Tchaikovsky (1970) Poster

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A fragmented biopic about Tchaikovsky, no match for the film "Amadeus"
frankde-jong23 September 2021
"Music of passion" is a biopic about (the last thirty years) of the life of the Russian classical composer Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky.

The film is told in series of more or less independent episodes. Maybe for every Russian the story of the life of Tchaikovsky is well known, but for Western eyes this way of telling the story is a little confusing.

It is generally believed that Tchaikovsky was a homosexual, but in the Russia of 1970 it was still difficult to be frank about this fact (as it still is in the Russia of 2021 I think). More surprising to me was the fact that in Russia Tschaikovsky is mainly seen as a composer of opera's and not so much of symphonies. The opera's of "Jevgeni Onjegin" and "Queen of spades" play an important role in the film.

As may be expected in a biopic about a composer the music is very beautiful. The cinematography is also OK, especially in the scene with the coach riding through a birch forest (the symbol of Russia's vastness). There is however nothing more kindly to report about this film. The acting is rigid and the dialogue is bombastic.

All in all "Music of passion" is no match for other biopics about composers such as "Amadeus" (1984, Milos Forman, about Mozart) or "Immortal beloved" (1994, Bernard Rose, about Beethoven). I saw "Music for passion" in a program with three films from Russia in the movie house of the city where I live. With directors such as Sergei Eisenstein, Mikhail Kalatozov and Andrei Tarkovsky I I really wondered if "Music of passion" was the right choice for this program.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Soviet "classic" garbage
praecept0r18 October 2009
I always regarded this opus as a rare piece of trash. There is close to nothing from real Tchaikovsky in this movie, just a glossed Stalinist version of the composer, the kind they indoctrinated in every music classroom to every youngster - that he was a progressive genius whose works fit socialist realism and Lenin's ideas about socialist culture very well. By the way, a vast majority of ignorant Russians are still offended by the notion of him being a homosexual. The composer's letters and reputable biographies are published in minuscule circulation, this film is seen by millions. Here's the power of indoctrination even in post-communist era. On top of that, the society is generally extremely homophobic. They used to send people to prison for homosexuality up to 1994, and every year there is a discussion in their parliament on resurrecting this law as part of criminal code. So here is your cultural backdrop...

Now, the movie has its own little merits, but the underlying total lie and poor director's thinking and probably general grasp of the subject make the better parts totally worthless.

Soviet cinema had its glorious moments, especially in the great escape of great patriotic war movies, where things were black and white, at least where the real evil was. The biographies - there were few interesting ones (Tsiolkovsky's, Pavlov come to mind), but always castrated by the intricacies of either Stalinist or post-Stalinist era.

I'd love to ramble on, but I think I got the main message clear - the film is a great lie, and on film merits alone is not a good work either. So to those first few folks who put there rave 10 star reviews - what planet are you from? Start from reading books, including composer's own letters. Then compare what you learned with what you see. Otherwise, Lenin still wins his micro battle in your consciousness, and the bastard doesn't deserve this, and you neither.

It would be great to make a true biographical movie or better yet mini-series about composer's life. His life was full of tremendous drama, add real music scores that make sense - and it could be something worth watching. Hollywood can't do it, its mostly prostituting pure trash, the French or Germans might. Russians could have, when the country and its cinematography was free for a fairly brief time, not these days of self-censorship, return of government control and new rules. And to say the composer was gay is a faux pas. How would one film a biography without this basic fact.

PS Regarding subtitles - never expect a decent work from Russian video publishers, it's in best case scenario a sloppy translation (heck, the translation of Tarkovsky's Andrey Rublev is simply horrible at times, and that's criterion edition). Few exceptions are fairy tales.
19 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Stunning fidelity to the life, sound and look of the composer.
lesmarsden6 January 2004
Starring the remarkable Innokenti Smoktunovsky in the title role, this film is completely unlike the Ken Russell debacle 'The Music Lovers.' Talankin's film is absolutely breathtaking in its fidelity to the story of the composer's life as I know it from numerous sources. The resemblance of Smoktunovsky to Tchaikovsky is striking and it's very easy to suspend disbelief and imagine one is watching the composer himself -- and in color!

The film doesn't try to go far afield from simply telling the facts of the composer's life, but then it really doesn't have to: the true story is vastly interesting. Brought to life splendidly are Nadejda von Meck, the Rubinsteins, Hermann Laroche -- all those characters familiar from the musical life of Russia in the late 19th century. Executive Producer Dmitri Tiomkin returned to Russia to arrange and conduct the soundtrack before such cultural exchanges became commonplace. Tiomkin's work with Tchaikovsky's music is respectful and also highly creative at the same time. While 'Tchaikovsky' is certainly not as fanciful as Hollywood or Ken Russell it's all the more rewarding for it.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
special
Kirpianuscus6 March 2017
the reasons to see this film are many. each-in same measure-important. the first - Innokenti Smokturovski. the great artist. and the impressive interpreter of fundamental characters. the second - Tchaikovsky portrait. realistic, touching and the perfect guide for discover his music as reflection of long and painful war against himself. not the last, the atmosphere. special, authentic, delicate and precise recreated. a film who propose the spirit of a period. the steps of a life. sure, not for the expectations of too many viewers. because, like each Russian film, it is, first, a homage. impressive for the care to give the essence of a work and love and passion and sadness and forms of hope. a film like a reflection. about the purpose of a not ordinary existence.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Worst Film Ever
gazebo3504 February 2007
That is correct. i deem this film to be the worst I've ever seen in my life. and im not a new comer on the scene. i am also an ardent tchaikovskyite. so i would have been more than glad to give this movie high praise if indeed it was worthy of it. what makes a good movie? it moves. it makes you want to see what happens next. it has a cohesive narrative that is logical and persuasive. i have never relegated a movie to be the worst ever till now. the cinematography is terrible. the story line is an unlikely jumble. there is little veracity here. its music making and performances are nil. i was barely able to watch this movie once a year ago. there is nothing in it that would want me to see it again. so it sits on the shelf. the portrayals were wooden and unlifelike. by golly, "the music lovers" was a cinematic masterpiece next to this, travesty of tchaikovsky's life as it was. it still was entertaining. i don't know where these Russian directors get their training but i can tell you that any American or English director would have done a much better job. in reading some of the other reviews i felt that i was living on another planet. give this movie high praise and extol it to the skies? beats me thats for sure. i relegate this one to the trash bin. a complete and total disappointment.
13 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Russian Romantic: The Life Of Tchaikovsky
FloatingOpera713 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Tchaikovsky (1969): Innokenti Smoktunovsky, Antonina Shuranova, Vladislav Strzhelchik, Kirill Lavrov,Alla Demidova, Yevgeni Leonov, Bruno Frejnndilkh, Maya Plisetskaya, Yevgeni Yevstigneyev, Liliya Yudina...Director Igor Talankin....Screenplay Yuri Nagibin, Budimir Metalnikov.

"I merge with you in your music"...........

This Russian film, from director Igor Talankin, was an obscure, independent foreign film when it was in theaters in 1969 and played in art-houses in the 1970's. But its impact must have been great, fueling the idea for other similar films about classical music composers (to name a few, Ken Russell's Mahler 1975, Amadeus 1984 and Immortal Beloved 1995). It is a long, emotionally driven and romanticized account of the life of Peter Ilych Tchaikovsky. While not every aspect of his life is covered, and his homosexuality is implied in the most subtle of hints, it is a glossy, beautiful tale with the theme of an artist and his muse. In the case of the real Tchaikovsky, it was his patron the reclusive millionairess Madame Natalia Von Meck. Their relationship is the focus of the film. Filmed on location in Russia and France, the film follows the life of Tchaikovsky, highlighting the key moments of his career. True to the depiction of him as a child, he was a gifted musician but a frail, sickly child with mood swings and psychological problems, problems which would continue through his adulthood. His first big step is a relationship with the prominent pianist Nicholas Rubinstein. In the film, Tchaikovsky occupies his time composing and teaching music to his pupils while studying music at the Conservatory, where he makes most of his friends. All this is very true, but the film completely ignores the fact that Tchaikovsky was gay and quite troubled by it, as this was a restrictive and very Catholic Russia. Only through small hints do we perceive his turmoil. His sudden marriage to Antonina was simply his way of attempting to quiet whispers and live a seemingly normal straight life. But after an attempted suicide, he divorces her. Meanwhile, his only relationship with a female is with the wealthy and older Madame Von Meck. She adores his music and supports him financially. They never meet and correspond only through letters, something which goes on for 13 years. For Von Meck, it appears to be a kind of mental love affair, and when she arranges for an actual meeting in a country estate, Tchaikovsky runs away, breaking her heart. There are many gorgeous and moving scenes, but these are limited to the ones between Tchaikovsky and Von Meck, such as the scene in the train in which Tchaikovsky, reading her letter, imagines she is in the train with him, and the two contemplate the nature of their relationship, one solely based in music. After the death of Rubinstein, Tchaikovsky begins to ponder his own mortality. Death comes again, this time for Madame Von Meck, who suffers a mental illness after becoming bankrupt. Tchaikovsky's imagination and creativity is fueled by these various experiences, and although we do not see him create the ballets he is most famous for - Swan Lake, Sleeping Beauty and Nutcracker, we see the completion of his Piano Concerto 1 (which was said to be unplayable), his Fourth Symphony which he dedicated to Von Meck and his great operas, the romantic tragedy Eugene Onegin, which reflected Tchaikovsky's own doomed relationship with his one-time wife and the melancholy final opera Queen of Spades, which seems to be making a sad statement about his relationship with Van Meck, the inspiration for the old Countess who has the secret to winning in the card game. It appears that Tchaikovsky felt he used Van Meck and she haunted him after her death. The music to the film is a hodgepodge of Tchaikovsky music including the symphonies and ballets but the score to this film uses variations and Tchaikovsky-like melodies composed by Dimitri Tiomkin, a noted Russian film composer who also made music for American movies, such as Fall of the Roman Empire in 1964. This is a long, poetic, philosophical, dreamy and romantic film, filmed on location in Russia and France, including Paris. The cinematography tends to be both romantic and bleak, which best describes the moods of Tchaikovsky. This is an excellent film for music students to watch, simply because the acting is top-notch (the actor playing Tchaikovsky is hauntingly like Tchaikovsky himself) and although this is not an accurate and detailed account of Tchaikovsky's life, it's an impressive film worth viewing by anyone who loves classical music and that of Tchaikovsky, the Romantic from Russia.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How could this have won any award aside from a Razzie?
goggins-125 September 2007
This was by far the worst movie I have ever seen in my life. The acting is terrible, the musical score doesn't even fit the scenes - it's just random Tchaikovsky pieces inserted in random places. When some characters are speaking French (they were in France I think, I only got that from one line saying it was good to travel), it's just dubbed over. The actual actors/actresses don't even speak French. To top it off, there are no subtitles indicating what these actors are actually saying. In one scene there is about 2 minutes of yelling between a French transient and somebody walking with Tchaikovsky - very heated discourse - and there are no subtitles. The cinematography is horrific - tons of shaky shots/off center shots/ etc. Basically, this is a film where a bunch of extras were put in with a shoddy story (I'm not entirely sure there was a flowing story), terrible dialogue, and a musical score that never fits the scene. This is, without a doubt, the worst film I have ever seen in my life. This is a travesty of film.
10 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Pushkin was right. There cannot be a happy end. There cannot be!"
TheLittleSongbird26 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Tchaikovsky(1970) is a very beautiful and very good film in its own right. And as a biopic it's interesting and is fairly faithful to the composer's life- though with things that could have been better touched upon.

Not everything works as well as it could have done. The sound is rather tinny especially in the music snippets that represent what is inside Tchaikovsky's head, which can diminish the impact of the music itself. Tchaikovsky's homosexuality is only implied and hinted at(considering that that was one of the main things that was tormenting him, this was at a time where homosexuality was against the law). The thunderstorm resolving into a symphonic movement was a somewhat hackneyed moment in how it was executed and the concept of it really. The ending is rather underdeveloped and glossed over,- those unaware of Tchaikovsky's life prior to watching will be asking how did he die and why- maybe because Tchaikovsky's death still leaves question marks(suicide I believe is the most common theory, but it's not been proved) and the film didn't want to make too much of an open-and-shut case. And some of the characters could have been better introduced.

However Tchaikovsky(1970), getting onto the many good points, is a very lavish production to look at with flowing cinematography and stunning scenery/landscapes and costumes that make you wish you were there in Russia(Russia has to have some of the most beautiful landscapes of any country), also very evocative of Russia in Tchaikovsky's lifetime. Scenes that was particularly quite striking here was that of the carriage running through the forest of birch trees and the 360 degree shot of the parties at the table looking on with amusement at Tchaikovsky trying without success to silence his wife. The music is simply gorgeous and cleverly interwoven(Queen of Spades is shown in nice healthy doses) and arranged by Dmitri Tiomkin, one wishes that their presence was richer though if the sound was better. The writing is sharp-witted and heartfelt while flowing well as well as informative and not soap-opera-ish.

The story told is poignant and compelling, the most telling scenes were Tchaikovsky and Nadezhda Von Meck on the train and Tchaikovsky lunching in Paris with the accordion subtly playing the second movement of the fourth symphony. The performances are great, Antonina Shuranova( Von Meck), Vladislav Strzhelchik(Nikolai Rubenstein) and Evgeniy Evstigneev(Laroche) stand out in support and we even see one of the greatest ballerinas Maya Plisetskaya. But along with the production values the best asset of Tchaikovsky(1970) is the performance of the composer himself. Innokenti Smoktunovsky portrays Tchaikovsky as tormented, introverted, sensitive and somewhat shy and we genuinely sympathise with him. That he bears a remarkable physical resemblance also is a great advantage too, if television did exist at the end of the 19th century this most likely would have been like watching footage of Tchaikovsky himself.

All in all, could have been better developed here and there, but absorbing, beautiful to watch and telling with a truly fine lead performance. 7.5/10 Bethany Cox
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A must see!
canarycaia14 February 2006
I will remember this movie all my life.I watched it twice on the 80s in a movie club.One with my friends and the other with my dad,a real fan of Tchaikowski as myself.Two days in a row because it was so moving,so wonderfully made,I had to watch it again.I wonder why I didn't find it on cable in all these years!

All the biographical musical movies are better made out of Hollywood ,I must say.Hollywood is too much show and fantasy,but this version of Tchaikowski's life is so close to his actual history you can't help to believe you are actually watching Piotr Yllich living his life than an actor playing a part.

I will always keep in my mind the scene beside the water where he was writing the 4th Symphony in the times of Nadezhda Von Meck,his benefactor.So poetical,so deep and without words.Only music and a beautiful sight.Great photography!If you didn't watch this movie,do.If you like Tchaikowski,you won't regret it.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A great effort to set Tchaikovky's inner life on the screen
clanciai25 November 2020
There has been many complaints and objections against this film, but they are of no consequence, since all betray one and the same thing: they haven't understood that this is exclusively a film about music and a musician. Although there is a story, it is not told straight but rather hinted at all the way, while the main body of the film is the composer's dreams, his fancies, his hallucinations sometimes but above all his moods. This is a film of moods and an admirable attempt to set moods to music with the use of film sequences to illustrate them and put them into life and colour. Innokenti Smoktunovsky makes a great performance although it is not quite convincing, since he is too good-looking, while Tchaikovsky in reality suffered from aging too quick and too soon - at the age of 53, when he died, he was still a young man, but he looked at least twenty years older. He grew white very early, and this enforced aging process by nature has been much discussed and never been quite understood, but since he was a highly oversensitive and overstrung nature, he most probably just consumed himself too fast, mainly by nervous worrying and stress. His sponsor Mrs Meck is played by Antonina Shuranova more convincingly, and one of the great credits of the film is bringing her fully to life. There is a brief but splendid guest appearance by Maya Plisetskaya, one of Russia's many major ballerinas, Ivan Turgenev also appears in Paris, as does Nicolai Rubinstein in an important part, while Tchaikovsky's wife (in a short and failed marriage) only appears casually in the first part, that ends with his (probably) attempted suicide, just like Robert Schumann, with whom Tchaikovsky felt closely spiritually related - they both made music to Lord Byron's "Manfred", one of Tchaikovsky's most remarkable and greatest symphonies, bypassed here. The main interest of the film, although beautiful and wonderfully photographed all the way, bringing all the loveliest sides of 19th century Russia to life, is the way Dimitri Tiomkin has treated Tchaikovsky's music. Tiomkin, originally Russian, was one of the very best composers of Hollywood, if not the very best one, and he really put his soul into this job of suiting Tchaikovsky's music to a film made as a tribute to Russia's greatest and probably eternally most loved composer. His tempos are rather fast, but that's the way of film music - it's a common trait that film music always has to run too fast. Perhaps the very finest sequence is that of the "Waltz of the Flowers", the only piece in the film played in full, before the final elegy. The one character you really miss in the film is Modest, Tchaikovsky's brother, who survived him many years and his chief collaborator in opera librettos, above all of "The Queen of Spades". One of the highlights of the film is how the film makers put Mrs Meck's abandonment of Tchaikovsky in relation with the old duchess in the opera - her great dying soliloquy follows directly on Mrs Meck's final disconnection. No one was closer to Tchaikovsky than his brother Modest and, second, Mrs Meck, although they never met, while the film interestingly suggests some telepathic connection between them. In brief, as a Russian tribute to Tchaikovsky it is wholly successful and worthy as such, although probably Tchaikovsky himself in his modesty would have objected against this next to apotheosis of him.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed