Blue Lagoon: The Awakening (TV Movie 2012) Poster

(2012 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
64 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
two models on a beach
SnoopyStyle29 July 2015
Emma Robinson (Indiana Evans) is a popular sweet girl. Her partying friend Lizzie tries to push her to date the hot quarterback. Dean McMullen (Brenton Thwaites) is the angry school outcast. The class goes to Trinidad to do humanitarian work or more like a privileged Caribbean vacation. They go on a party yacht. The police breaks up the party. Emma falls off the boat. Dean jumps in after her. Dean cuts the line not wanting to get in trouble with the cops. They are lost in the ocean and lands on a desolate island.

Dean is a real jerk and a true idiot. He is a horrible character. He could be an interesting quiet introspective outcast. Instead, he is really annoying and fully deserves his outcast position. It doesn't help that he's the reason that they're stranded. He caused the whole thing. The movie needs him to save her to start their adventure. On the positive side, it's two beautiful people on a desert island. The time back home is actually more interesting and a bit more compelling. The last act has some good melodrama. Neither of the actors are terribly good although I can't blame anything on their performance. They did what the movie needs but nothing more.
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
cheesy is expected... but the poor acting & writing is not.
leeloo2318 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I won't complain about the fact that they didn't grow hair in the movie. I don't care about that. I'll watch Cast Away when I want to see details. Sometimes a movie needs to skip certain details (like how they shaved) in order to stay focused on it's true purpose. For all we know, they used his knife and sharpened it on a rock. But to show us that is too time consuming and dumb. Let's pretend they used his knife to shave and move on. What drove me nuts was the lack of realistic human emotions. Poor Denise Richards. Finally lands an acting gig and boy does she look a bit rusty at it. Here's what I found laughable: SPOILER: 1st... Just 2 months after they are gone, she returns home. Who does that??? I'm sure the sister would rather they keep looking for her sibbling a bit longer! 2nd... Just 2 months after their disappearance, Denise, the mom, starts to pack away her daughter's clothes! WOW! She let that daughter go awfully quick. And without a tear! What a crock. 3rd... the arrival home. This is the WORST scene ever. Not only is it a huge public/media spectacle (in reality it would be a private arrival) but the whole school is there! So are the parents! Everyone waits as if in a queue line. The parents stand there with dorky grins waving when they see their kids come down the escalators... REALLY? You're not running toward your kid who you thought was DEAD! Last... I have a hard time believing, after that traumatic, yet exciting adventure, these 2 would just go their separate ways because of high school kids and their cliques. UGH, stupid, that's my immature reaction and non-lusterous way to describe this movie.
38 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
How can this movie have only 0.3 less than the original Blue Lagoon.
Julian_Tyler12 September 2020
How can this movie have only 0.3 less than the original Blue Lagoon!? Blue Lagoon (The Original) is criminally underrated. If anybody is seeing this I would hope they would give the Original a fair rating as this Film, which is basically Garbage, has a 5.5 and the Original Blue Lagoon currently has a 5.8. This movie is at least a 4 when compared to the Original which deserves at least a 6.5 minimum. The Acting and script in the Original is incredible.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Truly Horrible Movie!
scottsp1017 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This has to be one of the worst films I have seen in quite some time. I went into viewing it knowing it had nothing to do with the original. And that was fine because I was looking for a new movie or a re-imagining if you will. So, that is about the only positive thing I could say. At least it is original. But is so very bad. Where to begin? The script? The writers should never be allowed to pen a script again. The dialogue was so cheesy at times and laughable at other times when it supposed to be deep. Some of the back and forth between the leads will make you roll your eyes. Yes, it is that bad. And the actors do nothing to elevate the material. They are bad actors. I don't even know which one is worse. I realize they are generally unknown actors here in the States but I can guarantee that neither will come out of this being considered breakout stars. If you can get passed the writing and acting, let's discuss some of the ridiculous plot points.

The two are stuck on the island for two months or so yet the male character never grows a beard, moustache, or chest hair. How is that even possible? His hair doesn't even grow on his head. And the female remains completely smooth as well. Considering the time they are on the island and without the proper materials, this is just way too much for the audience to accept. Now, the two characters engage in a physical relationship and we find out that for the girl, it is her first time. Yet, the male had no clue. Really? Are we not even going to try and discuss how inane that is that he wouldn't know that he has just had sex with a virgin? Whatever. Beyond those things, we have the actual plot of the film. We go from one scene in which the female wants off the island to the very next scene where she is perfectly happy being alone with the male. This happens more than once during the movie. In fact, sometimes we go to a commercial with her in a panic and come back with everything seemingly better. Odd to say the least. When they are finally rescued (in a completely anti-climactic way), they return home and the movie takes an odd turn where both characters as cold towards one another and seem to forget all the bonding and changing they did on the island. This of course, remains the same until the final minute of the movie where they come back together and we are supposed to see just how in love they truly are. Again, whatever.

Take special notice of Denise Richards character for a specific point of bad writing meets bad acting as she plays the mother of the missing girl and beyond one failed crying scene, shows next to no realistic emotion over the fact that her daughter could be dead. Everything about this movie screams fake. It just seems to lack a decent plot, cohesive writing and structure, and expects the audience to just accept way too many things that are not consistent. A complete and total failure from start to finish.
81 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This was NOT the Caribbean.
elbeem2000-572-3063003 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I am from the Caribbean - and a lot of the scenes of a "desert island" was full of baloney!! My friends and I laughed through this "hoot" of a movie all the way through!! Sooo many inconsistencies and fallacies: Drinking and eating the coconut, fully husked!! A dried coconut is hard to cut and eat! One cannot "pick" fully ripened bananas!! A FULL lagoon AND a waterfall - on a "desert" island!!! First of all, there were no mountains on the "desert island" to have waterfalls. A big black cat; these do not live on any of the Caribbean Islands. Sleeping ON coconut leaves - most uncomfortable!! The "police" had American accents - not Trinidadian accents! Man - wheel and come again!!
49 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Formula Film with a Touch of Subversion
SentinelPrime14 January 2014
Okay, I am a little bit embarrassed to be reviewing this film, but I read some other reviews, and I wanted to point out some elements I noticed.

I caught this movie by accident one morning when I happened to have a day off. I was just flipping channels when it came on. When I saw what it was, I decided to leave it on while I did other things.

What surprised me about the film was the arc for Indiana Evans' character, Emma. While much of the movie was silly, the dialog between the two leads seemed honest in the context of the story and the characters. They actually talked to and got to know one another. Also, unusual for a Lifetime movie, Emma actually takes joy and pleasure in her own sexuality. That the character (not the actor) is a teenager makes for a slightly subversive moment in an otherwise formulaic film.

Emma is also the one who misunderstands Dean when they return home, which is nice, as often men are portrayed as misinterpreting signals, and instead Emma misunderstands Dean. Emma and her sister also have a great moment that passes the Bechtel test, in that they do not talk about the men in their lives, but each other.

The movie has problems, but the acting is not one of them. I think the two leads are quite good with the material, and they make their characters work despite some obvious holes in the plot. The movie's island scenes were also beautifully filmed. The eponymous lagoon is particularly lovely.

Not a spectacular film, but it had a few surprises.
30 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What have they done!?
nyf8517 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I was mostly disappointed. I seen the first 2 movies about 20 times each from when I was younger. Probably too young to have been watching them. My opinions are strictly based on what I expect from a Blue Lagoon movie. 1. Trinidad really? Should have been the same island as originals, more realistic someone could be lost in the South Pacific. 2. A little PG but I can forgive that. 3.The boat scene was a dumb idea. No one should have had a clue as to what may have happened. Otherwise they should have been found, there aren't that many islands off Trinidad that they wouldn't have found them by looking. 4. Throwing up but not pregnant. Anyone who has seen the originals was probably expecting that. The pregnancy & impending child is a big part in the story's ending. Original- baby causes them to end up adrift in boat. Baby eats bad berries, parents eat them to die with baby. baby doesn't die. 2nd- Baby from 1 is found w/ dead parents. Baby grows up back on island. He & girl decides not to leave island to protect impending baby from civilized world. I'm left to wonder what decisions a modern day young couple would do. I think this was to avoid the whole complicated world of teen pregnancy, especially in their return but to make it good they cant be chicken poo about getting in dirty waters. They should have had the kid & went to some interesting place about it if found. The odds of a non-sexually active teen being on any birth control unlikely, also I don't think sex was part of her plans until him. 5. They were found way too quickly. They should have been found a year or more later if at all. 6. Too much focus on the parents. Some parts can be tolerated but it was excessive. 7. This movie was missing some of my fav things about Blue Lagoon. The strong connection of the characters. The old characters seemed a lot smarter. They built whole houses and great survival skills. I wished they called it something else & let someone who thought over the bar take this on. I could have done a better job lol, but really.
20 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stranded-on-an-island romance,
edenroxyoursox16 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this in hopes on taking a look at their survival skills and observing Indiana Evans' acting. I know her from H20 and that's it (I always knew those accents were fake) and I don't like her character.

Anyway, this movie revolves around beauty queen Emma (Indiana) and outcast Dean (Brenton). I expected Dean's personality to be different, but I liked it as it was. I have no idea HOW no one saw Emma fall overboard. Unrealistically falling, may I add. Dean refuses to follow the police boat and they float out into the Caribbean. Once there, they paddle to shore on a nearby deserted island. The first idiotic mistake they make is not pulling the raft up more, as it floats away but they manage to save one life jacket. After this, they begin adapting to their new (temporary) life rather well. Not to mention that Dean is coincidentally equipped with survival skills and knows how to be independent. It's all candy and roses for the first two weeks I believe they are there. They screw each other multiple times and become closer. One minute Emma says she likes where she is and the next she's freaking out about being stranded.

After three months, they get rescued by a helicopter after firing off their flare gun. Upon their arrival, both teens unite with their parents (Denise Richards could not have been a better match for Indiana's mother) and go back to school. Emma continues hanging with her group and Dean goes back to his regular, uneventful life. Emma unfortunately begins ignoring the boy who saved her life more than once, but still invites him to her party. He comes and waits for her in the rain, where they share a final dance and the film ends happily ever after.
18 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
More Like Blue Lagoon: The Long Sleep...
natashabowiepinky23 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
When updating an 80's 'guilty pleasure' (not one of mine, though) about a couple of teens stranded on a desert island, and finding love and contentment there, you have a few quandaries to work around. Namely: With modern technology, and the world pretty much fully mapped... How on Earth could anyone overlook them? This question isn't quite answered satisfactory (One of them has a working cellphone they could easily be tracked on) but, meh... I'm willing to suspend disbelief if you are.

So, here we have a 'popular girl' and a 'social outcast' shacking up together on this far-off isle after a random series of events not worth going into. They hunt fish for food, eat plenty of bananas, build their own shelter, have baths in a photogenic waterfall and screw like rabbits( WHY does she never get pregnant?). Oh, and the bloke kills a jaguar. Woo hoo. The scenery is just as attractive as his abs and her bikini body... But alas, that talent does not extend to their skills as thespians. Never mind... there's always the cover of Vogue to look forward to.

Meanwhile, back at home, their friends and family fret... As the search is downgraded to a hunt for their corpses, before being stopped altogether. They never stop hoping though... Including Denise Richards as the mother of the female castaway. Whatever happened to Denise? Once a Bond Girl, now reduced to playing second fiddle to a couple of wannabe models. I guess as your good looks fade, so do all the good roles. Hollywood, sexist? OF COURSE NOT!! Take a good look at her, Indiana Evans. That'll be YOU in 20 years.

They get back to the mainland of course, having learnt VALUABLE LESSONS. She's realised there's more to life than parties and the in-crowd... A moment which symbolized by her throwing out all her old gaudy outfits. He finds the courage to reconnect with his estranged father , and they even share a couple of not-at-all forced hugs! Aw. Such character development! Later, he takes her to the prom in the pouring rain. "We've seen far worse than this"! He remarks, as some indie douche warbles away in the background.

Well, so have I... But I'd hardly call that a recommendation... 4/10
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
not bad, not a masterpiece
a-j-g-ritsema28 June 2012
I like castaway stories. I like BL: TA, although it is not as good as The Blue Lagoon (1980), and definitely not a masterpiece like Cast Away (2000, with Tom Hanks). In my view, the BL: TA has the following shortcomings: 1) The scenes with the parents searching their kids are too long. 2) What do they eat in the island? We see a bit but not enough. 3) The castaways should have lost weight, burned by the sun, get long hair / beards, etc. – as in Cast Away (2000). Or we should see a scene in which the castaways find one or more boxes with useful artifacts like matches, scissors, cutlery, solar cream etc. (in the 1980 version they get stranded with various things – no solar cream of course, since that story is placed around 1900). 4) The film should have some nude scenes as in the 1980 version. 5) They become castaways in a very unrealistic way. There is no island like this near Trinidad, and if there were one, castaways would probably be rescued within a few days (Moreover, such a small island cannot have a black panther or a waterfall). If someone had asked me to rewrite the script, I would have advised to start the film at an airport, where the two star-actors enter a plane as passengers. They don't know each other but the girl notices the boy as a "snob". The plane crashes in the Pacific (as in Cast Away). On their island, the teenagers tell each other about themselves and their relatives, with scenes as in the film, but shown in retrospect. The castaways find out that they are very different, so that they do not fall in love at once. Nonetheless, BL: TA has various enjoyable scenes. I like to see how the teenagers slowly fall in love during their exile. The scenes after homecoming are interesting as well. In Cast Away those scenes are very different – in that film the main personality cannot re-discover his destiny – but I like the scenes in BL: TA as well. The girl seems to be no longer in love with the boy – quite understandable.
17 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible portrayal of Trinidad
sheens3112 July 2014
I came across this movie on HBO and unfortunately viewed it. Let me say Trinidad is not a poor country in need of "Habitat for Humanity". It is the 7th most industrialized nation in the world and the biggest exporter of LNG to USA. Maybe the Lifetime movie creators should have done their research. I am disgusted by the portrayal of "locals" and areas that DO NOT exist in Trinidad. The Trinidad police do not have boats..we have COASTGUARDS. And lastly, there are NO panthers in the Caribbean!!!!!!

This show does not show anything about Trinidad except a fantasy of how a "POOR" Caribbean country is supposed to look like according to the myopic minds who created this junk.
27 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Just watch it without reference to other " brilliant " movies
johanrndrs28 March 2021
It is not comparable with the classics but with minor recourses, no special effects, it is just fun to watch. Do not compare or overthink it.

Just lay back and enjoy.

Although some. Scenes maybe not realistic, overall it is even educating in a way. How people can change when they are out off there normal environment. Ok, this is only the positive view on it. It is more likely that at onetime one of them kills the other but that is why you should not overthink to much while watching it.

I just enjoined watching it on a lazy Sunday evening when I only needed some relaxing and than it is more than an ok movie.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fresh and enjoyable Blue Lagoon for teen
saadgkhan27 June 2012
Blue Lagoon : The Awakening – CATCH IT (B) Blue Lagoon the Awakening relives the blue Lagoon phenomena in more PG13 rating for teens of today's. I think it was a really decent movie and deserves credit that even though it's made for TV, its risqué enough for teens. Aussie actors Brenton Thwaites and Indiana Evans are fresh and look great together with or without clothes. The whole movie is shot at beautiful locations and it's really fun to watch. Christopher Atkins and Denise Richards cameo is appreciated.

I personally loved the ending as it's a happy ending though Blue Lagoon movies usually end at Blue Lagoon. Watch it!
20 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not Impressed. Horrible Acting.
e-cianci31 July 2013
I was in a chick flick mood, so I chose to watch this movie. I knew with in the first two minutes that I wasn't going like it. I watched it anyways(mostly because the main actor 'dean' is hot). The acting was hard to get passed because a lot of the lines felt forced. Seriously the acting in Dirty Dancing and Twilight were better. The only thing I was impressed with was the similarity in looks the leading actress had to the original Blue Lagoon film and to Denise Richards, which I believe is the only reason they picked her to star. Save your self the palm to the forehead slap and watch something else more worth your time.
18 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty Bland In Terms of Story but Mildly Entertaining
Michael_Elliott20 June 2012
Blue Lagoon: The Awakening (2012)

** (out of 4)

The fourth version of the story has teenagers Emma (Indiana Evans) and Dean (Brenton Thwaites) getting stranded together on an island. Of course they're polar opposites and can't stand one another but soon they begin to fall in love while their future remains uncertain. I've always considered the 1980 version of the film, without question the most popular one, to be a camp classic because it's just so silly in some of its themes. The silly nature carries over to this remake but for the most part the film remains entertaining throughout. There are several problems with the film including the fact that it's way too pretty for its own good and it really does seem as if the producers just wanted to make a silly fantasy for teenage girls. There's really not a single smart conversation that happens at any point in the movie and for the most part the dialogue basically consists of one teen asking a question, the other replying and then the first person will have a follow up comment. There's also never a single second where you believe the situation these two are in. How they get on the island was pretty weak but it really doesn't help that even after months on this island both teens have perfect hair and make-up still as if they just stepped off a magazine cover. The romance between the two is silly and never believable and the final fifteen minutes are pretty pathetic, completely predictable and at times embarrassing. With all of that said, the film still kept me entertained because, well, it's just cheap and to the point. I thought both Evans and Thwaites were good in their roles, although there's no question that the parts didn't demand too much. I think their main goal was to just look pretty. Denise Richards really isn't believable in the role of the girl's mother and fans of the 1980 film will be happy to see Christopher Atkins in a small part. As much as I've talked down on the film I will admit that it was never horrid and thankfully it was never boring. I'm sure the targeted audience will enjoy the movie while others will probably want to stick with an earlier version since they were a lot more adult in the way the subject was handled.
26 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dull
grantss10 March 2017
Two teenagers, a boy and a girl, are stranded on a desert island together. Together they have to learn to adapt and survive, all while leaning about themselves. Over time, they even grow fond of each other...

Not a sequel to the Blue Lagoon, and not really a remake. Just takes advantage of the name, and tries to throw in some lame Lost-style intrigue.

Mostly pretty dull. Plot has heaps of holes, most notable being the physiological impossibilities of much of the movie.

Only highlight is the scenery, Indiana Evans being the best of it...
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The worst blue lagoon
milburnium23 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Having never seen the Blue Lagoon because I was not allowed to when I was a kid, I had the idea to get all 3 Blue Lagoon movies and watch them in one weekend. This is by far the worst Blue Lagoon and it does not even deserve to be included under the Blue Lagoon umbrella. Two spoiled teenagers (both dumb, and the male extremely unlikable) get lost on a small tropical island where there is a humongous panther for some reason (pretty sure there are no panthers on any Caribbean islands, but anyway). The first two movies are about the innocent awakening of romantic and passionate love, in this one it just seems like they have sex pretty quickly because they are sad and desperate and don't know what else to do. They're only lost for 3 months but their survival skills are not good, they barely manage to thatch together a shelter during that time, yet somehow they look exactly the same when they are discovered 3 months later, just as clean and pretty as they day they both fell off the party yacht. This is a dumb movie. The first Blue Lagoon has become a classic, the second one is pretty much a remake of the first one, and this one is just crap.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't watch
weerwolf7921 June 2012
It's one of the worst movies ever, falling of a ship without reason, being in a boat without moving and then there's an island coming from the left, walking over the island nothing to see and then there's a panther where did it come from and what did it eat? Why are they where clothing on a tropical island after making love? The film is full of mistakes and there is no story at all only 2 people being beautiful. The last part of the movie is even worse, they stop seeing each other without a reason, the party for the coming back is also stupid it doesn't really make any sense. There are to good part's that's the location and the girl.
16 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Way Too Tame for a Blue Lagoon Movie Warning: Spoilers
No nude scenes like in the 1980 semi-classic. An audience expects a lot more skin in a Blue Lagoon movie. Too bad. The male and female leads were both quite photogenic and sexy. They could do nude scenes without any need for body doubles. The premise of the existence of a reasonably large and well-watered but completely uninhabited island next door to Trinidad is preposterous. Sure there are flat muddy alluvial islands in the delta of the Orinoco where nobody lives, but these glorified mudflats and sandbars are not volcanic islands like the one they were on. Spoiler: Clueless parents don't realize how much the young lovers have bonded while in exile. They don't even ask if the horny teenagers had engaged in sex during their more than three months on the island.
15 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't bother
This movie has got to be the worst movie I've stumbled upon to in years. Aside from the gorgeous chic, the movie is full of goofs, bad dialogues, no composition at all, full of continuously errors (like rain when it's sunny, like artificial sunsets), etc. I felt insulted in my good taste and intelligence to watch this garbage.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fun high school movie, on an island.
Burstyn13 January 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Sometimes a movie you think must be garbage, surprises you. This is one of those reviews.

"Blue Lagoon: The Awakening" has everything that could make it a really bad movie. First of all, it's a Lifetime Movie, so it starts off with a disadvantage in the bag. Next, It's based on the "Blue Lagoon" movies without the key elements; growing up on the island, discovering the attraction of the opposite sex, young motherhood and the terrifying notion of the wilderness of an island. In this modern story, our young heroes are high school students who get shipwrecked by their own mistake while attending a boat party way past their curfew during a school trip. So, no traditional "Blue Lagoon" flick here. Yet strangely enough it works, because it's also a story about young love. Dean and Emma could have been stuck being study buddies in a traditional teen romantic drama and it would have still been enjoyable. This is mainly due to actors having great chemistry. On screen chemistry can make the most mundane movie warrant a second watch and make you believe in the characters. I have already re-watched it so to speak :) The actors Brenton Thwaites ( who snatched up the role of the young prince in the upcoming "Maleficient" and is a runner up for the role of Four opposite Shailene Woodley in the upcoming adaptation of the popular young adult novel "Divergent") & Indiana Evans have every quality to be young superstars. Both are exceptionally pretty (Indiana could have been love child of Brooke Shields and Denise Richards, the latter playing her mother so thumbs up for the casting as well), charismatic and light up the screen. Hopefully their careers will be filled with success, go kids! :) The music used in the movie is the second reason I enjoyed the movie so much. It even made the traditional slow-mo Lifetime movie shenanigans watchable. I have a really big nitpick about this movie that I can't let go of even though I loved it so much. This island had only one monkey and one very easily killed panther as its other occupants WTF? :) To sum it all up, if you like high school movies, picturesque beaches, pretty people and young love this is the movie for you.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Thanks, I Hated It
Raptorclaw15527 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The excuse "It's a Lifetime movie, what do you expect?" is not good enough. My biggest critique of the 1980 film was that it held back a lot despite seeming to want to be edgier. This film has that even worse.

Blue Lagoon: The Awakening? What exactly is being awoken in this film? A title like that would be more appropriate for the 1980 film than this one since there's no real character arc for either of the two main characters. They aren't transformed by their experience being stranded on an island for months. Once they go back to their old lives, it's like nothing ever happened.

The acting is bad. The line delivery on the lifeboat, especially, was so unnatural it felt more like a play being put on by inexperienced school kids than an actual film. It was almost like they filmed too little of that sequence and had lines dubbed over after the fact and it feels incredibly sloppy. The reactions of the parents after the two come back from being rescued are extremely subdued and unrealistic. Underacting at its finest, it seems. Your kids are presumed dead and have been for months and then you find out they're actually still alive and have been rescued and the best you can react is as if they are coming from year long study abroad program in Europe or something?

All of the meaningful social commentary present, even in passing, in the 1980 film are completely absent from this one, replaced by the concerns of high school social politics and worries of social implications of certain decisions, most notably, who you end up dating. It's incredibly shallow and either operates on a fundamental lack of understanding on what the original story was trying to say, or was purposefully watered down so that it could conform to the conventional Hollywood drama with all the fixings of a young adult fiction.

The drama and tension are all manufactured nonsense. There don't seem to be any real stakes in this film and any possibility of conflict or tension in the film is passed up in favor of something ridiculous, unrelated, and out of the blue. There is a question of whether or not Emma was pregnant but I believe the film when Emma says "Nope." We can't have underage teen pregnancy, what would the audience think? Any possible tension that sort of issue would imply is instantaneously evaporated in favor of putting in a ridiculous chase scene involving a panther on an island..?

One of the positive aspects of the 1980 adaptation that I complimented was that it did have nice visuals, especially with the swimming sequences. This film tries to do the same thing but can't quite recreate it and ends up looking like a cheap knockoff.

This adaptation of Blue Lagoon relies too much on its soundtrack to heighten any sense of drama or tension and the soundtrack, itself, relies too much on indie pop tunes to convey any emotion. Since there really isn't any chemistry between the two leads, the film makers seemed to decide on forcing emotion with a cheap soundtrack. At any standard, this film's soundtrack feels like an afterthought and more of a supplemental tool than anything else.

Blue Lagoon: The Awakening is bad. If Lifetime really had reservations about the original story enough to change it so dramatically, then maybe they shouldn't have made it in the first place. This film is an intensely watered down truncated vision of the story tainted with all the worst elements of the most cliche teen/young adult fiction tropes one can imagine. I cannot recommend this to anyone. The 1980 version is no masterpiece, but this is straight junk.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
quite enjoyable
breatheinforluck17 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I actually really enjoyed this move. I've never seen the original Blue Lagoon or any of the other remakes so I didn't really have high expectations for this movie. There were a lot of cheesy lines for sure but it was a Lifetime move what did you expect? It's a classic love story that is completely predictable but I enjoyed every minute of it! Fell in love with Dean from the start and loved watching the relationship between him and Emma progress while on the island. Don't go into this movie expecting it to be the original Blue Lagoon because it won't be, but if you want a feel good love story this is the movie for you!
24 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty bad, but a decent enough watch on a rainy day
rugbydude12318 June 2013
There are quite a few things wrong with this film, yet a few redeeming features too. Firstly, the script is awful. The cheesy one liners are woeful, and some of the ways the parents react are painful, although that is as much the acting than the script. So, the acting. The main leads, Thwaites and Evans, do as much as they can with a limited script, and looking beyond the American accents, bearing in mind they are both Australian, they don't do a bad job. They do actually create very intimate love scenes and keep the film going, and by the end of the movie, you do actually feel sad as Evans plays hard to get after all the attention they are getting. Also, they have obviously been picked for their looks, and not necessarily for their acting skills, and so much of it is filmed with minimal clothes on, which i must admit isn't a bad thing for the guys out there, and I'm sure the girls wont complain too. Overall, a rubbish script but with a nice deeper story and an intimate love story create by decent actors.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
See the First One and Skp This Cheap Account
ron-3181721 August 2020
As someone who enjoyed seeing both the Blue Lagoon and Return to the Blue Lagoon in theaters with my then girlfriend (who became my wife) I can only say that this is a miss on so many levels.

This movie feels cheap, like it was conceived and put into production with little thought, and then thrust unto the market in it's imperfect state to generate whatever revenue they could.

A far cry from the artistic integrity present in the 1980 film.

There is really nothing good I can say about this version, except to skip it.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed