Love Field (1992) Poster

(1992)

User Reviews

Review this title
28 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Outstanding drama that deserves a wider audience.
ThrownMuse7 April 2005
Michelle Pfeiffer plays a middle-class 60s housewife who idolizes Jackie O. When JFK is assassinated, she leaves her husband and road trips to his funeral to show solidarity with her icon. Along the way she meets a black man (Dennis Haysbert) and his young daughter. She immediately befriends them but realizes they are hiding a secret. Soon she is swept up in their lives and finds herself on the run from the FBI.

This is the best performance I've ever seen by Pfeiffer. She is practically unrecognizable--her southern accent is perfect and her Jackie O-inspired look is classic. She adds a welcome dose of humor to a film that is often emotionally overwhelming. The movie alternates between adorable and disturbing, but never gets too extreme either way. The plot gets a bit contrived at times, but the movie serves to question the comfort of routine middle-class existence, so it works. I am surprised this is not a well-known film. It is one of the best ones I've seen from the early 90s.

My Rating: 8/10.
34 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The definition of 'underrated'
Analog_Devotee20 January 2021
This little picture unexpectedly blew me away. Both Pfeiffer and Haysbert clearly gave it their all in these roles. This film deserves cult status -- don't sleep on it!
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Deserving of Accolades and A Broader Audience
FiendishDramaturgy31 May 2007
An obsessed beautician heads for DC when JFK is assassinated. Along the way, she loses her husband, but finds something within herself she never knew was there; courage and fortitude.

Fraught with dangers only our parents remember, this film shows you what the US was like back in the late 50's, early 60's. It also teaches us that we haven't changed that much, as a nation, in the last 50 years.

Michelle Pfeiffer, Dennis Haysbert, and Stephanie McFadden endear with their honesty in this gripping drama by Jonathan Kaplan (Project X, the Firm, and Bad Girls). The performances are heartening and lends us hope that things genuinely CAN improve in the future. Not necessarily that they will, but that it is possible, should we apply our hearts to the problem.

This is a great film, though you have to be in the right mood for it.

It rates an 8.2/10 from...

the Fiend :.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Brilliant, beautiful, and moving...
SSposeidon15 March 2001
Warning: Spoilers
My Stars, my "One line summary" sounds camp, but this picture was truly lovely and very moving for me.

I had seen it years ago, as I am a fan of anything involving period re-creations, but seeing it again recently moved me way past the perfect 1963 backgrounds and the Melmac cups in the kitchen cupboards...

This review may contain *spoilers*, so Viewer Beware.

Michelle Pfieffer portrays a woman obsessed with the glamour of the Kennedy family, particularly Jackie, and is thrilled to catch a glimpse of her as the First Couple arrive at Dallas Love Field Airport on November 22 of '63. Circumstances (humorous ones, at that, in the form of fabulously annoying character actress Peggy Rea) don't allow for her brush with celebrity, and of course the assassination crushes her. Her husband is less than sympathetic as she explains her need to attend the funeral. She escapes anyway, and catches a bus to Washington. She meets up with a black man and his young daughter (Dennis Haysbert and Stephanie McFadden) and the journey becomes very complicated indeed. Intrigue and mystery cloud his initial introduction, however Pfieffer's character is concerned for him, especially for the daughter's welfare. Soon the trio are entwined, and stubborn ethics keep them from abandoning one another. This is when they are suddenly on their own, and the story takes off.

Visually, the mixture is wonderful - the extremely "white" and VERY blonde Pfieffer, trying her hardest to look like Jackie even down to her home-made suits, and the curious "coloured man" and his silent, somewhat frightened daughter. Both actors are absolutely excellent as two individuals who become literal victims of their own time. There are the subtle vocal references to the child as "a coloured girl" by Pfieffer, who holds no prejudice but simply talks the way everyone else does; and then the stronger and much more "controversial" implications of the man and the woman and any kind of a relationship they may have, however shadowed by the mores of the early 60's, the confusion and upset the World is undergoing due to Kennedy's murder, and even the geographic locales they travel through.

We are reminded that Pfieffer's character is still a married, albeit unhappily, woman of principle, and that the mere sight of an interracial couple in that time would cause near hysterics - still we WANT them to overcome it all, and the fact that the very human need for love has to be compromised by the times is communicated intensely yet with enough restraint that the characters do not suffer being imbued with too much "foresight."

Stephanie McFadden as the 6-year-old daughter is incredible as well, her facial expressions saying so much more than the six or seven lines she speaks in the whole picture. Her poignant close ups drive the viewer to WILL her to understand, to see what is happening around her, comprehend it, see beyond it, but of course she cannot. Much of the story is this way, one wants to just clear away the limitations and the social ills and let them all BE. There are moments of tension (rednecks [they are even credited as such!] that pass the couple on the road and then come back to stir up trouble) balanced by those of palpable relief (a curious, inexpressive old woman and her retired husband, who take the three in for a night). This is sufficient to provide a realistic level of suspense, even angst, but it is the triumph of overcoming barriers, whether they are bad husbands who just don't know any better, or suspicious and bigoted backwoods policemen, that make for the emotions one experiences while watching.

This picture left me wondering who and where these brilliant people are, the writer, Don Roos, and dual-producers Sarah Pillsbury and Midge Sanford, and particularly director Jonathan Kaplan. Why haven't we heard of these folks, and why wasn't this beautiful film hailed in 1992? Rarely, very rarely, have I seen a picture that left me wanting to personally congratulate the folks directly responsible for it!

Needless to say, but important to emphasize, production values shine in all forms, as the film contains some spectacular period-recreations of downtown Dallas and other townships, even down to the store-front displays and seas of vintage vehicles buzzing around (Oliver Stone eat your heart out!), and the shockingly realistic Love Field Airport scenes, complete with the obligatory Pink Nubbly Suit on an incredible Jackie K. look-alike, are stunning. The interiors, the magazines in the racks, everything, is spot on; and the photography is breathtaking, as unpicturesque as a bus in the middle of Nowhere, Virginia, may seem to be.

A splendid, highly recommended motion picture in ALL regards.

Multiple stars. Much praise!
25 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Surprisingly effective film; highly recommended
vincentlynch-moonoi20 March 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I had always skipped over this movie, although I'm not sure why. I guess I had in my mind what it was about...not sure where that idea came from...and I was wrong. So, I watched this one evening when I wasn't feeling very well and, WOW, what a great film.

I thought it was interesting how they tied in 2 separate plots -- the assassination of JFK and the pairing up of an interracial couple...seemingly unrelated, yet the JFK part of the story set the time very nicely, thus making possible the story of the interracial couple. On the other hand, as the story wends its way to a conclusion, there are a few loose ends...like how they got away from the police a few times...but, it's a movie, and the point of the story isn't exactly their being wanted by the police...it's just one aspect of the story.

This may be Michelle Pfeiffer at her best (which would explain the Oscar nomination). I'm impressed with her here, and I say that as a person who is not a particular fan. Dennis Haysbert is excellent as the "Negro", and he plays the part just right for the time the story is taking place. Stephanie McFadden as the young daughter is excellent here. I was pleased to see Louise Latham in the film; a character actress I had forgotten about, but always appreciated over the years when she was still active.

Don't let a few of the reviews here stop you from watching this film. It's a strong film, nicely done, good production values, and rather true to the time period in which the story takes place.

I was tempted with an "8", but instead give it a very strong "7".
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Three for the road
jotix10015 January 2005
"Love Field" was a film that came and went without much fanfare. It was shown on cable recently, so we decided to take a chance with it. Jonathan Kaplan makes an impression with his unusual take on the subject of the race relations in the United States of the early 60s that pays a great deal of respect to the era in which it takes place. The film shows how things were in this country in the years where segregation was still enforced in the land.

If you haven't watched the movie, please stop reading now.

Lurene, the young woman at the center of the story was in awe of Mrs. Jacqueline Kennedy. The former first lady had such magnetic quality and charisma that it was easy to see why she was so admired and imitated by all women in America in the early 60s. After all, Mrs. Kennedy was royalty in a country that supposedly has no class differences. Jackie's sense of style was imitated by most women; after all, she was an elegant, vibrant and youthful woman who all wanted to adore.

The story presents a situation that rings false from the beginning. Lurene was only a step above of what would be considered white trash, therefore, her relationship with Paul Cater and Jonell, is hard to believe because of the woman's background. Lurene is kind hearted, but one wonders to what extend would someone in her station in life would have done in a real situation like the director presents in the picture.

As far as what we watch in the film, making allowances for Lurene's open mind and understanding about segregation and discrimination, the movie is easy to watch. In pairing Michelle Pfeiffer with a handsome Dennis Haysbert, who has already been seen in a similar role in "Far from Heaven", one can see why these two lost souls were attracted to one another. We can understand Lurene's sense of decency, as well as Paul's falling for Lurene when reason and logic would tell him to stay away from this white woman. Even in the big Northern cities where racial discrimination was not as blatant as in the deep South, integrated couples were a rarity in the early 60s.

Michelle Pfeiffer makes a compelling Lurene, the girl who is a decent human being. This role is a stretch for Ms. Pfeiffer, an actress not associated with dramatic parts that make such demands on her. Dennis Haysbert is good as the troubled Paul, a man that only wants to do his best for this daughter he is bringing back to Philadelphia. Stephanie McFadden is sweet as the young girl who can't comprehend what's going on around her. Finally, Louise Latham, as Mrs. Enright, is the only one that shows any decency to the situation in which she gets involved against her will.

While the movie doesn't break any grounds in racial relations, at least it has the courage to show how wrong segregation was and how prevalent it was in the United States.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I just love the theme
grantica28 August 1998
I love the relationship between the three characters. A very well directed movie.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Sad and Intimate Character Study Set in a Turbulent Time
Isaac585522 January 2009
Michelle Pfeiffer's Oscar nominated performance anchors 1992's LOVE FIELD, a surprisingly moving marriage between character study and buddy movie that draws the viewer in with the draw of vividly human characters involved in a somewhat over the top story that manages to hold our attention due to the extreme likability of the two main characters. Pfeiffer plays a Dallas beautician named Lurene in 1963, who is so devastated by the assassination of JFK that she decides, against her husband's wishes, to travel to Washington DC to attend JFK's funeral and, en route, befriends a black man (Dennis Haysbert)traveling with his daughter, and the relationship that develops between the two when circumstances find the three of them on the run together. The story taken on an unexpected richness because these two people are part of the racially turbulent 1960's and because of the beautifully evocative performances from the stars. Pfeiifer, in particular, gives us a sad and slightly pathetic creature, wearing a platinum blonde Mariyln Monroe wig that seems to represent her desire to be someone else, her Lurlene is slightly ditzy, bored,lonely, but with a heart as big as all outdoors and the quiet dignity that Haysbert brings to his character in this tense situation is on target. Brian Kerwin also scores in the most significant role of his career as Lurene's abusive brute of a husband, but it is the performances and chemistry of the two stars that make this journey a memorable one.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Love Fields a real sleeper, one of the best small films ever
shackel7 January 2007
I loved this movie! Pfieffer's child-like naiveté is beautifully balanced with the mature competence of Dennis Haysbert's character. This is the first time I'd ever seen Haysbert and I've been a fan ever since. Something about that man...the viewer understands why she falls for him. I ached for both characters. The movie stirs up some feelings about injustice, racism, oppressed women -- a memory of those times but not nostalgia for them. The ending soothes and satisfies all that was stirred up. Love Fields uses only a few people and not a lot of scenery to tell its story, but its quite enough. It is, essentially, a love story -- unexpected, but so right. The period (mid-60's)is well-established and well-maintained. See this movie!
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lurene goes to meet the president
ksf-212 March 2021
Michelle Pfeiffer is Lurene, bringing her neighbor down to Love Field in Dallas to meet the Kennedys. and the neighbor DOES! but then... as we know, it all went downhill from there. the death of President John Kennedy affected everyone differently. Lurene jumped on the bus to attend the funeral. and meets Paul (Dennis Haysbert) and his daughter on the bus. and then... more things go haywire. and they all have to get through it together. Lurene means well, but keeps making things worse. it's hard to watch, as they get in more and more trouble. we can really feel their pain as they navigate the obstacles. like her crazy husband. and the cops. and the racists. they are on a trip that feels like it'll never end. it's very well done, if you have the stomach for it. Directed by Jonathan Kaplan. Written by Don Roos. has written and directed film and television.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Cute but wildly inaccurate
view_and_review26 August 2018
The movie was interesting but I'm calling BS. Let me lay it down for you.

The year is 1963 and JFK is in office. Lurene Hallett (Michelle Pfeiffer) is a Dallas woman that loves the Kennedys. When JFK was assassinated she wanted so desperately to attend the funeral that she defied her husband and snuck out to catch a bus to Washington DC.

Paul Cater (Dennis Haysbert--better known as Allstate's spokesperson or the president in 24) is on his way home with his daughter, Jonell (Stephanie McFadden). He ends up on the same bus as Lurene, sitting right behind her. His daughter is withdrawn and it looks like things aren't what they seem between Paul and Jonell.

Now, here's where the movie simply gets it wrong. Lurene starts to engage in idle chit-chat with Paul and Paul somewhat reciprocates. Eventually it turns into them being on the lam together through various southern states with a stolen car. I'm skipping a lot of details but I don't want to be a spoiler nor do I want to make this review much longer than it's already going to be.

Here are my gripes:

Firstly, no way would Lurene be associating with a black man on a public bus in the south. Even if she was liberal at that time chances are she wouldn't have been that daft and would know the social faux pas of talking with a "colored" man for a reason other than an immediate need.

Secondly, even if Lurene engaged him, no way would Paul reciprocate. Even if he was a bold and defiant black man he would know that talking with a white woman in the south would mean almost certain death. Furthermore, he had his daughter with him so that was even more of a reason to be in self-preservation mode.

Thirdly, even if we conceded that actions one and two happened, no way would it go beyond that--which in the movie it did. It went way beyond that.

If this movie took place in any later era, like the 70's for instance, then I'd be more apt to believe it. Yes, there'd still be problems with the association between these two but at least it'd be more believable. This happened in 1963, and even though there was some progress by that time things hadn't progressed nearly enough for a white woman and a black man to be seen together in the south.

I give Love Field a little bit of credit because they did approach the grave danger Lurene put them both in. Paul was in trouble and he was trying to lay low and it was largely due to the naiveté of Lurene. She was so aloof and reckless that she was apt to get both of them killed. Today, that same behavior wouldn't even warrant a second look but not in 1963. Lurene was a walking weapon and didn't even know it and for that I say BS.
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
an excellent portrait of the times
bkostis18 September 2004
This movie is not only tells the story of the accidental connection of two people, one black and one white, who would probably have never met in their normal lives, it also presents a vivid portrait of the time in which they lived. Set against the background of the JFK assassination and the aftermath, the protagonists meet and help each other through turning points in their lives. At first wary of each other, they come to understand the forces which have shaped each other's personalities and then come to appreciate the humanity and longing they have in common. Segregation and prejudice on both sides are explored without preaching. Finally it ends if not happily at least on a note of hope.
23 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Our Jackie Kennedy Fan Club
JamesHitchcock11 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Love Field is an airport near Dallas, named after the pioneer aviator Moss Love. Its relevance to this film is that it was the airport into which President John F. Kennedy flew for the visit which was to end in his assassination. (This has not, however, prevented some people from giving the title a more literal interpretation; the German title, for instance, was "Feld der Liebe", or "Field of Love").

The film is set in November 1963, around the time of the assassination. The main character is Lurene Hallett, a thirty-something Dallas beautician obsessed with the President and even more with his wife Jacqueline. (Jackiemania of this sort appears to have been a genuine phenomenon of the early sixties; it was satirised by the British humorist Michael Wharton ("Peter Simple") who wrote of "typical housewives' fan clubs" with names like the "Revisionist Anti-Our Jackie Onassis"). When she learns that the President has been assassinated she is determined to travel by bus to Washington to attend his funeral, without either the knowledge or approval of her husband Ray.

During her journey, Lurene meets Paul Cater, a black fellow-passenger, travelling with a young girl named Jonell, who he claims is his daughter. She senses that something is wrong, jumps to the conclusion that Paul has kidnapped the child and raises the alarm. When she realises the truth- that Paul is indeed Jonell's father and that he has rescued her from an orphanage where she was being mistreated after the death of her unmarried mother- Lurene feels that she needs to make amends for her well-intentioned but ill-judged interference, and helps Paul to make a getaway. The two find themselves on a perilous road trip across several Southern states with the police in pursuit.

This was the film which won Michelle Pfeiffer her third Academy Award nomination in four years (the others were for "Dangerous Liaisons" and "The Fabulous Baker Boys"), thus completing her successful transition from sex symbol to serious actress. Her Lurene at first seems a slightly ridiculous figure, and not merely because she has the sort of Christian name generally used by Hollywood scriptwriters as shorthand for "dumb blonde trailer trash". Her thick Texas drawl, her overdone makeup and her platinum blonde bouffant hairdo, the sort of big hair that screams "early sixties!" at you, all initially make it difficult to take her seriously. (Even by the end of the decade, this hairstyle had been forbidden by law on pain of extreme ridicule). Her obsession with the President and First Lady seems naïve and childish, an adult version of a teenage crush. Yet as the film progresses, we realise that she is not just a dumb blonde, but someone who has hidden reserves of kindness and decency, especially as she is no middle-class liberal, but comes from the class which, in the South, has always constituted the main reserve of racist bigotry.

Films about racial prejudice are today commonplace, and even in the early nineties were not as daring or original as they would have been a few decades earlier. What was original about "Love Field" is the way in which it treats this theme. Lurene's deepening relationship with Paul is always going to cause both of them problems, given that they are travelling through rural areas where even a platonic friendship between a black man and a white woman will always be regarded with suspicion and anything deeper than that with outright hostility. When the couple realise that they are falling in love, they also realise that they have violated a fundamental taboo of their society. Indeed, this was a courageous theme even for 1992. Even ten years later when Dennis Haysbert, who plays Paul here, was to star in "Far from Heaven", another film with a similar theme, it was made clear that his character's relationship with Julianne Moore always remained non-sexual.

Like "Frankie and Johnnie" in which Pfeiffer had starred the previous year, "Love Field" is essentially a romantic comedy, but one which contains a greater degree of psychological depth and insight than is usual in films of this type, at least in its portrayal of Lurene. Haysbert's Paul is perhaps the sort of standard stoical, dignified black man common in films with a race relations theme, but it is Michelle Pfeiffer's performance which keeps us watching. I should also mention Jerry Goldsmith's excellent piano score which enhances the appeal of this film. 7/10
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Too fluff-headed to be very memorable...
moonspinner5522 September 2005
In 1963 Dallas, a Jackie Kennedy-obsessed beautician hopes to travel by bus to JFK's funeral, but gets involved instead with a troubled black man and his estranged little girl. Handsome production, nice details, but a curiously minor film that never quite kicks into gear. Occasionally, the way the racial prejudices are shown--from both black and white characters--is heavy-handed, though director Jonathan Kaplan does subtle work as well, performing a nimble balancing act while the screenplay works overtime being "heated" and "emotional". Michelle Pfeiffer's performance is alternately grating, unconventional, sweet and perplexing; we don't get to know her Lurene too well, and the actress has to rely on shtick for some of her major scenes; Dennis Haysbert as her traveling companion is a tower of quiet strength, and his handsome, aw-shucks smile isn't over-used. The plot is wrapped up neatly at the end, a tricky feat since the finale takes place some 12 months from the rest of the story--a gimmick that doesn't always work, but here it satisfies the viewer by showing lives changed and what might lay ahead. Potentially a heady mix of race-relations and something even deeper (and no-less complicated): forbidden love. Yet the picture somehow whittles down these complex issues into a road-movie formula. ** from ****
16 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A nice movie that lacks the depths it needs (spoilers)
Jim Griffin26 January 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Love Field is the kind of movie where you just know the words `set against the backdrop' were used in its pitch: A love story between a black man and a white woman, set against the backdrop of the Kennedy assassination. It's not a particularly comfortable mix of ideas.

What's strange is that it handles both threads rather well, if taken separately. The sense of shock at the assassination feels genuine for the most part, mainly because of the inclusion of a contemporary news clip as the newsreader struggles to find words and clear his throat as he announces Kennedy's death.

The love story is rather less successful, but comes close to being touching every so often. As Michelle Pfeiffer makes her way to the Kennedy funeral, she meets Dennis Haysbert and his daughter on a long-distance coach. Their growing fondness for each other is mostly convincing, and we should be grateful that there is no mutual-animosity to change to affection, an idea so old it can ruin a movie immediately.

Regardless of their individual merits, combine these threads together and the movie starts to unravel. Its heart is in the right place so it can't really be called tasteless, but it skirts the edges a little too often. In one scene we have to switch from the travellers spending a restful night at a friend's house to them watching the TV as Lee Harvey Oswald is shot. This kind of uncomfortable transition is made a number of times, and grates on each of them, none more so than in the climax, when Jackie Kennedy looks at Pfeiffer as she is driven past her on the way to her husband's funeral. Its intention was certainly not to trivialise the assassination, but too often it seemed to be used for dramatic effect in an otherwise unrelated love story.

The film seemed to lack confidence; believing that its main story was simply not interesting enough, it included racism, segregation, wife-beating, kidnapping and child abuse for good measure. These darker tones were treated with the gentle touch as everything else, which didn't earn them the credibility they deserved.

Love Field probably aimed too high. It just didn't have the weight to carry off the issues it dealt with or the messages it tried to send out. Had the assassination been played down it could have been a great love story. Had the love story been played down it could have been a great story about segregation. Had segregation been played down it could have been a great movie about the impact of the assassination on the lives of ordinary people. It tried to be all these things together, and together they weakened their own credibility.

It seems harsh to include these criticisms of a movie that was lightweight and mostly enjoyable, but that was the problem; a film that dealt with these issues shouldn't have been lightweight or enjoyable. Its tone wasn't dark enough to pull them off. It was a nice enough movie, with good performances from Pfeiffer and Haysbert, but it asked too much of itself and forced us to ask the same.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pfeiffer makes this one worth a look
Gideon242 March 2015
Michelle Pfeiffer's Oscar nominated performance anchors 1992's LOVE FIELD, a surprisingly moving marriage of character study and buddy movie that draws the viewer in with the draw of vividly human characters involved in a somewhat over the top story that manages to hold our attention due to the extreme likability of the two main characters.

Pfeiffer plays a Dallas beautician named Lurene in 1963, who is so devastated by the assassination of JFK that she decides, against her husband's wishes, to travel to Washington DC to attend JFK's funeral and, en route, befriends a black man (Dennis Haysbert)traveling with his daughter, and the relationship that develops between the two when circumstances find the three of them on the run together.

The story takes on an unexpected richness because these two people are part of the racially turbulent 1960's and because of the beautifully evocative performances from the stars. Pfeiffer, in particular, gives us a sad and slightly pathetic creature, wearing a platinum blonde Marilyn Monroe wig that seems to represent her desire to be someone else, her Lurlene is slightly ditzy, bored,lonely, but with a heart as big as all outdoors and the quiet dignity that Haysbert brings to his character in this tense situation is on target. Brian Kerwin also scores in the most significant role of his career as Lurene's abusive brute of a husband, but it is the performances and chemistry of the two stars that make this journey a memorable one.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Screenplay
Bacci30 September 1999
Good movie, Michelle is very good on it.

What I liked most in this movie is how it shows to those who watch it the both sides of the American condition in the sixties.

Screenplay could be a little bit less obvious.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
review
yoshi_s_story15 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
This is an American story of irrealizable love between a black man (Haysbert) and a white and already married lady (Pfeiffer), whose meeting is arranged by the chance of President Kennedy's murder. Apart from its effective stressing on the suffocating racist climate of the time, the course of the plot proceeds along the path of averageness and predictability; nevertheless Pfeiffer's enlivens the otherwise meager scene with her magic. About 10 years later Dennis Haysbert will play in another, deeper and closer to poetry yet despicably imitative and also possibly more biased towards commerciability, retelling of this story, «Far from Heaven› by Todd Haynes.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Naive, warmhearted Michelle Pfeiffer falls in love
Jocke-72 December 1998
Michelle Pfeiffer stars as a naive, warm-hearted woman in Dallas who lives to follow the presidential couple. The move takes place during the assassination of JFK and Lurene(Michelle Pfeiffer) meets a black, mysterious man and his daughter. She falls in love with them but she's just about to find out that everything isn't as it seems.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Gret underrated enjoyable movie
aceellaway201027 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Can't believe that this is another movie that I find the legendary Roger Ebert's review to be totally worthless. The performance are uniformly great particularly Michelle Pfeiffer and Dennis Haysbert. The story is involving and ultimately moving. The little girl's almost numb with abuse and fear, shock is well portrayed. The story is believable, and the ending happily, optimistic. A shame that the film is comparatively unknown. See it, if you like something more substantial than a simple chick flick, or the latest blood and gore offering. A movie for people with an adult mentality. It once again proves that Michelle Pfeiffer was perhaps the most under appreciated actress of her time.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
On The Road Again . . . .
sundayatdusk-9785911 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Lurene is a Dallas beautician who is obssessed with Jackie Kennedy. She has a notebook filled with newspaper and magazine clippings about Jackie and Jack. She sees their marriage as the ideal type of marriage. Her own marriage to a local guy is dull and childless. (She miscarried months earlier.) When the Kennedys are coming to Dallas in 1963, Lurene is thrilled and has no intention of missing the chance to see them in person.

Of course the day ends up being tragic, and Lurene is now obsessed with being at JFK's funeral. Her husband tells her she is crazy obsessed and he's tired of it. Thus, Lurene sneaks off to the bus station in the dead of night. On the bus she meets Paul and his daughter Jonell. Paul is black. Lurene is in the last white row before the black section, where Paul is in the front row.

Paul tries to be aloof, because talking to a white woman on a segregated bus can be dangerous. But Lurene won't shut up for a minute and she is being kind to young Jonell, who strangely does not speak. So begins the journey of Lurene, Paul and Jonell. When the bus goes off the road due to a crazy car driver, that journey becomes one thing after another. Yes, unfortunately, it soon became tiresome wondering what was going to happen next.

I even fast-forwarded through parts where Paul is attacked by rednecks, and when the three end up at the home of one of Lurene's co-workers' mother in Virginia. The story obviously had good intentions, but it didn't stay captivating enough. The very end was laughable, too. A year after the trip, Lurene had gone from a Jackie Kennedy hairstyle to a Carol Brady one. (This was years before Carol Brady, mind you.) In addition, she made a decision no woman in Texas would make unless she definitely had plans of moving out of the South very, very soon.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Love was most definitely in the air!
fierypoeticgirl6 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I'm speechless. The acting was sentimental on Michell's part, but who's wasn't when JFK got shot. She had a hum-drum life with a man that knew nothing about compassion or empathy toward others. He was only interested in himself and whether or not she'd stay with him. He could not understand the importance of her wanting to "pay her respects" to he late President. Her character actually GROWS in this movie, and she begins to fall in love (maternially) with the black man's daughter. (Not to mention the black man......hot!) In the end, I actually thought they were heading their separate ways, but then you see her car return to where the man's daughter is staying. Now that is true romance, and it goes against most of society which hints, "Stick with your own kind,"and I like the fact that she decided to return to him where she felt herself and safe.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Driving Miss Crazy
drednm28 May 2021
The actors are better than the story.

Set against the Kennedy assassination, the plot here deals with a rather simple-minded woman (Michelle Pfeiffer) from Dallas who is obsessed with the Kennedy family and especially Jackie. She's also unhappily married to a brutish guy (Brian Kerwin). She runs away from home and boards a bus to Washington to attend the Kennedy funeral.

Aboard the bus she chats with a black man (Dennis Haysbert) who is traveling with his small and oddly silent daughter. She never shuts up. He reluctantly responds to her endless chatter. The bus lumbers through racist America until there is an accident and the local cops start nosing around trying to get the details.

Right off they're suspicious of Haysbert and why he seems to be traveling with a white woman. To make natters worse, the ninny makes a phone calls when she discovers bruises on the child. That sets in motion a series of events with the travelers on the run from the cops.

While the man and woman learn things about themselves, their eyes are also opened to the realities of the American South in that pre-Civil Rights era.

The most annoying thing here, aside from the plot holes and implausibility of the story is the Pfeiffer character. If she has a Jackie obsession, why does she have platinum blonde hair a la Marilyn Monroe? She is a beautician after all. Seems like she'd had dyed her hair darker, not lighter.

Pfeiffer and Haysbert are good. Louise Latham is also good as the rural mother who takes them in while they are on the lam.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
soundtrack excellent
harry-4206 January 2007
The sound track behind this film would make a good atmospheric Cd. There are fine performances by the principles. The film has many good moments and several dark ones that include such racist behaviour by southern police officers, that if that is reflective of how they are,one would not want to go to the southern states of America ever. The film is crosscut with the assassination of J F K Kennedy moving from Dallas to Washington, the funeral of the President then the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald. Remembering the paranoia in America at the time about conspiracy, Red plots, Castro involvement or Mafia killing and the condemnation of the Dallas police force that followed because they seemed to prefer Kennedy dead and wanted only to put it to bed as quickly as possible. The police would have been very twitchy, but that wouldn't excuse the kind of pure nastiness portrayed here.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed