Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Once (I) (2007)
1/10
James Blunt and Norah Jones in an 85 minute music video for the Starbucks generation.
27 August 2007
I was unfortunate enough to see this at the Sarajevo film festival, and it was easily the worst film of the selection shown, and one the worst films I have ever sat through. The story is horribly clichéd, and I found the characters completely dull and predictable. Perhaps the most grating aspect of the film was the music, which was cringe worthy. Basically, John Carney has filmed an 85 minute James Blunt video, a crime that should be punishable by law. I was expecting the film to take a u-turn at some point and reveal some deeper commentary on the music industry or perhaps present a refreshing twist on a love story, but instead it plods along with a level of sincerity that is both naive and superficial.

Once is wholly conventional and unrelentingly smug; perpetuating stereotypes of the music industry that any intelligent film maker would challenge or subvert. The film's soundtrack (apparently written by the two stars) is repetitive and shockingly bad, doing nothing to flesh out the characters or tell the audience anything we don't already know. Another film I saw at the festival, Gus Van Sant's Paranoid Park, would be a prime example of masterful utilization of soundtrack and score, whereas this was merely offensive and self-indulgent. If anyone wants to see this kind of film done right then I suggest you see the popular Lost In Translation, or the stunning work of art that is Hiroshima Mon Amour.
17 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
300 (2006)
6/10
Well made, but ultimately hollow and disappointing
4 April 2007
I really don't understand why this film is gathering so much praise, I admit that it's very competently made, the visuals are interesting and well done, but ultimately it's a completely hollow experience. The characters are two-dimensional and ridiculously silly, how can anyone possibly relate to this film? Maybe I'm missing the point, but I wasn't even particularly entertained by any of the action. Some of it, I admit, was fun, but for the most part I was all too aware of myself sitting in a dark room watching what are largely computer animated images. It just didn't suck me in, and I'm disappointed because I thought it would be much better considering all the rave reviews on here. Unfortunately, by the end, I was just slightly bored. I'm not denying that the film has merits, it's still well made for what it is, but at the end of the day this has no right to be in the top 250 and I felt I should just add my two cents seeing as some of my friends were also disappointed. This is a very average film with, in my opinion, nothing radically original or great about it.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
You'll laugh till it hurts!
16 April 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Shaun Of The Dead isn't your typical zombie movie. In fact, the zombies don't truly enter the story until almost a third of the way in. So what's it really about? A man named Shaun, played by Simon Pegg, who lives in London and is a bit of a loser. He works in a dead-end job at an electronic goods store and spends most of his spare time at the local pub or playing video games with his unemployed roomate, Ed. One day Shaun's girlfriend, Liz, decides she's had enough of his lazy attitude and decides to leave him. When the city suddenly gets taken over by the living dead Shaun finds the perfect opportunity to prove himself to Liz, so he sets out to save the day, win his girlfriend back and keep his mum, Barbara, from being eaten by his step-dad who's slowly turning into a zombie.

Don't let the title and premise fool you, this isn't a simple spoof of Dawn Of The Dead, it's more a romantic comedy that just so happens to be littered with the undead. The film is also very clever, with a clear social commentary running throughout. The jokes that stem from this are absolutely hilarious but will probably be lost on any non-Londoners. It's actually quite unlikely that this film will translate to anyone outside the UK and this is a real shame and perhaps the films biggest flaw. But if you do get it, then good for you, because there is a lot of great stuff to be seen here. The script is wonderful and throws up many comedic moments, such as when Shaun and Ed are looking through Shaun's LP collection for a suitable vinyl to throw at two oncoming zombies, "Dire Straits?" "Chuck it!", or when Shaun and his friends beat up an elderly zombie in the pub using cricket bats, all to the rhythm of Don't Stop Me Now by Queen. The humour comes thick and fast, never have I laughed so consistantly during any film before, it only pauses briefly for a few dramatic scenes, all of which work surprisingly well. In fact the film tends to genre-hop quite a lot, and while some find this unappealing I think it works in its favour. One minute it's a comedy, then it's a drama and then it's a full blown horror. In fact some scenes are quite jumpy and certainly violent. One extremely gory part in particular is a clear homage to another famous horror film that shall remain unamed, but if you know what I'm talking about when you see it then good for you. That's the thing about this movie though, you don't need to be a horror fan to enjoy it. You just need to have the right sense of humour. Can I explain it? Well, no. You'll just know if the film's for you when you see it. I can assure you that most will like it. If you don't, then I really am sorry for you as this is about the most fun I have had in the cinema since Kill Bill . Ok, that wasn't long ago, but before that I don't think there was a film that was so rip-roaringly funny and then unashamedly brutal at the same time. There is nothing subtle about this movie, and yet it will simply go over the heads of most people. I urge you to watch the film and decide for yourself if you love it or hate it. It's not without its faults though, losing its spark slightly during the third act but it comes back with a vengence and gets in some really good jokes just before the credits roll.

Shaun Of The Dead is a great film. It's funny, it's clever and it's got zombies in it! Just when the British film industry appears to be dead this gem pops up and shows us what someone with a sense of humour and a real passion for the media can achieve. Go watch it, you'll laugh till it hurts!
243 out of 309 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The One
26 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
(MILD SPOILERS)

Right from the start Reloaded manages to grab your attention. We kick off with a cool action scene featuring Trinity which really gets your pulse racing. This movie picks things up a couple months after the end of the first, we finally see Zion and we are introduced to some new characters. The ongoing story, regarding the impending war with the machines, is joined this time by a sub-plot about Neo's love for Trinity and a prophecy he has about her. There are enough twists here to keep things interesting and a cliffhanger that will leave you desperate to see the next installment.

The script is exceptional, the attention to detail is wonderful and the philosophical and religious elements that littered the first movie make a welcome return. This certainly isn't a brainless action movie, anyone looking for one will be disappointed but those of you who are willing to read between the lines, to think about the dialogue and the situations will find something truly deep and meaningful within this film, you may have to watch it twice to pick up on everything though. But it's not all mind boggling dialogue, there are plenty of action scenes and some funny one liners too.

The acting from the main cast is on the whole very good, Laurence Fishburne and Hugo Weaving are especially fun to watch, but the supporting cast is pretty dire in contrast. It's not all bad though, Monica Bullucci does well as the super sexy Persephone and Gloria Foster is wonderful as the Oracle.

While the special effects may not make as big an impact this time round they are still a hundred times better than in the Matrix. The stuff you will see in this movie will blow you away. The scene with Neo and all the Agent Smith clones is spectacular, the camera glides gracefully around the characters as they fight. The choreography is intense and almost leaves you breathless. Another key action scene is the car chase, which is guaranteed to amaze, Trinity dodges bullets and oncoming traffic on a bike while Morpheus fights an agent on a speeding truck. When all this is over we are treated to a marvelous crash, and all in bullet-time, it's almost too good to handle.

Overall this is one hell of a sequel, it may not be as good as the first but it comes very close. Everything has been cranked up a notch this time, which is to be expected, but the story doesn't take a back seat and is kept fresh with new plot elements and big twists, there is some cheesy acting though that ruins things slightly but never becomes a major problem. Anyone looking for a deep, meaningful and exciting sci-fi movie need look no further, Reloaded is the one.

Rating- 8/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Excellent!
24 May 2003
It may not be as good as the first but it's fantastic anyway! Great story line with some cool twists keeping it interesting, amazing special effects, brilliant choreography and good performances from the leads. All in all this is a must see movie for all Matrix fans, most people who don't like it probably don't understand it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Too long!
4 January 2003
In the space of Three hours not a lot happens! A bit of fighting then some walking then some more fighting. The fighting does look good and that's pretty much the only redeeming aspect of this film. This movie is at times unbearably slow, you just wonder why it takes three hours to get to the end which is of course where the next film will begin. It's just pointless, maybe it follows the book too closely, I wouldn't know though, I haven't read it. Frodo is meant to be the hero right? well, he's barely characterized in the movie and he's just plain dull, not that he's on screen much anyway, in fact it seems as if there are so many characters to keep up with that each one only gets a couple minutes screen time. The movie has a couple plots going on at once and because some scenes are overly long you would have forgotten what was going on previously with another group of characters. Fans of the book though will most likely love this, but again, what's the point? Why turn it into a movie if you're not going to appeal to those who haven't read the book?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Simpsons (1989– )
It's gone on too long
2 January 2003
The Simpsons is definately one of my favourite animated shows, but I think it's been going for too long. Season 1 and 2 seem really slow and boring now, but seasons 3-9 kick ass, after that I just think it got rubbish. They should have cancelled this and kept Futurama running!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magnolia (1999)
8/10
Fantastic!
14 December 2002
I can't believe how many comments I've seen here just dissing this film, what the hell is wrong with everyone? Some complain that it's too long, unbelievable, it may be long but how can you complain? I didn't find it boring at all, it was very well paced. Also, some complain that it's too complex, well, if you're more used to watching movies like Naked Gun then you're not likely to appreciate anything! I'm not saying this is the best movie ever or anything like that, but it doesn't deserve all this negative criticism. Anyone who truly appreciates good movies should watch this.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed