Reviews

20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
My long-ass BEYOND RE-ANIMATOR review (spoiler free with plenty of bias to go around)
28 July 2003
Warning: Spoilers
We arrived for the midnight showing at about 11:30 with two fears, an empty theatre, or a sold out show - who could guess for an unadvertised, but highly anticipated B-movie? Sure enough, the theatre was about 3/4 full both nights. How nice.

The opening scene threw out what looked like homage's to The Gate, Scream, and obviously Day of the Dead (tonguey) all at one time, only to land on the aged Herbert West sitting in the darkness of a vehicle. The crowd let out a cheer, and I realized how fun this might get.

One of my favorite parts about this flick honestly is the credit intro. If you've seen the other two Re-animators, you remember the neon body schematics, rotating in time with that wildly dissonant and catchy theme song, and the credits on top. It's always been fun to watch, and they don't stray far this time. Only now, the schematics are all sepiatone, and they go from standard textbook drawings into very stylized, almost comic book fantasy drawings of the nude. Parts of some pictures zoom out only to form different pictures, and it's very cool. On top is a fully symphonic rendition of the original themesong, slowed down and fixed up nicely. VERY well done.

Remember the old Re-animators? The cheese, ass actors (except Herbert of course), intentionally overacted and entertainingly shallow dialogue, gore, and West's superhero qualities?? Well, if you loved all that, then you can relax knowing that Beyond is more of the same. Of course, the look and production values are updated for 2003 (14 years after Bride), but it's no rehash, and nothing "sells out" in this movie.

Directing: If you haven't heard, Beyond Re-animator takes place in a prison, and Yuzna makes good use of color and vectors with the prison bars, and definitely creates a closed, prison atmosphere. Everything is blue or an "off" shade of gray in Beyond, and it fits. But, the first 15 minutes and the last 10 are really the only times that Yuzna shows off visually. Some of the tricks are pretty clever. One scene shows the view from one of the Re-animated looking at West, and it's very cool! Another montage shows footage from different places twisted and morphed over each other, in the style of the opening credits... also very cool!

I'll tell ya though, It's definitely Yuzna directing this thing. 14 years later?? More of the same. He knows how to direct the camera, he knows how to create the occasional tension, but he can't direct a person to save his damn life! There are two scenes in Beyond Re-animator that are so abysmally bad, with dialogue that might live up to Junior High Theatre standards, and actors that I swear were recruited from Miskatonic High School just before the shoot, that the entire audience cringed and let out an applause and bark afterwards to relieve the pain. Jumping Jesus, I kid you not... the two main characters along side West are the worst thing since unsliced bread. It's so bad, we've convinced ourselves it was on purpose! And the best part?... IT FITS!! Like I said, more of the same. There has not been a Re-animator yet that didn't make you roll your eyes and laugh at how strangely lines were given... and with friends, it just makes the movie more fun.

Comedy: Holy hell!! At the beginning, I wondered to myself how much this movie would take itself seriously, and by the end credits, I knew. This movie loves itself for being funny, and man, is it ever. We chuckled through every other scene. Catch phrases, innuendoes and puns, a doctor kicking a table down the hallway for no reason other than to make me laugh, damnit... it's all out there - all leading up to a pretty wild ending. I can't spoil a thing, but the footage during the credits not only had everyone in the theatre rolling, but also gasping for breath leaving the theatre. THAT'S how much Beyond takes itself seriously. Ah yes... good times.

The effects: I'm so impressed!! This thing was $3,000,000!! There's some pretty amazing stuff in here for a measly 3. Yuzna keeps to the roots with latex and karo, but he uses a little CGI quite well to add something else - it fits, don't worry. There's some fabulous green-screening and 3D work in here. Props to Fantastic Factory for cranking this stuff out "at an affordable price". It does take a while for the gore to kick into gear (like the first one), but once it's there, it's there.

Everything else: It was interesting to watch the crowd both nights. Friday's crowd was definitely the hardcore West fanboy bunch - the ones that clapped upon his first entry (including me). The second night has some pretty dry people... people didn't laugh as much, and they seemed to be filter from the people that saw the flyer the day before when they caught Tomb Raider. A few people actually left. Most still enjoyed every minute.

Jeffery Combs has definitely aged well. He's still West. He plays his part to perfection, with maybe slightly less energy (not as much flailing), and he still remains my favorite over-actor of all time.

I must stress again how bad the new doctor's acting is. This kid is the child of someone, he must be. But he's by far the easiest to ridicule... better horrible, than just par in my opinion. It just adds to the comedy.

Oh yeah, and there are boobies.

Thank you Yuzna for bringing this back. I could care less if there is another, because if it's not broken....... don't make another one. Bride? Bride was broken. And this fixed it.

I'm giving it the ultimate bias fanboy fan score of 9/10. I took a little off because there are a few slow parts, and some of that acting really hurt... most helped though.

If you aren't a fan of the first two, you WILL NOT like this one. If you dig on everything the first two represented, I highly recommend a viewing. It's a lot of fun, and you will definitely leave with a big f'n smile on your face!

Can't wait for the DVD! Bring me extras or bring me re-agent!

"I gave him life!" - Dr. Herbert West
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Worst of the three but still great.
5 April 2002
It's more thought out, with better directing and better zombies, but it's just a little too drama. Great story to finish things up, but the Moonlighting soundtrack can go! =) Saw it last night, and saw the three in order. Dr. Frankenstein was great, the gore effects are Savini evolved, and it was enjoyable, but Dawn of the Dead is still the best Zombie movie ever... 8/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Majestic (2001)
4/10
So flat, so so flat...
20 February 2002
So much potential, and such a hard fall from all that is quality - A bad Quantum leap episode stretched into a two and a half hour piece of watch watching potential. I hate it for James, cause he is really a good actor. It is predictable, sappy pieces like The Majestic that make him look worse than he could be. Sad thing really, cause it had POTENTial with a capital potent. Could be great, but instead it's a movie that confuses itself. Two worlds brought together in a very uninspired and overlapping way that wreaks of last minute fidgety production. Mr Carrey plays a writer that gets into an accident, loses his memory, and is picked up by a town for someone he's not. But he fails to realize this until later. I ruin nothing by saying this, and that is one of the problems. The predictable and shallow story leaves you waiting and waiting for something monumental - at least a trendy twist or the death of some body. After Carrey enters this new life, there is a good 45 minutes before there is a glimpse of what is going on his real commie life. Oooookay, so he's not dreaming, and it just get's more confused from there. The end just trails on whipping over every cliche in the book from the risky, but right decision, to that damn kiss. Nothing is original in this movie - instead we wait and wait, sitting through Jimmy's gazes and (non)development which shoves this motion picture off the cliff of lameness and into nothing. Those who truly praise The Majestic, that's fine, you just prefer a picture that doesn't challenge you. This I understand, but if you are a movie lover, you may find this one to be one of the thinner ones this year. Bruce Campbell is in it though. A not-so-majestic overall 4. Save your money.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tron (1982)
10/10
My favorite movie because....
31 January 2002
... of what it did to me as a child, but picking up the DVD recently and really watching it, made me pick up on a lot that I couldn't when I was 10. Not only is the movie "cool" but it actually has story. Most people I know say, "I had no idea what was going on". This is totally the computer geek's sci-fi movie. They all said, "Now why is that guy with the glasses and the girl in the computer now? They were outside!" No one grabbed the concept of a persons program carrying their traits. Aside from the satisfaction of having a game genius actually "play" the games, the movie puts forth a very important social commentary by the MCP calling programs trying to reach the outside "religious fanatics." I just think TRON is fabulous outside of the effects, it's just a great movie. A dream for a child, and a well executed otherwise. Just a thought.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
If you like Evil Dead, see it, if you can find it
23 January 2002
I got my hands on a 30th generation dub of this short. The same plot as Evil Dead, but really really old and simple compared to the first full-length production of Sam Raimi. It's nice and campy, with some really cool camera shots, and it's the perfect length for a short. I enjoyed it, but if you didn't know anything about Evil Dead or Sam Raimi, you would just blow it off. I recommend FINDING A COPY, if you are a fan.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Overrated but very, VERY creative
8 November 2001
This movie should have not made it the big screen. It's not made to appeal to the masses, and the media ruined it. It's very creative. It has it's effect for being made on such a little budget, and people I know who aspire to make notsodocumentaries like this do truly look up to it. Sure it's not "scary" or whatever. Rent Suspiria if you want to be scared. This is shear independent appreciation, and for what it is, it's very well done.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great play put on screen
8 November 2001
I didn't know this was previously a play before watching it. I was told afterward, but it was pretty apparent through the entire thing. It's got the play dialogue. It witty, surreal spit back and forth dialogue that keeps people watching since there's no "special effects" in the playhouse to work with. Truly a masterpiece. Dark and hilarious, Parker Posey is righteous, and the story will leave you thinking for long. Tori Spelling even fit the role playing the ditz she really is. Very smart and dark. Rent this one!!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
For the Birds (2000)
10/10
Oh man!
7 November 2001
I couldn't breathe I was laughing so hard! Sets the stage for Monsters Inc. by getting you in the mood, as well as showing of Pixar's talent for animation and humor. Very creative and perfectly presented. One big fat 10.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Christian's are mistaking this for a good movie
6 November 2001
It is clear what the problem is with these comments. This is clearly a bad movie, with few redeeming qualities. It's not the good v. evil theme or the ideas that are flawed (those are quite good), it's the presentation of them. This movie is for the Christian community, and that is obvious, but Christian's are grabbing a hold of these theme's and tangible, nostalgic ideas and turning this junk into a decent motion picture. The reason some are so BLOWN away by it is the message sent, and the familiar uplifting values, which is what the movie was meant to do. But as a "movie", this is a sorry excuse of a motion picture labeled by the beating community as "cool". It was put together with money-fueled mediocre production, and the result makes people shake their heads at the Christian community for praising something so bad. Great message, but horrible horrible movie. Just as a disclaimer, I am a church going Christian film-major speaking the truth about a movie my friends are all tripped up over. It's a piece of junk. If you haven't seen it, please know what it is ahead of time. It will be a 1/10 or a 10/10 for you too.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fight Club (1999)
10/10
#1
2 November 2001
I hate going to the movies. I hate Hollywood and what they do to movies to make them appeal to people who don't like movies. It's sad. Just a disclaimer. Fight Club is my favorite movie of all time. Every movie has it's flaws, but I just can't find any here. The cinematography is unmatched with hokeyless use of FX, the acting is perfect, the writing is top notch taken from a top notch novel by a top notch author (Chuck Palahnuik, read Survivor), the story leaves you with the feeling of coming down from a large trip. Truly an emotional, confusing, yet satisfying experience. A masterpiece. Every line in the movie is quotable!! People who trash it, don't like this type of movie, and that's fine, it's not for everyone. But still, for what it is, simply perfect.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slacker (1990)
For those that love dialogue
2 November 2001
I watched this for the first time yesterday, because I've seen it in the video store for years. Very very smart movie. All dialogue, and a plot that doesn't follow any sort of format. Simply an exploration in the theory of six degrees of separation. The camera will be in one conversation and when someone walks by, it picks up with them, and that sums up the entire movie. If you're into action, don't rent this, you won't like it. It's all dialogue, sometimes slow, sometimes insane! I would say fans of Clerks would like this. Although Clerks is more witty, Slacker is simply SMARTER. Very entertaining.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Liquid Television (1991–1994)
Missing some imporant elements but otherwise awesome!
2 November 2001
There's no early Beavis and Butthead, no "The Maxx", no dogboy. It's missing some key elements! The stuff that got even bigger later. But even so, if you were a fan of the show, BUY IT! It's still got stuff I forgot about, Stick figure theatre and all. Worth the purchase on DVD for sure...
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Only one thing
1 November 2001
I loved the documentary. It was wonderful! Everything said here in the comments is true as well, but they just needed to go into more movies. They used Shiver more than I thought they should have. They could have moved a little further into how the genre eventually became franchised with sequels and glorification as the freddy series for example. The pace was very slow which added a nice effect to the documentary, but it could have been sped up a little to account for more movies, that's all. They only did one for each director interviewed. There's more to the entire genre than those 5 or 6 movies. Try and catch it! Great documentary! 9 of 10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Watch it for the visuals
31 October 2001
This movie is all visual. It has a pretty good story, but it's all for the animation. Some of the lip syncs are off, and like any other sci-fi, it has it's share of bad lines, but visually, it's one of the most groundbreaking features ever. Definitely eye candy, which was it's goal ahead of time. Worth seeing for sure.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Evil Dead II (1987)
10/10
Nothing more than simply "entertaining"
26 October 2001
Evil Dead II is one of my favorite movies but not for the quality of the movie necessarily. Surely not for the acting and storyline. People that tear it to pieces don't realize what was put into it, what movies were out at the time, and really don't have an understanding for what goes into low-budget cinema. People that are in love with Evil Dead II have an undying appreciation for what is in the movie. If you're looking for Oscar quality acting, you won't find it here, but the directing is amazing, and it's hilarious. There's a reason they used green blood (MPAA), you can see the set and strings if you look hard enough, and Bruce Campbell is one of the best overactors in the biz (next to Jeffery Combs). If you haven't seen it, check it out, just because everyone should, just know what it is ahead of time. It's in my opinion, one of the most "ENTERTAINING" movies of all time. It never gets old.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not the best Coen movie, but one of the best of the year for sure!
22 October 2001
I'm a Coen fan. Just as a disclaimer. I love everything about this movie except for a few small points. The cinematography was breathtaking! Extremely reaslistic and optically orgasmic (just to be silly). The use of yellow was very soothing and added an organic and antique feel to the entire movie. The music is well chosen, the acting was choice (it was good to see Holly Hunter again), and the parallels with Homer were well placed but not hokey. I was not too into the last 30 minutes of the movie. It appeared to me that the Bros had a good hold on the movie until close to the end, and were at least coerced to make for a little more tangible Hollywood ending. Other than that, I would say this movie is a very enjoyable movie, one of the most "enjoyable" movies I've seen. Very pleasing. And I would say it's one to own. It's nice to see a movie that appeals to so many different types of people as well. My parents even loved it. Great production...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Great idea, great book, not enough movie
22 October 2001
The concept behind American Psycho is an original one, and it is THAT concept that encouraged most people to see it, but it's just so underdeveloped. There IS some development as far as our "one" character is concerned, but most of his ramblings don't explain his strange condition anymore than his actions do (if that makes sense). Those seeking explanation and understanding of the main character are left with much to be desired, while people just sitting through the movie are left totally confused (but forget those people, this is an artsy flic). The last line of the movie tries to explain it all in a single blow cutting to the credits even before you really get a chance to consider what he just said. American Psycho takes the format of a thriller or horror with lulls in between scenes of climactic events. Basically, while most of these movies put the viewer through a series of situations furthering the plot making you think more, only to be resolved (or somewhat resolved) in the end, this feature sends the mood up and down while explaining nothing. You never understand what the motivation is behind the murders at ALL, which is understandable if that was the intent, but NO motivation can sometimes translate to the viewer as NO plot, and that is simply the case. The movie ends with a line that should knock you in the gut and make you love the movie and understand the character, but rather makes you shake your head and want to start the whole thing over to find something tangible. It is beautifully filmed, and the confession scene is oscar worthy, but overall, the movie shoves itself across the boundaries of "artsy" and right of the cliff into nothing. Definitely worth the watch, but it's not life changing.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Less than par movie, but very entertaining!
22 October 2001
Not too much to say about this movie, other than it has loads of bad acting, but is very fun! Bruce Campbell really makes the movie, and the random, silly gore just ads to the campiness. Good concept and an interesting venture from the first movie's plot. I really enjoyed it! You're sure to laugh!
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Taste (1987)
9/10
The reason this movie IS so well done
12 October 2001
I know lots of people that won't watch movies if enough isn't spent on them to make them Hollywood. If you spend too much on a movie, it makes it unrealistic and confused between the 1000's of people who work on it, as we've seen so many times in the last couple of years. The thing that really makes this movie so good is the talent involved, not the money. The movie quality looks horrible, it's washed out, the gore is silly (yet strangely convincing) because it was done with such a little budget, and the acting isn't award winning, but concepts, and simply the directing make the film extremely enjoyable. They didn't use a blue screen to hang a guy off a cliff, they actually did it, cause hey, it was free! Visually, especially at the beginning, it looks like something you filmed yourself with your K-mart camcorder, but it's HOW that camera is used that makes this so entertaining. This is the first work of a man that later went on to direct the extremely VISUAL movies like Frighteners (very visual), and soon, Lord of the Rings. Jackson was picked up for the Lord of the Rings not by a drawing, but because he has talent and is a masterful director... he just has strange content choice. If you are a fan of directing this is a perfect example of someone who does NOT have lots of money to fork out on postproduction effects and the best actors in the world, but works with what he has, and ends up with a very entertaining film. It's all from the mind of one man, which makes the movie more flowing and less produced, and it's just plain fun. THAT is why this movie is so good. And it's pretty crazy too... =) The bad reviews here are from people who do not appreciate this old and low budget way of making a good movie. If you are the same, I might pass, but give it a shot. Rent it if you haven't. Good Flick
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Braindead (1992)
10/10
Fabulous, and not just for horror fans
11 October 2001
I've always loved this movie, and my roomate and I got our girlfriends to finally watch it, and they are both pretty timid. They absolutely loved it. They cringed the expected number of times, but there was hilarious laughter throughout the entire movie, and nothing but smiles afterwards, with talk of the movies purchase. If you are interested in renting this, but are apprehensive because of the tagline "the goriest movie of all time", it ain't kidding, but it's so good, you have to see it. It's just so outrageous it's hilarious. Definitely a movie like no other, and I'm critical.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed