Devil's Knot (2013) Poster

(2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
96 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Paradise Lost series makes this a little flat
Tcarts7630 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"The Devil's Knot" is the true story of the Robin Hood Hills murder. The movie itself kind of falls flat for me compared to the documentary series that followed the story all the way through.

Reese Witherspoon and Colin Firth are strong actors, but this story is well documented from start to finish and it was only a matter of time before a movie was made, especially because people in Hollywood got involved in this one early.

I don't think there was really anything wrong with the movie itself. It is a compelling story and needs to be told. It is just that the "Paradise Lost," series that followed the real players in the story was full of twists and turns that Hollywood's top writers couldn't make this stuff up.

I watched the first documentary when it came out and I was a kid (I was a Metallica fan and their music was used). A couple of years ago I watched the 2 follow ons. If you haven't watched those I say watch this one first. I say that because the series were absolutely captivating when you get into it, and if you watch this first I think you will feel that this falls flat to the real deal. I say the documentaries are captivating, I know that sounds bad given the real crime involved, but it was kind of unbelievable. Then again it is good to illustrate these to a new generation that don't know much about this story. So maybe I am too old to appreciate this movie.

The child's voice narration in this movie just really should have been something they cut in this movie. I understand why it was inserted, but it really wasn't handled very well. It was out of place. If it was done to unnerve people and highlight something, it did, but not exactly in the way that it was meant to do. It's something that has to be done perfectly otherwise cut it, In my opinion, it should have been cut out.

WARNING: Do not read beyond this point if you don't know the story, because this may be a spoiler.

I am still a proponent of the death penalty after the details of what happened here. The system is broken in many ways but it is the best we have. I think some of the appeals process needs to be fixed, and a lot of convicts that were convicted before a lot of the DNA and forensic science that we have now today should be allotted more consideration/appeal hearings in order to be sure of their guilt or innocence as well.

The big part of the system that failed here in my eyes is that the Appeals process just continued to go back to the same Judge. I have all the respect in the world for the occupation Judges serve in and the incredible pressures put on them and the difficult job they do. BUT sometimes when you have that kind of power it is easy to remember you are a human being and can and do make mistakes. If the same Judge gets to handle an appeal he is essentially being asked to admit the prosecutor, jury, or he, himself made a mistake. That's a tall order.
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So much potential lost in a messy effort
Robert_duder16 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
When I first heard about Devil's Knot I was surprised that I hadn't been hearing more from it. It looks and sounds like Oscar winning gold. A first rate cast, a very well respected director, an incredibly compelling story...so I was cautiously optimistic that this would be a really great hidden gem. It has all the right ingredients and yet this story is far too complex and spans far too long a period to be effectively told in the confines of a single average length movie. Sometimes I like to quote other IMDb reviewers when I read something and think to myself "EXACTLY!" Well someone did that. This is a direct quote from emmaline89, "They flicked between different time points very quickly, which made it difficult to grasp how much time had actually passed between events. There is very little character development so viewers are left without any idea of who most of the people actually are, which is especially sad given that there are real people behind every character." I could not have said it better myself. You want to know so much more about these obviously complex characters but the script gives you virtually nothing. There are characters that pop in and out that I'm certain are vital to the overall story but there is far too much to cram into one movie. The "Paradise Lost/West Memphis" Documentary series which I have not watched yet spans decades and goes into intense details on this case. Devil's Knot doesn't even scratch the surface.

Its unfortunate because I thought performance wise Reese Witherspoon was excellent. She shows flashes of brilliance to a completely under developed character. She has the class and talent to actually make the role far meatier than what it written for her. She deserved better than this because she gave it her all and is the best part of the movie. Colin Firth (who is already very hit and miss to me) is a total miss in this. He does nothing with his character which is almost not needed in the story. He is literally just sort of there and most of the time you won't even understand why. He is downright boring in the role which is only partially his fault and partially the fault of the writer. Dane DeHaan gives an alright performance but again, like Witherspoon I think he could have knocked this out of the park, but the script is weak. Still he does the best he can with the material given to him. Kevin Durand was also very good in his role as John Mark Byers. I understand his character is absolutely vital to this case and Byers is generally considered one of the most ominous figures in the case and yet he is severely reduced to barely a supporting person. The chemistry between he and Witherspoon is good and they have a few really great scenes together but nothing ever quite takes off.

Essentially the plot is a mess. It was like they got over-excited and passionate about the story and tried to cram everything in there completely forgetting that for many of us we only know bits and pieces or even less about this story. Visually the film is very well shot. The initial scene of them bringing one of the boys' bodies out of the river was literally heart wrenching. I can't say I'm personally familiar with director Atom Egoyan's work but he is a director that people are always raving about. I certainly don't blame him for the lack of success in this film. I think his style shows and he tries very hard. Instead we turn to our writers. Paul Harris Boardman has formerly penned films like "Hellraiser Inferno" and "Urban Legends: Final Cut." His co-writer worked on the same films. Why in the hell would anyone take such an important and potentially amazing film and put the script in the hands of B-Movie horror writers? I'm furious!! If not for Egoyan's direction, Witherspoon, Dehaan and Duran's performance and their honest effort to squeeze something redeemable out of this...it would have been a complete disaster. Instead we have a sub par telling of what looks like one of the fascinating real crime stories in history. Average in every way. 6/10
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very well done but the documentary might be something you're looking for if you want all the details.
planktonrules30 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"Devil's Knot" is a slightly fictionalized account of a famous triple murder that happened in West Memphis, Arkansas back in 1993. Three young men were convicted of killing three small children and much of the evidence presented in court was testimony that the alleged perpetrators were young, listened to heavy metal music and had an interest in the occult...along with about 10,000,000 other teens at that time! The film talks a lot about the conflicting evidence, recanted testimony and holes in the case. And, it gives two other possible perpetrators who were never prosecuted. But, because the community was looking for convictions and because there was a strong cultural belief in the existence of satanic murder cults, folks seemed more than willing to see these three teens convictedand so they were.

The film does work very well in convincing the audience and providing an entertaining film. Your heart will certainly get caught up in the film and it will have a strong impact on viewers. The director, production staff and everyone associated with the film did quite well. When it comes to the acting, it was also very good all around. I was particularly impressed by Colin Firth--who sounded amazingly NON-British in the movie. This came as a bit surprise.

If you are looking for a thorough examination of the killings, the folks involved and subsequent trial, this film may leave you a bit cold, unfortunately. For dramatic reasons, the film chose to focus on one particular mother (probably because she was played by Reese Witherspoon) and completely ignored the other two grieving families--a very, very odd omission to say the least and something that seems a bit offensive. If you are interested in all the details of the case, then see "Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills", "Paradise Lost 2: Revelations", and "Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory"-three documentaries about the infamous 'Memphis Three' directed by Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky

Overall, the movie is a good, well-constructed drama and a reasonably fair representation of the case--albeit far from a perfect one. It's worth seeing and entertaining but not a film for kids to see because of the subject matter. And, if you do watch, you might want to keep some Kleenex handy...it has a few gut-wrenching moments.
89 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"There's power in the blood"
doug_park200118 June 2014
Based on the book by the same title, DEVIL's KNOT is a docu-drama about the 1993 ritual murders of three eight-year-old boys in West Memphis, Arkansas. This film does not contain any basic information that is not already covered in the documentaries PARADISE LOST and WEST of MEMPHIS. It does, however, provide some fairly interesting reenacted personal perspectives of the various parties: victims' families, the accused "Memphis 3" and certain of their friends, the police and prosecution, the defense teams, etc. DEVIL's KNOT makes for a compelling enough show and is expertly filmed with decent but not great acting. Though I'm sure that there are some misrepresentations of certain details, it is faithful to the basic events of this case. The biggest limitation is that those who have read the various books and seen earlier films will not find anything terribly new here while casual viewers who are unfamiliar with the case will find all the various characters and shifting perspectives confusing.

Colin Firth gives a nice performance as private investigator for the defense Ron Lax; ditto for Reese Witherspoon as Pam Hobbs. DEVIL's KNOT might have worked better with a stricter focus on one or maybe both of these characters, even if that meant ignoring certain other people and factors in the case.

Regardless, this film is very revealing of how incompetent police work, selective use of evidence by the prosecution, and public hysteria in this rather superstitious Bible Belt community led to the denial of reasonable doubt for the accused "Memphis 3." Without telling you what to think or pointing the finger unduly, it also cursorily examines other potential suspects. There are some brief bits of courtroom drama, but again, the focus changes just as things get really interesting.

In short, DEVIL's KNOT is quite watchable, but the attempt to tell the entire story in a narrative of less than two hours is inadequate and dissatisfying.

WARNING: Though there's not a lot of gore, there are some brief and graphic post mortem shots of the young victims.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Flawed but decent account of a comparatively recent case
STAR RATING: ***** Saturday Night **** Friday Night *** Friday Morning ** Sunday Night * Monday Morning

In 1993, three young boys were found murdered in the river of a southern town in America. The finger of suspicion fell on several heavy metal obsessed teenagers, who were suspected of being involved in devil worship. On learning that the death penalty was being considered, attorney Ron Lax (Colin Firth) springs in to action, assembling a legal team to represent the boys in court and overcome the hysteria of the town. While desperate for closure and keeping a narrow grip on her sanity, Pam (Reese Witherspoon), one of the bereaved mothers, is also unable to clear herself of doubt over the boys guilt.

While not what could be called a fact is stranger than fiction piece of work, Devil's Knot also has a more engaging quality somehow on the grounds that it's based on a true story, serving as it does as an examination of the legal system, and of people's small mindedness and tendency towards knee jerk reactions in the face of acts of over- whelming evil. In as unflinching a style as one can expect from modern films, it dramatizes the true horror and subsequent raw emotions of a small town on the edge. It's helped no end by reliably stellar performances from the lead stars and supporting cast, and it's all pretty on the level, but it's also sadly not the sum of it's parts.

As well as staging it all pretty well, director Atom Egoyan also strives to keep the authenticity to a high standard, with Firth delivering a fine American accent, at the top of every other little minor detail. Somehow, though, he manages to muddle the pace up, delivering a film that while telling a compelling story, is detailed in a slightly meandering, plodding fashion that stops it being the sum of it's parts. The parts this effects most is the conclusion, delivering a pay off that could have been electrifying, but as a result is merely perfunctory.

Still, it's a riveting, interesting real life thriller, boosted no ends from great turns by two reliable lead performers. ***
27 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Subtle storytelling catching the authentic penumbra of the case
karmaswimswami22 June 2014
"Devil's Knot" has gotten a lukewarm reception from audiences and this is ill-deserved. The film is a perfect-pitch plainsong retelling of the case of the West Memphis Three. Atom Egoyan is a master of understated film-making, but perfectly depicts the aura, atmosphere, cultural inclinations and Bible-belt provincial biases of the participants without being garish. Marvelous performances from Reese Witherspoon, Bruce Greenwood,Colin Firth and several others are on view here. Mireille Enos's lightning-catching turn as Vicki Hutcheson, in which she brilliantly channels uneducated de classe white-trash coarseness, is worth sitting through the entire film. The esteem in which this competent film is held will grow with time.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What else might we learn about this story?
lee_eisenberg24 May 2016
I had loosely heard of the West Memphis Three for years, but only now do I understand the full story. I'd say that Atom Egoyan is the proper director, since he specializes in grim topics (a school bus crash, the Armenian Genocide, etc). The preacher's claim that satanic music caused the defendants to commit the murders sounds like the typical stuff that we hear from religious nuts. As for the movie's focus on Stevie Branch's family as opposed to all three families, it was most likely because they cast Reese Witherspoon as the mother.

The movie ends by noting what happened in the years after the trial ended. What's most intriguing is that the man who came into Bojangles's and was never seen again. What secrets do all the people in West Memphis hide? Whatever the case, this sounds like one horrifying event. "Devil's Knot" is not a great movie, but I recommend it. Also starring Colin Firth, Mireille Enos, Alessandro Nivola and Bruce Greenwood.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A respectful but overly restrained dramatisation of true events - the real story is far more devilish and knotty than the film suggests.
shawneofthedead16 May 2014
For decades now, Hollywood has been mining the headlines for inspiration. It was only a matter of time before studio executives turned their attention to the West Memphis Three: a trio of teenagers who were convicted - most likely wrongfully - of murdering three young boys and sentenced to life in prison. You might imagine that the resulting movie would be every bit as disturbing, tragic and thought- provoking as the actual case itself. But Devil's Knot is more respectful than effective as a film, covering the facts without really getting to the heart of the matter.

On a summer day like any other, Pam Hobbs (Reese Witherspoon) waves goodbye to her little boy Steve as he heads off on his bike with his two friends. It would be the last time she sees him alive. When three bodies turn up in a rain-washed river, the local authorities conclude that the murders bear shades of a Satanic ritual. As a result, other leads - a bloodied man stumbling into a diner near the scene of the crime, a young man (Dane DeHaan) with an odd interest in the boys - fall by the wayside. Instead, three teenagers with an interest in the occult - Damien Echols (James Hamrick), Jason Baldwin (Seth Meriwether) and Jessie Misskelley Jr. (Kristopher Higgins) - become the targets of a community and legal system eager to find answers, even if it means looking in all the wrong places.

It's easy to see why these murders, which took place in 1993, have remained so compelling and fascinating, even twenty years later. Mixed up in the heartbreakingly tragic loss of three young lives are weighty themes of prejudice, religious bias and the miscarriage of justice. With new leads consistently popping up that continue to throw the original judicial decision into doubt, it's small wonder that private investigators like Ron Lax (played by a rather miscast Colin Firth in the film) find themselves turning over and over the facts of the case, trying to figure out how the police narrowed their search in a way that seemed to lead to obvious - and likely erroneous - conclusions.

But Atom Egoyan's film never really delves into the horror and humanity of the story it wants to tell. At some point along the way, the film shifts into documentary mode, hitting the story beats but never really finding its heart. There are a couple of emotional moments that come courtesy of Witherspoon's shell-shocked Pam, but very little insight is otherwise provided into the psyches of the characters. We spend hardly any time with the parents of the other two victims, and we're never really given the opportunity to come to grips with the seemingly stone-cold Damien or his two alleged accomplices - a befuddled Jason and a haplessly confused Jessie.

For anyone unfamiliar with the West Memphis Three, Devil's Knot will serve as a good enough primer: it's a dutiful version of the story, with the bare facts alone capable of chilling most people to the bone. But anyone who's more interested in the twists, turns, implications and consequences of the case might be better served by looking elsewhere. There are a few actual documentaries out there - the Paradise Lost series and West Of Memphis (produced by Peter Jackson) - that are considerably more incisive in their approach to these murders.
35 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth seeing but if you get a chance read & watch anything else on the West Memphis 3, you'll be more informed & more interested
cosmo_tiger11 May 2014
"If you don't have a strong case the state is gonna kill 3 young men and I can't stand by and watch that happen." In 1993 three 8 year old boys were savagely murdered. The state tried three teenagers as adults for the killings and claimed they were murdered as part of a satanic cult ritual. This is the story of the trial and how Ron Lax (Firth) tried to help the defense and how one of the mother's (Witherspoon) dealt with the loss and aftermath. I knew very little of the actual story going in. This is a movie that reminded me of the Aviator in the way that I watched a documentary and read more about the events after it was over and found those to be better and more interesting then the movie. The cast is great and has many big names as well as 3 Oscar winners, but at best this felt like a made-for-TV movie. I found it hard to really get into and was disappointed especially with this cast. I'm not saying it's not worth seeing but if you get a chance read and watch anything else on the West Memphis Three, you will be more informed and more interested then you would if you watch this movie. Overall, not bad but could have been so much better. I give this a B-.
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Wasted opportunity
helgis-6312015 December 2019
Atom Egoyan can't seem to decide whether he wants to make a para documentary or a "Twin Peaks" rip off, which distracts the viewers like me (unfamiliar with the West Memphis Three case) and clearly confuses his cast. The best of the bunch were the child actors and Dane DeHaan. Although I must point out that only the little boy playing Aaron was able to master the para docu "Twin Peaks" style his director was desperate to create on screen... Incredibly memorable performance. But the movie itself is just OK if not just meh. And considering the fascinating story based on true events and the talents involved this should have been a great movie.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
a decent summary of the defense's case
pmcguireumc16 June 2014
I have seen a lot of people trash this film, and if you are looking for something on the level of Angelina Jolie's "Changeling", you will be disappointed. If though, you are tolerant of a low budget but effective dramatization of a very tangled, disturbing, and tragic story about 3 young boys losing their lives to murder and 3 young men losing their lives to a group of detectives and justice system blinded by emotion, you will appreciate this film. Reece is fantastic as the mom of one of the victims. She is the big name in the film, though you will recognize several actors who are not quite up to her level of star power. I am a bit of a junkie on this case, and I was not disappointed. I think it does a fair job of presenting the defense's perspective. Granted, if you think they are guilty, and there are many who do, then you will be angered by its presentation. Nonetheless, I was very pleased with it.
32 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Truth is stranger than fiction . . . and that's the problem.
The_Film_Cricket17 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Atom Egoyan's Devil's Knot is a wholly unnecessary exercise. Here is a fictionalized recreation of the brutal 1993 murders of three elementary school boys from West Memphis Arkansas that has already been documented in Joe Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky's brilliant 1996 documentary Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills and its three subsequent follow-ups. If you've seen those films then you already know all the players. Those films were intricately detailed portraits of West Memphis with all its oddball characters and bizarre hysterical theories that led to the conviction three teenagers that the community believed were serving the devil. By this point, what can Egoyan's fictional narrative tell us that we don't already know? The short answer: not much.

It is not for lack of talent. Egoyan is a brilliant filmmaker. His most effective landscape has been the wilderness of his native Canada. His best films like Exotica and The Sweet Hereafter deal with events in The Great White North in a way that never seems generic because the territory seems as familiar to him as the letters in his own name. In stepping outside his usual landscape, he finds himself wading knee-deep in the waters of our expectations. They recreate the events without the intricate details so their film comes off feeling like a barely passable reenactment.

What is presented in Devil's Knot (which is named after the wooded area in which the three boys were found) is a fictional narrative that never comes close to the details presented in Berlinger and Sinofsky's documentary. The monumental task for Egoyan and his screenwriters Paul Harris Boardman and Scott Derrickson, is to create the same kind of creepy effectiveness that we got from the documentary. Yet, where the documentary had the advantage of prying into the private lives of the families and the legal team, this docudrama finds its focus on Ronald Lax (Colin Firth), the private investigator who worked with the defense pro bono. In doing so, many of the major players remain off-screen. The three accused teenagers, Jesse Misskelley, Damian Echols and Jason Baldwin remain shadows here. We see them fleetingly, mostly in the backgrounds.

The same goes for the families. There were six families devastated by this crime, but the film focuses almost exclusively on Pamela Hobbs the single mother of one of the victims. She's played by Reese Witherspoon in a performance that feels somehow muted and unfocused, as if the real meat of her performance was left on the cutting room floor.

What is strange is that Egoyan and his screenwriters would focus on the relatively banal figure of Hobbs (from a fictional standpoint anyway) when the most curious mainstay of the case has always been John Mark Byers, the stepfather of Christopher Byers, one of the murder victims. Byers was always the most outspoken of the grieving parents, a creepy and laconic man who spoke passionately about his faith in God while his background contained elements of a life of bitter chaos: DUIs, blackouts, hallucinations, violence, a brain tumor, restraining orders. Plus there was that strange business in 1996 when his wife Melissa (and Christopher's mother) suddenly died of "undetermined causes." Those details are to be found in the documentary. In Egoyan's film, Byers is seen fleetingly in the backgrounds.

Even from the standpoint of filmmaking, Devil's Knot never really breathes with life. Egoyan is the master of his canvas, an expert at knowing how to paint a portrait of a grieving town, as he did in his great 1998 film The Sweet Hereafter about the deaths of several school children when their school bus crash through the ice. The weight of that film came from the community that had to deal with those events. It could reasonably be hoped that he could create the mourning atmosphere of West Memphis, Arkansas that led to the suspicions and hysteria about Satanic cult rituals on which the three teens were accused. Yet, it doesn't work because our brains are so fine-tuned into the real facts and the real people, that any fiction feels phony by comparison.
20 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An average movie with good casting.
neil-arsenal2 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Many are already familiar with this tragic story. What we have here is a dumbed down version of the 'Paradise Lost' series of documentaries. This is a movie review so it's best not to get into opinions here, although it isn't easy with such a delicate, tragic and controversial story and I know I will struggle. What I will say is that there are two sides to every story and not to believe everything Hollywood spoon feeds you. I recommend reading the case files online before forming a concrete opinion.

The movie itself is average. It has the look and feel of a well made TV movie. The subject matter is very complex and obviously dumbed down a little for the audience. The documentaries are much better, although they are pretty biased. In fact in the second edition they blame the murders on one of the fathers. You can even see reviews and comments about him on here from the time of the movie release. This was later proved 100% untrue and the poor man had to suffer years of abuse and suspicion. He still does at times.

In conclusion, this movie is a good way to get a basic background of the case, but it misses a lot out. I must admit that I was impressed with the casting. If you've seen the documentaries you'll see the resemblances, I'm sure. Overall, you would be better advised to watch the 'Paradise Lost' documentaries but also to read the case files which are all online (and include some video interviews). They're very hefty and will take a while to get through, but if you want proof of why you should read them, just look at the reviews on here of Paradise Lost 2. And remember that the man getting so much abuse on here (and all over the internet as well as in real life) was proved innocent.

Despite this, supporters of the convicted (and still guilty) murderers are all too eager to do the same to another father on evidence so flimsy the authorities are not interested. If you have kids at home, how likely is it that one of your hairs will transfer to them? The fact is, it's very likely and he wasn't the only parent with hair at the crime scene, although you'll never get that from Hollywood.

Good casting. Average production. Dumbed down. Hopefully, the parents can get some peace one day when the truth finally outs (if it hasn't already).
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Surprisingly poor effort
Falconeer23 May 2014
From a competent director like Atom Egoyan, one would certainly expect a bit more than this sub par effort, that looks and feels like a cheap, made for TV movie, in every way. Filled with dull court scenes, and a preachy vibe throughout, as though the film was made specifically to prove that the 3 boys were innocent of the charges. It is hard to imagine that a movie dealing with such a fascinating subject matter, could actually be boring; but Egoyan and his cast manage to deliver a completely lackluster product. Even Reese Witherspoon, who usually turns in good performances, is just awful in this. Somehow her Southern accent sounds completely fake...even though the actress IS Southern! It felt like the actors didn't put any feeling into their roles, perhaps because even they realized that the script was so uninspiring. And if the people involved in the project can't find inspiration, how is the audience supposed to feel anything at all? The only bright spot in this film is the appearance of the up and coming actor Dane DeHaan, who is usually the best thing about any production he appears in. Unfortunately DeHaan is on screen for less than a total of 10 minutes.

For those interested in the infamous 'West Memphis Three' murders, the documentary "Paradise Lost" is still the most interesting film on the subject. Later this year, there is yet another movie on this subject, due to be released in November 2014. Hopefully that film will handle the material better than this lackluster effort..
43 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent enough, but a little lacking
neil-47619 June 2014
Warning: Spoilers
In 1993 small-town Arkansas, 3 small boys go missing only for their bodies to be found the next day, naked, bound, beaten and, in one case, mutilated. The ensuing arrest, trial and conviction of 3 teenage boys is predicated on a wish to see the crime attributed to satanism. But the evidence is somewhat shaky.

This adaptation of a true story has strengths and weaknesses. The strength is that it is absorbing, genuinely harrowing at times, and with several good performances. The less good news is that, as a narrative, it ends up (inevitably) being somewhat unsatisfying due to the absence of a proper conclusion. Also, the usually reliable Colin Firth is somewhat off his game, and never really convinces as affluent pro bono investigator Ron Lax.

Even so, if looked at solely as a catalogue of investigative shortcomings, shockingly poor evidence, and judicial partiality, it is a sobering couple of hours, and worth catching on that basis.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Too much missing
steveorr-0159929 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I gave this a even due to it's watchability. I was never bored and enjoyed seeing each little bit of reasonable doubt surface. I had not heard of the case before. The credits that explained the defendants did 18 years and still weren't exonerated made me do a double-take.

There is no way a judge could have acted the way this one did and not have the case declared a mistrial on appeal. I'm pretty sure no trial judge can give the actual date of execution, as well.

The jury did not find it significant that a bloody and muddy man came into a restaurant that night and this was not submitted into evidence at the beginning of the trial? And the police lost the blood? Or that testimony was coerced? Or the suspect in California?

This movie portrayed so much reasonable doubt a jury would not convict on capital charges. The OJ case was one year later and he was found innocent with some of the same discrepancies and no other viable suspects. Do they want us to believe this happened due to Arkansas still being far behind the rest of the US in judicial process?

Based upon the evidence given in the movie, a little poetic license and the jury finding them innocent would have been a better outcome. I would have given it a 10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Review: Devil's Knot/www.nightfilmreviews.com
lucasnochez3 February 2014
There are very few instances in this world where the reality of the matter is more interesting than any form of fiction. Such is the case with Canadian director Atom Egoyan's newest film Devil's Knot. Gripping, chilling, and in many instances disturbing, the film is a mildly rewarding take on a story that doesn't need a feature film to highlight anymore high tension than it already has.

Tackling the very daunting task of offering new insight in the on-again/off-again case of the West Memphis murders, Devil's Knot is a short yet ample "For Dummies" version film about a case that has been exhausted through documentaries (the Paradise Lost documentary film trilogy and West of Memphis) as well as various biographies, books and extensive media coverage.

Egoyan's film, which is based on the book Devil's Knot by Mara Leveritt, is really the first high- profile film project (excluding Peter Jackson's producing credit in West of Memphis) with A-List actors who paint a vivid picture of the people involved in the case, the victims and the "accused". From Reese Witherspoon to Colin Firth, the film is a by-the-numbers drama with sub-powerful performances that gives off a satisfactory feeling of relief; a relief that suffices only from the time you leave the theatre, to the time you get home and find out more about the case yourself.

The film follows Ron Lax (Firth), a private investigator who decides to take on the West Memphis case pro-bono in what we understand to be the pursuit of a "rightful conviction". Throughout his investigation, Lax uncovers numerous instances of judicial injustice, inconsistencies in the evidence, and improper police protocol that would have been crucial to solving the case and proving the innocence of the three young accused.

Egoyan is no stranger to dramas centred around the tragedy of the loss of children, or innocence for that matter. It seems as though no one else could have adapted Leveritt's book as throughly as him, yet Egoyan's vision is always second-string to the facts and the reality of the case itself. Often times veering in the direction of a 'made-for-televison film', or treading the fine line of being a special episode on CSI or Law & Order, the film is a washed out, third party perspective that attempts to be unbiased throughout, but still takes a strong side by the time the credits roll.

Much like the case itself, the film was able to round out a very high-profile group of individuals in front of the camera, especially given the small nature of the film and it's light $15 million budget. From Mireille Enos, Alessandro Nivola, Amy Ryan, Dane DeHaan, and Matt Letscher, to television stars Stephen Moyer and Martin Henderson, and Egoyan favourites Elias Koteas and Bruce Greenwood, the film is a star-studded festival entry despite it's surface level insight, cowardly execution and lack of style.

The film succeeds when it trembles the notions of stereotypes and common, misunderstood motifs. Once tragedy struck, the town of West Memphis seemed to be content with the fact that Damien Echols (James Hamrick) and his two friends, Jessie Misskelley Jr. (Kristopher Higgins) and Jason Baldwin (Seth Meriwether), were accused of murder solely because they listened to heavy metal music and dressed in black. The film shows the ridiculousness of society's stubborn ability to shed little light on the truth of misunderstood forms of art.

Set within the small town, low income, 'Bible Belt' of the United States, the film shows the very colourful contentions between the presence of the "unholy", as well as how quick people are to vilify anything it doesn't understand, even if that means sentencing an innocent teenager to death. It is in the scenes where Lax investigates the facts that could potentially lead to these young men's freedom, that the film flourishes leaps and bounds. From unaccredited sources and not-so-expert witnesses, to completely fabricated testimonies, the film acts as Lax's own personal assistant, as he navigates a seamlessly normal town which actually might have a few skeletons in it's closet after all. The film shows just how convenient and perfect the outcasts of society, especially within the small Hillbilly pockets of the United States, really are.

Highlighting the ignorance of small-town Southern US communities, the laughable prediction amidst the accusations of alleged Satanic rituals, and giving a very graphic and unabridged look on how these innocent little boys were recovered from a lake (aptly titled the Devil's Den), Devil's Knot would have worked best as an HBO special. Instead it succeeds best as a visual piece of narrative whose greatest testament is allowing it's audience to indulge in shocking images and discomforting truths. Ironically enough, Devil's Knot is riveting most when no dialogue is spoken–in the scenes involving the search and discovery of the bodies and the reactions of the victim's parents, especially Witherspoon's.

Upon conclusion, and much like the case itself, the film continues to insinuate that within the small town of West Memphis, Arkansas, everybody may be a real suspect in the unwarranted murder of three eight-year old boys. If anything, Devil's Knot is an appetizer size, introductory piece of narrative cinema that will surely serve as a catalyst for people to look into the complexity and uncertainty of one of America's most misunderstood and poorly investigated murder cases of all time.
16 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Devil's Knot" has its flaws, but there are some very important facts contained within the film.
cthulu4811 May 2014
Warning: Spoilers
My thoughts on the new West Memphis 3 dramatization film, "Devil's Knot", adapted from Mara Leverrit's book of the same title: Though production values were certainly sub-par, as well as some of the acting, I actually thought it was valuable due to the fact that any folks who are not aware of the West Memphis 3 case can maybe become intrigued to investigate on their own and draw their own conclusions.

Some of the acting was sub-par, but there were several elements of the movie which are only vaguely alluded to in the documentary films, such as the case file being changed from ending with "555" as the case number, then being changed to end the case number with "666". Deplorable. One thing I liked about the film is that they don't squarely point the finger at anyone definitively.... To me, it simply presented all of the possible angles that the police bungled. I was pleased that Mark Byers' role as a "suspect" was only touched on briefly among many, many other possible suspects that could ACTUALLY be guilty, not just conjecture against Damien, Jason and Jessie, but to Byers as well.

I was frustrated that the WM3 support group on wm3.org were not mentioned, nor was Damien's wife, and almost all credit for the doubt in the case is presented as Ron Lax and Ron Lax almost exclusively.

I like that the central theme of the movie is that we can never convict anyone for these murders justly, due to the police and the courts bungling the case in every way possible. The film centrally blames the inept police investigation, which I find unforgivable when it comes to this horrendous crime. It seemed to me that the film wasn't REALLY pointing the finger directly at anyone, but rather presented the police investigation as a recipe for disaster and injustice due to incompetence and corruption.

In my opinion, any extra exposure this case can get is nothing but positive, as the fight is no more than 50% concluded, with justice being served to no one. I've read "Devil's Knot", and I of course was simply looking for answers to questions that no one was asking. When I read the book initially, many years ago, it seemed to really focus on John Mark Byers, as a "primary suspect". Frankly, I didn't believe it for very long, and I'm sorry that I ever did.

The more publicity the case gets, the higher the chances of exoneration for the WM3, and thus, a higher chance that the real killer can be brought to justice. The film could've been better, but it could have been worse, and the film points out lots of key aspects that have only been glossed over by the documentary viewers who haven't done any private studies on their own. The big lesson? You shouldn't point your finger at someone unless you are damn sure, and I thing "Devil's Knot" raises more questions that it answers, but they are questions that NEED to be asked, and hopefully answered in our lifetimes.

One part of the film that I thought was hardly mentioned at all in the documentaries (other than the bonus features) was the kid Aaron Hutchenson's "confession" or "statement" basically being the totally weak link that caused the police to push towards tunnel vision regarding the beginning of the investigation into the WM3. His statements are so painfully inaccurate, yet the police used those statements almost like a fire was lit under their asses. How desperate and incompetent can a police force be, relying on the erroneous statements of a little kid who's obviously been coached and still doesn't make any sense when giving his "statement" to the cops. They took that as the first brick in the wall, and kept building and bending the work they should've been doing....for example, canvassing the Hobbs' neighborhood the way they did to Byers. MAJOR BLUNDER.

I do think the film could have a bit better AS A MOTION PICTURE, but I am glad that attention has not been focused off of the case just because Damien, Jason and Jessie are out of jail now. Maybe, not likely, but maybe, enough of this type of continued exposure to the public may lead to actual justice for the victims.. in a perfect world. What can I say? I'm not naive, but I am a dreamer. But I'm not the only one.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poor representation of a very complex murder case
emmaline894 May 2014
This movie is based on a real murder case, and that case is simply far too complex to jam it all in to a logical movie of 2 something hours. The film makers simply missed the mark on this and did a very poor job of turning this murder case into a story line for a film.

As a movie, it felt extremely disjointed. They flicked between different time points very quickly, which made it difficult to grasp how much time had actually passed between events. There is very little character development so viewers are left without any idea of who most of the people actually are, which is especially sad given that there are real people behind every character. In terms of the case details, they had some very odd choices in what to include and what to leave out, and they dramatized certain things but down played others. I feel they misrepresented certain people and certain relationships, and didn't seem to present much of a story.

Overall it was just a terrible movie. Such a shame that they managed to do such a poor job given that this movie is based on a real murder case with plenty of very interesting people.
62 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A disjointed presentation of the story makes me care less for the characters than I should
Gordon-117 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This film tells the story of the trial of three teenagers who were accused of killing three young boys for human sacrifice in a small town back in 1990's.

Given the subject matter, one might expect the film to be a tear jerker. It tells how three teenagers who were obsessed with Satanism got blamed for the murders. The whole town thinks they did it, and the film spends a whole lot of time presenting circumstantial evidence that they did commit the crime. At times, the film also present some evidence that the murderer might have been someone else, but the presentation of this was so poor that I did not know what the scenes signify until much later.

For example, when the owner of a restaurant calls the police about a man covered in blood, the scene is poorly presented and then forgotten until much later, when the scene is presented in new light that actually makes a difference to the plot. Another example is that the discovery of a pocket knife by Pam quite late in the film. Nothing is mentioned about a pocket knife until that scene, and the significance of it is told haphazardly right at the end. The delivery of the story was too one-sided against the teenagers to start with, that the contrary evidence does not create any suspense or thrill; or makes any sense until the ending.

It is a pity that the plot was so disjointed. It makes me care less for the characters than I should.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Paradise Lost trilogy
yusufpiskin16 January 2021
Exceptional dramatization of Paradise Lost trilogy. The documentaries are still best and most complete account of the tragedy, but this serves as a very fair, albeit concise, summary of the event.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Another case of poor directing..
danielthompsonfp27 January 2021
The cast was there, the storyline was there, this could have been a successful film.. however it's clearly evident that there was poor directing for this film. Hands down, one of Reese Witherspoons worst films.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An Outstanding Film About One of the Most Troubling Murder Cases of the Late 20th Century -- Unjustly Snubbed By Critics
classicalsteve7 July 2014
In 1996, HBO produced a documentary, "Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills", about the much-publicized murder case of three pre-teen boys, Stevie Branch, Michael Moore, and Christopher Byers, who were murdered in the wooded creeks called Robin Hood Hills near West Memphis, Arkansas. The local authorities were convinced the murders were enacted by three older male teens, Damien Echols, Jessie Misskelley, Jr., and Jason Baldwin. According to the present film and the HBO documentaries, the local authorities targeted the older teens as suspects in a kind of modern-day witch-hunt because of their interest in the occult, horror films, and Heavy Metal music. Echols was often seen wearing black clothing, an affront to the predominant Christian community of West Memphis. He later admitted to reading about Aleister Crowley but asserted he had never read any of Crowley's actual writings.

The case against the three teens hinged primarily on the notion that the murders were committed as a kind of sacrifice in a satanic ritual. Also, dubious testimony, particularly that of Vicki Hutcheson and her son Aaron, was later recanted. Hutcheson claimed initially that she had seen the three teens involved in Satanic rituals and that Damien Eckles had bragged about committing the murders at the event. She later said she had been coerced by police to offer false evidence, fearing authorities might take away her son. Her son Aaron in a video-taped interview said he had seen the actual murders, but then later when he was older withdrew his testimony claiming he knew nothing about the crimes. Other evidence, such as the possible involvement of an African-American who ended up in the ladies' room and smeared blood on the walls at Bojangles Restaurant the night of the murders was never adequately followed up on. No actual physical evidence linked the boys with the murders. Their prosecution was mainly based on circumstantial evidence concerning their interest in the occult.

Twenty years after the convictions of the so-called "West Memphis Three" and 17 years after the HBO Documentary "Paradise Lost", the film "the Devil's Knot" based on the book of the same name was released, starring Colin Firth as Ron Lax, a private investigator who became interested in the case, and Reese Witherspoon as Pamela Hobbs, the mother of victim Stevie Branch. First off, the film is beautifully shot. The lush swampy areas portraying the Robin Hood Hills appear almost like photos you might see in a postcard. The night shots are particularly beautiful, although simultaneously horrific as the setting for the brutal murders.

Critics claimed the film didn't add anything new to the understanding of the case, but I don't believe this was the filmmakers' intentions. The point of the film I believe was simply to tell the story in a dramatic/narrative format rather than a documentary. (HBO produced three documentaries in all about the case and probably assisted in the revelation about the poor police investigation, the witch-hunt sensibilities towards members of their community interested in the occult, and the dubious testimonies which led eventually to the release of the West Memphis Three.) Apart from whether or not audiences will believe the West Memphis Three are guilty or innocent, much of the film is about the complexity of such cases. Unless a defendant truthfully confesses to a crime, many questions and strange circumstances surround most cases. In many instances, the whole truth may be nearly unobtainable, such as questions which still surround the JFK Assassination.

An excellent and underrated film. The main reasons "The Devil's Knot" works as well as it does is because of the fine acting, particularly Witherspoon, Firth, and an honorable mention to James Hamrick as Damien Echols, the wonderful direction, and also because of the film's point of view. The film shows both sides of the case. The local authorities were pressured by the community to find the three teens guilty since a rift between conservative Christians and those interested in the occult was growing wider. In the film, one character states that those interested in the occult were bound to become enmeshed in a crime case sooner or later. Of course, the most informative details can be found in the three HBO documentaries, "Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills" (1996), "Paradise Lost 2: Revelations" (2000), and "Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory" (2011).
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Docudrama about the West Memphis 3
killercharm30 June 2020
This is a movie that needed to be made. The documentary is four movies long, and does not hold the attention so well as this movie. Obviously some things had to be left out to keep this under two hours. I had to credit the movie for admitting when they were veering from the truth. The tale of the murdered children and the convicted children is well told here.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ponderous exploration of a true story
Leofwine_draca16 September 2016
DEVIL'S KNOT is the film version of a true story about three boys who were brutally murdered in Arkansas in 1993. A public outcry and witch hunt followed, at which point three outcast teenagers were herded up and sent to court accused of the crime. In the subsequent years, many people have come to believe that the teenagers were innocent, and DEVIL'S KNOT explores some of the complexity of the case.

Sadly it's a bit of a disappointing film. It's well shot throughout but that's all you get. The film seems overly distracted by the presence of Hollywood starlet Reese Witherspoon playing the mother of one of the victims. For a relatively minor character in the story she gets way too much screen time and spoils what could have otherwise been an enthralling viewing experience. I was much more interested in the characters of the accused but they seem skirted over in some ways.

Another detraction is Colin Firth as the mild-mannered crime investigator. Firth is too occupied with trying to do an American accent than with properly acting and his subdued turn makes no impact. When the film finished I was just left wanting to know more about the case than in this somewhat sketchy version - perhaps to watch one of the documentaries which I'm sure exist about it. DEVIL'S KNOT is no MISSISSIPPI BURNING, that's for sure.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed