The Bay (2012) Poster

(II) (2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
194 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Darwin's nightmare
petra_ste6 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Let's get this out of the way: in spite of what synopsis and trailers may (mis)lead you to believe, this is not a found-footage monster movie. So, if you wanted Paranormal Activity: the Dagon Edition, don't bother.

The Bay is a competent, unnerving ecological thriller, a disaster movie about a sea community devastated by polluted water and plague-bearing parasites.

Unlike your typical found footage flick, a veteran director (Barry Levinson) is at the helm, and it shows: it's much better filmed than the average level for the genre. The final act, with hideous overgrown parasites crawling around the deserted town, has a truly nightmarish quality to it.

7/10
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This film will crawl out of your blind spot
mgarrison826 March 2013
A small town on the coast of Maryland has a bizarre outbreak of some kind in the middle of their 4th of July festivities. The symptoms are strange, disgusting, and quickly don't add up. The hospital can't figure out what it is. Within 24 hours the town is in chaos, surrounded by the national guard, and quarantined. A small town novice reporter was on scene covering the 4th of July and she describes what happened with the help of her own camera footage as well as other digital evidence pieced together from a variety of sources.

It has some of that Blair Witch camera work which I normally despise, but for this documentary style flick it worked really well and I think this is the best example of its genre I've seen.

The thing about this is that once we come to understand the origin of this outbreak it sounds like something that really could happen. The chain of events that cascaded into this disaster was surprisingly complex and at the same time very on point with the risks industrialization poses to the environment and to us! I don't think I've seen a threat in a horror movie this well thought out in many years. It all made sense once you understood what was happening but it definitely comes out of a blind spot in the horror realm.

This is not simply a mutated flesh eating infection, a curse, or anything quite so simple but neither does it have the histrionic level drama that some horror junkies need these days. This is weird horror in the realm of the real.

I never thought I'd say this, but I was glad when I found little discrepancies in the portrayal of the collapse of the infrastructure, hospital and police procedures, etc. While watching it, my mind was going into overdrive trying to find reasons that 'this isn't real; this really couldn't happen like this.' There were a couple of scenes that were chilling in how similar they were to actual news stories. I felt an emotional outpouring of sympathy for the victims. It was like watching one of these catastrophes like hurricane Katrina or hurricane Sandy where you just feel so bad for the people involved. Of course the difference was this was a bit more bloody and once you come to understand the nature of the biological danger it goes to a whole new level of revulsion.

I kind of wanted to see holes in it to find some respite from the growing anxiety. I felt like some of those holes were there in a couple of gratuitous shock value scenes that fell a little flat, and in the response from the government. But when you look at the lack of response hurricane Katrina got in the first 24 hours…maybe one of those holes isn't so big after all, though the conspiracy-style cover-up in the movie was a bit much.

All in all, this film will make your skin crawl!
27 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
OK, but a easy ending.
gmickel-7524616 March 2017
Warning: Spoilers
So this review is for people that have seen the show. Interesting premise on the chicken sh** being dropped into the water, for the people who have posted here for a long time not that the boards are down can you use a bland curse word? Anyway, that and getting the hyper growth of the concept of the parasites and bugs, whatever, becoming what they did and the mayor ignoring it a month before because of the 4th of July and the income of the city. I get it. Enlighten teens. Besides the mayor getting what he deserved for the all mighty American $ we worship.

What ticks me off is having the ending just being it covered up and and just dropping a massive amount of chlorine and all is solved. Like none of the fish would be out of that area and spread that black bug and that many fish dead and human deaths in a American city would just be looked over in the national media.

Interesting concept yet you have to finish a logical conclusion that is believable.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very enjoyable. Much better than it's 5.6 rating
BolgTheVillan16 October 2020
Creature feature meets Found Footage. This is a little gem and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Pleasantly surprised. Worth far more than it's 5.something IMDb rating. A strong 7/10. Horror fans will like. Not your usual crud. My only criticism is that it didn't quite give me the redemptive conclusion that I craved.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated horror flick
Analog_Devotee7 September 2020
This deserved to be bigger than Paranormal Activity, in my opinion. Way more original, better writing, and an event that's not too wild to the point of being unbelievable.

Not a big fan of found-footage, but this one gets a pass. Watch it if you dare!
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Founded footage addition to genre with mixed results
nesfilmreviews26 February 2013
It was only a matter of time before the found footage craze drew a bona-fide name- brand Hollywood filmmaker into its ongoing vortex. The story behind "The Bay" is that the US government cover-up an--outbreak that wiped out the town of Claridge, MD in 2009. All cameras and footage related to what happened were confiscated by the government, but now someone has compiled and the truth about what happened in Claridge, MD beings to leak out. Although this is placed in the horror genre-- containing some tension and gruesome moments-this is comes off more of an eco-scare.

The footage is a combination of the news filming of Stephanie and her cameraman, as well as other various form's of camera footage.This combination of POV adds an element of interest and realism to the film, expanding the storyline beyond what could have been achieved by a single camera held by a single individual. The movie jumps around town to give more comprehensive coverage of the crisis--sort of like if "Contagion" was told from a first-person point of view, and isn't nearly as good. The film follows the findings of a pair of marine biologists, who discovers species of benign organisms that appear to be evolving--into something more mischievous.

Levinson seems more interested in spreading a green message--than terrifying.viewers. There's nothing wrong with that, but audiences lured in by the trailers may be disappointed despite being well produced. The best found footage films "Paranormal Activity" and " "REC"s", immerse you fully in the hellish situation, and make you feel as if you're part of the terror. "The Bay" simply never does that, but it's an admirable attempt at something a bit different.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Well directed, well acted, derailed by a dumb script.
The_Dead_See9 April 2013
I realized tonight that there's a built in problem with mockumentary and found footage films. Whereas regular films create their own subtly pliable reality where disbelief can be stretched and molded as long as it's kept in context; mockumentary and found footage films ask us to believe that this is *our* reality - not a created one where things might work just a little bit differently.

So let's say you're watching an regular horror movie and something happens that doesn't quite gel with our real world - let's say a cop goes up to a house, leaving his partner in the car, gunshots are heard in the house and the cop says "I'm going in" but the partner, instead of calling for backup and then going in with him - as would be standard common sense, let alone protocol - sits in the car and waits and waits instead...

In a regular film you might be able to let that go.

But in a film that's entire style and purpose is an attempt to make you believe it's real - errors like this take on a much greater importance. In fact, they're absolutely inexcusable, and that's why The Bay sucks.

It's a shame too, because the actual found-footage and documentary style is directed well, with a lot of care and attention paid to realism. I'd go as far as to say this was the best handled "reality" film footage I've seen to date.

Why then, would Barry Levinson settle on such a stupid script? The entire thing is riddled with bizarre errors, things that just wouldn't happen in our real world (the world the film asks us to place the context in). Things like the CDC being a NASA style call center where the five guys who take the calls are also the disease detectives, biological experts, and seemingly also authorized to make national security decisions. Or that the death of 700+ people in a single day in a town of thousands could be silenced with a simple financial payoff, or even smaller things like a high powered lawyer not checking her cellphone for 8 hours.

So ultimately, very well acted, very well directed but completely derailed by a script that's dumber than a box of rocks.
49 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Bay
jboothmillard18 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I was surprised when I saw this scary movie was directed by Barry Levinson (Diner, The Natural; Good Morning, Vietnam, Rain Man), the description for it sounded good, and it was rated well by critics, so I was looking forward to whatever it had to offer. Basically the film opens explaining that the footage was confiscated by the U.S. government until an anonymous source leaked the footage for the entire world to see. On July 4th 2009, Independence Day, a seaside town in Claridge, on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, on the Chesapeake Bay, thrives on water and is ready to celebrate the annual Crab Festival. But two researchers find the water has a staggering level of toxicity, Mayor Stockman (Frank Deal) is alerted, but he refuses to take action fearing it will cause a panic, and the result is a deadly plague being unleashed. The outbreak is thought to have been caused by a combination of agricultural pesticides, random pollutants, and steroids-in-chicken-manure that have been dumped into the bay, whatever it is it has turned humans into hosts for a deadly, mutant breed of the parasite Cymothoa exigua, i.e. parasitic crustacean isopods. The creatures start infecting townspeople one by one, several stories are seen as the overwhelming chaos takes over, particularly local young inexperienced news reporter Donna Thompson (Kether Donohue) and her cameraman, who were reporting on the 4th of July festivities , she is also explaining the occurrences in an off-screen personal recording. Other stories seen include two oceanographers who first discovered the parasites, two police officers on duty investigating the residential area, a young unsuspecting couple swimming in the lake, a teenage girl sending a desperate message to a friend on FaceTime, Dr. Jack Abrams (Stephen Kunken) informing the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the developing situation at the local hospital, and a young married couple with an infant aboard sailing on a vessel toward the family home, unaware of the horrific unfolding events on the mainland. Also starring Will Rogers as Alex, The Cabin in the Woods' Kristen Connolly as Stephanie, Argo's Christopher Denham as Sam, Nansi Aluka as Jaquline, Kimberly Campbell as Nurse Rebecca, Beckett Clayton-Luce as Charles and Dave Hager as Fisher Jerry. The combination of "found footage" from news broadcasts, phone cameras, Skype, CCTV and webcam, accompanied by narration of the young newscaster, makes for an interesting take on the scary movie genre, you could call it a cross between Paranormal Activity and Jaws, and of course the special effects make up and little CGI to bring the isopods and their hideous body eating antic to life is fantastic, it is scary to think that isopods are real, it is well put together and definitely gives you the jitters, a terrific horror thriller. Very good!
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just flat out bad! in a bad way..
Daman-Malone28 February 2013
This movie was just a waste of my time and the studios money. I understand filming these movies on handy-cams and shots that are meant to be from CCTV cameras are the in thing, but really. The whole plot of the film was just straight crap, It was so basic and just stupid that it makes me question WHAT NEXT!!. The lead actress is BAD, the shooting style is bad, the editing was pathetic BUT this movie could have be made into something good with the right person in front and behind the camera. You are better off just staying away from this movie and waste your cash on Paranormal Activity or Chernobyl Diaries..It really was a let down...
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I Look Into You I See
raulfaust26 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
From the get go we have a slight reference to "Blair Witch Project", and if you're tired of watching movies self recorded, you can already turn it off after five minutes or less. "The Bay" has a documentary feeling; Stephanie is a former reporter that taped everything that happened in the town when a plague or something like that came and wiped out the population. Interesting to see such horrifying injuries in the inhabitants; I felt distressed while watching the drama and pain those people were facing. The main disease reminds the audience of popular movies like "Quarentena" and 2010's "The Crazies", but for some reasons, it sometimes feels original and unique. Director Barry Levinson is able to actually SCARE the spectator with a simply story-- I jumped out of my couch in the last scenes. Also, the sad way Kristen Connolly portrays her character gives more credibility to the plot and to the movie as a whole. In the end, albeit this movie doesn't bring anything specially new to the genre, it's an interesting picture of horror to enjoy with a pinch of reality. Give it a try.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not the worst found footage movie I have ever seen ... but close to it
ewoowe4 November 2012
The acting was pretty bad (with some exceptions) the story was very derivative, and the dialog was cringe-worthy. I feel the only reason they used "found footage" format was to save money in the post production, although some of the special effects and make-up weren't THAT bad. What really got to me was how bad the "science" was. Everything said that was suppose to be factual or scientific was just so mind-numbingly stupid and just plain wrong, I had to roll my eyes and slap my forehead. At the end of the movie my eyes hurt and I have a bruise.

If you have less than a 10th grade education, love found footage, love infection/horror movies and have seen everything else in the genre, maybe try this movie if you are really bored. Otherwise, just turn on a random SyFy original and chances are it will be much better than this.
61 out of 132 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A real gem in the mud
siderite18 July 2013
At first, when I saw that it was one of those films made with footage from web cams and handhelds, I cursed the found footage genre and was ready to be disappointed. After watching it, I must say I am glad I did and that people responsible for the low IMDb rating didn't really watch the movie.

The truth is that this is not really a found footage film, but a documentary type of horror. The premise is that some government secreted video footage has leaked to someone who montaged them in order to show "what really happened". And what happened is a biological outbreak. The film is trying to be realistic and it manages to do that, while the slow pace that some accused works perfectly for the film's ultimate and terrifying outcome.

Bottom line: I will keep this film in my permanent collection. I don't know what people that rated it 1 smoked, but it was probably infested by parasites :-) It may also have been the setting for me: a slow night with no one around, perfect for watching horror. If you are tired of dumb monster movies and boring killer in the woods crap, this is the film for you.
113 out of 144 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Garbage
sunnyraysofblack15 February 2014
This movie was terrible. It wasn't frightening whatsoever and the environmental message it's trying to put across is poorly implemented and clumsily presented.

They also appeared to do no research whatsoever into infectious diseases and protocols, and have a poor grasp of science. My favourite quote has got to be "maybe it's some kind of viral bacteria!" It moves too slowly, doesn't take full advantage of the medium/film technique and the intro is badly scripted and completely generic.

The "monsters" are kind of gross and interesting I suppose but all in all, watch something else.
28 out of 56 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Terrific, terrifying
searchanddestroy-119 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, let me say that I was astonished to see that this film was made by Barry Levinson, the great director of GOOD MORNING Vietnam, BUGSY, RAIN MAN and so many more features, great ones, since the late 70's till the late 90's. Great surprise. I could not believe it. And this director was not known for making horror features, especially ones in the kind of CLOVERFIELD, BLAIR WITCH PROJECT or PARANORMAL ACTIVITY. AS this one is. This movie that reminds me John Frankenheimer's PROPHECY, as a ecologic movie, or early features from David Cronenberg...

THis maybe cheap but astounding movie is really terrific, I was glued to my seat all long it.

I recommend it.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very good Eco-horror/thriller
MattyGibbs1 November 2013
This is an ecological horror/thriller about a virus affecting a small town. It's a familiar tale and uses mainly 'home footage' to tell the story. This means you have to get used to constant shaky pictures which can be a bit annoying. However in this case the shaky footage does add somewhat to the general air of panic that follows the outbreak.

The basis of the film is quite disturbing in that it might not be a million miles away from reality due to the damage man is doing to the environment. The action flows along at a brisk pace and most of the scenes are realistic and not for the squeamish. Although not an out and out horror it does have a nice air of tension, some gore and a few jump scenes.

For a relatively low budget film I found this to be a very good effort. It kept me glued and most importantly of all it was entertaining throughout. It's not groundbreaking by any means but this is an above average Eco-thriller that is well worth watching.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A short review of "The Bay" (2012)
ericrnolan13 June 2017
"The Bay" (2012) deserves credit for its effort to give viewers a detailed and well developed, found-footage science fiction-horror movie. In depicting a brutal parasitic infection eradicating a small coastal town, writers Barry Levinson and Michael Wallach appear familiar with the basics of epidemiology and public health. And they make nice use of a time-honored sci-fi standby — pollutants causing small organisms to mutate into large ones.

Levinson and Wallach are ambitious too. "The Bay" follows a number of intertwining narratives winding through the entire town, making use of more than a dozen actors and innumerable extras. Some of those actors are quite good — especially those portraying emergency professionals, like the local emergency room doctor, the staff for the Centers for Disease Control and the bureaucrat from the Department of Homeland Security. I think a story with this scope, and with this many characters, would have made a fine ecological techno-thriller novel. The filmmakers really do serve up a thoughtful, serious cautionary tale that is sometimes frightening.

Despite its strengths, however, "The Bay" is still encumbered by some noticeable flaws. There's little structure to it, the pacing feels off, and we follow so many characters that it is hard for the viewer to get to know any one of them. There is a news reporter whose point of view serves as a framing device, but she's performed with little energy by the main actress, and her character isn't scripted to be terribly likable to begin with. Parts of the film feel redundant, too. Levinson (who is also the director here) keeps replaying footage and key dialogue, and it's a poor choice.

All things considered, I'd rate "The Bay" a 7 out of 10.

https://ericrobertnolan.wordpress.com/
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Get a Vademecum, Mr. Levinson...
Nibbler00724 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
How can you be scared ? The Bay is anything but a horror movie. Barry Levinson totally disappointed me. This film is 100% inaccurate, both medically and on script terms.

I'm not the guy who rationalizes everything he sees. But if you mess with public environment, health or technologies available to control plagues, pollution, etc., you play with fire. The Bay is a negative example of that.

It made CDC and EPA look like morons, actually. Not to mention the awful medical behavior. There are treatments that could be tried before amputation and shotguns... I urge Barry Levinson to get a Vademecum in order to get familiar with drugs that kill parasites. They are not mentioned at all. Even later, when the parasite identificated, THEY DID NOT TREAT THEM with drugs! Unbelievable. How can you fear a 2 centimeters cockroach who is isolated, studied and should be treated as well...

One of the fear factors in a movie is when you have a situation out of control, when you ignore the cause of the plague, when you mess with a bad guy who seems unstoppable. Nothing of this happens here. Levinson tries to be seriously scary, but such thing didn't succeed. I think that if you want to be believable and threatening, you got to handle reality facts as well in order to be believable. Unnatural things can become natural if you are clever enough. I remember Contagion. Not the best movie of all times, but it had a good reality factor, and it was medically believable.

The Bay is unbelievable, absurd, and people seems to be retarded, especially those who are in charge of the situation.

I hate when directors do that. You got to study the subject a little when you are producing and filming, it's the least you can do.

Awful, boring, lacking credibility, lacking fantasy, lacking acting, lacking plot, people is portraited as idiots. And I tend to think that the guys in this film think that I'm an idiot, too. Insulting. Don't see it.

The worst movie I've seen in a long time.
36 out of 77 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better Than Expected
KerryRaport15 April 2021
The Bay is surprisingly well-acted, has a decent amount of creepiness/scares throughout, and, as found-footage movies go, is definitely among the betters ones you'll find. There are some typical horror-character-makes-worst-possible-decision moments in the second half and some plot holes which kind of pull the whole thing down though and the ending isn't strong enough to make up for those. Still, you could do a lot worse if you're looking for something creepy to stream.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sit back, expect a good movie, then be sorely disappointed
skydragon-427 November 2012
Now, don't get me wrong, I love "found-footage" films. Read the summary and thought "Yeah, let's give it a go". Seen Blair Witch, The Tunnel, Rec and all those films.

This is quite possibly the worst of the lot. After half an hour, I couldn't stomach the cheap "scare tactics" any longer, the music was silly, the actors weren't that good and this looked like a film that my kid sister would make. I'm not going to spoil anything, but the only thing going for it was possibly the plot. However, everything else was so bad that I started skipping through the movie after half an hour. All I can say is that I'm glad I did.

Boring.
30 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Underrated
hollytrinder20 January 2021
Found Footage style films are seemingly very marmite - if you can hack the mix of shooting styles i.e. 'news report', 'CCTV' etc then I would highly recommend giving this a go.

Personally I found the main lady a bit...over the top, but she doesn't feature too strongly so it's only a minor irk.

The film itself has a nice build, before reaching a successful climax. I liked the basic concept, and think it did well on a small budget.

Creepy with a little visual gore to heighten the experience.

An underrated horror with just enough reality to convince you going in the water might not be a good idea.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Shockingly bad and a complete waste of time
alistair1824 February 2013
IMDb really need to add an option for minus stars. I spent most of the movie thinking about how I wanted to describe how bad this movie is in my review! The basic description for this movie is definitely a lot more interesting than the actual movie itself. I couldn't help wondering where they got that from, as well as the idea that this movie is somehow classified as a horror. Sure there were a couple of rather disgusting scene's but hardly anything that would put this into the horror category. Perhaps they were referring the acting or basic lack of coherent story. When you are hoping the entire cast of the movie dies, you know there is definitely something wrong. An hour and 20 minutes of my life that I can never get back!
29 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Creepy and creepier for being plausible
stephen-brackin6 June 2013
I liked it. Most horror movies depend on something supernatural and implausible to get their chills, but this one makes only modest science-fiction leaps from real ecological problems facing Chesapeake Bay to something truly creepy. Sure, its innocents-at-risk central subplot is hokey, but what do you expect from a horror movie? (We all need someone to identify with.) I think its use of the found-footage technique, by which it pretends to be a documentary, increases both its plausibility and its scariness. I can't judge how well or how fairly it publicizes the ecological problems facing Chesapeake Bay, but it makes for a zinger of a horror movie.
54 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Excellent first act
PedroPires909 May 2021
This is good enough, creepy enough, with an interesting found footage format. However, I didn't feel that it developed a lot from the 30 minutes mark. It was great until there, predictable and repetitive after that.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Normal Bay Activity
kosmasp10 July 2013
For a movie that claims to be somehow similar to the Paranormal franchise this is pretty decent. While it still has the obvious flaws (convinience of the "found footage", sound enhancement for some of the horror/shock moments), it does convince with its "story". Plus while it may sound very strange and out there, this is actually more believable than haunting houses, because it actually dives into science (if you'll excuse the pun I'm using).

The acting is OK, the script isn't the best, but overall I liked that it underplayed the main theme, rather than being too on the nose. The effects were good too, characters not acting "rational" is something we almost grew accustomed to.
18 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good horror film about an environmental disaster.
allpavel2 August 2020
The Bay is a pseudo-documentary about the events taking place in the town of Claridge on the shores of Chesapeake Bay, where an epidemic occurred on July 4 - the mutated parasites Cymothoa exigua moved from fish to eating human flesh. Years after the tragedy, documentary filmmakers are trying to put together all available material about the terrible incident. The film's budget was $2 million. The filmmakers decided to show some originality within the genre and collected filming not only from a couple of cameras, but from many. Reporter's camera, police car camera, teenager's mobile phone, street surveillance, and others. At the same time, the hand of the master is felt - the director is Barry Levinson ("Rain Man"). The film turned out to be interesting and exciting. Everything is edited like a real documentary. The events are shown by footage of the journalists filming the report, and footages of the police, doctors, ordinary residents of the city. Despite the use of different camera techniques and different characters, you do not lose the essence of what is happening. On the contrary. All attention is drawn to the events on the screen. The cast also deserves praise. They play very naturally. There is simply no one to find fault with. There are no famous actors in the caste, but they are not needed either. The whole atmosphere of chaos, fear, and panic is conveyed wonderfully. Aside from the person on whose behalf the narration follows (Kether Donohue as Donna Thompson), there are no central characters. They are all just parts of the big picture. "The Bay" became a good horror film about an environmental disaster. One of the best representatives of the genre in 2012.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed