Geek Maggot Bingo or the Freak from Suckweasel Mountain (1983) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
The holy grail of bad B movies.
jimy2327 June 2011
Nick Zedd is the 80's Ed Wood if you don't think so watch this or they eat scum. Geek maggot bingo is on par with Plan 9 from outer space as being one of the best bad movies. The set is beyond cheap all the phones are made of paper even a wall phone is a paper cut-out desk phone windows are badly drawn or painted picture that look like they were done with crayon. But the movie is not boring it so bad it's funny Ed Wood would be proud I have seen worse movies that were professionally made. This is a must see for all bad movie buffs if you like this check out they eat scum another Nick Zedd z-grade movie or anything from Nathan Schiff. Ps watch for a Mars attack Alien prop used to make a two headed monster.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
As silly as it's title but this unfortunately isn't a good or fun thing in this case.
Boba_Fett113817 October 2011
This is the first (and probably only) Nick Zedd movie I have ever seen but I can already tell what kind of a director he is. He's one that deliberately attempts to make his movies look bad and even cheaper than they already were in fact to make. He does this by using cardboard sets, that deliberately look all the more like cheap cardboard sets, bad editing, old camera's, over-lighting and a bad script, with bad visuals and actors in it.

It's the sort of movie that tries to be a sort of a throwback to the '50's B-monster and science-fiction genre. I could recognize about everything that the movie tried to do but yet I still really couldn't appreciate it all that much. Why? Well, you could better ask that question to the film-makers.

I really don't see the point of this movie. It's a 'modern' movie, that deliberately wants to look bad, cheap and utterly silly. But why? What's the point of it all it it doesn't make the movie a good or entertaining one to watch. This is really the biggest complaint I have about this movie. I can enjoy watching a bad and silly B-movie from the '50's but I really couldn't enjoy watching this movie. The movie is too busy trying to be silly and forgets to ever become a fun one as well. It makes this ultimately such a pointless watch, that besides feels more like a torment instead.

Just its title alone makes it apparent what kind of movie this is. The title looks as if it's the most crazy one they could come up with during a short brainstorm session. 'We should name our movie Geek Maggot. Bigno! Or perhaps The Freak. From Suckweasel Mountain?' It's title makes absolutely no sense though in the context of the movie and has actually nothing to do with the movie at all. It simply wants to come across as as silly as possible, as does the entire movie.

Really, I wanted to appreciate and like this movie, since I recognized all of tricks Nick Zedd used to make the movie look and feel like a low-budget, Z-grade, monster/science-fiction flick and I also really sort of liked its cheap visuals and unusual directing approach but about half way through I really had to give up on it all. It just started to drag on and on, without being about anything really and the story actually got worse as it neared its end. And like I said, the movie still could had been somewhat saved if it actually was a fun one to watch. But there is really hardly entertainment to be found in this odd production, which still remains the movie its biggest miss.

An unusual and odd little movie that I wish I could recommend, since it's definitely something unique but I just can't find any good reasons to do so.

3/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Endurance challenge!
VideoMonkey16 May 2005
I've seen many many movies that some would call BAD. I've seen many others that I myself would call BAD. But this video goes way beyond being just mere BAD. This video is ... well it's hard to find a word for it...awful...horrible...dreadful...they all come close, but just don't quite fit the mark. But maybe, just maybe, the title says it all. GEEK MAGGOT BINGO!!! So I slide this sucker into my VCR and begin to watch. I see the one and only Zacherley hosting this. Now old Zach might be the Cool Ghoul and all, but this was definitely not his finest hour. Then the story begins. Don't ask me to explain it to you but there is a Cowboy and a mad scientist, his daughter and his humpback assistant and a two-headed monster and a hottie vampire and her vampire followers. They they wander around and say a bunch of stuff in some of the most amateurish sets imaginable. The sets make Ed Wood's look like big-budget Hollywood. It looks like it was made in someones basement or garage, like a home movie. Like some guy got a camera and all his friends (or anyone else who was willing to dress up, or get undressed, and act like a retard) and made something up over the weekend and edited it himself (I don't think I've ever seen worse editing). And who was that guy? Why it was Nick Zedd, God bless 'em.

Of note, however, is the fact that, then up and coming, Ed French, did the special effects on this. And, almost in contrast to the terrible sets, he does a couple very cool make-ups including the two headed monster.

Also of note was a certain Bob Martin in the credits. Could this be the same Uncle Bob Martin I remember from the early days of Fangoria magazine. I'll have to dig out my back issues and find out. (*and sure enough it was, thanks for the email Uncle BoB*)

And speaking of Bobs, I saw a few Church of the Subgenius references which could go to explain a lot.

So what's with the title? Is there geeks and do they play Bingo with maggots? I think my girlfriend solved that one for me I think, suggesting it was a take-off of 'Beach Blanket Bingo'. But who knows what goes on in the minds of people who make movies like this. It could be or mean anything. Sort of reminiscent of pre- Pink Flamingoes John Waters, this movie is definitely an endurance challenge to even the most die-hard fan of shlock-camp-B movie videos. A must see!!!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A must to avoid.
blackwalnut17 August 2000
This amateur film is reminiscent of erstwhile Saturday Morning Spook Show fare, only without the character some of those clinkers had. It was obviously filmed in someone's basement; the next-door neighbors are utilized as actors, and anyone else willing to put on a vinyl Halloween get-up and make a fool of himself; it uses crude line drawings painted on sheets and hung on a wall to simulate a mad doctor's laboratory; and there is nothing here that could be dignified with so grandiose a name as "plot," much less anything remotely original. All this would be well and good if it were funny, and god knows the performers mug and strain so hard to let us know it's a COMEDY we're watching, it's a wonder they don't implode. How this thing ever got general video release is one of the marvels of modern marketing. It would be difficult to imagine anything harder to sit through, and would have to be on anyone's "ten worst films" list. If you haven't seen it, let's just call it A MUST AVOID AT ALL COSTS.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nick Zedd is heir to Ed Wood's throne
antidisestablishmentarioism12 February 2012
In my entire life, I have never seen a more stunning example of how parody can fall flat on it's face. Listen, I get it, low-budget horror movies are laughable with their bad acting, corny dialog and low- budget special effects. Soooo......the obvious way to satirize them is with worse acting, cornier dialog, and special effects that would make Ed Wood cringe, right?. WRONG. And this movie proves it with a vengeance. Parodying low budget horror movies is an OK idea, just as long as you don't end up with a film that is substantially worse than most low budget horror movies. Furthermore, for a film to succeed as a parody, it usually requires humor and that is something that is PAINFULLY missing in this film. The amateurish acting and cringe worthy dialog would have been fine with me if I had, at least gotten a few decent laughs out of it. But the (intentional) laughs are few and far between. As far as the low-budget sets and bad special effects are concerned, I understand that they were deliberately bad. However, they went WAY overboard to make them look cheap and cheezy.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
These people shouldn't even be given film cameras
macabro35722 June 2003
Zedd's take on Dracula, Frankenstein, etc... all filmed using painted sets, bad acting and tiresome dialog. Some of the makeup effects are kinda cool like the melting face with the eyeball falling out of it's socket. Um, ok...

We also get Richard Hell as the cowboy. Jeez, he CAN'T act !

I'm glad he didn't make acting a career.

There's the added bonus of a 1983 interview with the cast and crew, videotaped while they're all sitting around drunk, rambling incoherently. And the NY Times calls this sh#t, art ?

Other Zedd shorts included on this travesty of a DVD include:

ELF PANTIES - Jen with fake Elf ears, wets her panties. We also get to see her crappy apartment as well as Jen's ugly body while she eats a popsicle.

Wow...big deal...

LORD OF THE COCK RINGS - Magical cock ring that some idiot can't get off ? We wind up seeing him and Jen's ugly, skanky friends all piled up in someone's apartment. Some of them topless, some of them not and they're all wearing fake Elf's ears, again.

Jesus, what's with the elf ears?

THUS SPAKE ZARATHUSTRA - Zedd wanders aimlessly around in Manhattan in the snow, looking like some kind of junkie loser, finally touching base with some of his fellow junkie losers on some snow covered corner at night.

More big deal...

1 out of 10 for being a waste of time...
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Worst!
BurnItDwn11 October 2006
I like "bad" movies. I get a kick out of movies like The Toxic Avenger or Sorority House massacre with terrible acting and minimal plot. I like low budget movies, Evil Dead and PI are great movies IMO.

However, this movie combines, no plot, no budget, bad acting, with just generally being annoying and cardboard and paper props.

I did not watch the whole movie because it was so horribly bad. This is so bad it probably isn't even MST3K material.

I give this a 1 out of 10 because negative infinity is not an option.

Worst movie I've ever tried to watch.

If you like "good" movies, stay clear of this one. If you like "bad" movies, stay clear of this one.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Behold! The worst movie ever made anywhere! Anytime! Any plan of existence!
lordzedd-310 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I didn't think it was possible, but I think I found the worst movie of all time. GEEK MAGGOT BINGO, now don't get me wrong, it's not all bad news, just most of it. THe Formaldehydeman is a cool monster. But when a movie is filmed on location in the director's garage, then you're in for some serious pain. What's up with the paper props? I mean, it's a couple of beakers and a sound recorder that expensive, I mean things cost less in 1983. Plus, how hard is it to get a prop phone? What the hell is with the cardboard cut out of a phone, I mean they are recording this cinematic abortion in the man's garage, you can tell. How hard was it to go into the house, unplug a phone and put it on the set. They obviously used Nick's desk. Now let's talk about the Warhol wig, what's up with the lame wig, at least get a hair net so the guy's real hair won't stick out from beneath. Finally, the acting and lack of it. What's up with the lame acting, I've seen grade school plays with better actors, and they're crying and waving at their parents. And yet, they're still better. I wouldn't wish my worst enemy to see this crap pile. No matter what I ever say about other movies, this will always be THE WORST MOVIE EVER MADE! The RASBERRY
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
zedd's best
ackerfreak28 August 2003
Nick Zedd is largely a hack, but its hard not to enjoy Geek Maggot Bingo. The amateurness and lack of focus alone is appealing in a strange way, coupled with a seemingly unending barrage of terrible horror movie cliches. There are lots of in-jokes for horror fans (ZACHERLEY is the host!) and a very strange take on the punk DIY aesthetic. The acting is horrible, and everything else on the dvd is worthless, but I was charmed by this absurd film.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not Zedd's best work
matt zodiac9 February 2002
This film is unique in its own strange way, but to be totally honest I found it really dull. I'm a fan of director Nick Zedd's other films such as They Eat Scum and War is Menstrual Envy. They're mostly fascinating and one-of-a-kind curiousities. This one is reminiscent of a home movie that is way overacted and lacking in any sort of shocking or original material. The vague plot concerns a mad scientist bringing back the dead, and lots of bad jokes and crude, but amusing gore FX follow. It's all very pointless, although it features Richard Hell (of the Voidoids) as a cowboy and Zacherle as a funny narrator. All in all, it's one of Zedd's worst films.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed