Impact (1963) Poster

(1963)

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Lifeless thriller
Leofwine_draca10 April 2015
Butcher's Film Productions are the chaps behind a series of low-rent, low budget British thrillers made throughout the 1950s and '60s, but IMPACT is very much a lesser product even by their low standards. This is a lifeless thriller with a simple storyline and not much in the way of incident or intrigue to recommend it.

The storyline sees journalist Conrad Phillips being framed and sent to prison for a crime he didn't commit. He's eventually released, at which point he swears revenge on the man responsible: crime boss George Pastell (Hammer's THE MUMMY). Unfortunately the revenge plot is hardly an exciting one, and despite a fist fight or two this is very low key and a film where barely anything happens.

The film features a role for Ballard Berkeley (FAWLTY TOWERS's Major) as a newspaper editor and a few scene-setting moments of the era. Pastell is the best thing in it and the only person who seems to be making an effort in terms of his performance. This is still entirely forgettable, though.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Only a rich man can afford to turn down a thousand pounds!"
richardchatten8 April 2021
Presumably this raw & racy little Butcher's quickie with a neat little sting in the tail, scripted by leading man Conrad Phillips (with the usual noisy jazz score and the cast once more buttoned up against the cold) is set in 1965, since the newspapers reporting the robbery with violence for which the hero spends a year in Wormwood Scrubs are dated November 1963.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
implausible plot ruins the Impact
malcolmgsw8 November 2012
Warning: Spoilers
If you are of a certain age ,like me you will remember films like this on the supporting half of double bills at your local Odeon,Gaumont or ABC.Some of them were quite good.Unfortunately this is not.It is riddled with implausibilities.For budget purposes much of the action is described rather than shown.The initial set up is implausible.After all wouldn't it have been easier for Phillips to have been killed or beaten up rather than locked up in prison.Wouldn't the police have thought that it was rather unlikely to have found some of the stolen mailbags in a car at the station.Phillips would have been sentenced to nearer 10 than 2 years if he had struck down a policeman.Maybe even 30 years as the Great Train Robbers.Then when he gets out he goes to the club and then sees the "witness".I could go on but little point .This is on the same disc as Serena which is a far superior film.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
no masterpiece
realthog15 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
*SPOILERS* Note that the plot summary given by one earlier reviewer is wrong in almost every conceivable respect. Phillips is an experienced reporter who's been hounding nightclub owner/crook Pastell, who in retaliation frames him for a train robbery. Phillips does 20 months for the crime and, on leaving jail, with the help of his cellmate Rees and some powerful refrigeration equipment (and without the help of his ineffectual girlfriend Marlowe) forces Pastell to sign a confession to all his crimes.

The script's no masterpiece but what really lets the movie down is the acting. Pastell is quite good and West, as his floozy, is perfectly adequate, but most of the rest are of amateur-theatrical standard.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Lacks impact
Prismark101 December 2013
This is a 1960s B movie short. It is a poor film which starts interestingly enough but quickly loses impact.

It is low budget that inspires to be some type of American gangster flick. It contains some straightforward performances, a dicey script with more holes than a colander.

It is rather surprising to see Ballard Berkeley better known as the Major in Fawlty Towers as a younger rather straight talking newspaper editor.

Conrad Phillips plays Moir, an experienced crime reporter who has been pursuing a gangster known as the Duke.

The Duke in retaliation fits him up for a train robbery and the police arrest him and he is sentenced to two years in jail. In jail Moir plots his revenge.

I have big doubts how the police would think a well known crime reporter can suddenly get involved in a train robbery.

As for the revenge plot. The climax takes place in a cold storage warehouse. It is underwhelming in its sheer hokeyness. I think the filmmakers got bored as it suddenly ends.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
For nostalgia value, it's watchable.
teachermarkthailand23 November 2022
Back in the day when 'B' movies were common and an additional bonus that preceded the 'main feature' (and ruined by the terrible localized Pearl & Dean' ads) this would have been a largely un-impressive and forgettable time filler Sixty years on the remaining appeal of this hour-long quickie is its nostalgia value only... but that doesn't mean it's not worth your time, especially if you're an older person, like me.

It's a reminder of how simple and mundane life was during the mid-fifties to early sixties. It's also rather like watching an episode of 'The Saint' (with Roger Moore) without The Saint actually present!

Despite the wearisome cliches and absurd plot, the cast put on a good show.

If you're in the mood for some YouTube nostalgia, then don't be put off by all the other very negative reviews. It's actually a pretty good way to spend an hour.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Which Side Are You On?
boblipton23 February 2023
Crime reporter Conrad Phillips' series of articles about gangster George Pastell annoy him so much he frames the reporter for mail robbery. While in, Phillips talk about his hopes for revenge with cell mate John Rees. When he's out, he goes to Pastell's club and proceeds to annoy him into wanting Phillips dead. When Rees comes in and offers all the information on Phillips a vengeance-seeking crime boss could want, he bites.

It's an inexpensive second feature from Butchers, which means it's very inexpensive. Nonetheless, it's competent, and I could figure out if Rees was helping Phillips, or wanted a payoff from Pastell. Now that's suspense! A very nice balance in script and production, and a particularly nice part for Rees.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Very corny, poor fight scenes, VERY 1960s
Johnk-520 December 1998
This was shown in UK TV in the middle of the night recently (Dec 1998) and I was transfixed by its amateurishness. The fight scenes were so unconvincing, I think I could have arranged them and the script was cliche ridden.

It's worth seeing just to see how bad it is.
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Utterly routine and totally missable offering from Butcher's
jamesraeburn200311 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A top journalist, Jack Moir (Conrad Philips), is framed for a train robbery by nightclub owner and Soho crime lord, The Duke (George Pastell), because he considers that he has become too interested in his activities in his newspaper columns and fears that it could arouse the interest of the police. Moir does time but, when he gets out, he vows to bring The Duke to book.

An utterly routine and totally missable crime thriller from Britain's poverty row studio Butcher's Films. The Cinematograph Act 1927 stipulated that UK cinemas had to show a certain number of British made films. The result was what became known as the quota-quickies - cheaply and hastily made movies that earned themselves such a bad reputation that they gave our film industry a bad name. Yet, there were some exceptions that have become to be regarded as classics but, alas, this is not one of them. Its ultra-low budget is evident with its rickety sets - it clearly did not stretch far enough to shoot a train robbery sequence! - and never did an hour seem like an eternity as it is all chat and no interest. The film's brightest moments come from Ballard Berkeley as Moir's boss and Linda Marlowe as his girlfriend who offer energetic and likable performances in what little screen time they have. But, unfortunately, they are not given enough to do and any brief flicker of enthusiasm quickly evaporates.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Impactfully
daoldiges27 March 2023
Impact feels very much a product of its times. There's definitely a 60's vibe to much of the proceedings here - the slightly upbeat jazzy score upfront and in the background, a hip swinging lounge with musical entertainment. Reporter is set up by someone he's reporting on, although the set-up and follow through consequences are not wholly realistic, but I feel this can be overlooked. Released from his prison term the reporter in determined to get revenge. Most of the cast is fine and does a decent job with the material they are given, Phillips and Marlowe in particular are good. There is a slight plot question/twist toward the final section of the film. Impact is not great film by any means, but at a tidy 61 minute run time, I think it was time well spent.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lacklustre, has a little merit though
naseby18 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Not anything to write home about, but I've always like Conrad Phillips in these budget-flicks from 'Butcher's films' which seem to be doing the rounds on obscure Satellite/Freeview channels and, put out by 'Reknown Films' on DVD.

A pretty thin story, of a reporter, Jack Moir (Phillips) who constantly bothers a local hoodlum nicknamed 'The Duke' Dukelow, with bad publicity about him. Needless to say, the latter has him put out of the way by framing him for a mail-train robbery of around £60,000. Moir is sentenced to 20 months in prison and swears/exacts revenge on his release. It's pretty staid to be honest. Two points, as Malcolmgsw points out, that 20 months for robbery of £60,000 especially involving coshing a cop, is a ludicrously short sentence, which would probably start at least eight years plus, even if you didn't serve the full term of it. Another load of rubbish surely is, as has also been said elsewhere, that the police (led by Mike Pratt) would surely not expect him to be hanging around waiting to be pinched with the evidence that was 'planted' on him (that he hadn't known about until they unearthed it). Of course, though, cops are cops 'We're a very narrow-minded lot' as was quoted in the film 'Villain' from Inspector Matthews. From an interest point of view, Ballard Berkeley as Moir's Newspaper boss puts in an early appearance before his 'famous' one as 'The Major' in Fawlty Towers. Anita West, 'The Duke's' resident singer and floosie disappeared as a character actress (sorry, actor) sometime in the seventies/eighties (Crossroads) but puts in a welcome appearance too. A pretty laughable ending is also had to add to the purile writing of the story. Again, bad skiffle and jazz music as well as short back-and-sides and Brylcreem add to the atmosphere but worth it only for a curious look of B-support movie featurettes..
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Impact
CinemaSerf15 February 2024
A drab little effort which sees investigative journalist "Jack Moir" (Conrad Philiips) framed and convicted for a mail heist. The remaining drama combines all the usual aspects - a local "Mr. Big" - this time hammily played by George Pastell; an incompetent police investigation and - luckily for him, his former colleagues from his newspaper (Ballard Berkeley & Linda Marlowe) who believe him innocent. Once he is released from prison, he is bent on revenge. The biggest snag for me with this crime caper is that they clearly invested heavily in the jazz-style soundtrack and so wanted to get their money's worth - it's intrusive to the point of being annoying and is frequently used to generate tension instead of any script!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Very little impact but interesting in parts
barkiswilling27 November 2022
A routine quickie offering from the Butchers studio that doesn't exactly catch fire. Conrad Phillips is always watchable and does well with his role as a revengeful newspaperman out to get 'The Duke'. There is real chemistry in the scenes with sexy Anita West (of short lived BLUE PETER fame), but absolutely no chemistry at all with his rather underwritten girlfriend Diana (Linda Marlowe).

George Pastell plays the chief villain by the book- to many in my generation he will always be remembered as the twitchy train conductor in FROM RUSSIA WITH LOVE.

Otherwise the usual fun is to be had spotting familiar locations and actors who went on to greater fame in other vehicles- such as the ever-dependable Ballard Berkeley (FAWLTY TOWERS) and Mike - billed here as Michael - Pratt (RANDALL & HOPKIRK deceased).
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blink, and with luck you'll miss it.
johnshephard-8368211 October 2019
Dozy, formulaic, B-movie crime story which must have cost about three quid to make, featuring all the usual ingredients of the low-budget genre: 1. the wooden hero (Conrad Phillips, who co-wrote it) with pretty but otherwise pointless girlfriend; 2. the 'Mr Big' villain, plus equally pointless Moll, who uses a night club as a front for his crimes (and which appears to be financially viable despite being populated largely by his own henchmen); 3. Clueless coppers, who only appear at the start of the film in order to arrest the wrong man; 4. A banal script which avoids any kind of continuity of motivation or behaviour, so that any kind of irrational action will do.

The plot concerns ... no, let's not bother about that. Of virtually no interest (and therefore the most interesting thing about this film) is the appearance of Ballard Berkley, trying to be a tough-talking newspaper editor, who later became a stalwart of Fawlty Towers, and who must have forgiven Phillips enough by the 70s for writing this dross to appear with him in one episode -The Wedding Party. It is mercifully short, and no one gets hurt.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
...has none!
Waiting2BShocked22 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
**ENDING SPOILER(ISH)**

Second feature idiocy in which Phillips is an aspiring journalist who inconveniently finds himself accused of a train robbery. With the help of his girlfriend, several rusty cans of worms are opened on the tracks to proving himself innocent.

The jury were also unanimous on Phillips' co-screenwriting ability it would seem, as he had not been given the chance to do so before this and was afforded even less chance to do so afterwards.
0 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed