Double Mommy (TV Movie 2016) Poster

(2016 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not as icky as it sounds
phd_travel27 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Sounds icky at first - a girl gets pregnant with twins one fathered by her boyfriend and one by his best friend who drugged and raped her. Yes it's possible. But the rapist family is rich and he wants to get rid of the baby.

Things are quite exciting actually and it's fairly watchable. The casting is a little confusing because the boyfriend and the rapist look a bit alike - should have chosen more different looking actors.

The conclusion is quite neat so makes it worth a watch.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Another Lifetime melodrama
mgconlan-119 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
After "Mommy's Little Boy" Lifetime showed another "premiere" called "Double Mommy," which like the earlier film is also a follow-up to a previous Lifetime hit, "Double Daddy" — in which a young man impregnates two women, his regular girlfriend and a rich bitch who drugged him and essentially raped him, on the same night and had to deal with both babies. "Double Mommy has at least one creative behind-the-scenes person in common with Double Daddy," screenwriter Barbara Kymlicka. It's directed by Doug Campbell and one of the credited producers is Ken Sanders, and as you might expect from those credits it takes place at least around, if not definitively in, the "Whittendale universe" — Whittendale University being the college the young high-schoolers in the dramatis personae aspire to attend, though as Charles pointed out when he arrived home midway through the movie, given that most of the films in the Whittendale universe have depicted Whittendale as a place whose women students all seem to be selling their bodies as prostitutes or mistresses to afford the school's tuition, they're probably better off not getting in there.

The leading character who gets doubly pregnant is Jessica "Jess" Bell (Morgan Obenreder), whose boyfriend Ryan (Griffin Freeman) deserted her for the summer to take an internship in Sacramento (the Whittendale universe films have been ambiguous as to just where Whittendale is; early on it seemed to be back East — Vermont, maybe — but later films in the series took place definitively in California and I got the impression that "Whittendale" really means Stanford) and left her with the attentions of Brent Davick (Mark Grossman), the hottest guy in the movie and therefore, according to Lifetime's usual iconography, its principal villain. Brent has befriended Jess and hung out with her throughout the summer, but being a teenage male (and especially a teenage male on Lifetime!) he wants more than that, and when he makes an advance towards her and she says no, he's grimly determined to have his way with her whether she wants to or not. So he offers her a cola which he's spiked with a date-rape drug — since Brent's dad is the CEO of a pharmaceutical company he had no trouble obtaining it — and he parks his SUV in front of some stadium lights on campus and tells her, "No one ever says no to me," before he has his wicked way with her and she passes out completely. Next thing she knows she's in her bed at home, only her pants are undone and her leg has a bruise on it. She washes herself and hears someone at her door — and of course it's Ryan, back from his Sacramento internship and ready to resume their relationship, particularly its sexual component, then and there. She ends up this bizarre day in her life carrying twins, one male and one female, and two and one-half months later — the earliest you can have this done — she has DNA drawn from her fetuses and learns that they have different fathers: one of the babies is Ryan's but the other is … well, we know it's Brent, and the Bells manage to get the police to order him to submit to a DNA test that proves it. But Brent is able to weasel out of the rape charge against him by claiming that Jess had consensual sex with him and intimidating virtually all of the students who were at the party into saying that Jess was "all over" him and clearly was hot for him.

At times "Double Mommy" plays as if Kymlicka was aware her movie was going to be shown right after one of Christine Conradt's and she wanted to make sure she could write something even more insanely melodramatic than the Old Mistress — though she lacks Conradt's skill (or inclination) in creating complex and morally ambiguous characters. Instead "Double Mommy" comes off as a work created more to exploit a provocative title than to tell us anything new (or even not so new) about the human condition, and though I liked the social commentary about how the 1 percent think they can get away with anything and their money can always buy their way out of disastrous or downright evil actions for which the rest of us would pay big-time, other Lifetime movies (can you say "Restless Virgins"?) have done this considerably better.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bad Good
ginjaninja-4390729 January 2021
It's so bad it's good. Watched it with the wife and kept me interested. Yes completely ridiculous but my wife enjoyed it. Happy wife, happy life.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better than expected. Should be given much more credit for shedding light on society today.
mintgreenbooks28 May 2023
While yes, it was a little poorly shot and was clearly a lower budget film, I was impressed.

It accurately portrays the often overlooked struggles of daterape victims, and sheds some much-needed light on how disregarded the poorer female voices are in the "justice" system and the deep mental sickness that can live within privileged families. No, it was not AMAZING, but it deserves to be rated higher. It was worth the watch, and should be celebrated more for bringing awareness to such a drastic, realistic, terrifying, impactful, and FULLY POSSIBLE situation.

This film deserves more credit and recognition for what it accomplished. I ask you to give it a chance, even if it's just 30 minutes. It deserves that, at least. I ask you to look past all the cruel digs at the actors and cinematography. The young actors did as well as possible, especially in such challenging, emotional roles.

Again, not perfect. But beyond worth it. And one of a kind. I hope it becomes as impactful as it should be. Especially in today's society, which tragically sees these situations more than ever.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible movie but what do you expect from modern Lifetime?
MalloryMarshmallows31 January 2021
Movie is bad, terrible actors and actress, terrible cinematography, What happened Lifetime? You use have such great movies, I think around 2007 or 2009 is when it started to decline. Watch Lifetime movies made in the 80s through 2005 any newer films are pure trash. Lifetime use to have so much drama and good actors now their just lazy.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Masterpiece
Moshpit_maniac13 January 2021
The worst movie I've ever seen and I loved every second. Bad acting, silly story and I couldn't stop making fun of it. Fantastically bad if you like laughing at movies with bad acting, production and direction.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
***1/2
edwagreen29 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A young woman is impregnated via two guys and the second one had her drugged before he forced himself on her.

This well done story is basically how the guy with his wealthy family thinks that he can buy himself out of this predicament, only to see that when he is discovered to be the culprit, none of his apparent wealth and family influence can help him. In fact, he goes beyond the misery he caused and murders to quiet those who would expose him.

Nice to see Bruce Boxleitner from the old days of television's "Scarecrow and Mrs. King," in this movie. Older of course, he reluctantly aids his no good son.

The first guy, Ryan, who impregnated her, was the true love of her life and is willing to raise the other child.

A good film depicting societal mores in such a situation.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Some good themes explored, but left an awful aftertaste
burgerman9329 September 2022
I can understand the social commentary of seeing a rich spoiled guy getting away with heinous acts and his parents protecting their reputation/family company. That was the only realism seen in this movie, the rest of it was just a ridiculous chain of events.

1) The guy's dad bribed the first rape victim and attempted to bribe Jess as well. Hush money given like this is not a legal binding contract.

2) Along the lines of blackmail, one of the teens was scared into not providing testimony from the night of the incident, as Brent's dad threatened to share that this witness had a DUI conviction. I don't see how that should be a deterrent. Any applicant is obligated to self-report past criminal convictions, and DUI's are public records. Most reputable colleges run background checks anyhow, and are bound to find out about it.

3) It's just so convenient that the alleged rapist and the victim still attend school and interact with one another. Plus Jess miraculously gets an entire group of people at a soccer stadium to hold up signs condemning Brent.

4) Brent's first rape victim is driving down a stretch of road and is being followed by Brent (she likely doesn't know it's him). How about driving to a public place or pulling over and calling the cops?

5) Rich dad just so happens to not lock his gun in a safe, and when he realizes it's missing he ends up in Jess' backyard right before his son is about to kill her. Hopefully he called the cops for backup.

Combined with the above stupidity, the last 20 minutes of this movie was exceedingly melodramatic. As for any positives - some of the older actors do a quality job. The high school characters are all cardboard cutouts.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Two Babies, Two Daddies
lavatch11 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
In life, timing is everything. That adage is no more apparent than in the phenomenon of superfecundation, which is the rare occurrence of twin babies conceived from two different biological fathers. Superfecundation is the reason that Jess is carrying twins, and the unfolding drama of "Double Mommy" is the justice that is sought for this young, victimized mother.

While Ryan, the boyfriend of Jess, was away, his friend and soccer teammate Brent Davick took advantage of the situation by drugging Jess at a party and raping her. After Ryan's return, Jess discovers that she is pregnant with twins by different fathers. But through the money of the wealthy Davick family, she is unable to prosecute Brent.

One by one, witnesses are bought off by the powerful patriarch Scott Davick, who is grooming Brent to take over the family business. Scott and his wife Candace cover for their son. Scott had previously bought off another young woman, Emily, when Brent had committed another felony act. When Candace discovers the drugs used by her son to incapacitate the women, she dumps them down into the garbage disposal.

It is only due to the courage and tenacity of Jess and Ryan that the truth about Brent Davick is slowly revealed to the community. The Davick clan seems to believe that because they have money and privilege and their son is an honors' student, he should not be prosecuted for his heinous offenses. But, at heart, Brent is a criminal. Jess and Ryan eventually find a way to expose ol' number 18 on the soccer field during a game.

The film's climax was a frantic race to stop an out-of-control Brent after he grabs his father's gun and makes a beeline for Jess. The filmmakers even added a denouement with gallows humor when Candace pays a visit to little grandson Charlie and expresses high hopes for his future, due to his genes. Once a Davick always a Davick!!!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Stupid premise, decent movie.
parleywilkinsonwbjc1 April 2024
Okay, I really don't understand how someone came up with this one, unless their intention was for a "what-if" kinda thing. The reason being, and it should be obvious what I'm about to say, that the entire premise of the movie is a biological impossibility. It might make for a good dramatic plot, but it's a well known fact that it is absolutely impossible for a woman to become pregnant with twins that don't have the same father. I'll admit this isn't a terrible movie without value whatsoever, but I personally just couldn't enjoy it due to admittedly unimaginative brain in my skull nagging me about the impossible nature of the plot. In other words, it could very well be a great movie, and I don't mean to infer it is a total piece of trash, I'm simply too smart to let myself enjoy it, even just for what it is.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed