Shot (1973) Poster

(1973)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Fun if you ever lived at the University of Illinois or made a movie with your friends. and are drunk. really drunk.
joeydeuce30 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Friends and I stumbled onto this title because we A) heard it was shot at the University of Illinois B)Was just awful C)had lots of helicopter shots and needless violence. Delivery- yes. As far as I can tell, all shooting was on the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign campus, as we could spot many public places in the scenes which have changed dramatically. Notably the chase in the parking garage, walking on a bridge which are the Presidential Towers (a local student housing), and the drug lord's mansion (the Japan House, a Japanese Cultural Center). For the most parts, it's a surprisingly good (at keeping suspense) for a low budget. Tire squeals on dirt, and fighting over $200 just adds to the fun. I specifically got the feeling that a large amount of the budget was supplied to destroy a car and use a helicopter, which many of the scenes reflect. If you have a case of beer and sadistic disposition- go for it.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
They tried... *sigh*
neeleyfrn-5181623 January 2022
It just tries too hard.

I think most of the budget went toward aerial shots and bright red food coloring for the blood.

This is 93 minutes (estimated) that you will not get back.

This movie would have been taken more seriously if it were a comedy.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Urbania in the Boonies.
EyeAskance25 May 2007
In the frozen, washed-out flatlands of some desolate part of the Eastern U.S. strewn with factories and dive bars, a violent war rages between young mercenary drug-lords and bumbling Hicksville cops. With the help of a few unreliable informants recruited directly from the seedy underbelly of said rural environs, the law steps in to eradicate the scourge of dope...and maybe have a bit of fun along the way.

This cash-strapped but ambitious little regional film, unreleased or barely shown at regional drive-ins, made a not-so-impressive debut on home video in the 80s(with deliciously sleazy box art). It's pretty much the slop-job of never-made-a-movie-before messiness one might expect, but entertains despite itself and offers up a few surprisingly violent moments. Much like the equally obscure film "ANOTHER SON OF SAM", this seems to have been made mainly because someone involved with the production had a friend with a helicopter.

4/10
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beyond obscure
JohnSeal25 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Surely one of the most obscure, low-budget films to receive a major label home video release (thanks, Sony), it's not even clear what the original title of this film was. There's a disclaimer in front of the feature which indicates that the title has been changed for the video release, but the title card for the film consists of the single word 'Shot'. So was this released to theatres as Shot, or as something else all together? We're not likely to find out any time soon. Death Shot starts off with a low rent drug transaction gone bad: one gang of hairy thugs accuses another gang of shorting them $200 (!) and end up getting caps popped in their collective asses. The jaunty blues-funk score of Area Code 615 then commences, supplying us with a clue of where this feature might have been shot: most likely Tennessee, from whence the band sprang in the late 1960s. Wherever it is, it looks COLD, with snow either falling or on the ground throughout the entire film. There's also lots of violence, as a pair of hairy, not-by-the-books cops chase after the motley drug lords who spend their time hanging out at the Mr. Quick fast food establishment when they're not pushing dope on the local kids. It all adds up to a gritty good time for admirers of regional cinema and fast-paced crime dramas. I'd love to learn more about this feature, but I suspect the DVD commentary is still pretty far in the future. Postscript: according to the credit crawl, Death Shot was filmed in East Central Illinois.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Super low budget, but highly ambitious and hence hugely enjoyable
Woodyanders14 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Renegade detectives Ross and Wilson decide to take down major drug kingpin Blasi. Writer/director Mitch Brown keeps the entertaining story moving along at a speedy clip, maintains a hard cynical tone throughout, stages the exciting car chases and shoot outs with flair and skill, and makes nice use out of such practical locations as an open field, a train yard, and a parking garage. Richard C. Watt and Chuck Russell are appropriately scruffy as the maverick cops on the case while Frank Himes makes for a pleasingly nasty villain. The aerial photography provides an impressive sense of scope. Considering that this movie was made for a modest fifteen thousand dollars, it's competently put together and manages to milk a lot of production value with its minimal resources. A cool little flick.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Impressive Considering the Budget
Michael_Elliott28 August 2018
Shot (1973)

*** (out of 4)

A pair of detectives are trying to bring down a drug kingpin who is constantly killing anyone who gets in his way. Everything the detective's have tried has ended with disappointing results but they finally manage to get to the dealer's girlfriend and she agrees to help.

SHOT was filmed while director Mitch Brown was attending University of Illinois and the total film was shot for around $18,000.00. That's a pretty amazing figure when you watch the movie because while there's nothing original here story-wise the film does look extremely good. What impressed me the most about SHOT was the execution because the director really did try to make this film bigger than it actually was.

The film looks as if the budget was a lot more than it was because there's just so much going on. Typically when movies have a budget like this they do everything they can to make sure they don't try to do anything big or anything that is going to add to the budget. What was amazing is the fact that this movie has a lot of helicopter shots, several gunfights and there are also some pretty bloody death scenes. Not only that but the film has some car chases that were rather impressive considering what the filmmakers had to work with.

The performances range from decent to poor but none of them are bad enough to ruin the film or to take you out of it. There's no question that SHOT looks and feels like a student film and it's certainly not as technically impressive as something like Martin Scorsese's first feature. You can also say that the story isn't that original and nothing fresh was done with it. With that being said, fans of 70's cinema will enjoy seeing how creative the filmmakers were without having much money.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Impressive Cops vs. Robbers Tale, Despite Its Flaws
Make no mistake that this was an independent production made and financed by a group of college film students shot in and around the campus town of Champagne, Illinois. Essentially, two loose-cannon cops running into all sorts of trouble while trying to take down a drug kingpin. There is a lot of car chasing and shootouts to please the viewer.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Cheaply made, horrendously acted....... hysterical!!!
dennisvenhuis4 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Of all the crummy movies I've seen in my lifetime, I was sure that even IMDb might have missed this one, but, lo and behold......

I am a huge fan of substandard film, mostly in the action and horror genres, and I first saw 'Death Shot' (or simply 'SHOT' in the actual credits) back in 1987 very early into my quest for crappy film. My friend and I just couldn't resist the cheesy artwork on the box depicting some dirt-bag with a headband and an assault rifle. The date on the box said 1987, so we figured we'd just stumbled across another direct-to-home-video, shot-on-home-video, laughable piece of junk..... In reality, it turned out to be much worse. This film was shot in 1973 and then dug out of a cellar somewhere and re-hashed for the home video market of the 1980s. The box artwork I mentioned didn't even depict an actual character in the movie, and not once was an assault rifle fired or even brandished for that matter. In fact, the characters pretty much fire snub-nosed revolvers that 'snap' suspiciously like caps....

It is really impossible to describe an actual plot. For the most part, scenes toggle between a group of greasy looking 'criminals'-- who are supposed to be bad-ass drug dealers, but pretty much behave like schoolyard bullies -- and the equally grubby cop duo who try to track down the criminals while engaging in some questionable behavior of their own (i.e. sleeping with junkies, shooting suspects, getting drunk...) Other random characters come and go during the film with little or no explanation as to who they are or how they tie in to the events. There are a few woefully done action sequences that should induce some laughter, but it's the dialogue that'll ultimately have you rolling.

A couple of scenes that really stand out: 1) The 'head' bad dude (I don't recall his name) wanders into a Mr. Quick restaurant to confront a client who is delinquent on some payments, then intimidates the Peter Frampton wannabe by stomping on his watch and tearing up a picture of his girlfriend, and then lets out a clichéd 'bad guy' laugh after breaking a wine bottle over the dude's head. 2) Shortly before the scene above, the three baddies bump into some dweeb named Mickey and allow him to join their gang after they make fun of his clothes and tear his frisbee in half. The verbal exchanges in this scene are so preposterous they have to be seen and heard to be believed. 3) The bad guys threaten to throw one of their pushers off of a rooftop because he supposedly short-changed them. Of course, the guy accidentally falls off the roof (one of the worst looking dummy falls in history), and one of the bad dudes remarks about how cool it was to see him splatter.

There are several other rotten scenes to enjoy, but the movie does have a number of slow spots, and the overall dreary atmosphere and bad sound might make it hard for some people to sit through. But for fans of fetid film like myself, this is a gem. The only problem now is that it may be nearly impossible to find, as I'm sure this one was ultimately discarded from most stores that carried it once DVDs took over as the mainstream format, and I highly doubt 'SHOT' will be on DVD anytime soon....

1.5 out of 10 for 'film' buffs.

8 out of 10 for lovers of crapola.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It's beautiful
nsexton-221 May 2020
I spent some time in college screwing around with 'film making' in the first decade of the 2000's. Maybe that gives me a different appreciation for his movie. I love this. It's campy, cheesy, raw, everyone tries... I think everyone should see this. Just because of the spirit. I've shown it to a couple friends, we still quote it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed