Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead (Video 2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
132 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Aptly Titled Mess
wirrrn19 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I loved the original WRONG TURN and thought the sequel WRONG TURN 2:DEAD END was even better. However, WRONG TURN 3: LEFT FOR DEAD is not very good at all.

*Characters that you think are going to be vital (Three Toe, the Latino cop pretending to be a convict, the female deputy) are literally discarded a scene or two after they're introduced.

*There's only one cannibal killer (Three Finger) in the whole movie AND he seems to have suddenly developed the ability to teleport around the (strangely bright!) night-time woods at will.

*Two survivors go completely against their established characters for a gratuitously mean and grim-ended coda.

*The acting is pretty bad. Several British actors play American characters, and drop their accents in the middle of scenes Janet Montgomery plays basically the same character she played in the (far superior) HILLS RUN RED- her character exists solely to scream, cry, look like Selma Hayek and be placed in peril to get rescued by the hero.

The gore is far too reliant on CGI- the amateurish, obvious computer effects completely ruin the kills; it's also painfully obvious that characters "driving" are being subject to some woeful rear-projection CGI as well.

Poor writing, poor execution (and poor executions!) and woeful, overly digital gore. The sole high point in the film is Tom Frederic, who is the only good actor in the picture and manages to turn in a good, likable performance with a convincing accent.

If there is a WRONG TURN 4, I suggest bringing back Joe Lynch. At least he knows what he's doing...
30 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead (2009)
SnakesOnAnAfricanPlain13 September 2012
Well they did the teenage/young adults, they did a reality spin, now Wrong Turn takes on some prisoners. This is good, as we have no reason to give a damn about those up for the killing. It removes any need for character development, not usually a plus but we all know why we came to this film. It's a shame they've reduced the mutated hillbilly family to pretty much just one guy. There's needless gore, repetitive chase sequences and a bizarre car scene which is a mix of very bad greenscreen and location work. It was confusing. The ending really ticked me off though, the ultimate in tacked on, thoughtless, middle finger up to the audience endings. Even for something this cheap and quick, they could have at least respected the characters a tiny bit.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Some may leave for dead.
michaelRokeefe10 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This franchise continues leaving a lot to be desired. So much room for potential never taken. Some special effects were clever, but most ho-hum. A group of friends rafting rapids and survivors of a crashed bus load of convicts fight for their lives in the deep back woods of West Virginia. A family of hideously deformed cannibals led by their inbred leader known as Three-Finger(Boris Illiev)stalk the group of lost travelers in the woods. Very easy to tell this film is budget challenged. The story does get a bit gory, but mostly is very predictable. My favorite scene is of a victim being sliced in thirds...head to crotch.

Cast members include: Tom Frederic, Janet Montgomery, Tamer Hassan, Emma Clifford and Gil Kolrin.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Insulting
re-12313 November 2009
As a fan of the first two 'Wrong Turn' films, I was expecting this to be a good but not great film with enough gore/horror/comedy to keep me entertained for 90 minutes. How wrong I was. The plot consists of this; four college kids are out rafting in the Bluefish River area, however their fun is abruptly ended when they are attacked by the mutant cannibal hillbilly Three Finger (Borislav Iliev). Only the teenager Alex (Janet Montgomery) succeeds in escaping running through the woods. Meanwhile, a group of dangerous criminals are transported from the West Virginia Grafton Penitentiary in a custody bus escorted by three security guards through the backwoods. Predictably the bus is attacked by Three Finger, causing the bus to crash in the woods and the struggle for power and survival begins.

Initially, I thought the plot was fairly well thought out and had the potential to work quite well. However, it doesn't work and these are the reasons why; the terrible casting, the laughable special effects and the dire script. I understand that this was a low budget horror movie but it could have been done so much better. The casting of British actors in American parts didn't help the film either with most of the casts accents slipping constantly, Tamer Hassan is particularly bad in his role and often reveals his strong London accent.

The special effects are beyond cheap and they look like something from the 70s or 80s. But undoubtedly the worst element of this movie is the script which could have been written by a couple of teenagers, the guards and cops have clichéd dialogue and the other actors have such a poor script to work with you almost begin to feel sorry for them.

Overall this movie is very poor and most importantly not scary in the slightest. In the end I found it a little insulting to the 'Wrong Turn' franchise.

I give it 2/10 and I think that may be slightly generous.
64 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Now I know why it went straight to DVD
jameszxcvbn15 October 2009
I am huge fan of Wrong turn series, wrong turn 1 and 2 were pure original gore until this crappy sequel showed

Wrong turn 3, I wasn't even aware of this film until preview teaser came out, and not for cinema, for DVD. I wondered why would such film go straight to DVD. So I watched this film, and it was the worst piece of crap I have ever seen. When I watched the preview I knew it was going to be bad anyway so I guess I was expecting it.

Actors, scenes, settings, effects were all so terribly made. I found no actors useful, maybe the girl and the police but they weren't so good either. And the prisoners, they made me laugh, especially the scene where the prisoner and the hillbilly fights, that scene frustrated me and I wanted to smash my TV go in to the movie and kill the hillbilly myself. What's up with the voice of that prisoner, I could barely understand him and he came to the point where I found really annoying.

The effects were so horrible that it was standard "home-made adobe effect". An amateur could make this effects using After effects. Such as when the guy gets slashed by the trap in the beginning scene, and he slices off, the effects were totally CGI. It's only real when they cut the camera shot and suddenly it's all real. The movie Cube had a better slicing scene in the intro and it is very old, well older than this

What I really want to point out is, do not buy this or rent this, it is waste of valuable money. I'd rather spend it on a charity. When you walk into the video store and see this movie on the shelf, say to yourself, "o look it's another crappy movie made by idiots". If you want to watch this, download it, like I did, it's only worth downloading.
74 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wrong Turn for the Series
Michael_Elliott9 April 2015
Wrong Turn 3 (2009)

* (out of 4)

Downright horrid third entry in the series has a bus full of convicts and police taking a shortcut through the West Virginia mountains when they're ran off the road. The cons take control of the situation and they head off in the woods but it doesn't take long before a mutant redneck shows up to take them out.

WRONG TURN 3 is a direct-to-video release that is without question one of the worst horror films that you're going to see from this era and there's no doubt that it's a major step down from the previous two installments. If you ever want to show someone what a cheap, wannabe attempt to rip off fans is then this here would be the perfect example. Not only are we given an incredibly stupid plot full of annoying, worthless characters but we're also given some of the cheapest looking special effects that you'll ever see. Whereas the first WRONG TURN went for suspense and the second went for over-the-top gore, this one here is just an awful attempt at making money.

There are countless problems with this thing but we'll start with the CGI effects. To say they're awful would be putting it too kindly because these things are among the worst you're ever going to see. Yes, there's a lot of violence and gore here but none of it is effective because of how fake it looks. Just take a look at the scene where one man is split into three pieces. The CGI effect makes it look like jello has been sliced because when the man is sliced he just perfectly falls onto the ground in these pieces and not even the blood or guts inside of him come falling out. Even worse is a scene towards the start where someone takes an incredibly fake look arrow through the eye.

The characters are another major problem because you've really got no one to cheer for. The convicts are all people you hate and you want to see them finished off but before you get to that you've got to endure God-awful fighting and bickering. The good guys here are all rather boring, bland and you just don't care what happens to them. Even the mutant here is boring and whereas they're were brought to life in the first two, here they're just a cheap killing machine that adds nothing to the picture. Even the performances are pretty much forgettable as is everything else in this mess of a film.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Turned off
lazyaceuk4 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Having seen the first two in the series I though I'd chance on Wrong Turn 3 when it was shown on a cable station recently. Oh well, you win some you lose some.

I knew that Wrong Turn 3 had been made for video so did not have any great expectations but it was quite clear that the producers had no real link with their predecessors in the franchise. The first Wrong Turns gave as much screen time to the mutants as the main characters and certainly Wrong Turn 2 gave some development as to why and how the mutants came to be, even though this was also a straight to video offering. Also the first two films were story driven with the first being an old fashion 'teens get lost' premise whereas the second was a satire on the reality survivor shows which seem to fill the schedules these days. It was clearly a cheaper affair but the writers clearly had some nouse and added lightness to the script that Wrong Turn 3 misses completely.

It was no surprise to find that, according to IMDb, Connor James Delaney has not had his name attached to any other production since he got a pay cheque for this effort. If he got paid by the expletive he did quite well out of the deal. If he got paid for a coherent story then he is probably still paying backing the producers for breach of contract.

Wrong Turn 3 quite clearly does not have the budget of its predecessors and this probably explains why the majority of the story takes place at night to hide the limited production values. The cast is the regular mix of B-movie unknowns with my interest only piqued by an early US role for Janet Montgomery whose American accent holds up better than the rest of the UK based cast whose accent drift around the world as they deliver mono syllabic lines interspersed with tiresome fight scenes, all the better for the fact that their white t-shirts are splattered with red 'blood' as they have been fighting with a meat grinder.

And the story, for what it is, involves a group of inmates who are being transferred to another penitentiary early to prevent a planned break out. On their way they get knocked off the road by our friendly mutants and the rest is the standard run of the mill 'which one do you think will make it to the end' storyline. The writer and director add to the overall boredom by creating tension between the lead inmate Chavez (Tamer Hassan) and his nemesis Floyd (Gil Kolirin). The end result is that there is no tension. It is the constant third rate banter between these two as others around them die in fairly average fashion that makes this film very boring indeed. It is like watching two old blokes arguing over a wet paper bag.

Declan O'Brien clearly has an agenda to fill in his role as director, and I see as writer of Wrong Turns 4 and 5, but this agenda does not include engaging with the audience.

This is poor fare and if you have to waste 90 minutes of your time there are better ways to do so.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It Was Defenitley A "Wrong" Turn
magic-tone12 November 2009
Wrong Turn 3 Dead End, is nowhere near the level of goodness between Wrong Turn and Wrong Turn 2 Dead End. This film just destroyed the trilogy! Not it's just a twin. Wrong Turn 3 is nothing like the other Wrong Turns.

The negative points of Wrong Turn 3- It was boring, bad cast, stupid graphic of violence when people died and it was certainly TERRIBLY ACTED. Look at the guy who was screaming at the beginning of the film. THAT-WAS-TERRIBLE! The whole movie was just based on the people in the woods. They were just talking! This is the cycle of the movie: Kill, talk, fight, kill, talk, fight...

And the positive points of Wrong Turn 3- THERE ARE NONE!!!!

Terrible, stupid, bad graphic, overdone, three-finger Isn't three-finger, lack of plot, terrible tag line.

1.5/10
31 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
What A Shame
sarahmillyhannah7 April 2010
I am a big fan of the wrong turn series, especially the first one, i have only seen the second one once. But this film, oh what a shame, it does let the series down. The main problem with it is the acting and the dialogue. The story itself or the idea for the story isn't bad at all, but why choose such cheesy actors delivering such cheesy lines. The main lead copper isn't too bad, the female lead is okay, but the rest of them, oh where to start. There isn't enough hillbillies in it either, 2 or 3 of them at a count when there is meant to be a family of them according to the original wrong turn series. They seem to try and take this story back to the original woods too but somehow it just doesn't work, it doesn't have the same feel, maybe because this was set a night and the original was in the day. The special effects, gore and CGI leaves much to be desired too, its so cheesy its not stomach churning, more comical. But its not the worse I have seen/watched this year and I kind of did like the ending too. The worse of the year for me still goes to Cabin Fever 2.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Meh... Nothing special
Michael-d-duncan13 October 2009
By the third movie, the audience has figured out the general plot.... Someone takes a WRONG TURN, and ends up cannibal fodder.

The acting is wooden, the gore is mediocre and way over the top ( a really bad combo...). The plot and subplots are both very predictable, and the ending was convoluted and left no real closure.

It really feels like a made for TV movie, that has been rewritten for the STV crowd. I barely paid attention and even so never got lost, nor felt as if I was missing our for not giving it more concern.

All and all, if someone else foots the bill, it is watchable but I would not recommend you spend hard earned cash on it.
25 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What You Don't See Will Kill You - KILL ME !
dasanirudh20 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Wrong Turn 1 made history (at least in my books), Wrong Turn 2 bettered it in many ways thereby raising expectations, According to me, Wrong Turn 2 ranked up with the best horror movies of all time.

"Wrong Turn 3 - a blunder in all departments of movie making."

What were the producers, script-writers and especially the directors thinking or were they even thinking.

Pros - 8 out of 10 kills were nicely done. Intensely graphical but hey thats wrong turn (movie) for you.

Cons - (Rated on Mistake Intensity - Minimal, OK, Bad, Worst) 1. Topless show kinda cute but unnecessary for the scene.(Mistake Intensity - Minimal)

2. Just the 2 hill billies. (Mistake Intensity - Bad)

3. Actors acting except for Janet Montgomery. (Mistake Intensity - Worst). Question #1, can these actors act ???

4. Kills looked unreal. (Mistake Intensity - WORST) Sophie's kill was nice but not of her BFs.

DO YOU GUYS NEED A SPECIAL EFFECT SPECIALIST?

5.In one of the scenes, Alex is punched by Chavez, she falls and when Nate tries to get her back up on her feet, from nowhere she just stands tall, like nothing happened, YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME!

5. According to a few comments on this movie, Tamer Hasan can be idolized. Dude, he seriously lacks acting skills - at least in this movie. No facial expressions, every time he sees the hill billy, he raises his hands as if he wants to fly. Gosh! Does he know how to hold a shotgun?

6. NO STORY.

**Things that could have been considered on the drawing table -

1. Start the 3rd movie from where the 2nd one ended.

2. CARS USED - Wrong Turn 2 had a convertible Mustang whereas Wrong Turn 3 has a Chevy Prison bus which looks old (90's stuff). County sheriff's using 80's police SUV. Gimme a break. POINT IS, use stuff belonging to the year the movie is made in.

3. JUNGLE - Wrong Turn 1 had a pretty awesome jungle area. Wrong Turn 2 made me feel like the next trip to US should be to that jungle. Wrong Turn 3 made me laugh, is that what u call a forest. (sarcasm intended)

4. MOVIE QUALITY - WT2 looked "REAL". WT3 looks STUDIO MADE.

5. ACTING - Are cops that friendly to inmates, or were the actors just showcasing over professionalism. Guys watch "The Longest Yard" to know how a cop should behave, at least with top priority inmates.

I can go on and on and on...

BOTTOMLINE - GOD SAVE US FROM SUCH DRASTIC MOVIES (+ MOVIE MAKERS).
17 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Way underrated
johnjanis7 November 2019
4.6? It's way better than that. I'd put it on par with the second one. Possibly even better. It might even be even more gorier too. Considering it's low rating on here it's probably one of the most underrated horrors of the last ten years in my opinion and my second favourite in the whole Wrong Turn franchise.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mindless, but still kind of fun
Woodyanders25 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Several campers and a group of escaped convicts both run afoul of a vicious hillbilly cannibal mutant (Borislav Iliev in funky grotesque make-up) in the deep West Virginia backwoods.

Director Declan O'Brien relates the enjoyably dopey story at a brisk pace, makes nice use of the beautiful sylvan locations, delivers oodles of savage violence and outrageously in-your-face graphic gore, and even sprinkles in some tasty gratuitous female nudity for trashy good measure. Moreover, it's decently acted by the competent cast: Tom Frederic as eager prison guard Nate, Janet Montgomery as the spunky Alex, Tamer Hassan as the ruthless Chavez, Gil Kolirin as the brutish Floyd, Jake Curran as wormy car thief Crawford, Christian Contreras as undercover cop Willy, and Charles Venn as the easygoing Walter. However, this film does suffer from some painfully cruddy CGI effects, terrible tin-eared dialogue, a by-the-numbers predictable narrative, and a crippling dearth of tension. That said, this flick overall still passes muster as a fair amount of perfectly nasty'n'gruesome entertainment.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Hard to Say
iansmom9914 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This third sequel of the Wrong Turn Series does have a lot of flaws. A group of convicts and a police officer are trapped in the backwoods of West Virgina hunted by a family of cannibalistic hillbillies. First I have seen a lot reviews saying this sequel sucks. I somewhat disagree because I actually enjoyed this movie. I thought it was better than the second and I'm not lying. Most of the deaths were low budget CGI effects, but I thought they worked okay. The constant profanity did tick me off a bit. The forest setting looked believable. The acting however is a huge concern. The only three actors who gave a good performance were Tamer Hassan as "Chavez", Tom Fredric as "Nate", and Gil Kolirin as "Floyd". The rest couldn't act for sh*t. Nonetheless I did enjoy this movie. It deserves a chance to be viewed.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The worst one yet
paulsrgraham16 October 2009
After the first two movies which were 5 or 6/10 this one was a real let down. The acting is poor and the story is poor. It would have helped to have more deformed bad guys rather than just one throughout the whole film. As there are families of baddies in the woods I though the film would have progressed from the second film and developed more of a story into the third film but this doesn't happen. The gore is what you expect with a couple of tasty deaths but the acting really is bad and let's the film down badly.You can see why this was a straight to DVD movie..hopefully they don't try and make a 4th one unless a good budget is used. You can see when the actors are in the bus that the road ahead is cheaply added into the film to save money...Don't bother with this film 3/10.
31 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This movie took a wrong turn downhill...
paul_haakonsen21 October 2012
"Wrong Turn" was a great movie, the first one that is, then it started to go somewhat downhill in part 2, and now having seen part 3, I must say I am at a loss here. Why is the series on a downward slope and not able to pull up?

The story in "Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead" is not really bad as such, but it is the lack of excitement and thrills that makes it less than mediocre. And also that there is basically only one of these misshapen mountain folk running around. Sure, you see a boy as well and another towards the end, but throughout the entire movie it is just a single one doing all the killing. And he looks comical and goofy, so it is very hard to take him serious as a murdering mad man.

There is an okay amount of mutilation, blood and gore in this third movie, and that is one of the better things about it. And another thing that made it bearable to sit through was that the people they had cast for the various roles were actually doing good jobs with their given characters. (Just hard to take the mountain man serious as he looked like a spoof character!)

There isn't really any great plot twists or surprises to the movie, and it plows forward at a fairly good pace. The only surprise twist there was in the movie, was the end scene. I enjoyed it, and think it was actually a nice touch to the movie. But all throughout the movie I sat and hoped for the movie to pick up and shift into a higher gear.

And there were some pretty funny errors and goofs in the movie. For starters, Chavez must have incredible arm strength to be able to hold a shotgun out in stretched arm and fire it without any recoil. That was hilarious, even worse than Rambo and his guns. The other thing I noticed was when they cut off the legs to remove the dead person from the chain, it must have been some amazingly sharp blade on that knife as it cut through meat and muscle like butter, and it cut through bone apparently without even slowing down - or perhaps that convict didn't have any shin bones? It was just awful.

I am sure that newcomers to the "Wrong Turn" series, will find it enjoyable, but if you are a seasoned and weathered gore hound, then you will find "Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead" to be nothing particularly interesting and to be a fairly mediocre movie at best. I have seen "Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead" twice now since it came out in 2009, and can't say that it has gotten any better since.

Despite this, then I will still give parts 4 and 5 a go as well, just to have seen it all.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Never Trust a Con
claudio_carvalho30 October 2009
While rafting in the Bluefish River area, four college kids are attacked by the mutant cannibal hillbilly Three Finger (Borislav Iliev). Only the teenager Alex (Janet Montgomery) succeeds in escaping running through the woods. Meanwhile, a group of dangerous criminals are transported from the West Virginia Grafton Penitentiary in a custody bus escorted by three security guards through the backwoods. When they park in a rest stop in a police station, Sheriff Carver (Bill Moody) is informed about the missing teenagers. The bus driver heads to their destination with the guards and the prisoners but a tow truck driven by Three Finger hits the bus that falls off the road. They are attacked by Three Finger and the perilous Carlo Chavez (Tamer Hassan) dominates the guards and the other prisoners. When they accidentally meet Alex, the girl tells how sick and threatening Three Finger is; sooner the survivals discover that Alex is telling the truth.

"Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead" is a poor sequel of this good franchise; actually is a terrible collection of clichés. The story is totally predictable; most of the characters are unlikable and maybe only Alex and Nate are charismatic; the "Freddy Krueger face" Three Finger is absurdly indestructible and without any credibility; the awful conclusion is a trigger for a possible sequel. The beautiful Janet Montgomery resembles Linda Fiorentino when she was young. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "Pânico na Floresta 3" ("Panic in the Forest 3")
21 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste of celluloid...
Ripley86JC14 October 2009
This is my first review on IMDb, so bear with me, and let my first review be on this piece of garbage, straight to DVD, 3rd installment of the Wrong Turn saga...but I feel it my obligation to warn you, don't waste any money or time on it....whoever made this, obviously didn't! I enjoyed the first Wrong Turn, not the best in the genre, but a fun movie to watch (loved Eliza Dushku is this one). Especially after WT 2, I should have know better...this was going to disappoint. And it did more than that, I wouldn't even pick it up at the store if they were giving it out for free. Other than to burn it and make sure nobody else ever gets to see it.

Ah well, I know, especially in horrorland, sequels, good sequels are a rare find, as in any genre btw, but some are enjoyable to watch because they have something of the original in it, be it characters, plot, script.

WT 3 has none. I didn't even care when any of the characters met they're untimely and gruesome death. The script probably written on a post-it, the acting sometimes painful, overall pretty bad, and the special effects, well, not good enough to save this mess.

So, if you have never seen WT, watch the first one, never mind the rest, take my word on it 1/10
29 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wrong Turn 3: Left For Dead
gwmcr28 January 2010
By all means the first Wrong Turn, was entertaining and original. Wrong Turn 2 was slightly original... both with great acting... Yet Wrong Turn 3: Left For Dead is a boring, corny and basically spoils how good the rest of the movies were. The movie is basically set in the woods with badly acted prisoners, two prison officers and a young woman who are fighting for their lives from a deformed in-breded mutant who seems whatever you do will never die, and a younger in-breded mutant.. It is basically an extremely badly acted 'horror' film which if you enjoyed the great entertainment from the previous movies, do not by all means spear yourself to watch this.

1/10.
18 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Just Shoot Him Already!
chicagopoetry25 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I suppose as sequels to sequels to straight to video horror movies go this isn't the worst of the lot. The writing, especially the dialog is horrible, and I might add completely racist. This is one of those movies during which you can't help screaming at the screen: "Just shoot him already!" The victims have about a dozen chances to shoot the bad guy but of course they don't do it. Nothing makes any sense, every decision the characters make is completely absurd, and the acting is so bad it nearly reaches the point of funny. But what makes up for it is some pretty gory special effects, including: top of head cut off so that we see brain, plenty of impalings through mouth and out various body parts, arrow through the boob, man wrapped in razor wire being dragged to death by a tow truck, body sliced from head to foot in three pieces, and face completely chopped off. You don't watch a movie called Wrong Turn 3 Left For Dead to see the Oscar winning performances; you watch it to see the gore, and on that level this one certainly does deliver. Too bad the inbred three toed cannibal creature looks like a guy wearing a Halloween mask.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Silly but still good.
Boba_Fett11385 September 2010
This movie made me realize all the more how incredibly generic and below average the first movie out of the series actually was. At least the sequels showed some creativity and tried out some new stuff.

This is still definitely a movie though that had far more potential in it and the end result is therefore also far from anything real satisfying. Nevertheless within its genre there is basically very little wrong with this movie. It's still a good watch, that offers some nice stuff for the fans of it to enjoy.

Basically all of the movie its wasted potential is in its concept of having a bunch of tough convicts, who escaped, set in the woods against the cannibal-incest-mutant-freaks. It sounds real awesome and the movie could had really been like a "Predator" type of horror-action cross-over but the movie really does far too little with this concept. Of course this is also partly due the to movie its fairly low budget, this movie being a straight to video sequel and all but that doesn't make it less disappointing as a viewer though. Seriously, they couldn't have come up with some better stuff for this movie with such a potentially great and awesome sounding concept? The story now instead makes some odd and wrong choices.

The movie could had really used some more excitement and now all of the excitement basically only comes from its killings, that are being quite creative though at times. It makes this movie nice to watch for the genre lovers but it basically does very little for the movie its actual tension, horror and originality. To be honest, the movie is now more often being a bit silly and clumsy than anything spectacular or exciting. But overall this doesn't ruin to movie its overall watch-ability.

What could had also made the movie a tad bit better was if it had some characters in it that we could actual care about or at least get to know something about. All of the characters are really flat and stereotypical and it really should had focused a bit more on its main character and 'hero'.

But oh well, within its genre this certainly is not a bad one. There are obviously far worse movies you can waste your time on and with this movie you will almost certainly still have some fun as well.

6/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This series takes a really bad wrong turn
atinder3 November 2009
Start of really well, With some teens hanging out in the woods, with some nudity at the start, the kills start there and then as they are killed by the cannibals , Alex see this, she heads back into the woods, while her friends are getting killed.

At this point, I did like the move but then it takes a really bad Wrong Turn.

Now we see a bus load of criminals who are being moved from one West Virginia prison to another.

Which takes a shortcut through the woods. While there in woods there bus is attacked and then Crashes.

Nate the cop, get all the criminals out of the Bus, before it blows up and then Latino take leads of the group and soon find out something else in the woods.

They go into the woods and Nate is attacked by Alex the Girl and then Nate calms her down but then Latino the criminal, dose not let her go.

There are way too many fights scenes going on this, it silly. There are some good deaths scenes, which I really liked but they somehow end up messing up one of the death scenes , which was so badly done.

Also these cannibals are not scary at all,I actually felt sorry for one ofthe Cannibal.

The acting from the whole cast was not that good at all , it was a least watchable.

3/10
20 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not so bad as I expected!
madpredator3 November 2012
After reading previous negative reviews I still decided to give it a try. And I have to admit that I do not regret! Maybe it was not the most original piece but it was still entertaining enough from the beginning until the end. There was not too much talking (which is good for this type of movies), plot is simple but contains enough action. In my opinion it was not as good as the first movie, but it was much better than the second one. I do not like those "teenagers in trouble" type of horror movies (too many of those). Acting was not brilliant but it was decent enough for the prisoners. And I liked this money sharing part. Only those cops were not believable. In overall the movie was quite enjoyable!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Following in the footsteps of the second movie, but without comedy...
markovd1111 August 2022
"Wrong Turn 3: Left for Dead" is, same as the second movie in the franchise, a movie for slasher horror movie fans. It pits a group of escaped convicts against one of the cannibal killers from the first two movies during one long and creepy night in the woods. There is less nudity than in the previous movies, but gore is here as always. It's an entertaining watch for the genre fans and the chemistry between all the convicts, while not not something that was never done before, is interesting enough to make you interested in what will happen next. Sure, there are a lot of stupid and illogical things in the movie and some effects are also bad, but if you can get over that, there is some fun to be had here. All in all, for the genre and series fans, I recommend this movie, but to casuals I don't. 6/10!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hillbillies should not be allowed to write autobiographies
jc-wright8625 October 2009
I never really cared for the first Wrong Turn, but in breaking the old horror cliché I actually found the sequel to be quite enjoyable; more victims, more freaks, good fun. This film however has taken all the good work in Wrong Turn 2 to make the film into a series akin to a mixture between Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Friday the 13th, what with mental Hillbillies cutting down a group of horny teens, and flushed it down the toilet.

We are seemingly transported back to the original family, where only the annoying laughing hick-mutant is left and he inexplicably has a plot-device son. Throw in some escapee prisoners, guards and a little eye candy for taste and you have the recipe for another badly scripted throw away movie that will no doubt be in pound shops by Christmas.

There honestly is not much point in watching this movie. Nothing exciting or amusing happens and the dialogue is bad but not cheesy so it's not even that satisfying to laugh at. You will just end up disappointed and a little closer to death. Avoid!
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed