Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
25th Hour (2002)
1/10
Horrible and Ridiculous
20 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This film was absurd and traveled nowhere for over two hours. I saw a prescreening and then just laughed reading the few laudatory reviews claiming what a triumph the film was but never stating any reason why. There are a couple of truths to what they say.

Monty is a "super nice guy" drug dealer, as though any of us has ever met a character like this. How he got involved is never explored. He just has 24 hours to analyze his life before he goes to jail... but he does little of this and his activities are surprisingly trite.

The film is entirely comprised of trite subplots that are never explored nor properly resolved with situations that are not realistic. There is the question of who turned Monty in (villian identified but it made no sense nor was there a reason why this even happened.) There is the "self-hating Jew" who lusts after an underage student. Why this is in the film (and why the character has to be Jewish and self-hating) is unexplored but I can only wonder the motivation given that this is a Spike Lee film. There is the White Irish stockbroker who has absolutely no morals, chases every skirt, but still believes righteously that his best friend should go to jail for selling drugs to high school kids. Say what? Then there is the act that Monty asks his stockbroker friend to perform. Why? I have absolutely no idea.

I could go on and on about the gratuitous shots of the World Trade Center, the lack of any exploration of the relationship with his girlfriend, but why bother. This is the kind of film where critics will praise because of an association with the filmmaker but read closely. Nobody can really identify why they think this film is redeeming -- it isn't. It's a sad, wasted opportunity that deceives the audience through it's tagline of "changing your life in a day" that it has any substance whatsoever. A film like this is the reason why of Spike Lee's 25+ films, you've only heard of 1 or 2.
58 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amélie (2001)
1/10
Cute but we've seen Ally McBeal
3 August 2002
The film is a worthy rental but extremely highly overrated. With many Ally McBealesque type effects over an overly cutesy story, Amelie is still a worthy viewing, has some funny and endearing moments, but is just a bit too over the top. At times the antics are a little dull and the movie prods a bit, about an asexual French girl (believe that one?) who wants to help people and finds love in the process. Amusing moments, decent script, some nice production, the film begins with a girl who is raised alone and lonely, away from other schoolchildren, and as a result enjoys her solitude although she is fascinated by the world around her. She learns to love helping others and does so in creative ways, sometimes straining credibility. Designed to pull on the heart strings, it does so somewhat effectively. Good viewing for couples but don't be surprised if it doesn't blow you away but just seems like a very cute production piece for candy viewing.
9 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Typical Hollywood fare glamourizing life -- 6.5/10
6 July 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Once again, Hollywood comes out with a film that strains the limits of credibility in order to make the viewer the happy man who walks out of the theatre feeling that love conquers all. This film is highly overrated although not altogether unsatisfying.

Unfortunately, right from the very beginning, I didn't believe much of the script that later had the rug pulled out of it in "Shylamanian" style. Some of the surprises were telecast right from the beginning and made for somewhat awkward scenes. Crowe's Virginia accent changes considerably over the film and the image of his buff physique should not have been shown, which in my mind made him the furthest thing from resembling a mathematician. But I'm whining here... let's get to why this film is truly overrated although not unwatchable.

The script was incredibly poor. A love story develops with almost no perceptible verbal chemistry on screen. Usually characters have to interact and the character and audience needs to be won over, not just by sensuality and a clever line or two. There is little explanation as to WHY Nash's wife saw something in him more than most who supposedly didn't like him at all (although everyone seemed to enjoy his company at Princeton too, except for one or two tough scenes -- odd.) Neither did I feel the viewer get the sense that the math genius could do the impossible in the manner he does -- look at a roomful of numbers, no pencil, no calculations, nothing -- and simply breaks codes with the aid of some cheesy Hollywood special effects "mesmerizing" your mind. Please, this more resembled Superman than it did a genius mathematician. It asks you, the viewer, to connect the dots you know you have to make since the script doesn't do it for you at all.

Unfortunately, the movie continues to strain credibility, especially the family troubles. The lack of other characters assisting in that difficult situation was odd, unexplained (where are their parents), and made me wonder just how much fantasy this movie was based. Apparently, the words "based on a true story" is an understatement as Nash's true story doesn't quite resemble this glorified, Hollywood heart candy. I didn't get much sense of struggle -- the problems encountered were simply passed over quickly. Everyone sticks around to help Dr. Nash, to ends that just were simply not the manner in which people act.

Is the movie altogether bad? No. In fact, there is quite a bit that is very good with the movie, such as excellent performance by Russell Crowe and an equally good and sultry performance by Jennifer Connelly, who does the best she can with a mediocre script. This is a good rental but don't go in expecting to be blown away with it's overhyped rating. It's your typical Hollywood fare that glamorizes and airbrushes the lives of people who should have faced serious adversity for fear that you might not want to go to the movies if you don't come out feeling all warm and fuzzy inside. In an era of incredibly weak film-making efforts, this film rises to the top of a mediocre heap.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Whitewashed movie about racism
5 July 2002
I wanted to like this movie.... after starting off promising it ends up being yet another Hollywood movie, straining the limits of credibility and boring you after the first hour. This movie is Hollywood's prototypical whitewashing of the bad to create a clean, happy, wonderful solution that makes us all happy to be alive and together, no matter what our race or creed. One second there's hate, the next moment there's love. This movie does little to explain how this could occur and the fact that Hallie Berry needs to bare a LOT of boobs and butt and do her best to act like a porn queen should tell you all you need to know about the value of the script. The fact that Ebert and several other "critics" gave this movie such a high rating shouldn't fool you. It's superficial a movie as there ever was, masked by some fine acting. Perhaps Ebert was drenched after watching some rather distastefully filmed sex scenes, draped in the guise of "artistic filming." Be honest with yourself. If you're renting this movie, it's only to see what it might be like to "do it" with Hallie. Otherwise... you will leave unsatisfied.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Good, Bad, and Downright Ugly
16 May 2002
In short, it was better than the Star Wars I -- which unfortunately tells you little. It does provide entertainment value but you'll sit there with a look of incredulity on your face at least several times during the movie, including parts which you'll laugh hysterically when you shouldn't. But read on and don't worry, I won't blow the movie for you like the trailer.

The Good: The graphics were top notch as usual. Some of the effects were so good you didn't even think about how good they were as they were very convincing. If you follow the Star Wars story, you'll enjoy meeting a few of the players and seeing how the story progresses. The Obi-Wan and Anneken characters did a decent job acting. Unfortunately, that's it. I wasn't that impressed with some of the fighting scenes but others were just amazed by it. Thought the sabre work was better in Star Wars I, which should say something too.

The Bad: The story has several holes in it, as does the ability to use the force. One minute, the Jedi are all powerful. The next, you wonder why they are totally mortal -- perhaps it is to lend a feeling like there is a dangerous situation for our protagonist? The movie editing is not good and there are so many cut scenes you'll get a little dizzy and, in some cases, a scene will be too short so you'll be confused and have to consciously guess that "significant time has passed since the scene you saw 92 seconds ago." The beginning of the movie is incredibly confusing as it throws a whole bunch of characters together whom you don't know and it assumes that you remember all the players in the first movie. Fortunately, the dizzying number of characters lessens over the course of the movie. Surprise... you will see a cameo appearance by a well known actor and you will laugh when you see him (and how out of place he is!) The best part about Luke Skywalker's and Han Solo's characters was that nobody knew who they were and it didn't stick out in your mind. Some jokes are forced into this movie and you will feel like they were sometimes funny but too often placed there because Lucas felt like he needed laughs. Other times, these little "jokes" just fall very flat. Jar-Jar is back for no reason and in ludicrous positions... and fortunately he/she isn't around for very long. Warning: bring earplugs if you have them because Lucas obviously felt that he needed as many roaring engines as possible. It's VERY annoying.

The Ugly: Oh, the script in many places was, to put it kindly, MS3K laughably bad. In fact, several times during the movie, especially with the absolutely horrifically hysterical love scenes, the dialogue is so awful that you sit there in amazement and wonder how this sappy, awkward, forced garbage could ever have made it to the screen and whether Lucas was so full of his own work that he couldn't see just how absurd it is. Some of the editing is choppy. Natalie Portman is a good actress (good body too ;) ) but her lines are so awful... well, you know. Also, you'll see characters thrown at a hundred miles an hour only to walk away and brush themselves off. It's horribly funny. Princess Amadallah will annoy the hell out of you with her wardrobe that changes in virtually every scene. I thought that some of the battle scenes, especially one at the end was funny to watch. It wasn't bad, but it was very much like a comic book character.

Summation: This movie is a B-movie with superb special effects and a story line that people want to know more about. There is entertainment value but the script is so poor in several places that you might find yourself looking at your watch during this semi-predictable film and thinking that the Star Wars movies have unfortunately deteriorated into little more than cheap sci-fi tripe with CGI. I give it a 5. It's clearly below any other Star Wars movie except the first -- but it's not better by much. You will be disappointed if you are looking for a "great" movie.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Why ruin a good premise?
18 April 2002
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers Ever go to a movie where you try to just sit back and enjoy a little coincidence and potential implausibility but the awkwardness and unexplained events just ruin the whole experience for you? Well, "Don't Say A Word" falls into that genre with the following, in order of some to great contrivance: (1) The addition of Esposito as a cop who plays virtually no role in the film except somehow managing to figure out the whole series of events in just a few short hours and whose contrived lines (included an obtrusive, meaningless telephone conversation with someone unexplained) and ability to somehow find the location of the movie's climax with virtually no guidance. Additionally, there is this semi-emotional scene with Douglas which makes no sense since the two never spoke during the entire film. (2) The placement of the extraordinary, surveillance equipment all over New York without a hint of how it got there. It relies upon the audience to formulate various ways in which it *could* have been placed there -- never a good idea. (3) No explanation why the whole focus of the movie, some small red jewel, was so immensely valuable beyond everything else. (4) The psychological aspect is virtually tossed out the window from the start and the movie becomes an action flick. (5) How in the world the bad guys knew that the 6 digit number was in the girl's head and how the jewel ended up where it was. (6) The ability of Douglas and his crippled wife to beat the crap out of guys much larger than themselves. (7) The placement but lack of real explanation of characters like Esposito and then the revelation of the Dr. who has an association with another victim, that is so ridiculously obtrusive and unexplained that it will jolt your attention from being absorbed in this movie to ask yourself why the "character that obviously does not belong" played such a prominent role of distraction. Horrible movie? By no means, I've seen worse. Disappointing? You bet.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Training Day (2001)
A Shocking Farce
18 April 2002
Warning: Spoilers
After seeing this movie I was convinced that the Academy Awards is fixed. Where do I begin with the absurd implausibility and script of this film? What starts off with a decent premise disintegrates about midway through the movie where the "rogue" cop can somehow get away with virtually everything. Denzel is a baddie that is not only untouchable, but seems to have been unnoticed by everyone, including the press and those who are not involved in the corrupt underground. The plot holes are gaping, especially where he leaves his partner to an uncertain fate for reasons unexplained and with an escape that gives a whole new meaning to the words "deus ex machina." The ending, where a white man can simply walk through a tough black neighborhood and then get their backing, was about as awkward as John Goodman on a tightrope. Worse is how Washington's partner is able to pull of physical feats that rival those of coming back from being pummeled more than Rockey and being able to leap tall buildings in a single bound *and* showing strength and "stickum" like Superman and Spiderman. You'll wonder who thought up this tripe. Denzel Washington is a fine actor but the script was so awful that Denzel was left with the memorable tag line "you shot me in the a**!!!!" I fail to see how any actor could win an Oscar with such a poor script. The "all black win" at the Oscars was unquestionably pre-scripted for this warm fuzzy feeling of accomplishment to America. Denzel may deserve an Oscar for another film, but combine this tripe with Halle Berry (and there were plenty of other films and performances that were far better than hers) and you can understand what kind of contrived garbage you have here. If you want to see another fine black actor who hasn't won an Oscar and should have that appears in an awful film that should, unfortunately, prevent him from receiving an Oscar, go see Morgan Freeman in "Along Came a Spider" -- another contrived piece of garbage.
43 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Rating is Ridiculously Low
6 March 2002
Don't know who is grading this film or if some kid has made it his business to vote 500 times, but I never get tired of seeing this film and I see many. The dialogue is witty, the performances are hilarious, and it all makes for an enjoyable viewing. Martin gets the most out of his goofy character without the prior Martin goofiness that some people liked or hated. Caine is fabulous in his role as the smart and wealthy con. While some may feel that the plot isn't original, the dialogue is great and the acting is even more entertaining.... I think I'll see it again.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ridiculously low rating for all these great comments
21 July 2001
This movie is hilarious. It isn't intended to have the twisted plot of the Sting. It is supposed to be a movie that takes a light, funny view of two con men, each coming at the con from different angles. One of the top 10 funniest movies I have seen and easily seen several times.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Memento (2000)
10/10
Innovative Gripping Noir You Won't Forget
22 January 2001
Great film noir that you won't forget. Never heard of the film, saw it on a flight to Europe pre-US release and was shocked at how gripping this odd, bizarre, completely fresh "retrospective storytelling" mechanism is. Watching it is quite disconcerting but as you watch you realize how great this methodology is, especially at the end. Good performances, memorable storyline, definitely an instant cult success. You must watch this film and be a little patient to "settle in" and once you do, what a ride! You won't be sure anymore what is a real memory and documentary and what isn't! Honestly, this is a GREAT, FRESH film and probably won't get the publicity and box office push that it deserves. It's a *smart* film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Cell (2000)
2/10
Dull Story with CGI Graphics
25 December 2000
What made Silence of the Lambs such a great movie is what made this movie so terrible. Silence has a terrifying villain, a mystery that is far from uncovered, you get to know more about the villain and the mystery, the interplay of the characters, the mystery unraveling... very cool, very interesting. The lack of CGI effects made the directors of Silence focus on a compelling movie and script. Unfortunately, not true for this utterly boring piece of tripe which seems like the directors thought they could provide a cheap rip off and just add CGI effects. Even assuming she could (and it doesn't seem like she is that good) Jennifer Lopez doesn't even have a chance to act in this silliness. Some that do are terrible. You are set up with an overly gory compilation of bad deeds done by a supposedly terrifying villain and the rest is a major draw out with some decent/commonplace CGI effects to discover what you knew completely in the first few minutes of this stupid film. At the end you are saying to yourself "so what? I've heard Lawnmower Man 2 also went nowhere."
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beowulf (1999)
5/10
Hilariously bad but gripping B-Movie
25 December 2000
Most who wrote completely missed the fact that there was a plot -- the problem was that it wasn't revealed until the movie was more than half over! Only after that point do you realize it makes sense (the great book it was based on was unfortunately murdered by the script). This movie was hilarious because it couldn't decide what it was and mixed modern with medieval and created a ridiculous product which was mostly swords and sorcery. All is going well until out of nowhere I see loudspeakers! Film wasn't so bad as some surprisingly decent acting (the hot Layla and her father) and the absolutely awful acting and throw ins (the Americans who happen to be black and speak like they are from New York thrown in to provide "comic relief" in merry old England who are out of place in every way) which provides you with a slasher film that is truly something to laugh at and somewhat gripping at the same time. The CGI is OK part of the time and, for a relatively higher budget low budget film, is hysterically bad at the very end. A CGI alien combined with the cutaways to see "blood on the sword" and close ups when it is obvious that the budget had to be cut at the end and couldn't spend more cash on the CGI! I've seen A LOT worse, and this one is not nearly as bad, e.g. the few minutes I saw some cheesy Godzilla films or those super low budget D&D type adventures with mind numbingly bad scripts, acting and special effects. If you are expecting a little mind numbing fun and yet another poor man's highlander, then go for it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Virtuosity (1995)
Horrifically terrible
15 October 2000
There is almost nothing redeeming in this movie -- with the exception of Russell Crowe's over the top performance. Unfortunately Denzel Washington is dead wood and his limitations of an actor are stretched with this terrible script. This wanna be Lawnmower Man meets Escape From New York meets Tron meets Bladerunner is positively awful because the science fiction aspect is, quite frankly, not at all credible. The movie assumes all of us are so banal and thoughtless that we can simply dispense with reality, basic assumptions and common sense and have all of them be explained by "advanced science." As we move further into the computer age, this film gets sillier and less believable. An awful movie. Avoid if possible.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Must be seen blues performance
16 February 2000
The best live performances are those were not intended to be taped, such as this one. Stevie Ray's in your face, heavy, powerful blues chops are intense and this sweat pouring performance must be seen and heard by blues fans. The selections are amongst Vaughan's best material and it seems that the band is almost completely oblivious to the cameras as they do what they do best -- make great music. This is a rare gem that will not disappoint, and seeing this for the first time is what made me run out to find Stevie Ray Vaughan's material.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed