Ghost Bird (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Nor Really About a Bird
TanakaK27 July 2011
Contrary to earlier comments the subject of this documentary is -not really- a rare woodpecker. The bird is merely the conduit for a documentary about much stranger animals: people. It's about how a Mayberry-like community in the deep American South dealt with a brief spotlight of fame when the bird is spotted in its vicinity. It's about excited ornithologists and amateur bird-watchers. It's about the media hungry for feel-good stories amidst a swamp of feel-bad daily news.

Yes, if you're a bird watcher you'll certainly enjoy this doc. But if you could not care less about birds you'll nevertheless be entertained by the portrayal of people's reactions to this spotting, as it's just barely this side of being a bit snarky.

One technical criticism: the audio design is rather poor. For example, the stints of background music become unnerving because they often overwhelms the dialog and is often just distractive noise. Very annoying. But for the poor audio design I would have given this a 7.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Little hope for this awesome creature
bbsalamander10 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I heard about this movie from MonsterTalk podcast, a great podcast about all types of unexplained stuff. When I finally got around to watching this great documentary I could not take my eyes off it and was really hoping they would find the elusive "Ghost Bird" (Ivory Billed Woodpecker), knowing that even if they did find a few that there was little hope for this awesome creature. Do see this movie as it shows how the world holds hope for such an unlikely miracle as an extinct bird to come back from the dead and all the things that go along with that. Let us get our priorities in order and not spend all our time chasing unicorns and take some of that energy and save the creatures that truly might be saved. If you love nature or are any sort of out doors person see this movie.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
This Documentary Exposes a Great Scientific Debacle
chas4379 September 2012
This superb documentary exposes one of the most egregious cases of "faith based scientific fraud" in recent times. This fraud was perpetrated by the most prestigious Ornithological institution in the US no less, the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.

The manner in which the Lunard video was handled by a team of "researchers" from Cornell is scandalous. This video should have been vetted by all the top field ornithologists in America, before it was published in Science Magazine as definitive proof that Ivory-billed Woodpeckers still persist. Several top "birders", most notably David Sibley, exposed the amateurish mistake almost immediately. But by this point it was too late, the Ivory-bill frenzy was in full swing.

Without going into the details, which are well chronicled in the documentary, Cornell has refused any comment on the situation, hiding behind the weak argument that "it can't be proved that Ivory-billeds are extinct", and hoping that the passage of time will cause this incident to blow over. Meanwhile, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, who originally bought this crock hook, line and sinker, have backed off the Ivory-billed Recovery Plan, stating that "conditions for recovery are inadequate", instead of admitting that the bird is extinct.

For the record, the American Birding Association voted 7-0, not to accept any recent reports of Ivory-billed Woodpeckers. The Florida Rare Bird Committee did the same. This scandal should have shaken the Cornell Lab of Ornithology to its core, but it appears they have been successful at diverting blame, while remaining tight lipped about the entire episode.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed