What's in a Name? (2012) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
French Carnage
greenylennon30 July 2012
As you sit in front of Le Prénom, you can't help but think how many similarities it shares with Carnage (Polanski, 2011): same middle class context, almost the same setting, but with that French flavour that makes everything much tastier. Vincent is about to become father for the first time, and, during a dinner at his sister's house, he's asked about the name his wife Anna and he want to give their son. This simple, lame question sets off an evening where secrets are revealed, feelings are declared and hypocrisy is unmasked.

I think the movie, built on a very strong and witty screenplay, wouldn't have worked the same if the actors hadn't been so good, with so much remarkable chemistry between them. The cast is directed as if it were a company in a theatre: everyone has to be empathic with the others, in order to make the script work.

Better to watch it in original language, with subtitles: it's worth the risk to miss some of the dialogue.
48 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A simple story idea that works very well.
planktonrules8 July 2016
"What's in a Name" is a story with an amazingly simple plot...yet it works exceptionally well. The writing, acting and directing are spot on...and make this a French film well worth seeking.

The film is set almost entirely in an apartment and you can easily see that this was once a play. In this apartment, a group of friends and family get together and the evening goes normally enough...to a point. However, when one of the friends makes a stupid joke, the climate in the room becomes quite chilly. Then, soon after, folks start saying things they've never said before...and the room practically becomes the next ice age! While some will undoubtedly see this as a comedy, instead I see it as a very well constructed drama...one that really sucked me into the story. Well made and unique.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good
christophe9230029 December 2012
Mix of Un Air de Famille by Klapisch and Carnage by Polanski, Le Prénom is clearly divided in two parts: the first is pure comedy oriented, whereas the second is more drama focused.

The problem is that those two parts aren't homogeneous: the beginning is very good, dynamic, the dialogues fly, the humour is really present and the viewer is quickly sucked in. Unfortunately, the more the film progresses, the more the comical aspect is left aside, and the more the movie loses interest. The script goes thought bland and uninteresting passages, and we are served a dramatic aspect that isn't the most exciting one, which is disappointing in comparison to the thundering start.

A fifteen minute cut, mostly from the second part, could have also improved the overall rhythm of the movie.

Special mention to the cast who was very good and showed a great chemistry.
23 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wit and Drama Around a Dinner Table in Paris
3xHCCH9 June 2013
"Le Prenom" is about a group of five middle-aged friends who are having a Moroccan dinner get-together one night. The hosts are Pierre (a literature professor) and his dutiful wife Elisabeth (nicknamed Babou). Claude is a professional trombonist who was Elisabeth's best friend. Vincent is Elisabeth's joker of a brother, whose wife Anna is pregnant with their first child.

It was the matter of naming Vincent and Anna's unborn baby boy that starts us off in this adventure of bitter wit and sharp barbs all within the confines of Pierre's apartment. From a heated argument about the name Vincent plans to give his son, their conversation devolves into more serious and painful matters about each other's secrets they have been keeping from each other all these thirty odd years they have known each other as close friends.

"Le Prenom," with its confined action and lengthy dialogues, felt like a play. The passionate cast, led by Vincent Bruel and Charles Berling, were also acting like stage actors with their over-the top, exaggerated (therefore not too realistic for film) reactions and exclamations. I found out afterwards that it was adapted by Mathieu Delaporte and Alexandre de la Patelliere, based on their 2011 stage play.

This script of this film is reminiscent of a 2008 French play by Yasmina Reza called "Gods of Carnage", made into a film called "Carnage" by Roman Polanski. That play/film had two middle-aged couple whose arguments begin from a fight between their sons to topics totally different from what they started talking about.

As with other foreign language films, I felt a lot of the humor and wit is lost in translation into the English subtitles. Especially in a very wordy screenplay like this one with practical jokes and secret revelations, so much subtleties in the use of language is expected, and I surely missed. This is already very good as I watching it, but I have a feeling French-speaking people found it even better. I will definitely watch a live English language performance of this play if there was one.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
He said the first name, they didn't say their last word ...
ElMaruecan8224 March 2014
What "Le Prénom" ("The First Name") accomplished was a miracle: it restored my faith on French comedy.

Indeed, just when I thought that they were forever condemned to rely their success on simplistic and childish plots compensated with star-studded cast, or some more or less abuse of that parodist humor mostly inspired from TV, Alexandre de La Patellière's film reminds us that even in our cynical Internet days, it was possible to make people laugh with delightful dialogues and realistic human interactions, with the perfect cocktail of gentleness and cynicism, something I didn't think was possible since "Le Diner de Cons".

And it's true that "Le Prénom" is really the descendant of Francis Veber's masterpiece and not just on its excellent sophistication that never patronizes the spectator. On the form too, there are similarities worth to be noticed: both movies are based on popular plays, "The Birdcage" was another example of successful adaptation from stage to the big screen. The movie perfectly combines a respect of the unity of time, place and plot, with a delightful premise: a friendly dinner in upper-class Parisian house that turns sour when one of the guest revealed the name he decided to give to his future son, shattering instantly the harmony and friendship between a memorable gallery of characters.

Vincent (Patrick Bruel in a very interesting and nuanced performance) is Vincent, the brother of Babou (Elizabeth) played by the late Valerie Benguigi, a modest teacher married to a literature professor, Pierre, played by Charles Berling. Joining them is a meek, effeminate and non-confrontational musician, Claude, played by Guillaume de Tonquédec and Anna (Judith El Zein) as Vincent's pregnant wife, carrying in her womb the roots of the discord. Five characters, that's enough to set-up one of the funniest comedies of the last years. Both Guillaume de Tonquédec and Valérie Ben Guigui won the César for Best Supporting role, and the only bit of sadness conveyed by the film is Benguigui's untimely passing, at the age of 47.

(Indeed, It's impossible not to think of that sad loss for French Cinéma while watching "Le Prénom" and I'm glad she won the César, as a tribute to an immense talent that will be sadly missed. She left Cinema with a poignant and funny performance that will be remembered in the years to come) Now how about that first-name that will ignite the fire of discord and misunderstanding? Although it's very tempting but I won't give it away, out of respect for the screenplay and because one of the first delights is to play that game with Vincent, when he challenges to guess the name he picked for his son. It's not an unknown name, which makes the exercise even more suspenseful and once you know it, you understand why it was so polemical. I wondered for months what was that was mysterious name and how could it provoke a clash, I'm glad I didn't have a clue till the day I saw the film. And yes, they couldn't have come up with a worse name.

But don't worry, the film isn't centered only on the names' subject, it's just a starter to what will turn into something as chaotic as "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?" where all the guests will have to say what they truly think and get rid of the whole social hypocrisy. And this is one of the aspects that make "Le Prénom" such a great comedy, it's a clever social commentary on the behavior of French elite, and the way their interactions, their speech mannerism or body language betray their political beliefs and their true feelings about so-called friends.

It's a reminder of the way sometimes, conflicts can have a sane effect by luring us to reveal the most sincere part of ourselves, and what more eloquent than the way we name people we love to speak about us. I, myself, am tired with people in my country, who gave their children name that sound foreign because they know that today, having an Arabic name can be a handicap, for me these people are either accomplice of the system, acknowledging the very hate their people inspire, and be part of it, driven by a form of unconscious cowardice. I could relate to a story like that, and I'm sure I can get excitable when it comes to such subjects.

So, behind the funny surface, "Le Prénom" is an extremely intelligent movie and deep in the way it tackles social interactions, much more when they touch family and friendship. There'll always be someone who'll be taken for what he is not and a simple sentence, one too much, can work like a wake-up call. And just when you think, you pointed your finger on someone's flaw, you realize you're not beyond criticism either, and this is the main lesson of "Le Prénom", it's about understanding each other, and respecting both people's choices and opinions, without being too wrapped up in one's egos.

And at the end, the battle of egos turn into a recognition of each one's plea, and what starts like a comedy end like a great lesson about humility. Yet the film doesn't conclude on a serious note, and the ending is the perfect punch line to it. When it ended, I found every bit of the film most satisfying, tasting like a good wine that thankfully never went too sour. And as I said, as an aspiring screenwriter, I wish I could come up with a film half that good. Of course, I could throw some one-liners here and there, but taken out of their context, they wouldn't have the same effect, much more; they might give clues about that infamous name that started all.

So, please, just watch it, if only to discover what is that mysterious name … but be a good movie fans, good sports, and don't cheat.
24 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
screen and stage
dromasca8 June 2013
'Le prenom' translated in English in the Shakespearean 'What's in a Name' is even more than an adaptation, it is almost filmed theater. Excepting the introduction which is funny but has little to do with the film and the final few minutes which could have been much better all the play ... sorry ... the film takes place in a Parisian apartment where five characters mid-class, mid-age meet for dinner and live the crisis of their lives triggered by a practical joke one of them makes related to the name of his baby-to-come. As in Polanski's 'Carnage' which brought to screen a play by Yasmina Reza, the border between theater and film is never really crossed. Actually this film/play is so close to Reza's style that I would have been fooled easily if they told me it's written by her.

Alexandre de la Patelliere and Mathieu Delaporte brought to screen Delaporte's play and it looks like they do not have any other ambition than bringing to broader audiences the same story of good friends discovering unknown truths and hidden aspects of each other's personalities. Every ten minutes or so we do have a new revelation, each one about another of the characters involved which will put at try family relations and friendships forged decades back, in childhood. There are no social comments of actuality and no political sub-tones if we exclude some references to the left vs. conservative stereotypes, and probably the most significant (and funniest) reference is made to political correctness, related to the selection of the name of the baby boy, but it is consumed unfortunately in the first third of the movie. However, this may play eventually in the favor of the text, keeping it timeless and helping it stay actual even if read and played many years or decades from now.

At the end of the day viewing 'Le prenom' is an enjoyable experience and this is due to the well written dialog (it's a filmed play, but a good one) and to the excellent acting. I especially liked the pair of brother and sister (Patrick Bruel and Valerie Benguigi) who succeed both to bring real-life nuances to their characters, supplementary to the complexity and wit which is derived from the text. Do not avoid 'Le prenom' if it comes soon on a screen or a stage close to your place.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Classic French Cleverness
starrdust-931-71364822 February 2014
Arguing is instilled in French culture. The French practice arguing to keep their minds sharp (perhaps something lacking in our culture). Cultural relativism is not apparent in other reviews that criticize and find the the amount of arguing in the film "boring." The film is quite captivating. Classic French cleverness is very present in the script. The characters present a wonderful view into the lives of Parisians and their commitment to great wine, food and conversation. The idea of titles and the strange taboos society has on names is the deeper argument for all the audience to ponder once the film has finished. The actors in the film keep the audience engaged with a handful of stories and perspectives on family life.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining but with a weak final
Pencho1515 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I had the chance to see Le Prénom during an Air France flight. Flying is always a chance to see new movies and, taking advantage of the extensive menu of movies that are unknown in Mexico I took a chance with something I'll hardly see in my country. Between the various french productions I saw this one mainly because it was starred by Patrick Bruel, when I was a kid I enjoyed a lot his movie Le Jaguar (1996), so I decided to see his acting once again now that I have more experience and could appreciate it better.

Le Prénom is a sitcom which relies on a clever script and in the work of the actors, who play a group of friends (two marriages and a single man) that meet for a dinner to celebrate the future birth of the son of one of the couples. However when the name chosen for the baby is revealed it turns out completely unlikeable to the rest of the group. Vincent (Bruel) announces he will be called Adolphe in honor of a literary character of the XIX Century, but everyone else can only think about Adolf Hitler. From that point on the conflict between the five characters escalates, and during the evening secrets and quarrels will be revealed leaving no one untouched.

When it starts the movie is really good, the first discussion is between Vincent and Claude (Gillaume de Toquedec) the main opposer to the chosen name and it has great dialogs and convincing arguments for both points of view, it is ingenious, funny and definitively the best of the picture which, regretfully, can't keep this highpoint during all its runtime. When the movie goes on we find out Adolphe is not the real name for the kid and that everything is nothing but a practical joke played by Vincent, however this is not revealed to the characters in time and once it is is to late to stop the conflict between everyone of them. By this point the movie has lost its novelty, the viewer quickly learns how events will unfold and thus it misses some fun. A discussion ends, a silence fills the place and you know that at any moment someone will let out a comment that will lead to a new argument with some of the characters that so far have avoided the fighting, indeed that's what happens. The acting remains solid and the movie is still entertaining but not surprising.

By the end every character is unhappy and everything seems to show that nothing will ever be the same between them, this is were the ending comes and from my point of view it badly hurts the rest of the movie. We see the birth of the baby which turns out to be a girls instead of a boy and the parents call their friends so they can meet the newborn, everyone is just as happy as always and it would appear that nothing happened during that dinner, their friendship will go on with no changes. I don't have anything against happy endings and I wouldn't have any problem with the movie if the conflict had been solved in other way, but it all happens so fast and with no explanation that it left me with the feeling that the writers and the director didn't gave much of a thought to this and just took the easy way out. The ending leaves everything we saw without any consequence and thus it takes all the significance of what could have been a better film.

Good acting, funny dialogs and a good script but all hurted by a bad ending, still it ain't a bad effort and you will have fun if You watch it, give it a chance if you have the time.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Incredible
thiagoneves-288716 April 2018
I highly enjoyed Le Prénom. The dialogs are so dinamic, with such a fluidity and the perfomances are sublime.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
bitingly savage and hilarious comedy/drama
gregking423 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Successful and easy going real estate agent Vincent (Patrick Bruel, from Paris Manhattan, etc) is about to become a father for the first time, and at an intimate gathering with a close circle of friends he drops a bombshell when he reveals the controversial proposed name for his son. This sets off a heated exchange between Vincent and Pierre (Charles Berling, from L'Ennui, etc), his uptight and educated left wing brother-in-law and long suffering wife Elizabeth (Valerie Benguigui). Also reluctantly dragged into the arguments is Elizabeth's long time friend and musician Claude (Guillaume de Tonquedec), and Vincent's chain smoking heavily pregnant wife Anna (Judith El Zein). Soon other secrets, long simmering issues, startling revelations and recriminations bubble over, and the evening becomes rather heated. Politics, religion, history, egos, trust, family issues, and even sexual orientation soon become fair game, and everyone is vulnerable. Oh yes, there will be blood spilled (figuratively speaking). This bitingly savage and hilarious comedy/drama is a bit like a Gallic version of Who's Afraid Of Virginia Woolf or the recent Carnage, in which a dinner party goes out of control and the guests verbally tear strips off each other. No-one emerges from the evening unscathed. There are many twists before the evening is over, and many will blind side audiences familiar with this type of claustrophobic drama. The staging is very theatrical in nature as the action is confined to Pierre and Elizabeth's living room. It's not surprising to learn that writer and co-director Matthieu Delaporte first conceived the idea as a stage play but then decided to turn it into a feature film. Delaporte and Alexandre De La Patelliere have collaborated as writers on a number of films including 22 Bullets and an Iron Man television series. While Delaporte has directed one other film, his writing partner De La Patelliere is making his debut with this film. Their direction is fluid, and they maintain the pace throughout this dialogue driven film. The astute, erudite and crisp screenplay delivers a barrage of verbal zingers and caustic put downs, and the tone shifts seamlessly between the comic and the dark and serious. The chemistry between the five person ensemble cast is electric. Production designer Marie Cheminel has created a wonderfully warm book lined set that is the perfect backdrop for the verbal sparring.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than expected.
Ellie13529 August 2012
Usually not a big fan of french movies, but this one was surprisingly good. It didn't bore for a single second and yes, there was sharp dialog (even in dubbed version) but it was funny and not to the point where one had to cover one's ears. And another plus, unlike Carnage, it did not feature a puking which was a major bonus points earner. I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it and think the actors did a great job. They felt real enough that this could have actually happened at a dinner party back at my own home. It also had a nice twist that I didn't see coming and don 't want to spoil for anyone. Just this much, things are not always what they seem to be. Yep, that about covers it.

A well worthy ticket for an enjoyable popcorn movie night. (8/10)
36 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A congregation of negativity
Gordon-1115 February 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This film is about a dinner party that turns very wrong, after a man announcing that he will name his unborn son Adolphe.

"The Name" is a very dialog heavy film. It comprises of 90 minutes of non stop arguments, people throwing tempers, and being nasty to each other. The spotlight keeps changing from one character to the next, and all five characters get their share of blame and ridicule. This film reminds me so much of the Hollywood film "Carnage", which I did not enjoy. For both films, I just do not understand why any of the characters keep the argument going by being in the room, when they could easily have walked out. The two films both show an extended argument for argument's sake. All I see is endless negativity, and no artistic credit. I find "The Name" a huge bore.
14 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
French blah blah
titusg26 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
French gossip pretentiously called movie. Few lads are invited one night around the dinner table. They start talking about all the nonsense's possible. The camera stay in this room for the hole movie. I will say the budget was not to big or they use some public funds. There are few interesting lines and some funny jokes but this is not sufficient for making a movie. Adolf and Adolphe is a good example but they push it too long. Then you sleep with my mother, I make jokes about your kids names etc etc. This scenario is more adapted for theater that for cinemas in my opinion! Compare with Nous York, the last french movie I have seen, this is still watchable though .... I just realized how hard it is to write down 10 lines about a movie you don't like.
5 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
More layered and verbally articulate than a lot of mainstream comedies
Likes_Ninjas9023 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A family is preparing to have a dinner party together in a French apartment. It is being hosted by Elisabeth (Valerie Benguigui) and Pierre (Charles Berling), while the first two guests are Vincent (Patrick Bruel), who is Elisabeth's brother, and Claude (Guillaume de Tonquedec), who is a childhood friend. Vincent arrives before his pregnant wife Anna (Judith El Zein) and one of the main discussions is what they will be naming their child. To create havoc Vincent elects to tell them a controversial name. His one small lie unleashes the fury of Pierre first and then numerous other arguments breakout, revealing each of their personalities but also some long buried family secrets and some unexpected conflicts and surprises.

There are pleasures to be found in this minor French comedy, it just takes time to reflect on them. Adapted from a play, the film seems as though it lacks cinematic stylisation. The technical elements leave something to be desired because this is directors Alexandre de La Patelliere and Matthieu Delaporte's first feature film from Delaporte's own play. The film is set almost entirely in one area, which isn't new, but the camera is largely static and the actors stand around, waiting for their turn to speak. One of the saving graces for the film though is that the humour shifts between highbrow French culture and then gleefully embraces a silly side too. The film opens with the repeat images of people throughout French history being assassinated through the macabre route. This establishes the rather black rim that borders around the jokes. The film is about figurative character assassinations as people shoot each other down, based on their interests or their insecurities. Pierre and Vincent argue about the political incorrectness of the baby name he is said to have chosen, I guessed prematurely what it was, and then Vincent argues that he took it from a literary text and they fight over the spelling of the name.

The dialogue is written with rare, microscopic details and then the humour and jokes broaden as the power plays between the characters shift. Vincent the instigator suddenly becomes the butt of people's jokes, like when they torment him about his facial expressions. Similarly, after being left out of conversations Elisabeth launches at Pierre over their domestic roles. Some of the setups are well-organised, particularly when Vincent is about to reveal that name because it gives a preemptive feel to the chaos that is about to erupt. The weakness of the film is that despite the comedy revealing character and being purposeful, as it should be, there aren't a lot of big laughs. I think this has to do with the film's low energy levels. At just under two hours the film feels very long when this setup has been performed much leaner in the past. The Roman Polanski film Carnage from last year had a very similar premise but it was thirty minutes shorter and felt more satisfying. It was funnier and had more memorable episodes that I can still remember today. Nonetheless, this is a comedy that is deceptively small, and more layered and verbally articulate than a lot of mainstream comedies.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Different
antonisgi20 November 2018
The beginning was familiar to Amelie beginning for no reason. Followed by a static huge part with lots of thoughts and conversations some of them lasted way too longer than I would like to. It had its ups and downs. There were parts I laughed there were parts I would like to have seen lasting less. The plot seemed good and changes took part in the process with surprises and dramatic speeches which were interesting. A movie which is all about the script and the acting. I would have prefered it as a theatrical performance...
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Battle royale with words.
suite922 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The Three Acts:

The initial tableaux: The film starts in the 9th arrondissement in Paris. Pierre and Élisabeth (called Babu by most) are hosting a small dinner party. The daughter and son hopefully will stay asleep. Babu's brother Vincent arrives, and draws interest in the name of his pre-natal son with his wife. Trombonist and long time family friend Claude joins the group. Considerably later, Vincent's wife Anna arrives.

Delineation of conflicts: Vincent's choice for the son's name is quite offensive, and a debate rages over it. Much emotional heat is generated as a result; tempers warm more than a bit.

Later, Vincent admits that the announced name was a joke, but the hurt feelings remain. Worse, the admission comes only after Vincent and Pierre have wounded each other with words. The group continues skewering each other with sharp speech.

Resolution: Can the group resume their usual warm relationships? Several harsh buried truths surface during the verbal fencing.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Funny, eloquent French comedy but I can't forgive the dog part!
eremia-917-1186622 April 2021
The movie is funny, slick and clever. If you like French humour, you will enjoy it. It's all about conversations, discussions, friendship and old secrets. Very well played and engaging.

What I couldn't forgive is the dog part. I really don't like the way this situation was portrayed and I lost sympathy to the characters involved. It was really in bad taste...
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent film!
milou-9134120 November 2018
J'ai adoré... Film intelligent, divertissent. Le jeu des ateurs est incroyable. À voir absolument ! 👍😁
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
French people arguing at a dinner party
Persora27 January 2024
If I had to sum up the story that's how I would do it as the whole name trope (which is literally the name of the film) is just a pretence and doesn't really carry us through the whole film.

It seems funny at first but quickly falls into a screaming fest and blame game. Leaving us frustrated as there is no resolution. All the valid concerns mostly expressed by the 2 women are just swept under the rug in the end because...women are just hysterical creatures who will eventually calm down I suppose... The ending is also a bit ridiculous.

Maybe it works better as a play because the film didn't do it for me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great Film
WilliamCKH26 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Based on the premise, I had high expectations for this film. I was not disappointed. The film, however, started out, I thought, too quickly, too cleverly, a la Amelie Poulain, with its introductions and back stories of the main characters. When the film settled down, inside the apartment, the film got back on track to a pace I could enjoy. The dialogue is wonderful between the characters, each character having a unique voice and talking about subjects I would talk about at a dinner party. Each character had a certain point of view, unique yet relatable. Although the title is only a springboard to other subjects, it does start the film rolling, and roll it does, from jokes, to misunderstandings, to secrets, to childhood resentments, to pent up rage reaching it's climax during Babu's meltdown. Although all the characters are interesting, it is Babu we are rooting for. I loved Valérie Benguigui's amazing performance. I'd never seen her in films and I hope that I get to see more of her. The other actors are also fine in their roles. I must also say that Francoise Fabian has just aged beautifully. The first time I saw her was in Eric Rohmer's MY NIGHT AT MAUDS'S which was released in 1969. She still looks amazing.

....I wrote this review before reading all the credits and was saddened to learn that Valerie Benguigui passed away in 2013 from cancer. People are here for a short time and they leave us. Some, if lucky, leave behind something that is forever in the cultural landscape. I'm glad I was witness to this beautiful film and beautiful performance ..Rest in Peace
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good play on screen
JohnRayPeterson21 April 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a play written for the screen. It has a very smart plot, if I may use that expression for a play. As it is for all such type of movies, play for the screen, the key is character development within a good story, and this film has it.

The actors deliver excellent performances, all of them, and once you start watching it, you become interested in the play because of the solid performances. Of course, the story had to be smart to keep you in your seat all the way through the movie, and it did. We get to know each of the character's story, discover the humanity in the bonds that friends have.

The appropriately named movie deals with a couple's choices of name for their yet unborn child, and how a group of friends and family get involved in that choice, over an evening at the couple's home. The history of their relationships is really what all the discussions lead to, not to mention each spewing their heart out over revelations that occur during the discussions. The ending scenes make the whole movie worth watching; it is not a disappointment, which it could have been if not for the smart screenplay.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good enough
PennyReviews10 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Five friends gather for a dinner party and they end up revealing secrets. The main story doesn't sound much, however the movie is very funny and entertaining. Simple jokes, without the vulgar additions that the comedies tend to have these days to produce laugher. But, as the story proceeds, the humorous atmosphere turn into a dramatic, as the secrets are being revealed one after the other. The transition is very smooth and you don't really realise it. Great performances, without overdoing it (well, most of the time anyway). The characters are clear and you can easily get them and understand their next moves. All in all, a nice movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well done dramedy
Bantam4 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A comedy is a tragedy, that does not concern you. Like when we see a person trip and fall. We laugh. For them it's most certainly not funny.

The movie itself borrows from (or was inspired by) the adaptation of Carnage by Polanski. A group of five long-time friends (some are family) get together for an evening of food and wine.

Vincent (Bruel - a fine French actor, btw.) tries to push the buttons of his liberal lefty brother-in-law, Pierre, for personal amusement. He tells Pierre, that he (Vincent) and his wife (Anna) are planning to call their first-born son 'Adolphe'. The exchange between them leads, almost inevitably, to a heated conversation about naming conventions, perceptions of names and ultimately into a meta-discussion about values and bigotry. Mind you, Pierre's children are called Appolin and Myrtille (in the translated version she was named Melody).

The evening goes totally south from there, with everybody having some sort of beef with each other- and not holding back at spilling the beans. There is a lot of resentment, and a lot of venom flying all over. However, the movie ends on a happy note.

Since almost the entire movie takes place in the apartment of Pierre and Elisabeth, it solely relies on the interaction between the characters. And this is what makes the movie great, IMO. The exchanges are really well written, witty and funny. They are also very hurtful, most of them are nasty blows below the belt. This is the part that makes it real fun to watch. Even though most of the dialogue is a kick in the teeth, it is still poignant and delivered with panache. A real treat to watch. I would have loved to watch them in French, but this would have been a waste. However, the translation was superb from what I could gather. It's not easy to make a good movie that is solely dialogue-driven, but this one pulls it off.

As mentioned, since it did not concern me, the entire 'bouquet' of dialogue (insults, innuendos, allegations and hard truths) did really made laugh. A fantastic piece of French comedy with subtle undercurrents and punches aimed at the idyllic suburban life of the (upper?) middle- class. In short: one of the best dramedys I've seen in some time. Well written, well acted and directed! I only realised after checking it, that the team behind this one did also: Bis (2015), L'immortel (2010) and Renaissance (2006). If you want some seriously funny French cinema, grab it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
a wonderful French comedy/Drama (:
richwgriffin-227-17663521 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I had a big smile on my face during the end credits because I thoroughly enjoyed this French movie from 2012! Yes, it's essentially a stage play, almost the entire film is set in the upper-middle class Parisian living room of the couple who have invited another couple and a single friend over for dinner. The dialogue is exceptional, the acting is superb (it's my understanding they performed this as a play with the same cast in Paris before making the film; this is why they seem so cohesive).

Two of the cast members were known to me: Charles Berling and Patrick Bruel. Three of the cast members were new to me: Cesar winners Valerie Benguigui and Guillaume de Toncquedonc; and Judith El Zein (as Anna, Vincent's wife, who is very late arriving at the party, so she can reveal that they aren't really naming the baby Adolphe/Adolf, but rather Henri). Francoise Fabian has the small role of Vincent and the wife's (Babu) mother.

I didn't like the film version of Carnage at all, and this film resembles it very closely. This one is MUCH better.

I was surprised the film didn't feel static. It moved right along without any sagging. It's almost all talk but interesting talk. I would be interested in other plays by Matthieu Delaporte, who co-directed and co-wrote the screenplay.

I love French cinema. It's a cinema of actors and dialogue more than cinematography. Films often look similar but feel different.

The one suspenseful moment is that I thought Claude was going to declare his love for Babu. We are misled into thinking it's Anna he's having an affair with, but it's actually Francoise, the mother! Nice touch! Especially since everyone, including the audience, thinks he's gay! (:
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Code Two
writers_reign19 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This is is the same ballpark as Daniele Thompson's Le Code A Change and that's not necessarily a bad thing given that Thompson is a seriously talented writer-director. Both movies focus largely on dinner parties involving close friends and/or families, skeletons, closets, home truths - perm any two from three. This takes about a reel and a half to hit its stride after which it delivers consistently. It benefits from a fine screenplay and some great ensemble acting by people we don't see that often outside France with Patrick Bruehl and Charles Berling having the highest profiles. It's not going to win any prizes for originality but against that it does take a well-worn plot and breathe new life into it as a fairly banal practical joke triggers repercussions far outside the scope of the original intention and a close-knit group edges close to the brink of fragmentation. It would be churlish to single out any one of the high quality performances and I for one will certainly watch it again.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed