smile on Reggie's face is worth sitting through the entire movie. Another noteworthy scene is when Bruno turns into the midget. Very funny and well-acted. Louis Jordan is lively as the villain, David Hess (from Last House On The Left) is a scary, imposing villain, Nicholas Worth brings a physicality and distinctiveness as Bruno, his second-in-command, and Adrienne Barbeau is energetic and charismatic as the heroine. Worth seeing mostly for Reggie Batts. Too bad he hasn't made any other films. He adds immeasurably to the movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cop Land (1997)
8/10
Fun to watch but clichéd dialog and overacting
17 February 2010
This is a fun movie to watch, with crisp direction, lively acting, interesting stories and an exciting climax. There's some serious overacting, however, as well as some clichéd dialog. I'm not sure if cops in real-life start screaming so frequently, like Ray Liotta's character does. The scenes where he screams "In for a penny, in for a pound!", "don't shut me out, Ray! don't shut me out!" and the scene where he sticks the dart up Robert Patrick's nose are so overacted and overdone that they seem more like an acting class than anything else. They are fun to watch, in a certain sense, but too corny to be taken seriously. In addition, Robert DeNiro is encouraged to similarly overact in some of his scenes, and Harvey Keitel (as well as the usually excellent John Spencer) isn't far behind.

On the plus side, the female characters are interesting, it's nice to see Stallone playing a more subtle character (even if he turns into the usual superhero character at the end) and the friendship between Liotta and Stallone has a feeling of genuine warmth and sincerity to it. Overall, a good movie, but too corny and overacted to be fully successful.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Brave One (2007)
5/10
self-important audience pandering
8 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It's a shame to see Jodi Foster bringing her thoughtfulness and sensitivity to a movie that is audience pandering of the most pretentious, self-important sort. Same thing with Terence Howard. Times must be hard for actors nowadays, or maybe they just need the money for their kids' college tuition. All the talk from Jodi Foster's character about becoming a "stranger" who isn't the person she used to be is lost in a movie designed to make the audience scream "yeah! kill that f*ck!" The movie is very well-acted, well-directed, photographed, and so on, but you can't disguise the fact that it's an exploitation movie trying to pass itself off as a thoughtful essay on human nature. For anyone who's ever been beaten up, or a victim of a violent crime, this movie is just a revenge fantasy with no redeeming characteristics other than some well-acted, well-written scenes that lead up to a lowest-common denominator ending. God, what a disappointment.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Halloween II (2009)
7/10
More consistent than first one, and more interesting
30 January 2010
Okay, this film is a mess. Plenty of comments saying this. But it's still a more consistent film, and ultimately more interesting, than the first one.

Zombie's remake of Halloween 1 had a great beginning, but grew monotonous after Michael escaped the sanitarium. It was hard to even watch it because it was so boring.

Halloween 2, on the other hand, maintains a consistency in quality and tone throughout the entire film. It's not a great film, and has the usual boring splatter movie deaths. But there's some interesting qualities between the tiresome murder scenes.

The scenes with Michael's mother and the younger Michael are intriguing, and the scenes with Malcolm McDowell as a greedy, pretentious exploiter of the murders have a darkly funny quality to them. Also, the scenes at the goth Halloween party are quite funny if you're into that kind of music and lifestyle. Additionally, the scenes of Michael with the long beard, travelling by foot to find his sister, have a certain power in their imagery and had the potential to be even more interesting.

In the future, I think Rob Zombie should just abandon the splatter movie components altogether and make a movie that more accurately reflects his own unique vision. Whether he's aware of it or not, it's obvious that he's grown bored with the traditional horror movie trappings and has moved on.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Xanadu (1980)
Magical, romantic and sincere
12 September 2009
Very underrated celebration of magic, romance and believing in your dreams and making them come true. Olivia Newton John has a natural, open-hearted and playful presence that fits the movie perfectly. There are 3 or 4 show stopping scenes:

  • The scene where the girls on the mural come alive and dance to the ELO song I'm Alive,


  • The scene where Olivia Newton John playfully flirts with Michael Beck as she roller skates to her song Magic


  • Gene Kelly reminisces about his experience with Olivia Newton John and ends up dancing with her


  • The scene inter-cutting the The Tubes playing and the big-band performing until their music merges together


  • The concluding dance number with different costumes and the title song being played


There is a positive, optimistic spirit to the movie that comes across as very genuine and heartfelt. All the actors, and Olivia Newton John especially, are appealing, full of laughter and love.

There are some flaws, but the magic and message of love, laughter and following your dreams is so refreshing that any shortcomings are easily forgotten and not even worth mentioning.

You have to believe we are magic...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Children (1980)
7/10
starts out good...
30 July 2008
I thought the movie started out very promisingly. It had a sinister, understated beginning. But as the film progressed, it didn't follow through. The characters weren't interesting, the movie gets tedious and it didn't have any momentum. That seems to be the problem with a lot of horror films, and it's too bad on this one, because it could've been great. I'd love to see this movie re-made and have it follow through on the creepiness of the beginning. I think I'll buy it on VHS anyway. This was made around the time of all those delightful 80's horror films. Plus, the theater I saw it in had a weird flower smell that somehow fit the movie, and made it more scary.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hey Hotshot!
18 May 2004
This movie is so bad it's hilarious. Leslie Neilsen plays a guy who's so annoying and obnoxious that it's hard to believe it's meant to be a serious role. His hilarious performance is worth renting the movie. There's a lot of great one-liners from his character. Christopher George is his usual no-nonsense macho self, Andrew Stevens is great, there's a lot of pretty women, and Ruth Roman is great in the Shelley Winters role of the increasingly hysterical mom. A very seventies-type movie, and very funny. I loved the nature theme, and there's a lot of great action scenes. I love the rats who come flying at the sheriff for no apparent reason. Highly Recommended!
30 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rollerball (1975)
Flawed but worth watching
26 May 2003
This movie is very interesting and well-made, but James Caan is surprisingly tentative and dull as the lead character. There are a number of memorable scenes, though. John Houseman is great. His presence adds a lot of authority and seriousness to the movie. The violence is presented in such a way that it glamorizes the very thing that the film is supposed to be preaching against. But that glamorized violence is one of the memorable things about the movie. James Caan is interesting in the movie, because he seems kind of foggy and hazy, and although he certainly looks macho and masculine, he seems to be kind of unfocused in his dialog and facial expressions. Compare this with his focus in the Godfather and it's a noticeable difference. I've seen this film a number of times, and while there are some interesting qualities, it seems like it could have been more developed and memorable than it is. John Beck is especially good as a macho colleague of James Caan, and he gives the film a much-needed freshness and sense of humor and jocularity. He saves the film from being too dry and serious. All in all, it's definitely worth seeing, and has the feel of a movie made in the 1970's, when they made violent films that were also thoughtful. Nowadays, a movie with this kind of theme would undoubtedly be made for a much younger audience, and would be very watered-down, more superficial, less experimental and more MTVish. It's too bad they don't make movies like this any more (unless it was an independent movie, in which case the lower-budget would affect the look and realism of the film).
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed