"Three Pines" The Cruellest Month - Part 2 (TV Episode 2022) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Terrific but so sad
keysam-026108 January 2023
I haven't read the books and apparently the residential school stuff is something of an addition?

Whatever, I had heard about these atrocities in the news, as the unofficial graveyards are slowly uncovered. Really, how anyone still gives the Catholic church any respect is beyond me. Anyway, hearing it as a news item is one thing, Seeing a dramatic representation of the things that went on and of the long lasting effects on those who are left behind is quite another. I wept.

Apart from the way it's occasionally tearing my heart out, this is a great series. I love Alfred Molina as the honest, empathetic and *not* screwed up chief detective and I really like his team too.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good, not Great
pcotnoir13 December 2022
Having read all the novels, and being from Quebec, a few things bug me that probably won't bug the typical viewer.

In the 4th episode for example, there's a giant Grizzly bear. There are no Grizzlies within a couple thousand kilometers of here or more. That's just lazy writing. And it's nowhere in the books. And the police have the people get out of their vehicle right by the bear. What? Just silly.

The whole residential school theme is almost completely alien to the books so that's a big surprise. Obviously they took a lot of liberties, which is fine. It's done pretty well, although it's not a very nuanced look at the real complexities of that whole mess.

I'd say the biggest triumph is they nailed Gamache - this is a really great portrayal of him that rings true to the novels. Beauvoir is good too.

The writing could be better, sadly. Tighter, etc. So.. 7/10 so far.
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
So good, until...
xbatgirl-300291 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I was really enjoying these two episodes, perhaps more so than the previous pair, until the very end which killed the mood. A real shame. In White Out, there was good bit time was devoted to necessary exposition. And the cast was a bit bigger. So The Cruelest Month was more streamlined and they could just focus on the two mysteries. As an aside, I still have no idea why this was called the cruelest month because that is April and this seemed to take place in September, maybe October.

I feel like I need to watch both stories again because I was a little confused if the abandoned building that had been the old residential school here, was also CeCe's house in White Out, which was also an old residential school. I thought CeCe's home was more in the town and this building was out in the woods and seems to have been abandoned for years. I feel like that info could have been made clearer.

By super strange coincidence, I had just rewatched an episode of Republic of Doyle the previous night which featured the actor who played Hayden. Spoiler - he was a criminal in that show as well. So the moment I saw him I said "well he's a con-man" (his role there). As the show went along and things didn't look good for Hayden, it made me smile more than anything. I didn't have a suspect after the first half myself, but as the second went along, I don't know if too many viewers will be too surprised when he is revealed.

I felt more emotionally connected to the side stories, especially when Bea's brother is found and they have the ceremony, which brought tears to my eyes. I'm also glad they toned Ruth down a bit this time and made her much more sympathetic, especially when the chick was buried. As for the investigation into Blue, I don't know if the police can be trusted with the evidence from the house, unfortunately.

But then I felt the ending with the bear was very poorly done. As another reviewer stated, there are no brown bears in Quebec. If they had made it a black bear, the ending would not have been so completely mental. I know they were likely continuing the magical realism used in White Out, so maybe you can fan-wank that is the reason it's a brown bear out of nowhere.

It was completely insane to force Hayden and Sophie to get out of the car with the bear standing there. If I was in the car, I would tell the police to just shoot me rather than get out and risk getting eaten. Those things are crazy fast and fearless. It's a long story but I was in a car in Alberta when we came very close to a mama bear and her 3 cubs and, man, it was fast and scary. Maybe if the director had included more of a look of communication between Gamache and the bear so we would know this was magic and they were safe?

I suppose we are the think this magical bear was connected to the Native people so it was stopping Hayden's escape? This to me hints that the filmmakers consider the First Nation people to be exotic and magical, which was a trope used by white Hollywood in decades past relating to many POC and is now considered really bad taste. The whole scene was unnecessary and poorly done. Because it was right at the end, the mood was impossible to be repaired. I will still keep watching the show, but now it is 0-2 for strange writing choices and I'm getting worried. Is there magical realism in the books?
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Well Done Murder Mystery
Hitchcoc12 December 2022
Gamache faces problems gathering evidence. He is still establishing himself in Three Pines. Also his ignorance of the past makes him a stranger. As the investigation of the young man killed and put in a hole in the floor of the institution. We are introduced to a girl with vision problems whose father is overprotective. We find out about three boys who disappeared and were assumed drowned. It is discovered that a janitor at the old school was a horrifying figure who had carte blanche to do what he needed to keep the kids in line. Some of the townspeople were in that school, which was more like a prison. I hope this series continues because so many of the people have their individual stories. One of the highlights of this one is a scene with Ruth Zardo and Armand Gamache, involving a baby duck, and a poem she wrote about life and death.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A bear, really???
LoweCo-AK23 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I'm really enjoying this series and rate the first three episodes in the strong 7-8 range. Which is why I still can't believe what I just watched in episode four...a chase scene abruptly ended by a big fat grizzly bear just standing in the road! Good grief! The bear was so fat it was almost comical, and yet characters, safely ensconced in their car, were cringing in fear! By that point I was laughing, but at the same time I was incredulous at the ridiculousness of the scene, especially following the truly good quality of the show up to that point. I could go on, there are more incredulous moments in the bear scene, but you get the idea. The scene came off as totally contrived and was not up to the standard of quality of the show. This episode was a solid eight before the bear, but the bear scene dropped it to a three for me because it was that bad.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Seriously, a grizzly bear in Quebec?
frednorman-137271 January 2023
I've enjoyed the series so far I love Alfred Molina and I read a number of Louise Penny's books and I've even been to her town of Knowlton , Quebec, when we visited eastern Canada from California last year. So these two episodes were very good until the very ending when lo and behold, a fat, overfed grizzly bear appeared on the road and blocked escape car. That is the lamest ending. I have ever seen it reminds me of those terrible TV detective series in the 1970's like Mannix or Columbo. And there are no grizzly bears in Quebec only black bears. But that's not the point it would be like watching "the sound of music" and non th last scene a bear chases the Von Trapp family. Or in "South Pacific", a suddenly appears on the scene. Having a beer appear in the middle. The road is so smalzy, it had no relationship to anything why the Director chose this is beyond my imagination.. hey earlier in the program there was a raccoon and I guess the Director chose an animal trainer for the beer decided to throw the raccoon in for free. So please, Director no more bear stunts!
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ridiculous Ending
lewis-514 May 2024
I like the books by Louis Penny so was drawn to give the series a try. Alfred Molina is good as Inspector Gamache. His three assistants are a pretty good representation of the corresponding characters in the books.

As for the plot of these two episodes (3 and 4), they are not like anything I've read in the books. Maybe it happens in later books, but I have seen nothing about indigenous people. Ruth does not have a duck.

I was moved to write this review because of the utterly ridiculous ending. I don't want to give away any spoilers, but a grizzly bear appears in a very unnatural way. Are the writers trying to be deeply symbolic? It doesn't work. It's just silly.

What a shame they couldn't end it realistically.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed