Royal Wives at War (TV Movie 2016) Poster

(2016 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The unseen conflict of personalities behind the crisis
barryrd19 September 2016
It's been 80 years since the "Abdication Crisis" of 1936 so it's not surprising that we would be viewing a retrospective on this subject. In a nutshell, the reigning monarch of Britain, namely Edward VIII, abdicated the throne because of opposition to his proposed marriage to Wallis Warfield Simpson, an American who was twice-divorced. Two women who waged a personal "battle royale" behind the scenes are featured as we see a series of segments and monologues in which Gina McKee (The Forsyte Saga) as Wallis and Emma Davies as Elizabeth the Dutchess of York, later Queen consort and longtime Queen Mother. At the time of the episode with Wallis, Elizabeth was a popular and charming member of the Royal Family with a husband and daughter who were next in line to the throne. Elizabeth felt that Wallis was manipulating Edward and that she was totally inappropriate for the role of Queen to the reigning monarch. In a number of scenes she showed her deep dislike for Wallis who she was quick to put in her place. The TV movie uses a format where Royal biographer Andrew Morton talks to two authorities on the conflict between the two women. The transition from TV drama to round-table discussion helped to inform contemporary viewers on the dynamics of the relationship and the roots of the conflict. I thought the movie was quite successful in attempting to dissect the the personalities of the two women through the acting of Davies and McKee as well as the discussion with Andrew Morton.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fascinating
drjgardner26 September 2016
This is a fascinating behind the scenes look at one of the most remarkable controversies in the 20th Century, made dim by the passage of time and by the fact that it was mostly centered on the U.K. Digging through the letters of Wallis Simpson (the Duchess of Windsor) and Queen Elizabeth (the mother of the existing Queen Elizabeth), and using newsreel footage, the producers give us a pretty good look at the rivalries that helped shape the abdication of King Edward VIII and probably shaped the nature of World War 2.

This material was covered from a completely different angle in 2012's excellent "The King's Speech" and viewers of that film will find themselves at an advantage in viewing this film.

I enjoyed the round table discussions between the biographers and I think this added a lot to the value of the production. To this day there are still many ideas and feelings about the issue.

The full truth, of course, will never be known. But the use of the newsreels and the numerous quotes from the letters helps add an aura of authenticity to the film.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Perhaps Exploitative
Hitchcoc25 September 2016
Of course, since it's doubtful that anyone writing the script was "in the room," the feud between Wallis Simpson and Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, is based on a good deal of speculation. While it is captivating, the single high point for me is the historical perspective on the events leading up to and after the war. The actions of Wallis and Edward could certainly be deemed traitorous. Wallis considered herself a victim and said that the British people suffering shouldn't complain because she had put up with a great deal more. The pettiness of all of this is hard to take at times. I've always had trouble with the whole business of adulation for these spoiled brats. I have to say, however, the integration of actor portrayals and real film works pretty well.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Catty, gossipy rubbish.
jquinlan1920 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The only good parts of this made-up tabloid film are the actual newsreels, everything else is terrible, from the bitchy so-called presenters (especially Lady Colin Campbell...what a terrible women), to the really bad makeup that is so obvious it is actually a mask. I looked forward to this program, but realized it is a lot of fiction characterized as truth, but is actually sensationalist gossip without much basis in fact. I only gave it 3/10 because of the newsreels. The true history is a riveting tale and it could have been quite good without the "presenters", who seem so self-important, but they have nothing sensible to say.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Lady Campbell complete rubbish
hicuff@aol.com16 December 2019
Lady Campbell, one of the three speculating, wasn't even born until 1949, so how could she have any insight into what happened behind closed doors. She was so obviously a hater of the Queen Mother and enthralled with Wallis Simpson. She's obviously a gold digger since she was only married to Lord Campbell for a year, obviously wanting a title.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed