"Blue Bloods" Burning Bridges (TV Episode 2014) Poster

(TV Series)

(2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
5.3 ****
edwagreen11 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Another outstanding episode this time dealing with homosexuality within the police department. While witnessing a bias attack, a NYC police officer has to admit that he is gay as well. He is immediately shun by members of the department and his own partner punches him out and refuses to ride with him. Frank condemns the church on this issue and it puts him at odds with a church official, a long-time friend, who may decide the fate of a particular Catholic school as well as other issues.

It's difficult to view the anti-gay attitudes among important officials of our police department. Wait to you see who one of the guilty guys responsible for the fatal beating is related to? Wait to you see the previous bigotry shown by the relative.

The episode seems to show the gender gap in views towards homosexuality with the older generation vehemently opposed versus toleration by younger people.
11 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
'Untimely ripped' from the closet
bkoganbing8 December 2016
Even though the NYPD now and has had for a few decades a Gay Officers Action League for its LGBTQ members I'm sure that there are still people on the force like Frank Pando who won't come out. But in the words of Shakespeare, Pando was untimely ripped from the closet when he witnesses a gaybashing.

Of course it's Donnie Wahlberg and Marisa Ramirez who catch the case. What Pando does is catch hell from his long time partner Denny McCarthy who no longer wants to be his partner. His father also disowned him. That still happens.

Catholicism gets into the picture when Tom Selleck is asked by a sister to go to bat for his old parochial school slated to be closed. He gets tangled up in that same bias case his son is investigating when at a press conference he's questioned about his faith. The church responds in its traditional way.

Will Estes and Vanessa Ray decide to teach an object lesson to a smart mouth detective who steals one of their collars. That part of this episode was the comedy break in otherwise was a very grim story.

The episode tried to cover all bases in its audience an almost impossible task given the Reagan family Catholicism. Still Pando's story is all too real and deserved a telling.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Weak and inconsistent plot
Phil-5862027 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This episode attempts to deal with homosexual prejudice in the police force and brings in Catholicism only to insult both institutions.

The plot is initially interesting after an off duty officer is exposed as being homosexual after witnessing a brawl. Initially the officer receives the cold shoulder from his partner in a way that is believable, however the numerous jokes from other officers who receive no recourse is difficult to believe in a modern setting.

The plot seems to indicate that a large part of the police force is aggressively anti-gay. This, along with the wide spread aggression towards cops "ratting" each other out in recent episodes is hard to believe in the time setting.

On the other hand, most of the Reagan family is portrayed as being pro-homosexual in spite of their religion. The script provides minimal support for viewers to understand their reasoning on this stance. In a press briefing Catholicism is depicted as being behind the times using misunderstood theology and stereotypes further weakening the plot.

Overall the episode is a missed opportunity to show growth between the officers and convey how the Reagan's draw strength and clarity from their religion as they have in previous episodes.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Well Titled Episode
jqdoe15 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The writers surely knew what they were doing with this episode, and that was burning bridges. Another reviewer here demonstrated that by noting that she/he was done with this show after this episode.

Blue Bloods was one of - maybe the only - network television show which made any effort to portray the faith lives of families in any positive light. It is fairly obvious that the VAST majority of the folks in Hollywood and the networks are atheists, but there are literally a couple of hundred million Americans out here in flyover country who believe in God, and tens of millions who practice their faith in their lives, attend weekly church or synagogue services, etc. Everywhere but in the movies and on TV. Except Blue Bloods, where we see the family praying at dinner, where we have seen them in church, where they discuss their Catholic faith, and more. I am sure that was not a small part of the show's appeal to many in its loyal audience.

This episode takes on the issue of homosexuality. And it takes a decided position: if you believe that homosexuality is a sin, you are to be condemned. Even the whole Church is to be condemned. Even if the Church teaches its adherents to hate the sin but love the sinner, embraces homosexuals but not their homosexual behavior, does not support hate or government punishment or discrimination against homosexuals, etc. You must fully embrace homosexuality as perfectly acceptable to your God, or you must be condemned. As the lead character in this character condemns the Church here.

Yep, they burned bridges - and with more than the one viewer whose review here I noted above.

See ya.
11 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Religious connotations within storyline
Originator199417 September 2015
The storyline was going along pretty well until the sit down with Frank Reagan and the Cardinell. What is hard to grasp is the kissing of ones ring by another human being , especially a man in his station in life. It is repulsive to see a grown man kiss the ring of another man , in his religious garb, as if the one receiving the gesture is considered better than the other . I keep finding the religious aspects in this show a bit unnerving as it seems to flaunt it every week but in this particular episode to see one man literally bowing to another is unacceptable ....Is the show catering to ones religion by outlining ones faults ? Time to delete the religious aspect on this show and leave it in its respective place..elsewhere
7 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed