"Law & Order" Pride and Joy (TV Episode 1993) Poster

(TV Series)

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Parental abuse
bkoganbing15 October 2018
Jerry Orbach and Chris Noth investigate the case of a building superintendent being beaten to death in the boiler room of his basement apartment. The trail leads sadly enough to the victim's son Gabriel Olds.

The family which also consists of mother Pamela Robin-Wright and daughter Maureen McKinnon lives in a basement apartment that I would kill to have on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, but is part of the package of being a building super. Olds who has grown up around wealth wants more than anything to break into that. There was another episode on the sister Law And Order program SVU where Frank Langella is abused by one of his two sons.

In this family Olds is academically smart and is looking at admission to Princeton. But he wants to be part of that privileged Ivy League scene and the whole family is terrorized by him as he's become psychotically obsessed.

Olds really stands out in this episode.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It may not be a joyful episode but there is plenty to take pride in
TheLittleSongbird3 September 2020
Not that one should expect to be uplifted by an episode of 'Law and Order'. Not because of the quality, at its best the show was exceptional and even when at its weakest it still fared better than most shows. But because of the tone, which is of the hitting hard and gritty kind because of its uncompromising approach to controversial issues and tough stories. Which it often did brilliantly. "Pride and Joy" is no exception when it comes to that.

"Pride and Joy" is not one of the best episodes of 'Law and Order's' Season 4. Comparing it to the season's previous episodes, it isn't as great as "Black Tie", "Volunteers" and especially "Profile" (the last being a season high point) and even better than those would come later on in the season. It is still a very good episode of what was an overall solid season, that just lacks the extra something that the best episodes had, where there is quality-wise a lot to take pride in.

There is very little to criticise here. The episode is over in a little too much of a hurry at the end.

Other episodes have a little more tension too.

However, the episode is slickly made, the photography's intimacy is never too claustrophobic. The music is haunting and understated while not being too over-emphasised in major revelations. The direction is accomodating as ever while never being dull. The script is thought-probing and even when talk heavy there isn't too much waffle and it is easy to follow. Love the rapport between Briscoe and Logan and the legal-oriented scenes have a lot of insight and didn't go over my head, despite knowing very little about law outside of film and television (it has always fascinated me though).

Even if there is more tension and a little more emotion in other episodes, the episode is still hard to watch. Appropriate for the subject by the way, that is not meant as a bad thing at all. It is a very disturbing episode, because of all the family situation and the character of the perpetrator, and also in a way sad. The regular characters are all written well and have great interaction with each other, especially Briscoe and Logan though Stone is the juiciest character. The acting is very good from all, with the overall acting honours going to Gabriel Olds who was suitably unnerving.

Concluding, very good episode if not quite a great one. 8/10
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Sharper Than A Serpent's Tooth.
rmax3048235 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This is about average for the series, which means it's well done in almost all respects and is made for adults.

A building superintendent is found murdered near the boiler room of an apartment house, the window of the outside door broken. It looks as if some crack head broke in, was discovered by the victim, and killed him with a hammer.

But, as is usual, things aren't what they seem. The "lab boys" find that the window was broken from the inside out, and then swept back inside to make a phony break-in look more authentic. What's more, the dead and bleeding body had been dragged from the boiler room and left close to the door, as if everything had been staged.

There are the usual red herrings before the law pins the murder of the victim's own seventeen-year-old son, the pride of the family. The kid has brains. His father was working twelve-hour days to put him through a prestigious prep school, and the kid had gotten admitted to Princeton. But, ashamed of his working-stiff father, the boy was forever beating his old man, putting him in the hospital four times, until the final confrontation turned lethal. The mother and daughter covered it all up as best they could for reasons of their own.

I doubt the story was "ripped from the headlines" because incidents like this aren't very common. Murder in families are common enough but not systematic abuse of a healthy father by a dominant teen-aged son. To the extent such a case is sensational it would be because of its rarity.

The lawyer for the defense is pretty sharp. He doesn't manage to get the kid off -- which, for the kid, means good-bye Princeton, and that's all he cares about. He may see the inside of a jail cell but never the basement of the Firestone Library. Yet, watching this episode, I found myself wondering how this working-class family was able to hire a competent trial lawyer.

How much could they have had in the way of assets after paying the son's tuition at that tony prep school? I've seen two lawyers. One charged $100 to make a phone call and then forgot to call me with the results. Another charged $100 to retype a letter I'd prepared and then got the contents wrong. If the family had assets like mine, they'd have been flat broke before their lawyer reached 150 hours. If they'd been terribly wealthy, of course, they might have engaged Alan Dershowitz, in which case the murderer would now be in a fancy club somewhere chatting about Old Nassau over a glass of single malt scotch.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cat's in the cradle
safenoe24 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Lauren Ambrose guest stars Maureen McKinnon, seven or so years before her career exploded in Six Feet Under. Anyway, here it's the nasty son who's in trouble with the law as he exacts his resentment against his superintendent father who works hard to raise the son and get him through Princeton, and for what you may ask.

I'm enjoying watching the early seasons of Law and Order, and that was when Carolyn McCormick got guest credit as Dr Elizabeth Olivet in the opening credits so well done to her. The early seasons has the Serpico or French Connection feel about New York City before all the glamor.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed