Long Street (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
A different film
youmike31 July 2011
To watch this film, you have to be prepared for a very unconventional way of story-telling. For the first half of the film, the characters seem unconnected, but persevere and you will be rewarded. It's a portrait of a family that's completely at odds with my own experience, but I can empathize with it and be very glad that I have not had experiences like these. As Sia, Sanni Fox is enigmatic, as anyone with her personal travails would be. Her parents, played by David Butler and Roberta Fox, made me feel both sorry for them and angry because they did so little to change their lives.

I lived and worked in Cape Town for over twenty years and the photography brought memories of the beauty of the city. Not only the sweeping panoramas of the mountain, but also shots of urban landscape.

Film-making in South Africa has not reached the heights of what we see from Australia & New Zealand. here's one film that allows us to hope that this may change.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Plodding, boring, ugly and nothing like Cape Town
fustbariclation28 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Oh, dear, what a dreadfully bad film!

Bad plot, bad dialogue, bad acting, bad cinematography (it makes Cape Town look ugly), bad direction (it's slow and boring).

As an amateur effort at film school it should score a resounding fail.

Cape Town is a beautiful place, like anywhere, ugly things happen. There's no need for a film to be so utterly bleak when it's only a pedestrian story.

It isn't its main failing, but the film tries hard to be politically correct - it shows orphan children in the street, for example, but they're incidental to the plot, they're just there to show the film is trying to be 'worthy'. They're less than cardboard cutouts, they're poster victims. Horrible. Just taking advantage of misery to make the films pretend moral position - a ghastly exploitation.

On the good side, the main character can sing. She can't act, but that didn't stop them. The music is OK, but it reveals the ugliness and emptiness of the film, rather than making it.

It's so dreadfully slow, pretentious and portentous, aiming to carry some meaning in tediously long, badly-lit mundane scenes.

On the bright side, since Cape Town is sometimes too full of visitors, anybody who saw this film would keep well away from the place!

If it were filmed in 1930, in Black and White, with no sound, it'd pass as just a bad film. Produced now it is truly awful.

Avoid this at all costs - unless you're a student of why films are bad - it's a great example of utter dreadfulness.

On a simple note. The reason people take drugs is because they give them a good feeling. That's it. The realisation of how awful they are comes later. It's utter nonsense to claim people take drugs simply because they 'don't have a good self image', or similar tosh.

Middle-class white South Africans shouldn't make films unless they can get away from their guilt about being middle-class South Africans. Get over it, chaps! You're as responsible as a street kid for your background - all that's interesting is what you do with yourself as a human being.

This film tells you absolutely nothing about being a human being from anywhere. It could have been made by a blind an feeble martian with no aesthetic sense.

Apart from that, it isn't that bad.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed