Who Killed Nicole? (2019) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
RUFKNKDNGME?
tonybrennan-0448124 March 2021
Absolute rubbish. Poorly edited, the so called investigators are morons, and where did Dodi come into play?

Don't waste your time. I wish I hadn't.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Asinine theory
debbiecalifornia31 December 2020
This flick has tons of useless info and the entire premise makes no sense. Yeah, OJ was crazy but I'm sure he didn't connect with a serial killer to kill Nichole. This flick presupposes that EVERYONE BUT OJ is lying, the phone records, Robert Kardashian, police, even ice cream. That's time I'll never get back.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Disjointed
rememberdave21 April 2021
This is really bad. There was so much generic imagery being used when audio recordings were being played. They didn't use any photos of the victims or the crime scene. The editing was bad. Much of the time it felt like the audio and video were out of sync, even though they were not, the editing made it feel as if they were. The main supplier of information is OJ's manager, who, did not know O. J. until 1999, so he was as much a part of the O. J. of 1994 as any of us. An amateur production.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Bahahaha
labng27 October 2020
Is what it is. A ridiculous load of salacious baloney. The thing that offended me the most was oj singing along to the song about the murder. This isn't going to change your mind. It's why you haven't heard of it before now.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So much evidence left out to fit the narrator's story
wenisknocker5 October 2020
Narrator says the "real" killer, a house painter and friend of OJ's, killed NB (OJ was there too). OJ saw him kill Nicole BUT OJ RAN AWAY in a panic. So the "real" killer ran over to OJ's to plant him as the killer by "throwing the bloody glove onto OJ's property." But the narrator fails to explain how OJ's blood soaked sock that he dropped in his bedroom as he rushed to throw all his clothes into the washing machine ended up on OJ's bedroom floor. How could the "real" killer plant that sock inside OJ's bedroom as well? He couldn't have. Another ex, the FBI said OJ's Bruno Magli shoeprint was not found on driver side floor of the white bronco. No kidding?! The shoes would have been soaked in blood, so OJ stripped off before he got inside the getaway bronco. Who would leave Nicole, Ron and his own blood stains all over the bronco?! And it goes on and on: concocted ideas that uniformed people of the Nicole Ron murder case could buy into. What a joke!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Solid theory, badly put together.
Shelly-1816 June 2020
If you watch this for the theory then you will eventually get what you came for. There is a lot of extra stuff tossed into the mix that isn't necessary.

I understand that the filmmakers feel the need to prove that Norm Pardo was part of OJ's inner circle for a time, but the terrible back seat style footage that is heavily peppered throughout doesn't do much to add to this doc.

The scenes where OJ is sitting and listening to a rap song are a head scratcher.

We get it, you have footage.

Norm's theory portion doesn't really start until about an hour and five minutes in. Prior to that is some decent information but it is slogged down by a lot of unnecessary stuff.

Great Red cam stuff, really interesting white board timeline in the background that we really should have seen more of. Maybe a voice over track to marry some of the more disjointed elements together? Something.

I won't spoil this for you, definitely see this if you are interested in a new and very solid theory. Just be warned that it can be, in my opinion, kind of messy at times.

I gave it a six.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolute garbage
veritasbulldog3 December 2020
Sorry, conspiracy buffs, but Simpson did it. This was proved beyond doubt in the civil trial. He's guilty, so stop pretending otherwise.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Utter, utter garbage... insultingly stupid
andrijj29 April 2021
I'm 8 minutes in, and they're already doctoring the 911 calls to make them fit their narrative. The investigators are already so insanely NOT credible I'm highly doubting I'll make it through more than 20 minutes.

Pure, unadulterated garbage.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hard to follow????
aflowergirl6928 March 2021
I don't know if it was just me, but this was hard to follow. Kinda jumped around a lot with footage going all over the place. I lost track several times of whom they were speaking about. The story could have been put together so much better. I watched every minute if the OJ trial and admit I thought the prosecutions case wasn't proven. I wasn't convinced he was innocent though. So to see a documentary with another possible suspect caught my eye, so I had to watch!!! This documentary had so much potential. Sadly it just wasn't what it could have been.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Just the Facts
zrenibe2 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Nothing at all like the neatly packaged lies and propaganda presented by the California States Attorney's Office as evidence. This film goes over all that the State's Attorney presented as "evidence" as being nothing more than sensationalism and hyperbole without a shred of fact. The film presents a confession and evidence from the actual murderer along with filmed confessions of Federal witnesses and Federal experts that worked the case. Spoiler.....Officer Fuhrman was without question a "bad actor" during his career and in various elements during the murder investigation (as were other L.A.P.D Officer's mucking up via walking all over the crime scene, etc.) however; this film identifies who actually planted the glove at O.J. Simpson's residence and it wasn't not someone named during the entire hearing/trial.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst documentaries I've ever watched
fssd-615461 July 2022
Talk about throwing everything at the wall, including Dodi Fahed, to see if anything sticks. I'll save you the trouble: Nothing did. Poorly thought out, edited, and overall incoherent garbage.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Cherry picking evidence to turn a buck
tamralea26 June 2022
There are there are holes all over the place.

The most blaring is the insinuation of a sexual assault buy Simpson on Kris Jenner in 1990. Yet there are photographs of Simpson & Nicole and Simpson & Paula attending vacations and golf tournaments with Kris & Bruce Jenner in 2016.

Rape victims do not go on vacation and events with the rapist who brutalized them.

There are numerous people who have stepped forward and documented that Simpson was extremely volatile. Good Lord, Paula wrote an entire book on it. Claiming that he wasn't is a joke.

Apparently this dude does not believe in domestic abuse and domestic abuse leading to murder. He seems to excel more at victim-blaming than anything else. Best way to claim a murderer is innocent is to claim the women are drug addicts. Get a new narrative.

Completed trash.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Interesting and informative
texasangel51714 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
It was put together fairly good but there was some parts like OJ listening to rap that didnt need to be put. The back seat video was real grainy but other then that it brought out secrets that everone had. I thought OJ did it/or had something to do with it and will always think that way.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
You have to see the uncut version
fennyjohnson13 November 2021
The original uncut version has way more information. When they decided to edit it and cleanup the foul language, they basically butchered the documentary. There original version was a really good watch.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed