Legend of the Seeker (TV Series 2008–2010) Poster

(2008–2010)

User Reviews

Review this title
348 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Exactly what Terry said it would be... and I'm glad.
MidnightWraith10 December 2008
I bought Wizard's First Rule the day it was released in 1994, simply because of the great cover art and my love for new, good fantasy books. What I got was my favorite fantasy series of all time, including Tolkien and Jordan. I am a published author myself, as well as having a profile on this website. I am an avid reader of classic literature since 1975, especially fantasy. So, written above, is my claim to believability.

This series is terrific. The camera work and ambiance is smooth and satisfying for the fantasy genre of swordplay, magic and high adventure on an epic scale. The story is changed a bit, especially the time line, but that is expected to keep it exciting and suspenseful for a TV audience, which it is. Can you imagine tuning into a show about a book you've never heard of and watching a woods guide walking around the forest for 2 hours? Of course not. It amazes me how many people complain about the series without doing a bit of research, making common errors. Terry Goodkind IS involved, intimately, with the story flow of the show and to keep his characters as close to his creations as possible, allowing only changes needed for TV adaption. You can read a letter about the series, directly from Terry to his readers, on his official website TerryGoodkind.com. It explains everything. Go read it to keep this review shorter after you've finished here.

Some people are comparing this series to the Lord of the Rings movies, and, in the same breath, complaining about the changes made for this TV series from the Wizard's First Rule book. Yeah, like they never had to cut anything out of LOTR movies. That book was only about the size of the bible. Don't get me wrong, I LOVE LOTR; books and movies. It's my second-favorite fantasy series of all time. The only reason I like Goodkind better is deeper characters more easily related to. As for the changes in the "Legend" series, as you will read in Terry's letter, they are mainly ADDITIONS to use up all the time they are afforded in a full TV series. People seem to be uninformed of this and are making snap judgments. Now, I don't know about you, but I can't think of anything better than watching my favorite book series in live action with even MORE content and background, from, and approved by, Terry himself. I'm beside myself with happiness at this and hope everyone tunes in and avoids the uninformed negativity, and that it runs for 11 seasons to tell the expanded stories of every single book in The Sword of Truth series.

Some are also comparing this to Hercules and Xena simply because some of the same people happen to be working on it. Hercules and Xena this is not. Those shows were entertaining in their own right. I enjoyed the episodes that I saw. However, they were mainly a bunch of campy, individual fantasy-based shows that happened to form a series. They were meant to be that way for people who enjoyed that type of show, and I don't fault them for that, at all. Legend of the Seeker is a continuing story of amazing vision, that of Terry Goodkind's first book, "Wizard's First Rule." If you enjoy epic fantasy, trust me, keep watching.

I hope you found this helpful.
207 out of 284 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Fun fantasy to watch
as_santos29 November 2008
I heard about this series by a friend that said "Just don't read the comments before you see it". Of course, that was the very first thing I did, and let me tell you how afraid was after I read them!! I though this series was going to suck big time, but had to see it by myself and guess what - I loved it! OK, it's not phenomenal, but it's quite good. I was kept interested, the photography was awesome, the costumes, too. I've only just seen the first two, but I sure am going to see the others and if they continue like this I'll be a fan. I'm not sure if I'd would of liked it had I read the books that this series is based on, but I think I would have. I've always been good at separating the books from their interpretations to the theater or television. When I watched "Legend of the Seeker" I watched the show for itself and therefore I enjoyed it very much. It's good entertainment for a fantasy series and I was actually quite surprised by the excellent performance of the actress Bridget Regan.
105 out of 146 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Legend of the Seeker
hahayes126 November 2008
I for one think it is great to have something like this on television. Good versus evil with the trio cast here is fun to watch. The special effects are terrific, and I like how the episodes are going. I love the wizard, the Seeker is awesome, and the Confessor makes my husband want to watch! Love it! Keep it coming!

It definitely reminds me of the Hercules/Xena type show, and I was always a big fan of those. This show is an update of those with an entertaining new cast, based on great stories by Terry Goodkind - how could it go wrong? The only thing I see wrong is that it isn't in wide enough distribution.
74 out of 102 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
As someone who hasn't read the books...
loriens_star24 November 2008
...I'm actually really enjoying this series (as of episode 4). I started watching Legend of the Seeker knowing that I was signing up for extreme fantasy, and must say it's very entertaining. It is a huge call to pay off a story of this scale every week without looking embarrassingly cheap, especially with all the special effects required. To the show's credit, it embraces what it is and delivers an unusually high standard for television.

I find the action sequences gripping. They have put a lot of effort into stylizing the fights, and as someone who generally finds hand-to-hand a bit dull because it's all cut-cut-cut to hide inconsistencies and build pace, Legend of the Seeker has some wonderful stunt work and detailed action. The slow-mos are fantastic; it is great to see the detail and be able to understand the complexity of choreography instead of it being hidden under choppy editing.

I will agree that Craig Horner is almost too pretty for this role, but it compliments the style the directors have taken; just look at the effort that's been put into delivering beautiful cinematography. It is not surprising they have chosen to cast equally beautiful leads to give the show a holistically beautiful appeal. And let there be no doubt: this show's cinematography coupled with New Zealand's breathtaking topography makes for a very pretty show.

The angry and negative reactions of the book fans has been pretty overwhelming, and a bit disappointing to read. But on the bright side, this show has encouraged me to pick up the books. So it's not all lose/lose for fans of the books, as the show is garnering new readers for the novels.
210 out of 254 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Legend of the Seeker
cholt712 June 2010
Legend of the Seeker is action packed, there is romance, magic, stunning locations, great cast and movie quality special effects. This is the best show on TV. If it is given proper promotion and permanent time slot it will be a huge hit!!! So many people are just finding out about the show and are falling in love with it. I just happened to run across it one Saturday afternoon by chance during season 1 and was immediately hooked. It is now the only "must watch" on TV for me. I bought Season 1 as soon as it came out and have ordered Season 2. This show is epic and deserves to go on. I have read the books and love the series. I know it doesn't follow the books exactly, however I have yet to see ANY book brought to the screen (big or small) that does. I am not a fan of the so-called "reality" shows. I have enough reality in my own reality. Give me Fantasy and take me away for awhile. This show is perfect. We need to have Seasons 3,4,5...
39 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unexpectedly charming!!
ayuni99849 December 2008
When I first heard about the TV series, I knew it was an adaptation of a book. At first, I didn't want to watch it thinking that the TV series is surely not as good as the book. Of course. Surprisingly it is charming and captivating to watch. It is like an addiction, you want to watch it again and again.

I like all the main cast. Craig Horner as Richard from my opinion is a good actor(hunk!haha) and Bridget Regan as Kahlan was doing a really good job as the confessor. The wizard Zedd has a good sense of humour (kind of weird at first). I enjoyed the series so far.Can't wait for the next episodes..
56 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun, entertaining, sword-slicing fantasy.
sdifgiopasj3 December 2008
So how is the Legend of the Seeker? What do people think so far? Looking at the comments we get a load of onestars from people saying it doesn't follow the books to the letter, people that can't understand how Goodkind could "sell his soul to Hollywood" (really... wow), and people that make untrue claims about inaccuracies in the TV-series apparently without having watched it themselves.

So is the Legend of the Seeker that awful? Nah, not really. It's a fun series, a bit heavy on the comedy on some occasions, and it's taken a while to get the story rolling, but its good fun to watch, beautiful scenery, good main actors that feel believable. It doesn't take itself too seriously and in my opinion, neither should the viewers.

In conclusion: The naysayers say, No! Horrible! Goodkind sells his soul to mammon! But I'm sure after an honest viewing without preconceptions most will agree that its a nice example of a good, old-fashioned fantasy story with all the sword slashing, magicking, and vanilla romance to make it a recurring theme in the rss-downloader.
123 out of 177 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not The Books, But Still Worth While In Its Own Right!
chrisisstressed8 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Like most who read the Sword of Truth books I eagerly awaited seeing what the series treatment would make of it. But you have to keep in mind that no film/series/miniseries is ever exactly the same as its source material.

When the first episode began, I scratched my head as to why Dennee (Kahlan's adoptive sister) was A. alive, and B. riding with Kahlan to find Richard, as the book starts with her having already been killed. But it was interesting to see someone else's vision of the story I'd all but lived (as books tend to do that), and what the people in it looked like.

It became a bit of a novelty at first; to see the changes, the visualisation of worlds, peoples, and situations (nevermind swords and magic *wink* *wink*). And while some things bugged me; Kahlan being pronounced Kaylan, as the 'H' in her name would flatten the 'A' so that it sounded like the 'A' in "apple", rather than the 'A' in "sway" - other things did make me smile and take note, as it was interesting to see characters reference people and places and things that readers of the book would know intimately (it was kind of a wink to us who had stayed with it all this time).

WHAT YOU HAVE TO REMEMBER IS THIS: what has been created on screen is not the books, but rather one interpretation of them. It feels like I'm peering into another dimension that runs parallel to the books, where the characters in both had roughly the same starting point but are making their way down the road at a different pace, and stopping to see different sights.

In all honesty, you cannot with the mindset: "This had better be just like the books or else".

Personally, I really enjoyed the story of the books, but I'm also enjoying the series as it comes out, and I find myself checking for when the next episode is on.

The story in itself is timeless because a lot of the themes are ones that have been with us forever, and I feel a lot of the same spirit exists in the series as in the books.

What's been done has been done to bring it to a larger audience (and in some cases a younger one), and while it sometimes gets to me that the fights are done like the movie "300", or that a wounded enemy will fall down and have no wound whatsoever when he hits the ground, the series was never intended to be the books. To have tried to make it exactly so would have been foolish as not only are the mediums so different, but the audiences as well.

Any reader who picks up Wizard's First Rule is probably already a fantasy reader, where as people can and probably will enjoy the series as a more light thing than sitting down to read a novel.

So the facts are this: The books are so well known because they are THAT good for what they do, but the series is also top notch by a fantasy series standard (nevermind a Disney standard - as Disney standard its far more intelligent and grown up than you'd expect). The series, like the books, will not suit everyone, so its time to stop protesting its existence because it isn't exactly what you may have read. Those who watch it as they're first introduction to the Sword of Truth world will get a kick out of it for the same reasons we all did reading the books.

So if you haven't seen it, give it a go, but don't expect it to be the books. And if you're just interested in a fantasy TV series or a fun series for the family or for whatever reason, you'll probably have a blast.

Seriously, I wish it had been around when I was a kid, it would have slotted right in next to Thundercats and Dungeons & Dragons, and I would have been well-pleased.

The fact is, if Terry Goodkind can still remain a driving force behind the writing of the series, and remain happy with what's going out, why can't you? WE may have visited the world, but its creator had to live in it, and breath in and out with every creature in that world, feeling every inch of that reality. It would have been the hardest thing for him to let go of, but if he's still as happy as he is with what his baby is growing up to be... maybe it deserves a little pause for thought.
63 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great Show
justcozy17 November 2008
I loved this show, I catch is by chance on the CW this past Sunday (saw the third and forth episodes) and was instantly hooked. I missed having a great adventure, swords blazing, fantasy including and hero adoring show on TV. I immediately looked up the first two episodes that I missed online and watched them.

I loved the fire that lingers between Richard and Kahlan, the Confessor (I love that title/name). Zed is perfect, he adds that hint of humor while still maintaining his powerful presence. Now the action....it was great and captivating. I am a fan of taking bits of slow downed fighting snips within a fight that just make the scene grander (alla 300), and I adore me some sword play. I think people who liked Lord of the Rings, Zena, and just plain fantasy adventure stories will love this series.

I personally have read the books but never became an obsessed fan (I have enough obsessions) and I have been reading a lot of hating from fans of the book , saying that the show gets away from the books' story line and that Richard's character has been dumped down a little and he is also physically smaller. Both these things I do not have an issue with. I to thought he was stupid at times in the first two episode, but I think that they did that to show character progression and growth. He will learn in his journey (by the fourth he already seems much wiser). I like him smaller as well because is makes him a character to root for even harder, he may not look like a all menacing warrior ( alla Hercules) but don't underestimate him. He comes off more as a young man that destiny has chosen to become a hero but a hero that was bond to have a great destiny.

Although, as an obsessed fan of other books that have been adapted I understand the fans feelings, but I am also one that lets things go. When adaptations are not all I imagined, I take it as a separate thing. The show is just inspired by the novels and does plan on keeping the main story line. However, it is not a movie or a mini series but a TV series it will not follow the book to note and can not be expected too.

All and all I thought it was a great action adventure show to satisfy the fantasy lovers in all of us, just enjoy it. I recommend people to go watch and see if you'll loved it like I did. Additionally, Craig Horner and Bridget Regan are great eye candy and welding swords and kicking butts just makes them hotter.
89 out of 128 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Maturity of WFR Must Not Be Edited!!!
metalhead867531 July 2008
OK here is the bottom line: Wizard's First Rule is a mature adventure filled with both intense violence and extreme sexual content. To put this miniseries on a channel other than HBO or other unedited station would be compromising the original drama and story line of WFR. If this show is put on a channel where it will not be able to show the Demmin Nass content, the sexual scenes between Richard and Kahlan, and the gore of the seeker's battles, then it should not be created in the first place. If you do not agree with what I am saying. then you obviously and sadly do not fully appreciate the artistic beauty of what Goodkind writes. A great deal of drama and feeling cannot be portrayed within WFR without the mature content. But then again, it will still never compare to actually reading the novel.
118 out of 233 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
For a younger audience
aaakker2 November 2008
I really hoped Legend of the Seeker would be nothing like Hercules or Xena! As these series have the same director. Just that comparison makes me sick as I am a fan of (some) of the books this is based on. The acting in Xena and Hercules was terrible, the script pretty bad, historically nonsense and it never was really serious. Face it, it was perfect after a long night of drink and you are lying on your couch with a hangover (just like the shows of Bob Ross!). But i would like something i enjoyed as much as Wizards first rule to be made seriously. Good actors, serious acting, historically believable (do not use Hercules/Xena like clothing or the fake looking weapons) and please, please do not make it for children.

Alas, after seeing the first episode my fears were proved to be well founded. It is indeed (clothing and surroundings) like Xena and Hercules. The director just repeated the old trick again. Also i found it to be directed at a much younger audience than the books. On top of that, the guy playing Richard is just a boy with no charisma at all. Would you follow that man into death and beyond? Would you believe that man can inspire thousands (the Richard in the books could)? No i would ask if he needs his diaper changed. A great disappointment. The other actors that I have seen are all a great disappointment as well. All except Kahlan (played by Bridget Regan) and Zed (finally a good cast) and to a lesser degree Darken Rakl (played by Craig Parker). But it must be noted that my expectations were high. And i have a serious dislike for series with bad acting. But in defense of Legend of the Seeker: it is very hard to make a fantasy series without turning it into a children show. The series Merlin succeeded, its successor Merlin's apprentice did not.

So, this series is NOT for the hardcore fans of the books. I think the target audience is the 13-18 segment. Just like so many famous fantasy novels (except Lord of the Rings) this is not done with the love of the books in mind. Nor is it taken seriously. I think this series can best be described as a mix between Hercules and the second Merlin series (Merlin's apprentice). So it can entertain you if you do not take it seriously and do not expect it to be of great quality and have any high expectations.

Update: Because i am a fan of the books i did giver the series (grudgingly as is obvious from the above) a chance. The first two episodes were a complete disaster because I had the brilliant storyline of the book in mind in combination with the characters from the book. Now after watching more episodes somethings should be noted.

Once hardcore fans of the books realise the show is only based on the books, not follows it, it can be enjoyable. The characters in the series differ from the books as well. It just is that way and can not be changed anymore. Still a shame, but it can be acceptable for a large audience.

The overall "Herculis /Xena" feel of the show still annoys me. But the show does have some promise. Especially the actor playing Zed does a good job. Kahlan is not bad either. Good episodes still follow bad ones, but my verdict of the show has become a bit more mellow. At least I can understand why people can enjoy it. Especially if they are unfamiliar with the books
57 out of 111 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An excellent show so far, approach it with an open mind
jagley2 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Like many of the people who appear to be frustrated by the television series, I have read all of the books several times.

However, unlike these people, I really appreciate the series for what it is. In order to make 22 episodes for a television series, it is likely that changes had to be made. Does it really matter that Darken Rahl uses catapults to attack the barrier? Not really. The story is about the people and the value judgments that they use to go about their lives. In a way, I actually enjoy the deviations from the textual source, because it allows me to experience, to some extent, the sense of the unknown that a fresh viewer would experience.

There are times when the limited budget shows through, but aside from these minor glitches (the reason for a 9 instead of a 10), I genuinely enjoyed watching the show.
25 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Legend of the seeker
Mystryhyprgrl1519 October 2008
I have been reading the sword of truth series since I was in high school, and I am willing to admit that this is my favorite series of yet. And though I don't really jump up and down with joy over the people they cast, I am not dreading the T.V series either. I guess I like the actress for Kahlan, I am alright with the casting of Richard, and I don't particularly like the actor they cast for Zedd. Though these assessments are purely looks since I cannot really comment further. However people have to realize that when a movie or T.V series is made based on your favorite book series then yes you are entitled to your opinion of the characters they cast, but you can only go so far without actually watching the series.

I agree that it is really how these actors and actresses play the characters that really count. Sure I have pre-judged the actors, which I try not to do, but it is based on looks, and I understand that I am never going to have the characters in my head look exactly like that on the T.V. And even though I may not be impressed with what I see so far, I will be sitting down and watching the first episode, to see how they brings this series alive, and how the actors really bring the characters to life. Looks aren't the most important thing when making a book come to life, though I agree it is a factor.

So I guess what I am saying is to judge by looks for now, since it is almost impossible to not do so, but keep an open mind and at least watch the series to see how it plays out. Right now I am the stage where I am really excited because it is my favorite book series coming to life, but terrified that they will screw it up. I guess we all have to wait and see :)
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Horror Show
Venge14 November 2008
This series is what all fans of great books dread.

When I heard that the "Sword of Truth" books were to be made into a mini-series, I was hopeful. In the past few years, movie and television interpretations of great books have been surprisingly good while still remaining true to the original source material. "The Lord of the Rings" and "The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe" are a couple of examples that come to mind. Sadly, the "Legend of the Seeker" is neither good, nor true to the source material.

The production looks and feels like a poor man's Xena. Amateurish looking stunts, bad acting, horrid casting choices, poor camera work, etc. On top of which, the story, that glorious, gritty, inspiring story, has been butchered so as to be almost unrecognizable. Change for change sake, none of it for the good.

Imagine, if you will, "The Fellowship of the Ring" opening with Gandalf and Bilbo being chased by a group of Nazgul. Bilbo is shot by one of the Nazgul, but with his dying breath he gives Gandalf the ring and says "Find the Ringbearer, he must have this ring" and the dies in Gandalf's arms. During this emotional scene, the riders who have been pursuing them have evidently taken a wrong turn, or else a lunch break, as they are nowhere to be seen. Gandalf jumps back on his horse, rides to the Shire to find Frodo and give him the ring, and so begins the tale.

This is not far off what the writers of this travesty have done to "Wizard's First Rule." It proceeds to get not better, but far, far worse.

Far better off to just read the books and give this joke of a series a pass.
51 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
series renamed and new zealand actors named
derekosbo26 July 2008
Filming of Wizard's First Rule, the first book in Terry Goodkind's popular The Sword of Truth books began this week.

But the 22-episode series has been renamed Legend of the Seeker - apparently to avoid religious concerns among American audiences about scorcery.

Executive producers Sam Raimi and Robert Tapert told a comics and fantasy convention of the name change, and announced the New Zealand actors, Entertainment Weekly reported.

The syndicated series from Disney-ABC Domestic Television and ABC Studios, will premiere in the United States on the weekend of November 1. The series marks ABC Studios' first foray into broadcast syndication, and has already been sold into stations covering 95 percent of the American market, according to TV Week.com.

Each one hour episode will have a New Zealand director and the series will be shot in the Auckland region over 36 months. One of the episodes will be directed by New Zealand actor Michael Hurst who starred in the original Hercules TV series.

The series is based around a backwoods guide, Richard - played by Australian actor Craig Horner - in Westland, the only part of the world which contains no magic. While investigating the mysterious murder of his father he rescues a woman, Kahlan Amnell, (played by American actress Bridget Regan) who has crossed over from the "magic" side of the world, and does battle with an evil dictator.

Raimi said Australian actor Bruce Spence will play Richard's best friend Zedd, Jay Laga'aia will play a boundary warden Chase, and Craig Parker will play the series' villain, Darken Rahl.

Parker spent four years on Shortland Street after being cast as Guy Warner in 1992, and won international attention after being cast as Haldir, one of Lothlorien's elves in the first two parts of the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Laga'aia played David Silesi in four series of the television drama Street Legal and Captain Typho, in two Star Wars films, Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith.

Tapert, who filmed Hercules and Xena, Warrior Princess in New Zealand and married his star, Lucy Lawless, in 1998 showed people at the convention a clip from the show's filming around Auckland.
64 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Spot On
dragonchowguild13 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
So far, the trailer is almost perfect. Zedd is way too tall, but still a good choice. Casting the physical parts over the personality is always a mistake, and comes off too Disney-like in the end. The age of the guy playing Darken Rahl would concern me most of all, but only because he appears too young to be the age of Richard's father.

I am hoping the acting resumes of these actors are as accurate as they are promising. If they are, we should be in for some better acting than the Hercules/Xena shows everyone is comparing this to.

I expect that Sam's personal resources and connections for producing a show in New Zealand and Australia will enhance his ability to bring the books to life. As a fan of the book series himself, I am sure he intends to do it justice. If anything, his success with the Spiderman movies will give him more leverage for selling the show at a higher price than he did with Hercules and Xena. With a better budget and more experience with special effects, I am hopeful that the production value will be what is needed.

I agree that the series would be more entertaining on HBO, but would not want to relive the nightmare schedule of The Soprano's again. If we can't see Kahlan and Richard bumping uglies, I suppose the story can survive. (sigh) ;) As for the gore factor, well that can be done pretty well in most cases. There are 2 scenes I can think of off-hand that would be a bit rough for TV, but the rest fall within the limits of existing shows if you focus on the story and not on the details of a single passage. See the Terminator series for gruesome scenes, when they skin a terminator it is pretty rough. Since it is integral to the story, it still works without getting to be a horror show. I expect some of that in this series as well.

The bottom line is that some changes have to be made for it to work as a TV series. If it was done just like the book, it would be one big narrative. Now if they had Bruce Campbell doing the voice over, it could work for a while (wink) but not for a full run. Converting inner thoughts to visual cues for the audience will take quite a bit of cutting and pasting, so do not go into this thinking it should be just like the book. Think the movie version of comic books. The heart is still there, even if the story has to change slightly to make it work in another medium. That said, Kahlan's power appears to me to be exactly what it is described as in the book. Perhaps a bit more staggering to the men around her, but there is a concussive nature to the power being used if I recall it correctly. As to any concerns it was more powerful than it should have been (the concussion that is), you should consider the need to visually portray the effect of it that the book may have descibed merely as a sensation. Again, that pesky medium difference.

Frankly, I like that we are getting 22 episodes, at approx 40 mins each, for a total of 14.67 hours just for season 1. Imagine trying to stuff this series into a couple of 2 hour movies? This gives the proper attention to the parts that are needed. Whether the entire series will be given its due dilligence will be evident when we see how long it takes to kill off Darken.

Now if you will excuse me, I have a box of Orden to track down....
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This is a great show, no matter what anyone says.
killthesorrowxx1 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Warning this will contain a few spoilers!!!!!! First off, I'd like to start by announcing to all the people complaining about the show.

THEY CHANGED THE NAME SO THAT IT DIDN'T HAVE TO BE ACCURATE TO THE BOOKS!!!! And for people with comments like, "Obviously nobody working on the show has ever read the book." THE AUTHOR OF THE BOOKS IS WORKING ON THE TELEVISION SHOW WITH THEM.

Also, for some errors on "inconsistancies."

1. Right off the bat, Richard knows that Kahlan is a confessor, and what that entails.

--No... when watching the first episode, Zedd tells him that she is Kahlan, a confessor.

2. Zedd quite apparently is not Richard's grandfather, and they have never met before.

--Again, no. In the first episode he calls Zedd, "THAT crazy old man!?" and if you actually watch the show, a couple of episodes in, Kahlan is like, "So are you going to tell him?" and Zedd is like, "No, I don't want him knowing yet, that I am his grandfather until, and only if, we find his mother."

Anyways, putting all that aside. Don't listen to people complaining about how off it is from the books. It's not meant to be the books. And you just need to enjoy the show, for that. The show. It's it's own thing people. And I think it is a wonderfully action-packed, fun tale for people of all ages to enjoy. The acting is not bad at all, and I got sucked in straight from the first episode. So please, don't bash this series, just because your disappointed, or you heard that it sucks. Watch it, and judge for yourself.
16 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My All-time Favorite Show from my Childhood (Actually my Preteen Years) Now I'm 20
chisom_kk18 January 2017
I remember when this show aired on TV, I used to watch everyday coming back from church religiously. Like it became a tradition and my parents would watch it with me sometimes. As a female, I loved Kahlan. However, I liked Cara's fierceness. Things the others would be afraid to do, she was be brazen and do it. Interesting how she used to work for the enemy and then came on their side. Sad how she was ripped away from her parents and forced to be a Mord'Sith. I never understood Lord Rahl's desire for Kahlan. Idk whether it's just wanting a Confessor son. It's so bizarre. Ahh, I miss this show. Haven't watched it in years. Although, I'm start the entire series now.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Legend of the Seeker
red_hooded_demon12 May 2010
I heard about Legend of the Seeker about 3 months ago through many almost rabid recommendations from friends online, and after being bugged about it for a couple weeks, I began to catch up, starting with Season 1.

The first episode had me hooked, the sets, costumes, landscape, cinematography, and acting had me coming back for more. It was difficult not to watch Legend of the Seeker right through the night to see what would happen next to the Seeker, Confessor, and Wizard, and after I had finished the first season, I felt like a part of a family - not only of the characters, but of the amazing fanbase as well.

In the second season the addition of new characters and challenges has kept me watching every week. I laughed, I cried, I fell in love with the Legend of the Seeker world all over again.

It's hard to explain to somebody who does not watch Seeker what it truly means because of how much the show talks about. It talks about love, the difficult choices everyone has to make, seeing the best in people, that you have to keep fighting for what you believe in, and the inevitability of death and loss - of course intermixed with epic sword fights and horse rides.

The second best thing to a Seeker episode the fans picspams, discussions, and reviews that follow them - I have laughed out loud too many times to count while reading Seeker-related blog entries, and have met some of the coolest people I know because of Legend of the Seeker.

I highly recommend this show to everybody I know.

It's been an awesome adventure, and know I will follow the Seeker on any quest he sets out on.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Ccsting and a good start
brade-man2 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Having read the entire series from Goodkind, and anticipating the first showing, I nearly missed the premier tonight.

Glad I didn't! After a slow start, the plot picked up when we met Zed and the borders were breached. Once Richard and Kahlan met, the producers began to move along a bit faster, without sacrificing too much detail.

Richard's character is just naive enough to be believable, but not too young to carry the part for the next in the sequence. Not too sure about Kahlan, yet, but there is promise.

The gar was done pretty well, for a CGI.

It's a great surprise to see who they cast as Zed. I had to wait until nearly halfway through the episode before I began to buy into seeing the Gyro Captain as a wizard! My only big disappointment is the actor playing Darken Rahl. Slimy; yes, Evil; without a doubt. But not nearly malevolent and vicious enough to meet my expectations.

Sorry, but the final scene is a bit of a cliché', but I guess they had to find a way to end it. Good enough to want to see the next installment!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
So sad it canceled!
jonimm316 September 2018
This could have had another 4 or 5 more seasons! I really loved the magic in it! It was well written and the cast worked really well together!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
come on people..........
blaheka1 December 2008
There are only a few questions you need to ask yourself. If at any point you answer no... don't bother. Go find another series.

1) Do you enjoy fantasy? 2) Do you enjoy a little comedy with your fantasy? 3) Did you ever watch Hercules or Zena ... and enjoy it? (note. if you answered yes to 2 your answer will probably remain yes.) 4) Do you really require your Saturday afternoon T.V to be taxing and exhausting? Or can you be satisfied with light and entertaining.

Is it an accurate representation of the series. Most definitely not. Did they loosely use it to build a basic story-arc and have a ready-made civilization to use. Yes

Its not movie quality. But it is extremely entertaining.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great show, just one problem
nightlover12692 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
At first, when I saw the previews for the show, I was very unhappy about the actor playing Richard. After watching the first two episodes, I am no longer displeased. Despite the lack of height, he is very ideal for Richard. The jawline, the hair, the muscles, everything fits very nicely. Plus, Richard doesn't start out huge like Chase, he grows within the first few books. I was pleased with the show, and I was concerned at first. The storyline is a little different, but some of the important parts are there.

My biggest problem with the show is the beginning storyline. I was beyond upset that the show has Richard being estranged to Zedd. ZEDD IS Who taught him ABOUT HERBS AND THE FOREST!!! The books reference Zedd's teachings way too much to have cut that out. George Cypher was a huge part of Richards life, but Zedd balanced out his raising as well. A lot of how Richard thinks and acts is because of Zedd.

The whole mother twist was okay, I'll live with that, but they should never have taken away Zedd and Richard's past.

Kahlan and Darken's hair was another tiny problem. She is supposed to have very long, brown, wavy hair; while he is supposed to have pale blond, shoulder-length straight hair. Those actor's hair color is way too dark for Kahlan and Darken. But, it definitely isn't a deal breaker for the show.

I really liked the show, I'm already addicted in watching my all-time favorite book series on t.v. It's few changes, besides the one involving Zedd, are acceptable because we have been waiting so long for this show and these books are beyond fantastic. WATCH THE SHOW!!! I WANT IT TO KEEP GOING!!!
16 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not worth the time
aalzaeem6 November 2008
This is probably one of the worst series that you will ever see. the fight sequences seem to be right out of a Low budget Conan movie.

We have out grown Xena and the likes, try something new other then the "Oh... i am not the Chosen one. But oh... Look it took a tragedy for me to realize it", So 1990's.

Their is no real Drama, just attempts at one. the only one that came close to Acting were the Wizard not that i am saying he excels, i would say he is OK.

But you have to see the LAST fight sequence at least once, you will be cracking up on the, "death deifying", jumps the main character makes. A rabbit should not fear him let alone empires.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a waste
emase316200528 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I was incredibly excited when I heard that they were making a TV production of sword of truth because I thought Terry Goodkind's series is awesome. The book happened to pop in my mind and I decided to check Goodkind's site to see if any new books were coming out (related or unrelated to SoT). I found out about the show yesterday (it probably been out for a year) and went to bed thinking, "im going to wake up tomorrow and catch up on every episode"...that's how stoked I was. And I was incredibly disappointed.

This show does the books a great disservice. I expected that there would be differences because whenever there is an adaptation, there are going to be differences...but this was just...horrible. I turned it off and tried to just view it as a new show, unrelated to the book...and I just could not. While the actors do a good job of doing what they can...the TV version of the story is a crappy humpty dumpty of the book.

I watched the first 4 episodes...then I skipped to the episode with Denna and I am just horrified at what the producers are going to do to this story. At max, I give this series 2 seasons and its a real shame...if the producers stuck more to the cannon, they'd have a show that wouldn't seem like a star wars, eragon, lord of the rings rip off and have a show that would be come a TV legend and be as beloved and highly appreciated as Terry Goodkind's books.

They are "garbaging" up a series from the beginning that had so much potential before they got their hands on it. I really wish Goodkind would've held unto the rights because the TV show is so upsetting.

I will not be watching this show ever again and would prefer to just re-read the book series and wait for better producers to come along to make a good adaptation.

If you've never read the books, you will probably find this show entertaining (it'd be nostalgic of hercules or xena pre-crapification). If you've read the books and are a fan...I ABSOLUTELY recommend you STAY AWAY from this show because it will be torture. In the shows defense...they casted a few of the roles very well (Kahlan, Zedd, and Denna) and not to belittle the actor who plays Richard or his ability as an actor, but he just doesn't fit the role of Richard...its like casting Denzel Washington to play James Bond...good actor but he wouldn't fit the part (the actor who plays his older brother or darken rahl would've been better in the role of richard).
38 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed