Switchback (1997) Poster

(1997)

User Reviews

Review this title
110 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Good thriller about a mysterious series killer who executes slaughter and kidnapping
ma-cortes23 September 2012
Exciting thriller plenty of suspense and action , dealing with the kidnapping of a FBI agent's son and the desperate chase of the murderer who has him . As a F.B.I. agent named Frank LaCrosse (Dennis Quaid) goes home to encounter has been broken into and his son is missing . He is following the clues of a brutal serial killer whose massacre stretches nearly two years . Frank's relentless pursuit leads to Amarillo , Texas , where two more victims have been found slashed to death and the enigmatic series killer goes on his crime spree . As Frank join forces with the local Sheriff named Buck Olmstead (R. Lee Ermey) and his Deputy Nate Booker (Ted Levine) to search for his suspect , elusive killer , and all of whom investigate the murders before he disappears perhaps forever into the Rocky mountains . Meantime , a drifting previous medic named Lane Dixon (singer/actor Jared Leto) is picked up by an ex-railroad man , an African-American named Bob Goodall .

This is a thrilling film that contains intrigue , noisy action , suspense , chases and plot twists . The highlights result to be the train confrontation and the surprise ending . Interesting and thrilling screenplay by the same director Jeb Stuart who debuts in this enjoyable flick . Intriguing narrative is well developed , as we are interested on the events are we are really cared what happens to this people . According to an interview with Jeb Stuart in Premiere magazine, he had originally intended to make this movie back in the early 1980's under the title 'Going West in America', with Sidney Poitier, Robert Duvall, and Kevin Bacon in the three main roles . Magnificent acting by the protagonist trio as Dennis Quaid , Jared Leto and Danny Glover . Excellent support such as Ted Levine as Deputy Nate Booker , Leo Burmester as Clyde 'Shorty' Callahan , Walton Goggins as Bud , William Fichtner as Chief Jack McGinnis and special mention to Lee Ermey as Sheriff Buck Olmstead . Furthermore , a rousing and stirring original musical score by Basil Poledouris . Colorful and evocative Cinematography by Oliver Wood . The motion picture was well directed by Jeb Stuart in his film debut . Stuart is a prestigious screenwriter , he wrote successful films such as ¨The fugitive¨, Die Hard¨ , ¨Another 48 hours¨ , ¨Lock up¨ , ¨Fire down below 2¨ and ¨Just cause¨ . He only has directed two films ¨Switchback¨ and ¨Blood done sign my name¨ , both of them failed at box office ; however , ¨Switchback¨ is today pretty well considered . The picture will appeal to Dennis Quaid and Jared Leto fans .
33 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A solid thriller
Tequila-1811 October 1999
I was surprised by this film quite a bit. I thought it would be another mediocre paint-by-the-number genre piece. To my amazement Switchback is a taut and suspenseful film. Its fun to see Danny Glover cast against type. By no means a masterpiece, but well worth watching by thriller fans
24 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A different kind of serial killer
ric-2925 December 1998
Switchback was an enjoyable mystery/thriller with a few nice action sequences. Quaid's character seemed a bit cliche to me (like he was impersonating a dour Harrison Ford) but Glover's character was unique and interesting. This movie didn't have a lot of surprises or plot twists, but director Jeb Stuart managed to keep my interest high by using well drawn and likeable characters and by keeping a lot of balls in the air from the beginning of the movie. With the exception of the serial killer himself, the conflicting motivations of the characters played well with the story and provided plenty of tension. I especially enjoyed the portrayal of the serial killer himself. This is possibly the first movie I've seen where the killer had a human face and was not a psycho mastermind genius or a low-life loner with a chip the size of Manhattan on his shoulder.
30 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An under-rated top-notch serial killer thriller.
joyceglasser15 May 2001
I saw this film for the first time on late night television after returning from the cinema where I saw the disappointing 'Along Came a Spider'. There are similarities, but Switchback is by far the better film. Jeb Stuart has done a terrific job keeping us at the edge of the couch and there are very few cliches around. Danny Glover and the entire cast are just right, and all the characters, even the minor roles, are three-dimensional. The story centres on a young handsome hitchhiker picked up and befriended by the serial killer. But this is no ordinary serial killer -- he is Mr. Popularity along the mountain roads where they travel in buddy movie-fashion. But not for long. The killer isn't out to make new friends. What he is doing is cleverly framing the loner-hitchhiker (finger prints on murder weapon etc) so that the law will be searching for the hitchhiker, and not the real killer. That is the killer's modus operandi. So here we have this handsome hitchhiker with a mysterious past (a doctor who ran away) and a killer with a bloody past who is on the run. Enter an FBI agent (Dennis Quaid) who is wanted by the FBI. The FBI want Quaid off the case. But Quaid is a determined man: the serial killer, who he has tracked for 18 months, has kidnapped his son....All of these outsiders come through a small town where the local sheriff loses the election by opting to help the truant FBI agent find the real killer... Three quarters of the way through the film, everyone is chasing someone and the tension keeps mounting along with the altitude.

The killer has left a note with a cryptic clue that Dennis Quaid must decipher. But the key to his son's whereabouts lies elsewhere.....

This is a fresh breath of writing into a genre that has been abused and neglected of late. There are nice echos of our favourite films noir (...the hitchhiker, the loner, the car accident.....the guessing came about who is who...). There's a touch of The Fugitive, but not too much. On top of all the good acting, casting, plotting and suspense, there's nice atmosphere and locations in the Rockies.
60 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
finally - something much different
sweet_candii0122 March 2008
this is by far a very differemt serial killer movie than other ones I've seen. it really makes you fall in love with or hate the characters. i have to say these days there are a lot of serial killer films , that people have to be killed in, but when they do die we neither feel happy or sad towards their deaths.

all the parts were played well and the casting was well chosen. there's not many twist or unexpected stuff at the end cause they were all revealed in the middle og the film , and that disappointed me cause i like to keep guessing the killer towards the film.

its a for sure recommendation. WATCH IT!! 7.6/10
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-Done Serial Murderer Thriller.
rmax30482316 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Almost an oxymoron, isn't it? A well-done serial murderer story? Yet they do come along from time to time. This one isn't as innovative as "Seven," not as well observed, but it's still above average.

The killer, the affable Danny Glover, arranges to take the hitch-hiking, unwitting Jared Leto on a trip through the Colorado mountains in the middle of winter. Glover, whose identity is unknown to any social control agents, is being pursued by a local police department, R. Lee Ermey in charge, and a loose cannon FBI agent, Dennis Quaid, whose son Glover has kidnapped and stashed away somewhere.

Half the film has Glover driving his white El Dorado, festooned with pics of Playmates of the Month, through a convincingly snowy landscape. The other half deals with the reluctant cooperation between Ermey and Quaid. Ermey finally decides to throw the law books out the window and join Quaid in his personal quest. The climax brings Glover, Leto, and Quaid together in the caboose of a freight train plowing its way through a mountain pass and turns the movie into what is more or less a formulaic bang up.

Two things contribute to the quality of the film. One is the location shooting. Everything looks cold, bare, gloomy, and windswept. The landscape seems to be hibernating and waiting for spring. The other thing is Danny Glover's performance as the serial killer. He's great. A Scatman Crothers whose big grin and avuncular manner barely manage to mask the vicious psychopath beneath. Glover's character has worked these mountain passes for the railroad before. Everyone in the small towns along the route and on the job seem to know and love him -- and he's a black guy too. It says volumes about our national change in attitude that someone was willing to cast an African-American actor as a charming murderer of white people, and Glover justifies the risk that was taken.

Quaid is stolid, stuck in the humorless role of the anxious but determined father. Jared Leto can't really act at all. And there are clichés in abundance. The car that rolls off the road and hangs on the edge of a cliff while its occupants try to crawl out of the wreck. It's held up by a single tree, which cracks and allows the vehicle to plunge into the valley, while Leto hangs onto some projecting roots by his fingertips.

But it's Danny Glover who redeems the film. At the start, we only see him as an amiable guy, and only gradually do we come to suspect his identity as the killer. The first time he uses his knife, the victim is an old friend with whom he has shared his childhood. It's a truly chilling scene. Glover's friendly smile fades into a scowl while the puzzled victim simply stares back at him. Then there is Glover's death. He's knocked from a speeding train and does a series of somersaults down a snowy slope, yipping and yelling along the way, like Major Kong riding the catastrophic bomb in "Doctor Strangelove." What a job he does.

At heart, it's just another serial killer story but -- here we must all get on our knees and thank heaven for small favors -- the killer doesn't leave puzzling clues behind based on "Alice in Wonderland" or The Seven Deadly Sins or the first folio of Billy Shakespeare's works or the seven levels of Inuit hell. There's only one teasing clue, and it doesn't require a trip to the library to solve it. There's really very little gore, and no violence except for a few minutes at the end.

You'll probably like it.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's more about the acting here than thrills.
Hey_Sweden28 July 2014
Warning: Spoilers
The extremely well chosen cast raises the value of this thriller a notch, in this tale of a somber FBI agent, Frank LaCrosse (Dennis Quaid) in relentless pursuit of a serial killer. For Frank the pursuit has become personal because this particularly crafty and odious killer has abducted his son. The movie intercuts between Frank's story and that of drifter Lane Dixon (Jared Leto), who's hitched a ride with gregarious character Bob Goodall (Danny Glover). Eventually the two stories are brought together, and a confrontation occurs on a train passing through some mountains.

As those who have seen this will tell you, "whodunit" is not at all the hook of the story. Debuting filmmaker Jeb Stuart (who had co-written "Die Hard" and "The Fugitive" for the screen) cares far more about his characters - and telling the tale - than trying to dazzle the audience with elaborate action set pieces. Granted, the movie does eventually head in that direction, but this is one of those rare cases where the action serves the story rather than the other way around.

And these characters are people we can actually get to like - even the psycho, who does have a certain charisma about him. You can see how his victims wouldn't feel threatened by him until it was too late. Filling out the rock solid supporting cast are R. Lee Ermey as the small town sheriff who is moved by Franks' predicament, Ted Levine as his loyal deputy, William Fichtner as the smarmy lawman trying to move in on Ermey's job, Leo Burmester as amiable mechanic Shorty, and in small parts, Brent Hinkley, Walton Goggins, Ted Markland, Gregory Scott Cummins, Maggie Roswell, Allison Smith, Julio Oscar Mechoso, Kevin Cooney, Merle Kennedy, and Sandy Ward. Glover is engaging as Bob while Quaid is wonderfully understated.

Those aforementioned action scenes are rousing, and there's a great deal of impressive rural vistas well shot in Panavision.

"Switchback" is lengthy, but worth the effort for fans of the genre.

Seven out of 10.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cheap whiskey.....
FlashCallahan1 December 2011
Warning: Spoilers
F.B.I. agent Frank LaCrosse returns home to find his home has been broken into, his son is missing and Missy the babysitter is lying in a pool of her own blood.

Her murder being the hallmarks of a elusive enigmatic serial killer whose slaughter spree stretches nearly two years.

Frank's desperate pursuit leads to Amarillo, Texas, where two more victims matching the killers M.O. have been found slashed to death.

As Frank searches for his suspect the local Sheriff Buck Olmstead and his Deputy Nate Booker investigate the killings in-between a heated election feud, with his competition police chief Jack McGinnis.

All the while drifting former doctor Lane Dixon is picked up by ex-railroad man, Bob Goodall.

As a local Mechanic, Clyde 'Shorty' Callahan becomes the latest victim.

Frank hopes and prays to find this sociopath before he disappears perhaps forever into the rocky mountains...

It's a good movie with some great performances from the cast, but if you have common sense, you should know that Glover is the killer from the start because such a prolific actor wouldn't be in a role where the character has no real meaning in the film.

He only picks up Leto, and thats his part in the narration of the film, and acting like an old school cowboy, I would have been very surprised if he were innocent.

But despite that flaw, it's quite a tense film, with lots of beautiful locale, and red herrings.

Quaid lets the side down a little, if only for the fact that he has an expression of 'no toilet for the next 20 miles' on his face.

When Glover and Leto are on screen, the film is full of energy, and this is the problem too, the film seems dull and lifeless when they are absent.

But all in all its a good effort, but never challenging, thanks to advertising and Glover playing the obvious choice for guess the killer.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I liked it!
Ross-452 September 1999
I liked just about every aspect of this movie. The local police aren't portrayed as a bunch of inbred idiots, the killer isn't portrayed as maniacal and impersonable, and the FBI agent isn't just a suit with all the personality of a tube of toothpaste. All of these combine to make a refreshing murder mystery/thriller. This isn't the classic "who dun it?" type of murder mystery; rather, it is more in the flavor of "Silence of the Lambs", where we discover who the killer is long before the end of the movie, and the suspense comes from anticipating the hero catching the villain.
33 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
1st hour 8/10, 2nd hour 4/10 (spoilerish)
TheOtherFool1 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
Serial killer thriller starts off well and is really exciting for it's first hour or so, but then kinda collapses.

Dennis Quaid is FBI agent Frank LaCrosse, who is in search of a serial killer. This serial killer hasn't been killing for a couple of months, but then starts killing again in the district of Sheriff Buck Olmstead, and him and LaCrosse try to catch him.

That's one side of the story. The nice touch here though comes from the other side, the killer's. You see, we have two men cruising the country (Jared Leto and Danny Glover). One of them is the killer... but who is it?

This set-up works pretty well for the first hour or so, but once we know who the killer is there isn't much to enjoy anymore. In particular because the movie has some side-elements that don't make much sense (I won't bore you with them now, but they include kidnapped sons and an election). The ending really was too much... too bad as it started out so good.

Conclusion: slightly above average, but could've been better: 6/10.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
wait a minute...
lee_eisenberg9 April 2012
I mostly liked "Switchback", but the last half hour or so seemed kind of anticlimactic, as if suddenly the truth gets revealed and then nothing more can happen. Granted, they did have a lot of tricks up to that point, but I still would have preferred a bigger surprise at the end. Nevertheless, Dennis Quaid, Danny Glover, Jared Leto and R. Lee Ermey do well in their roles. I kind of wish that more movies took place in the Rocky Mountains region (the most famous one is "The Shining", but another good one is "Sunshine Cleaning").

Anyway, an OK movie, but I would have preferred a stronger ending.

PS: Maggie Roswell, who plays Fae, is best known as one of the voices on "The Simpsons".
11 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"A very underrated thriller of the 90's!
inxsfett12 September 2014
I remember the first time i see this and become one of my favorites movies of the 90's.

I know what your thinking we already see this movie before but the big difference here is the actors,the direction and of course the script.

Dennis Quaid,Danny Glover,Jared Leto and R lee Ermey are the powerful cast of this movie.

The direction of Jeb Stuart is more than incredible he never leave you to take a breath and give you the enough suspense to keep stuck to the TV for almost 2 hours.

The script is clever,intelligent and very very entertainment you never gonna yawn in all movie.

I am glad to see this movie years ago and i always recommended who haven't see it...Like one of the best thrillers of the 90's.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Slightly Underrated but Slightly Disappointing... Worth a Watch
LeonLouisRicci25 May 2016
This is one of those Movies that Doesn't quite Work and it is difficult to figure out Why. It's got a Good Cast, Budget, Story and it all makes for a Suspense Filled Entertainment with an Edge.

The Film has an Edge but is Never Really Sharpened to the point of Excellence. It seems to Meander at times and one of the Biggest Flaws, and this is Lethal, the Killer is Revealed way too Soon.

It's got some Nice Neo-Noir Touches, like the Car Interior, and a Creepy Killer. With Off-Beat Characters like Lee Ermey as a Sheriff and His Deputy (Ted Levine), and Jared Leto as a Defrocked Doctor, all are Underused. But Danny Glover is better than usual as the Overacting actually makes His Character more Engaging. However, the Story Lingers at times.

Dennis Quaid is Wasted as an FBI Agent on the Trail of His Kidnapped Son and the Post-Script Ending is not handled very well. Overall, Slightly Underrated, it has its Moments but has a Feeling of Something Not Quite Right.

It is Suspenseful Enough and the Action Grips. Worth a Watch and with Low Expectations it might even Surprise.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Unusual Thriller
QueenMag27 November 1998
"Switchback" is a worth-while rental. Dennis Quaid reminded me of Harrison Ford; his character was strong and silent on the outside, but definitely hurting (and possibly screaming) inside. Danny Glover also breaks his acting mold and does something different. He is likable but a little creepy. Jared Leto once again plays a quiet, introverted young man with a mysterious background. Needless to say, he is (as always) easy on the eyes.

R L Ermey (sp?) is admirable as Sheriff Buck Olmstead. I will remember this guy for a while. He often plays politicians or policemen in his movies.

The movie is about a Sheriff (Ermey) who is running for re-election against a younger, somewhat slimy, opponent. There is a strange double murder in his jurisdiction, and he is soon joined by a lone FBI agent (Quaid), who is intent on catching the killer and unconcerned with local politics or Bureau policy. Meanwhile, a young hitchhiker (Leto) catches a ride with a cheerful traveler (Glover).

The film does a nice job of having two separate storylines and then bringing them together ... well-paced film. Unique characters. Solid acting. I recommend it.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Definitely a Good suspense/thriller
bravos26 May 1999
Definitely a Good suspense/thriller........should have been rated nearer to an 8 to an 8.5 rating. Danny Glover does an excellent acting job. There are enough turns and twists in the plot to keep one's interests all the way through the movie, in my opinion.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
thrilling action sequences
blanche-21 January 2014
"Switchback" begins with a murder and a kidnapping. The next thing we know, an FBI agent, Frank LaCrosse (Dennis Quaid) arrives in Armarillo, Texas, looking for a serial killer. The MO of the murders there matches that of the killer he's been tracking for some time.

In a parallel storyline, a good ol' boy, Bob Goodall (Danny Glover) driving a wild Cadillac gives a ride to a young man, Lane Dixon (Jared Leto) with a mysterious past -- at one point, a man is choking in a coffee shop and Lane announces he's a doctor and gives the man a tracheotomy. But he won't discuss it with Goodall.

And in a third subplot, the town of Amarillo is preparing for a big election of sheriff, and the fight is between the current Sheriff Buck Olmstead (R. Lee Ermey) and police chief Jack McGinnis (William Fichtner). In the midst of their murder investigation, Olmstead learns that FBI agent Frank LaCrosse was removed from the case and is on probation with the FBI.

All these plots fit neatly together.

"Switchback" is an exciting film with sequences that will have you on the edge of your seat, particularly those on the train. In a funny way it reminded me of a less glossy version of a James Bond film, in that the stunts were wild, with characters hanging off of cliffs, dangling from trains, in horrible car accidents - it never lets up.

The plot is a little far-fetched and the ending predictable, although some elements are left open. But it has moments of real thrills and tension, with good performances by Glover, Quaid, and Jared Leto who always looks so drop dead gorgeous in movies. "Monk" star Ted Levine (Leland Stottlemeyer) plays a deputy, and if you look fast, you'll see Shield's Walt Goggins as one of the sheriff's men. Fortunately both have gone on to deserved success.

Recommended.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Enough *!! Some SPOILERS !!*
fookin14 August 2000
Warning: Spoilers
I'd have to say that Switchback could have been great, instead its good enough. Danny Glover was great, and I think he played his character perfectly. Afterall...if they had chosen someone else to play his part, and had them play it like every other serial killer, then it wouldnt have been that hard for the FBI to find him now would it? Leto and the Sheriff..everyone really except Quaid did a good job. Quaid needed to be a little more passionate..avenging..afterall..he had every reason to be p***ed, but they way he played his character didnt make that much sense. Mr. Sensitive FBI guy shouldnt have had the balls to be a rogue FBI agent seeking revenge, but he did...it seemed inconsistent with his character. Someone should have kicked him in the ass to get his blood flowing or something. Aside from some plot holes to mislead the audience, I'd say this movie is good enough to suggest to other people. I gave it a 7.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Should Have Been Better
gbheron16 May 1999
Switchback comes very close to being a very good movie. The plot revolves around that standard 90s character, the serial killer. But Switchback puts an interesting spin on the story by simultaneously weaving three distinct plot threads through the movie. The first follows a hotly contested election for sheriff in one of the towns where the killer strikes. The second is the manhunt by a rogue FBI agent of his elusive quarry, the killer. The agent has special interest in the case in that the killer has also kidnapped the agent's young son. The third is a cross country car trip by a retired railroad man and a young medical school dropout hitchhiker who just happens to be in every locale the murderer strikes.

The filmmakers almost pull it off. On-location shooting of the Mountain West in winter is extremely effective. The supporting cast is great and believable. If the story didn't have so many plot-holes and stupidisms (the killer's identity is revealed way too early). And if Dennis Quaid had turned in a decent performance as the FBI agent (he's pretty bad). Well, this movie could have been a very good, and suspenseful movie.

As it is it's not bad, and I give it a C+. What annoys me is that it had so much potential, and it was wasted.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just a good action/thriller.
NightOfTheLivingDon19 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I really enjoyed this film. There are plenty of imperfect action/thrillers out there that fell much, much shorter than "Switchback." I've always enjoyed typically protagonist actors reverse roles, and I thought that Danny Glover did great. He wasn't Robin Williams in "Insomnia" (or "One Hour Photo" for that matter) but he was strong. I felt that delivering his performance in typical good guy fashion really added. Dennis Quaid wasn't phenomenal in the film, but he did fine. There was some real tension in most scenes, and though you knew what was going on, there was the occasional shadow of doubt. Sure the ending was the usual good triumphs over evil scenario, but so was "Terminator," "Die Hard," and for that matter "Braveheart." Sure the plot had some holes, but all-in-all I thought this was a solid movie.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Virtue and the Serial Killer
brainlocked5116 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Formally a thriller, this film is in fact a rather substantive morality play about the price of integrity. Everyone in the film is called upon to make a moral choice that reflects who and what they are. And choosing has a price. Sheriff Olmstead played masterfully by R. Lee Ermey--once observes that "He--FBI agent Frank La Crosse--told the truth, and once you tell the truth, everything else is just cheap whiskey." Olmstead's observation pretty much sums up the film. Virtue is good whiskey. Laughably, Ermey delivers this line spot on with a bottle of Jim Beam--definitely not good whiskey--in the background. Olmsteads's integrity costs him the sheriff's election. His elective replacement, Chief McGinnis, played by William Fichtner, initially comes across as a pompous ass: but even he makes a virtuous choice that eventually costs him. Jared Leto who plays Lane Dixon, a burned out physician who strangely bonds with the killer, is another case of self-discovery through moral agency. Even Bob Goodall--a.k.a Danny Glover--the clearly insane serial killer, has a kind of warped integrity. Twisted, yes; but true to his "twistedness". FBI agent La Crosse's observation that the killer, Bob Goodall--the name is hardly accidental--may be a murderer but is not a liar simply underscores the film's larger Stoic themes. As Epictetus put it: "Be one man, bad or good." This film, written and directed by Jeb Stuart should have received more critical attention. It is a thoughtful and philosophically reflective film that paid a price for its quirky moral subtext and integrity: it flopped at the box office. Philosophical films, even subdued ones, are generally not money makers--even with decent writing such as this and a popular genre that should have been an appropriate vehicle for its message. However, even for an unreflective viewer this is an entertaining film directed and written by the same guy--Jeb Stuart--who wrote the screenplays for "Die Hard" and "The Fugitive".
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tense and Exciting but Wants Characters Who Express
orglit123 January 2008
Viewers keep trying to predict the action based on scant information about characters. Thus, the story is tense and exciting. From early on, a question is Why is FBI Agent Frank LaCrosse (Dennis Quaid) so determined to find this culprit? At the same time, another question is Why does the serial killer do any of that? And there are other questions at the same time.

But, of course, no murders need to take place in a story for multiple questions, and suspense, to occur -- this genre is not to my taste. It's unrealistic, or else cynical. However, given the story's assumptions, there is a lot of suspenseful questioning in the viewer's mind, some of which is satisfactorily resolved.

It is never clear what could be motivating murderer Bob Goodall (Danny Glover) to do any of this, as there are many games to play, and as Goodall as portrayed by Glover seems to be a well-humored type. Glover's performance is not convincing; with all the pals he has around there, he would have been better as a policeman.

It is resolved why LaCrosse is after Goodall with determination -- pretty much what one guessed. But he is too remote from his relationship with his son. When he reveals this motive to the sheriff after the sheriff has elaborated upon the dinner he prepared, there is more interest in whether he will sit down and eat it than in what he tells about his son. Maybe he didn't even like his son, or maybe he wished he had spent more time with him -- but we get nothing more than a defined relationship and an inevitable act of paternal duty. Maybe LaCrosse just likes adventure -- chasing a train in his car, and physical challenges like that.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Keepin' it real
lhhung_himself21 February 2013
It's not something that Quaid or Glover would want to buy back and destroy every copy but it's not very good either.

Quaid has one constipated expression all through the film as does Leto. They obviously needed the paycheck. Glover, to be fair, hammed it up, had fun and it kept me from changing to something else.

But the entire plot was bad - and even the chases were dull lacking any excitement, the contrived "surprise" was revealed too early - and nothing makes much sense. Just a bunch of scenes strung together to fill the time. No humor or decent FX/explosions ala Lethal Weapon to distract from a boring story either.

Very meh - Predator 2 was better...
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hokey, But Intense Man's Movie
ccthemovieman-13 March 2006
Wow, this is an intense story that should keep you interested for the full two hours. The five main roles are all men and they are pretty interesting, led by Danny Glover's character, who is very, very creepy.

I'm hesitant to say much about this film for fear of giving anything away for those who have not seen it. Suffice to say its a rough movie in regards to language, violence and general attitude but the story grabs you quickly and is tough to put down once you are into it.

One complaint I read said this film never made it big because it was too convoluted a storyline. In fact, the story isn't really pieced together until the last few minutes. Well, a lot of films over the years were like that (Charlie Chan and Sherlock Holmes mysteries, just to name two) and no one complained.

The fact that FBI agent Dennis Quaid would figure things out to the exact minute does stretch credibility so don't look for a film that makes a lot of sense: it's simply a very tense thriller that entertains, so it serves its purpose.

Lee Ermey, the fanatical drill sergeant in Full Metal Jacket, also is fun to watch in here. Jared Leto and Ted Levine also contribute nicely. It's a man's film, for the most part and an effective diversion for two hours.
54 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Switch Roles ,not switchback!
CharltonBoy27 June 1999
The greatest thing that stands out from this movie ( apart from the gaping holes in the plot) is that the two leading actors should have switched roles. Glover was far too lightweight for the character he was playing and quad was far too deep and depressing for his role. I wouldn't say this was a bad film it was actually ok but it won't last for too long in the memory. 6 OUT OF 10
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Switchback: Good actors, Interesting plot but...
Helwoe3 June 2001
I like the cast pretty much however the story sort of unfolds rather slowly. Danny Glover does a good job making you wonder if he's the bad guy. Meanwhile, the other characters are just part of the story. Dennis Quaid didn't have as much room in the story as he could have had. I thought the first scene was a bit over the top grim compared to how the story unfolded. I'd watch it again though. I rated it a 5 (wish I could rate it a 5.5)
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed