Reviews

15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Halloween (2007)
4/10
Poor Take on the Original Classic
22 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I went into the theater with very few expectations except for one: This new Halloween movie was going to have great atmosphere and chills. I was confident it would be one scary movie and I was really looking forward to it.

The first ten minutes go by and I'm laughing quite a bit. I thought to myself, is this supposed to be a comedy? Am I in the wrong theater? I figure maybe Rob Zombie made it funny at first as an odd way to hook the audience.

Suffice to say, I'm still waiting to be scared. This movie had no atmosphere and did not scare me in the least. Sure, some of the killings were gross but none were scary. And where was the 1970's style horror atmosphere? I thought Rob Zombie loved 1970's style horror movie making (as do I). Halloween is 1970's horror served up on a silver platter.

This isn't a bad movie overall, very average if you ask me, but it is a less than stellar Halloween remake or re-imagining. It just doesn't work as a different take on Halloween. It's almost as if Rob Zombie took an old story he created about a kid with a totally messed up family life who becomes a serial killer and said, "Hey. I'll just make this kid Michael Myers." His "explanation" of Michael Myers, while very well acted especially by the little boy, just didn't ring true to me. The boy becomes a serial killer because of a bad family life? Cliché and uninspiring to say the least. The footage of him in the asylum was even worse. Awful and boring are words I would use to describe the asylum footage. And the writing and acting for the Dr. Loomis character was laughably poor. It got to the point where I laughed every time he was in a scene.

*** Spoiler*** And the ending. The endearing quality of the original 1978 film is the ending. The imagery of seeing Dr. Loomis looking out the window at the spot where The Shape should be is the most compelling and powerful portion of the film. I literally was so scared I couldn't even move when I saw the original the first time. Fantastic imagery and a fantastic ending to the movie.

Rob Zombie chose to include the silly "Laurie Strode is my sister" add-on angle from Halloween II but chose an ending that is neither clever nor endearing. It's your average bloody girl somehow is lucky enough to survive and kill the knocked out bad guy. Folks, that's not what the original Halloween is all about.

I guess I assumed wrongly that Rob Zombie understood what Halloween was about originally. Or, maybe, he didn't have complete creative control as claimed. Either way, what I saw was a decent horror movie but a very poor take on the original Halloween.
77 out of 122 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ringu (1998)
5/10
An Interesting Tale
13 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Let me start off by saying I did see 'The Ring' a few years before I watched Ringu so I knew quite a bit about the movie from the get go. Also, subtitles are not my favorite thing as I don't see many movies with them and they were a bit of a distraction for me. Some of them were simply laughable as something was lost in the translation.

Overall, I enjoyed this film quite a bit. I was amazed at how closely 'The Ring' followed Ringu, which was not nearly as frightening as The Ring. The best word I can think of to describe it is creepy, especially the last third or so. The acting is decent and the story-line is alright, although certainly not the greatest story ever told.

***Spoilers***

The one thing which bothered me about the movie was the ringing phone, or, to put it more accurately, lack of a ringing phone. After the main character watches the tape, the phone rings right away to signal her pending doom in one week. She then shows it to her ex-husband at her home. After he watches it, the phone never rings. I was left thinking, 'Hmmm. It didn't work for him.' But, later, he says to his ex-wife, 'I only have one more day than you,' meaning the phone must have rang but they just didn't show it. I found that very odd. Same thing occurs after their little boy watches it. The phone does not ring but we are led to believe the boy is also in danger.

Good movie and my first taste of Japanese horror outside of Godzilla (not really horror I know). I did enjoy "The Ring" more but this story interests me enough to where I would definitely like to see the next Japanese Ringu movie if I can get my hands on it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Loneliness...
10 December 2004
I watched this movie the other night and I thoroughly enjoyed it. However, you must be in the proper mood to enjoy a movie such as this. This movie centers around 2 lonely characters, man and woman, on a 'first' date at the woman's apartment. This movie is not too funny nor is it fast paced. The movie simply tries to flesh out each person's character for 90 minutes. This movie also led to some candid discussion between my fiancé and I, especially about the man's 'troubles' at the end of the film. We also discussed if there would be a 'second' date between them. The movie is steeped in realism and is shot very well. Worth a look if you're in the proper mood for a slow but interesting, character development story. 6 out of 10.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ghost World (2001)
3/10
Odd tale of negativity
5 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this movie with my girlfriend and we both had the same reaction at the end. "What was that?" was pretty much our reaction.

This movie isn't awful because it is well acted and funny at times, Enid's father is hilarious, but it just doesn't go anywhere. The main character in the movie, Thora Birch, plays a recent high school graduate who has this "I'm so much better than everybody else" attitude. Everything she sees around her she considers "sucky" in some way. However, she ends up befriending a lonely record collector and this is when the story began to get interesting. I won't go into spoiler details but she pretty much ruins Seymour's chance at happiness because she becomes jealous when Seymour begins to see and like a woman Enid pleaded with him to meet originally. She is a twisted little girl.

I was thinking about the title too. I believe the title is not about her living in a "ghost world" per se, it is the opposite. She is actually the one living as a ghost in the world. She goes thru life like a ghost. Her attitude ostracizes her from her best girlfriend and her friend Seymour whom she ends up misleading into a life of misery when he was so close to finding true happiness. She went thru life, not as a person with hopes and dreams, but as a ghost, dead inside and raining on everyone's parade. And what does she do at the end? She rides off into the sunset as a ghost would...unseen, without a sound and with nobody to really care. She actually tells Seymour this is her fantasy earlier in the picture. An odd tale about what can happen if you poison your friendships and life with negative attitudes, lies, and jealousy.
19 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wrong Turn (I) (2003)
4/10
Could have and should have been much, much more
23 February 2004
Warning: Spoilers
**Spoilers herein**

‘Wrong Turn' could have been so much better. It turned out to be just an average horror film that wasn't very scary, not to mention the plot rip-off of Texas Chainsaw Massacre. It was actually a little comical to see 3 retarded, inbred hillbillies killing people and keeping a few of their body parts for reasons never revealed in the movie. This film also didn't have any charisma of it's own. It was simply a twist of TCM.

However, it COULD have been so much more. The first part of the film, with the 2 rock climbers, should have really set the tone of the movie. Instead, it was a huge disappointment. Without getting into specifics, this portion of the film could have been horrifying but took the easy way out with killings off screen that had no scare or shock value whatsoever. Then, unbelievably, they spell out who the killers are immediately via press clippings during the opening credits. I don't get it. Very poorly conceived way of telling a horror story.

If you ignore the obvious TCM aspects and simply watch the movie, it is watchable and somewhat enjoyable but highly predictable. I knew the outcome 10 minutes into the movie, including who would get killed and in what order. I will give the director credit though for having three highly attractive women in the movie, especially the short-haired redhead.

The ending also leaves a lot to be desired. These killers are simply brutal and kill their victims on the spot. However, they simply tie up the final woman instead of killing her in the woods. Why? Very strange. Anyway, I give the movie 4 out of 10 stars. But only 1 star for horror. This movie is just not scary.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I'm the biggest dog there is but even I don't mess around with married women. It's bad karma, kid."
16 February 2004
This is a very funny movie. The subject matter is near and dear to everyone's heart: Dating and relationships, marital or otherwise. The story centers around 6 main characters that are made to look like they're just regular people on the streets of New York. Each one is `interviewed' on the street about topics ranging from sex, dating and relationships. Then we see what each person's dating or marital life is like. Each of the 6 people's lives are intertwined somehow throughout the movie. A well done, well acted cross-section of the 6 people's love lives. Also, look for Dennis Farina's character. This guy had me rolling on the floor laughing; everything he said and did was funny to me. An enjoyable hour and a half. Highly recommended.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Story line very, very bad
2 August 2003
Warning: Spoilers
*** SPOILERS *** I've enjoyed many of the Halloween movies, especially the first one. I saw H20 back when it came out and thought it was a good way to end the series. H20 satisfied the following...Michael Myers met his doom. An ending which completely wraps up the saga with Jamie Lee Curtis and Michael Myers.

Now comes this film which, literally, lies to the viewer. There is really no other way to put it. To say Michael Myers was not killed at the end of H20, that it was somehow another man who survived being pinned against a tree at high speed, is tantamount to the most foolish storyline I can imagine. Not so much because it is ridiculous but because it's a complete lie. The film was ruined for me right there. I couldn't believe the writers actually expected the audience to believe such a thing. A total insult the audience's intelligence.

The rest of the film just never worked for me. Busta Rhymes. Man, I don't know what to say. Worst actor of the year award? And the whole reality TV angle with all the Myer props in the house, which had nothing to do with Michael Myer's real childhood, was absurd as well. Just a bad, bad storyline.

I read an interview with John Carpenter a long time ago which stated he never wanted a single sequel made with Michael Myers. The first movie back in 1978 was it. A great open ending but the Michael Myers story was complete. Carpenter actually wanted other writers to write stories under the name "Halloween" each year with different characters and story lines each time. It is past time for that to happen.

Please.....No more Michael Myers. The man is gone...Dead in H20. Burn this installment of the Halloween series and start with a fresh story line.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Coupling (2000–2004)
This is Must See TV
25 June 2003
I receive BBCAmerica on my Directv system and one day I turned to the channel and saw this show. I can honestly say I laughed non-stop. This show is funny, intelligent, pertinent and, most importantly, politically incorrect. Anything goes on this show and the method of story telling is unique and fun. The characters and the situations involved are so true to life.

I can't figure out why but some people compare this show to Friends in the USA. I can unequivocally say Coupling and Friends have very little in common. Watch one episode of Coupling and you will see why. Friends attempts to be a soap opera, Coupling doesn't. Friends attempts to be funny, Coupling actually is funny. Hysterically funny. Friends discusses sexual topics like a freshman in high school would. Coupling has a biting sexual wit and intelligence I've never seen before in a sitcom. The characters are adults and they act like adults.

I could go on but these few words won't do the show justice. Watch the show and find out for yourself. You won't be sorry.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sisters (1972)
5/10
Excellent Film Making
4 March 2003
My thoughts on this movie are two-fold. First, the story and plot are only decent. The story centers around two women, Margot Kidder and Jennifer Salt. They are two very different personalities who are set up against one another for obvious reasons. Both give good performances but Kidder's character is the highlight of the film. She is sweet, sensitive, and extremely alluring but a tad off the wall. Her French Canadian accent was hard for me to decipher in the first part of the movie. I won't give away any of the plot but it is dated. The music score is good. My biggest frustration was the ending. Psychologically scary, yes, but definitely not the type of ending I was hoping for. It was a let down.

My second thoughts deal with the cinematography used by director Brian De Palma. Excellent. I loved the camera work in this movie. The use of split screen is tremendous and the ending was filmed well. I just didn't care for the ending from a story perspective. Overall, a good movie. I rated it 5 out of 10. If you enjoy psychological thrillers/horror movies, you should enjoy it. Also, Alfred Hitchcock fans should give this one a look as well.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wake me when it's over, please....
17 February 2003
One word sums up this movie: Idiotic. British humor can be funny. `Men Behaving Badly' and `Coupling' are very funny British shows I see occasionally on BBC America. But, for the love of God, this movie is positively not funny. It also is complete foolishness, not funny foolishness but utter foolishness. Sleep inducing foolishness. Most of the characters are unlikable in almost every way. Bridget is not very intelligent to put it lightly. Her escapades I assume were supposed to be amusing but were more or less annoying. Hugh Grant is by far and away my least favorite actor of all time. If I had known he was in the movie I would most likely have skipped it altogether. Colin Firth's character was the only character I enjoyed watching. He at least had some kind of intelligence and depth along with a little mystery and intrigue.

In short, I wrote this because I am flabbergasted at how highly this movie is rated here. To put it in simple terms…This movie sucks big time. So for those of you who have not seen this film and say to yourself `IMDB ranks it high so it must be good,' think again. Easily one of the most boring and meaningless films I have ever seen.

If you wish to see a good Renee Zellweger movie see Nurse Betty or Jerry Maguire. This one is pitiful.
30 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flashdance (1983)
10/10
Finally on DVD
17 February 2003
I grew up in the 1980's. So, for me, 80's music, shows and movies are nostalgic. I think this is one reason I really love this movie. I loved it when I saw it the first time and now I own it on DVD. This movie is uplifting, charming, and has the best ending to a film I have ever seen. The music makes the whole movie work. It is almost like the movie was created to go around the music.

Jennifer Beals plays a lonely, attractive, yet scared 18-year-old woman, even though she acts much older. She is mature, intelligent, strong, and full of life. Any man, including myself, would go gaga for a woman like this. But, most importantly, she chases her dream. It is this part of the movie that I feel captures the entire film. The main character, as well as other side characters, chase their dreams even though they are all scared to death of failure. Some of them do fail but some succeed in varying degrees. They all chase what they want out of life and that is truly the message of the movie. The ending you will have to witness for yourself but every time I see it I get goose bumps. It makes me feel like I can do anything I put my mind to. Excellent film. Highly recommended.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sanford and Son (1972–1978)
Classic Television
9 January 2003
TVLand aired a 48 hour marathon this past weekend. I taped about 12 hours of this classic show. Sanford and Son was funny to an extreme. The show was so simple but it worked. Redd Fox was a truly great comedian and fit perfectly into the role of Fred G. Sanford. Whenever I see his picture I think of Fred, may he rest in peace. It makes me feel old to compare `old' sitcoms to today's sitcoms so I won't do it. But, I will say I laugh more at Sanford and Son re-runs than I do more current shows, including Seinfeld, Cheers, and Martin, three of my modern sitcom favorites. I saw an episode last night and I was literally crying. I had forgotten how funny this show really was. So, if you have the time and you have never seen this show, do yourself a favor and check it out.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vanilla Sky (2001)
8/10
Brilliant and Philosophical
8 December 2002
This movie is awesome. A completely entertaining, thrilling and philosophical piece of film. I highly recommend this movie to everyone over the age of 18.

I don't want to give away much of the plot but the camera work is very good throughout. The story is superb and is explained fully by film's end. Far fetched, sure, but brilliant. A true work of art. The only negatives to me were the first 20-25 minutes of the film. Tom Cruise is awfully cheesy during the first part of the movie. Smiling all over the place for no particular reason. But, once he finds a woman with whom he wishes to begin a true relationship, the movie really takes off and only gets better and better. Good performances all around.

Cameron Crowe did a fantastic job with this movie and anyone who wishes to be taken on a brilliantly confusing but fun ride should see it. My rating, 8 out of 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Good Premise, Poorly Executed
3 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This movie considers what life is like when 2 people attempt to build a relationship with sex as its foundation. The question asked of the viewer is `What would a relationship be like if the only connection the couple makes is sexual?' The answer is quite obvious.

** Possible Minor Spoilers ***

Each main character is consumed by sex. One-night stand type sex or sex without meaning. This is all well and good but problems arise when 2 of the characters mistakenly try to have a real relationship based on their like appetites for sex. Demi Moore and Rob Lowe quickly learn workable relationships are much, much more than great sex. Most people, including myself, at one time or another think sex is the single most important part of a relationship. This thinking could not be further from the truth as this movie tries to illustrate.

Unfortunately the movie is not real effective. Nor is it very funny. All 4 characters are complete sluts and seem to lack any type of intelligence. James Belushi is funny but Demi's friend, Elizabeth Perkins, is simply annoying until the very end of the movie. Let's face it, Rob Lowe is not a great actor and it shows. Demi, with her utter beauty and sexy voice, is extremely sensual and naked in the movie. She makes the entire film worth watching in my estimation. The ending is decent but the story is told in a choppy way. The scenes do not flow together very well. The characters, Lowe and Demi, do seem to learn something thru their experience but overall they are both shallow people.

Overall this film is watchable and somewhat enjoyable but does not do a good job developing the character's thoughts and emotions. Plus, this comedy is simply not very funny other than a few stories and lines by Belushi. This film is more `eye candy' than a true portrayal of a couple's trials. 4 out of 10.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fog (1980)
6/10
A Glowing Review
19 November 2002
I watched The Fog for the first time since the early 1980's the other night. John Carpenter and Debra Hill did a fine job with this one.

The good points of the movie deal with the overall story and the setting of the film. The story is explained fully during the movie and the setting in California is superb and creepy. The music is also disturbing. The background music coupled with the uneasiness and lonliness of the town, Antonio Bay, is very effective. No gore whatsoever in this one so the whole family may watch this movie together. When I was about 10 or 11 years old this movie did scare me quite a bit. The only negative was the characterization. No character development at all but that was probably intended. Jamie Lee Curtis's role is strange. Some references to Halloween are also found in the film. i.e. Look out for the name of one of the main characters.

Overall a good movie. Not great but good. 6 out of 10.
32 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed