Hallow's End (Video 2003) Poster

(2003 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
20 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Not the worst
TonyDood6 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I probably give this more credit than it deserves because it's Halloween, I was just at "Knott's Scary Farm" and I was in a mood to watch a really cheesy Halloween movie.

Oh, and it only cost me one dollar.

Usually I'll ffwd through a movie like this to get to "the good stuff," but I resisted the urge here and I'm still not sure why. It was obvious from the opening shots this wasn't a "real" movie, not even a B-movie. It's more in the category of the DeCoteau "horror" movies like "The Brotherhood" that are shot on film-look video for about 50 cents (in fact, I was half afraid any minute one of his beefy college boys would stagger out rubbing himself in his underpants or something). There were no cutaway shots (too expensive to do multiple camera setups) and flat lighting but...it's hard to pinpoint. There's something refreshing about watching a director with no money pull off a half-decent movie. The fact that he's doing even a half-decent job is commendable, and this movie has it's share of merits--the acting isn't bad, the photography is pretty good (if too bright to be scary), there are some surprises, and the whole thing is sort of...different somehow.

A bunch of college kids are (for some unknown reason) stuck in the warehouse where they are decorating the annual haunted house. A creepy old man gives them a satanic book and they accidentally summon up the powers of hell. This results in the costumed people in the haunted house becoming who they are made up to be, and causing a lot of mayhem and human suffering. Along the way we are treated to an oddly complex and thoughtful lesbian relationship subplot--it's interesting that this couple seems to be the most well-rounded in the movie. Yes, there's a sex scene but it isn't salacious--or at least no more so than you'd find in any legit movie about lesbians that shows them having sex. It's rather unusual for a horror film to take the time and effort to do this without resorting to cheap exploitation.

The other thing about this that held my interest was how it was clearly trying to emulate the "stupid kids have sex and get killed" vibe of the 80's slashers. It's hard to take that on because there are so many of those films that already exist, the genre has been done to death. I'm not sure if it's good or bad that these filmmakers simply tried to make another entry in that genre, without irony, as if it was still a LIVING genre, but I appreciated the attempt.

Which is why I sat through it; sometimes you just want to watch a mindless, no-budget, "A-for-effort" horror film. There really was too much set up, not enough gore, endless plot-holes, dead-ends and clichés and the unfortunate overall feel of a movie that simply did not have enough money behind it to be the film the producers envisioned...but at the very least the haunted house scenes were pretty cool. I'd pay to go to that haunted house if it existed, and didn't mind paying a dollar to see it on DVD even if I'll never watch this again.

Oh, and **possible spoiler**, but there was great, brief business with the vampire girl in the coffin: "I used to be claustrophobic. But I've changed." Ha ha, good one.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dreadful
thunderpuppy22 July 2003
Horror movies can be a lot of fun with low budgets, bad acting, and a bit of panache. I think the film is just missing panache, because, one thuddingly dull scene after another, people make laughably harmless claw-handed grabs at the air. If it weren't so boring, it might be funny.

A horror film can go a long way with a tired concept like "college kids in a haunted house," in much the same way the Evil Dead movies had a lot of fun with a similar standard plotline. Hallow's End, unfortunately, doesn't go a long way. Actually, it doesn't go anywhere. It spends the better part of an hour setting up faceless and anonymous characters with what seem like endless interpersonal drama. I have nothing against character development, not even in a horror movie, but these are strictly one-dimensional characters (the alpha-male, the milquetoast, the... um... throwaway characters that exist mostly for sex scenes.) Spending forty-plus bloodless, droning minutes with them was more horrific than when the bloodshed started.

Well, implied bloodshed anyway. When the college kids turn into whatever they dressed as for their haunted house (one's a vampire, one's wearing O.R. scrubs and some white pancake) they look pretty much the way they did in their amateur haunted house costumes; The Dead Hate The Living, using a similar theme, is a masterwork in comparison. There isn't really any gore to speak of, nor are there any real scares.

I've thought about this one from almost every approach. If it was supposed to be a tight, suspenseful horror movie (which would explain why things moved so slowly), the pathetic sex scenes and cheap monsters would invalidate it. If it was supposed to be a genuine blood & guts horror movie (which would explain the schlock)... where's the blood and guts? And the anticlimax is one of the unexciting endings to a movie I've ever seen. It's the kind of movie that, though it doesn't have a narrator through the film, is bookended by voice-overs because all of the meaningless dialogue just wasn't enough.

This was a hard one... coming out of it, I wonder if I've just sat through a christian horror film. Maybe the "I know hell exists" of the opening wasn't meant that way, but there are some hints (or misdirection-- I'm not sure which). For all the profanity in the film, a line like "gosh-darnit" comes off a little absurd, and so does most of the crucifix worshipping, god-fearing, and satan-dreading, especially after some lecherous T&A sex scenes (one heterosexual, one lesbian).

If it a christian company (Highland Myst's logo even has a bit of a crucifix resemblance), then this film weighs in heavily for the atheist camp. An omnipotent being can't be this bad a filmmaker.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ummmm . . . . it's shot well?
ektalon7 March 2004
Warning: Spoilers
*WARNING. THERE MIGHT BE SPOILERS AHEAD, IF YOU CARE.*

Okay, the basic premise of this homegrown Texas film is: College kids + spookhouse + evil magic book = scary stuff. In practice, it equals a lot of time looking at the time to see how much longer this movie is going to drag on. A bunch of frat boys, along with assorted girlfriends & volunteers, is setting up a charity haunted house. The project is being presided over by a thoroughly repellent character, whose main purpose seems to be verbally & physically assaulting as many cast members as possible. I had a hard time believing that anyone would even attempt to work with this person in any capacity: he's nothing but rude and abusive to everyone, including his girlfriend and his buddy. Regardless, the kids are visited by local character & annual pumpkin-carving champion "Pumpkin Jack", an elderly coot who is described as the "Santa Claus of Halloween", and who drops off a load of props for the house, including an ominous book that figured prominently in the irritatingly strobe-flashed prologue(where a gaggle of robed cultists get turned into stir-fry). Needless to say, some damn fool starts messing with the book, and eventually most of the costumed monsters turn into real ones, and the remaining few normal folk have to try and survive. There's some good stuff in this film, but not much: everything is shot well, and the makeup effects are decent. On the other hand, the performers either underact, or overact drastically; much of the plot makes little sense outside of a "this happens so that can happen" series; there is hardly any musical score to speak of, just snatches of songs throughout the film; and the movie takes an hour to actually get anywhere. That last problem is the most telling: two-thirds of the 90 minute running time is used to repeatedly set up the characters. Tom is a nice guy dating Heidi the control freak, but he used to date Jill, who is now dating Dan the jerk, but she's started a relationship Kira the girl who wears too many shawls/capes. Dan is a really big jerk, Gary likes to play jokes, and Steve & Lily like to have a lot of sex. Stuff that could have easily been dealt with in 20 minutes or so drags on and on, to the point where the lesbian "sex" scene(calm down, it's pretty tame) left me looking for the fast forward button. That leaves us with half an hour of lo-calorie scares, a klunky ending and a deep-seated dislike of ol' Pumpkin Jack, who I blame for the whole mess. Unless you can get this on some sort of deep-discount rental(and really have seen everything else in the store), put it back on the shelf and keep looking.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Intriguing horror idea marred by weak acting and bad production work
rixrex7 March 2005
This feature, which looks like a mediocre student production, has a very intriguing idea for a horror story, that being a Halloween night in a frat haunted house tour where the players become the horror characters they are performing. However, the production values are so weak and sometimes so inept that the whole idea is ruined. The acting is what you'd expect from college students, generally mediocre and either too weak or over-the-top. Fortunately, I only spent $1 for this DVD, so in that respect it was okay, but it's really not worth much more than that. Just can't figure out why some folks rave about it and give it a 10. Do they have a stake in it somehow?
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another Lame Ass Horror Flick
huggy_bear13 February 2004
Once again I took a chance and rented this bag of crap. Billed as a horror flick, there wasn't one scene, not one, that was even remotely scarey. NOT ONE!! Sure there was some nudity, but all the lesbian action got a little old. I guess maybe that was suppose to be this movie's saving grace? And Dan, what an annoying ass bag!! Right from the beginning I knew I was in for it when good ol' Dan first spoke. And he was suppose to be intimidating? What a laugh!! All in all, this movie is dreadfully awful! How in the hell do movies like this get made? If you want a movie with a few thrills in it, don't rent this one. This movie is about as thrilling as the Teletubbies.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Blechhh...worst piece of celluloid in ages...
bmoviefreak-13 March 2005
Wow...where to begin...picked this up at Big Lots for only $2.99. That's three bucks I'll never see again...ever...and for what? I'll tell ya. An hour and fifteen minutes of boring, boring, boring chat and college angst that seemed more suitable for a Lifetime movie than the horror flick advertised on the box. (May the marketing droids who designed it burn in Hell for all eternity). Follow that up with a little bit of cheap gore (not even good gore mind you...) and a plot twist at the end that comes out of nowhere, and makes no sense. Awful, awful, awful...

Was there any redeeming qualities? Well, on the Joe Bob Briggs scale, there WERE six breasts involved, but that's hardly worth my long lost three bucks. Without those, this coulda been on Sci-Fi at, say, two or three in the morning...

Bmoviefreak
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This movie is bad
JeffBlount9 November 2004
SUcks. That's all I got to say about this sorry excuse for a film. Sucks. Sucks. Sucks. I mean, what the hell were they thinking? The idiots involved should never be allowed to make another films. The acting was so bad that it even failed to entertain on a bad level. The attempt at a "lesbian scene" was sad. I felt so bad for the ladies involved. This movie sucks! Sucks! Sucks!

I heard rumors of a sequel.

God

Help

Us

All
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful Movie.
coderster29 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This movie proves that you can't judge a movie by the awesome artwork on the DVD cover. It also goes to show that you should learn more about a movie before you buy it (or get it for someone at Christmas). The beginning of this movie actually looks somewhat promising. Well, until you meet the characters. Pumpkin Jack (the old guy from down the street) brings the college co-eds a book full of witch's spells that he leaves at their annual haunted house (where the movie takes place). After that there is some drinking, fighting, and soft core porn. Then the action of the movie finally takes place after over an hour.

Overall, Hallow's End was predictable, unsuspensful, and reminiscent of a soft-core porn. This movie is probably best viewed with a group of friends who have nothing better to do, as it is a good movie to make fun of. And for first-time viewers, it is really fun making predictions of the order of people who die.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Was This A Student Film Project?
MWNiese19 December 2009
***One Out of Ten Stars***

Because if it was, it gets an F. Holy Mother Mary of God was this bad. I mean, I gave it every reasonable accommodation considering it was a straight to video film, but it let me down at every turn. Like so many other B movies, the basic storyline was decent and the filmmakers seemed to have a reasonable level of resources, but the execution was ridiculous. It's a shame they attached the good name of Halloween to this fiasco.

The basic premise surrounds some frat douche bags hosting their annual Halloween haunted house fund raiser, when a satanic spell book shows up out of nowhere and hurls the frat boys into a living hell. Well that's the idea anyway, but instead most of the film is devoted to displaying these frat boy's relationship escapades, abound with an outrageous lesbian subplot. Very little of the actual story is devoted to Halloween or the mysterious spell book. It actually makes me mad that the film makers thought they could get away with making such dribble.

The film is essentially about frat boy relationships. This IS NOT what the movie is billed as. I'm tempted to track down the producers and at the very least threaten them with bodily harm. The acting is about as bad as it gets, it's atrocious! The script is unintentionally funny. The cinematography is just plain lazy. The whole film is amateur night. This movie actually makes the SyFy channel movie productions look like masterpieces.

The last half hour of the film felt like the film makers realized they weren't producing a soap opera and had to throw in some sort of horror sequences. The evil spell book finally comes into play and turns everyone in the haunted house into the character their dressed up as. I almost feel like crying as I write this review. Wow! I mean wow! This thing was an undecipherable chopped up disaster.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Quite Hollow...
terrible24 December 2008
Ya I rented it, so shoot me!

A decent premise sets up an otherwise awkward story with no real payoff, but at least it's shot well. Director Jon Keeyes takes the simple idea of a fake haunted house with real danger inside. In most cases this should be a slam dunk, but this little stinker derails quite quickly. The cinematography is above average and the acting is mediocre at best, but the story and writing is just plain awful. Slower scenes drag on forever and the scares are too few and far in between with no real climax to the film. An eerie mood is set at the beginning but loses it's luster before any type of horror transpires, and I found myself bored to death and making another sandwich... The cover art is appealing and I suppose it's worth a rental if you're looking for mindless low budget dreck, but if you enjoy a good story and eventful ending, reach for something else.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Enjoyable - with the right expectations
TheTaoofNetflix1 January 2009
I'm a firm believer that that sum of a movies parts can be considered independent of its whole - meaning that an interesting element (e.g., a neat scene, a certain actor/actress, a sub genre, location, etc.) can be sufficient to provide a basis for enjoying a movie...particularly when viewing on DVD with the ability to quickly scan through substandard parts. In this movie's case, I have to say I enjoyed it enough to buy a copy, but here's why - its a Halloween flick (my favorite holiday) and its set in a haunted house (one of my favorite forms of entertainment). The acting, admittedly, is quite terrible, horrible in fact. The writing is at times absolutely disastrous - particularly the dialog associated with the organizer guy who is always threatening to fight someone. This guy reminds me of a horrible coworker I once had - a 27"-waisted, boy of a man who felt so Napoleonic-driven to remind everyone of his importance. The scenery isn't so bad; despite the micro budget, some sets were interesting, and good use of camera work and other atmospheric elements to improve the look. But if you expect crap acting and weak dialog, its a good time.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best Halloween film of the last 20 years
flair4president16 February 2005
Jamie Lee Curtis and Michael Myers have nothing on Hallow's!! The wife and I purchased this movie after renting it the first night it was available, and it was a great purchase indeed. This movie has a superb and balanced mix of horror, comedy and intrigue that will keep the viewer in suspense up until the very last moments of the film. Concurrently poignant yet intriguing, action-packed yet drama-filled, Hallow's End is sure to deliver for you fright fans out there. I honestly am ashamed to only be able to give this movie a 10; if the scale was 1-500 I'd be asking to vote 1000, it is that phenomenal. The young actor playing Tom Sharp, Stephen Cloud, is especially noteworthy in a movie full of noteworthy performances, as he and 'Dan' carry the movie along nicely. Cloud reminded my wife of a cross between a young Tom Cruise and a young Johnny Depp, and I have to say I was beginning to get jealous, but I can't stay mad at such an obviously talented actor who is THE future in Hollywood. Buy/rent/see this movie immediately!! Best of luck to all the young actors in this movie, and keep up the great work Cloud!!
4 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You CAN have fun watching this movie!
RobynBelfry11 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I picked "Hollow's End" up at the local video thrift shop for a meager 99 cents. Obviously my expectations weren't through the roof.

But, for what it was, it was a fun ride. For every bad thing I can think about the film, I can think of a nugget of goodness.

And the parts that are bad as so bad that they're truly a good laugh, so why not enjoy? What really resonates with me is the concept. It's not that poorly written, either. It DOES suffer from a very long first act. Does anyone have it on DVD? Are there any extras? I'm willing to bet that if there are it doesn't include any deleted scenes, because I get the feeling that there ARE no deleted scenes. Everything they shot is probably on the screen. At least it seems that way at times.

Trying to juggle a million sub-stories with multiple relationship interconnections takes patience on the viewers behalf, so be ready for it.

Some of the acting is truly horrible. But some of it isn't. Some of it is just misdirection and some of it actually holds a candle to a "good performance". Not something I would expect from a movie from the bargain bin.

What can I say... I'll watch it again...

To those that made it... don't give up.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Play
tedg10 July 2005
Gosh, another great idea pummeled into the ground by inept film-making.

No one needs to recount the ways this fails. But what it has that's clever is worth talking about.

Horror isn't about horrible things so much. Its about frightening the audience, and the best way to do that is to engage the audience in the story. The most common way is to "fold" the audience into the story somehow.

And the easiest way to do THAT is to have the movie start out being a show and turn REAL.

That's what we have here: some dumb teenagers dress up as actors in a haunted house show. Then by some curse, they actually become their scary characters.

Could have worked if the filmmaker had a clue. By the way, when this is done deftly, it doesn't matter if the actors or effects are good. After all, it is only a show, right?

Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hallow's End deserves nothing but the highest accolades....
AmherstTommy17 February 2005
First of all there is nothing like a great horror flick, so when I saw Hallow's End in the local blockbuster I thought to myself, "I have to see this." Now, keep in mind I had never heard of this movie before but I threw it in anyway on a hunch, and boy was I right: This movie is OUTSTANDING. From Tom and Jill to Dan and Heidi, and the sneaky Steve as well, the main characters in this movie deliver like Karl Malone, and might I add that there is no one as hot as that Camille Chen. UNBELIEVABLE. As far as the story goes, it fits the genre which I always appreciate, and I won't spoil it for you, but Stephen Cloud as Tom Sharp was something special to behold on the screen. It's one of those rare cinematic moments when I wonder how a film like this could afford someone with such obvious talent. I know we have not seen the last of this future star, and if you have not seen this movie, it is well worth the viewing for some memorable entertainment, great acting all around, and you get to see future star Cloud in a leading role that is decidedly underrated. Hallow's End rules!!!!!!
1 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining unintentionally
walk_wild77715 March 2004
This is a VERY bad, very low budget movie. But it's one of those that's so bad and so cheap, that if you like cheese, you'll love this one. I'm not going to talk much about the plot, because it doesn't even matter.

I rented this with the intentions of being entertained for reasons that the filmmakers never intended, and I was not disappointed. There's an effeminate southern Santa look-a-like named Pumpkin Jack, 4 reasonably hot girls (three of which get topless) and a bunch of acting that so bad it's good, from the male contingent of the cast. There is also a lesbian sub-plot that'll at least hold your attention (if you're a guy) when something unintentionally funny isn't happening.

The greatest part of this movie, is Matt Moore's character of 'Dan', who is the a-hole bully of the movie. His over the top cliché acting is endlessly funny and the greatest part is everyone in the movie is scared $hitless of him and he's the skinniest guy in the flick and he dresses like an older brother character from an 80s teen movie.

Oh yeah, the "monsters" in this movie are barely recognizable as such... I highly suggest everyone who likes to laugh at cheese watch this. A must see, best watched in groups.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
How I wasted 91 Minutes of my Life!
BHorrorWriter21 June 2004
Let this be a perfect example of how a movie description and box art can be overly misleading!

HALLOW'S END is trite, predictable, pointless and offers NOTHING to its viewers. The pace of the film is enough to put anyone to sleep! Nothing really seems to happen in the film until the last 20 minutes or so. However, even at that point what does happen is so utterly ridiculous, making absolutely no sense whatsoever. There is no real build up, no back story to support the less than paper-thin plot.

In all honesty, this movie could have been a great direct-to-video flick, unfortunately they missed by a LOOOONG shot! Another reviewer mentioned this movie reminded them of the classic horror from the 80's...I question whether or not this individual has seen 80's horror flicks, as this movie pays no homage to them in any way!

Avoid this at all costs!!!! This flick doesn't even offer avid horror fans like myself some kind of guilty pleasure. I was left very dissatisfied and wanting my rental fee back!

0 out of 10
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Between a rock and an hard place
pumaye1 March 2004
Amateurish effort, with a nice cast of good looking people (as usual in a B-movie horror this days), better cinematography than you may think, a terrible, very derivative script that steals ideas from several different sources, but doesn't find anything interesting to work with(it's real crap from start to finish in this sense). You have the usual part of nudes, a couple of sex scenes (even a lesbian one), usual pranks, usual verbal in-fighting among the member of the party. Usual stuff that is not worse than the one you can find in several other contemporaries efforts, with a mid part (the house of horrors tour made up in the fraternity) that is almost good. Could be worth a rental if you are a fan of the genre.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hallow's Rear End
cyclone25923 October 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler'S AHEAD? WHO KNOW'S....

It's unfortunate you can't sue a video store for providing shelf space for boxes of defecation like 'Hallow's End'. My wife and I are fans of low-budget films, but there has to be at least (1) redeeming quality, such as the following:

1. interesting effects 2. good or original storyline 3. believable characters 4. decent gratuitous sex or violence scenes 5. pacing (that's a gallup, rather than a snail going uphill)

Well, Hallow's End fell short in every respect. I thought... hmmmm... "Girl-on-girl love scene? You don't see that very often in a horror movie." ZZzzzzzzz... That soon fell as flat and limp as Anna Nicole Smith's last husband. There were certainly possibilities for any of the (5) redeemers to come to fruition, but everyone missed the boat. Some people will say that low-budget films have an excuse to be bad. Think of such great horror films as: Night of the Living Dead (the original), Halloween, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Nightmare on Elm Street and my personal favourite, The Evil Dead. All of these movies had genuine scares and when faced with miniscule budget constraints all of them came up with ingenious ideas to pull-off some interesting effects. 'Hallow's End' is just another piece of crap to toss on the ever-growing pile of pointless, poorly-made 'horror' films. Too bad... My rating: 0/5 stars
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
LOW BUDGET HALLOWEEN HORROR FLICK SHOT IN TEXAS
heavyc6522 August 2003
A group of fraternity brothers and their girlfriends are holding a Haunted House to raise some money. Local farmer `Pumpkin Jack' wants to help out, and brings a box of props for them to use. Little do they know, the goodies he brought include a book of witch's chants and a cursed jack-lantern among other items. While everyone is setting up for the haunted evening, one girl gets busy reading passages aloud from the book, which in horror movies is usually not a good thing. As the evening progresses, one by one the guys and girls dressed up in scary outfits start to become the creatures they're dressed up as. Dracula turns into an actual vampire and tries to bite people's necks. The zombie becomes a zombie and wants to eat the brains of his friends, and a bitchy girl turns into a witchy woman. Very low budget, but it's releasing the week before Halloween, so it's probably going to make money on home video.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed