The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
158 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Highly entertaining and informative
Elizabeth-32824 March 2000
I've never been to the circus, so I think of this movie as my trip to the circus. Charlton Heston is great as Brad, the all business manager of the circus. But my favorite character is James Stewart as Buttons the Clown. It's a very different role for him, but it's great.

The Best Picture of 1952, "The Greatest Show on Earth" is wonderful, especially if you've never experienced it. I think this is one of Cecil B. De Mille's finest movies, and I recommend it to everyone. So I give it a 10 out of 10!
48 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hey, doesn't anyone remember Last Emperor?
sharkey19728 December 2005
It constantly amazes me that people carp that this won best Picture, as though no movie before or since ever won when maybe they shouldn't have. It was a big picture, it had a great story, it gave a lot of bang for the buck and that has always been a factor in grabbing the Oscar. It does seem a bit dated to us now, used to high flying special effects, different acting styles, and quick cut editing, instead of letting the scene play out as it so often does here, but it's such a great story. The circus itself is a character and the way Demille used the audience to make them seem so individual is wonderful. And I'm not just referring to the Hope/Crosby cameo. Remember the fat guy with the kid scarfing down the ice cream laughing his head off while the kid looked confused? You could tell he was reliving his childhood and he became EveryMan to us with only seconds of screen time. That's mastery. The integration of the real circus people with the actors was seamless and if nothing else this movie captures a time when the circus was really a circus. Carp all you want, guys. But I think you may be too spoiled by ultra realism to appreciate the subtler gems in this very respectable film.
72 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I like this one
wade15557 November 2006
I have seen this film several times and each time I am more impressed. I don't look at a film to rate the acting, but rather I look at a film for its entertainment qualities. This film shows a behind-the-scenes look into circus life that most people would never have a chance to see. The circus acts shown are typical and entertaining, the characters have some qualities that are not always seen in a movie of this magnitude. I am always interested in special effects and how they are used in a film. The train wreck is obviously done with models but it is so well done, it rates mention. There are many considerations in making special effects seem real and all of those are carefully used in this film. Of course, the circus acts were NOT done with special effects and are very entertaining. If you have not seen this picture, please do so with an open mind and expect to be impressed.
26 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great show and story
Graceland3161 October 2002
I know that some people are down on this movie, but I absolutely LOVE it. It has great ideals and good (not great) acting. It tells a story about the circus in a pseudo-documentary. The story has love, action, and humor. Three things that are missing from much of today's movie. I also love the color and the dramatic "feel" of the film for that era. It's a wonderful, wonderful, piece of 'Americana'.
40 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An entertaining picture, just not the Best Picture
AlsExGal21 November 2009
"The Greatest Show on Earth" is a good movie and it's entertaining enough, it's just not an Oscar-winning caliber movie. As other reviewers have noted, this film was probably given its Best Picture Oscar as a kind of life-time achievement award to Cecil B. DeMille. It wasn't that the Academy felt that they had unjustly snubbed DeMille in the past for any specific film, it was just that he had always made those kind of epic cast-of-thousands types of pictures that drew in the audiences but that rarely won Oscars. Plus, a large body of DeMille's work had been done before the Academy Awards even came into existence in 1927. The whole thing seems especially unjust when you look at the competition that year. Two of the other nominees - "High Noon" and "The Quiet Man" are considered unique and classic to this day. Also, there is a film in the top 10 of AFI Best Films from that year that didn't even get nominated for best picture - Singin' in the Rain - which is arguably the best musical film ever made. It's rather ironic that just four years later the Academy could have probably awarded DeMille more legitimately when he made his last movie, the epic "The Ten Commandments", in 1956.

This movie is basically a documentary on how the Ringling Brothers circus operated in the early 50's, and large chunks of film are taken up showing how the Big Top was assembled, the manual labor involved, how the entire circus - including wild animals - was transported via rail, and basically just all of the hard work that went on behind the scenes. There is also a pretty spectacular scene near the end of the film involving the two trains as they are transporting the circus from one town to another. I say "was" because the circus as it is portrayed in this movie closed down and ceased to exist in 1956. The truth is that the Ringling Brothers circus never fully recovered financially from the double whammy of the Great Depression and a fatal fire that killed over 100 people in Hartford, Connecticut in 1944 and thus was in the process of failing even when this movie was made. The plot of the movie is very thin, the main thread being an uninspired love triangle involving the two stars of the trapeze act, Holly and the Great Sebastion, played by Betty Hutton and Cornel Wilde respectively, and the managing boss of the traveling show, Brad Braden, played by Charleton Heston. The subplots include an elephant trainer who is obsessed over a girl in the show who doesn't care for him, some small-time mobsters whose crooked games get thrown off the lot by Brad, and "Buttons" the clown, played by Jimmy Stewart, who never takes off his makeup and who seems to have a mysterious past. All of these plot lines are just there to hold the documentary part of the film together and also as a backdrop for all of the circus acts that are numerous and quite spectacular to behold, especially the acrobatic acts. Quite honestly, one-fourth into the movie you can see the outcome of the dramatic portion of the movie coming at you from a mile away. This makes the fact that this movie won Best Motion Picture Screenplay an even odder decision than the Best Picture award.

There is some interesting trivia involving the film. Famous clown Emmett Kelly can be seen at one point in the film without makeup - a fact that Mr. Kelly was not happy about. Also, Dorothy Lamour has a supporting role in this film, and during one of her musical performances in the show the camera pans to the audience -as it often does in this film - but this time you get a brief glimpse of Bing Crosby and Bob Hope enjoying the show. The inside joke here is that Lamour, Crosby, and Hope were the costars of the popular series of "Road to ..." movies of the 40's and 50's.
17 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"We bring you the circus..."
classicsoncall12 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I suppose if one is fixated on the idea that this film didn't deserve it's Best Movie Oscar, then it will affect your entire enjoyment of the picture. Maybe what's best is to view this one in a couple of different ways. For it's pure spectacle and color it has few rivals, and the train wreck sequence near the finale was rather impressive, even if the mock-up toy trains were more than evident. If I were to disqualify the picture from it's top award, it would be for the ridiculous attempt at a love story angle between the principals. The romantic pairings bounce off each other like ping pong balls and aren't credible in the least. So there, I've said it and now I've got that out of the way.

The thing I think a lot of the reviewers on this board don't appreciate is the sheer immensity of the effort to put on the Big Show. It was mentioned at one point that the Circus employed fourteen hundred and it took a veritable army of people and equipment to move it from one town to the next. Even the filming of the roustabouts putting up and tearing down the Big Top didn't quite capture the enormity of the task, not to mention the skill and precision required to keep it all in some semblance of order. I could only marvel at the effort.

As for the show itself, I thought the filming did a good job of presenting a huge array of entertainers as they made their way into the Big Top. The costumes were marvelous and the parade of entertainers and animals made you want to be part of the action. Every now and then you had to get a kick out of the expressions on the faces of the customers. Many quite obviously were filmed without their knowing it, as the unbridled happiness and laughter was entirely evident, and I got a particular kick out of youngsters who might have sat expressionless not knowing what to make of it all. Every now and then an unexpected cameo appearance made it's way on screen, Hopalong Cassidy as a one night stand was pretty cool for example. An even better one might have been Hope and Crosby downing their popcorn as Dorothy Lamour did her 'Lovely Luawana Lady' routine.

Regarding the principal players, I thought they did an adequate job apart from the romantic angles I mentioned earlier. It became apparent later in the story why we never saw Jimmy Stewart's real face except in a photo. Personally I thought his character might have been let off the hook after saving Brad Braden's (Heston) life, but you had to consider justice being served. Funny, but you never hear Emmett Kelly's name mentioned any more, he being the sad faced clown who appeared every few scenes. His name used to come up between my friends and I back in the day, along with Bozo and his infamous 'Eat it, Clown' comment that I'm chuckling about as I write this. Yeah, those were the days.

So I don't know if you need to have ever been to a real, live circus to appreciate this picture but I don't think it could hurt. They're few and far between these days, and it seems when they show up there are plenty of free passes to go around, so their allure as an attraction has probably passed. A shame in a way, as watching the picture today brings back memories of a life gone by when families could enjoy the simple things together and have fun doing it. You could see it in the faces of the crowd.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An impressive spectacle
cricketbat11 October 2018
For basically being a two-and-a-half hour advertisement for the circus, The Greatest Show on Earth isn't bad. Is it the best film of 1952? Probably not. But it's still better than some other Best Picture winners I've seen. Part fiction and part documentary, this movie is an impressive spectacle. The dialogue may be corny and the performances may be over the (big) top, but this is a fun way to experience the magic of the circus.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Amusing and and entertaining film about circus world for children of all ages
ma-cortes24 June 2011
Spectacular and overlong story of a traveling three circus combined show , plenty of diverse characters as a tough manager (Charlton Heston) , a swaggering ringmaster , and a mysterious clown (James Stewart ) with a dark secret who never takes off his disguise . Furthermore , it includes the aerialist acrobat girlfriend (Betty Hutton) , a French somersault artist rival (Cornel Wilde) , and an evil elephant trainer (Lyle Bettger) , among others .

Cecil B. DeMille is an expert in realization of high-budget films with glamour where the greatness does not lack even a moment , here gets to make a nice tribute to the circus world and its surroundings . This hugely agreeable film is a faithful reflection of the title . This is tone of the best Cecil B. De Mille, here in all his epic glory , he is the great director of the greatness. It has a fantastic scenario, great mass movement, and even spectacular scenes for the time, as a car driving toward a train on the railroad tracks and subsequently crash. The story is fine , wrought with romance , love stories , and impressive scenes with enormous pedigree. The film is a melodramatic and romantic tale with the classic triangular love story between Heston-Hutton-Wilde and meshing drama with events offstage along with some scenes in documentary style . The movie is wrought with romance and glamour but is a simple , and also contains an intriguing story about a doctor pursued by the justice . It packs some patently faked ones with players in front of obvious blue real projection. This colorful and dramatic flick packs amazing shows and exciting final . Extraordinary cast and good performances , especially from Charlton Heston and James Stewart as likable clown , both of whom are top notch under Cecil B De Mille's correct direction . Furthermore , some scenes the actors perform their own stunts . Some surprising guest-star cameos as Bob Hope , Bing Crosby watching their usual partenaire , Dorothy Lamour . Lavishly produced Henry Wilconson who plays a police , he's Cecil B. De Mille's usual . Unfortunately the circus at present time , in total downfall, is far from the magic in which they lived in that time. Here are united the Ringling Bros , Barnum and Bailey in combined shows and three-ring circus with colorful parades . The movie deservedly won two Oscars as Best Picture and Story , however the complaints of reviewers and moviegoers ever since , who don't believe it worthy of the honor . Although long-term, it becomes very entertaining and does not superfluous nor a minute. It's a fantastic and spectacular film that achieved big success at Box office . There are frames that children may never forget as the train wreck and an aerialist falling to the soil . Rating : Better than average . Worthwhile seeing .
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
"Ladies and Gentlemen and Children of All Ages.........."
bkoganbing18 September 2005
The Greatest Show on Earth is a Cecil B. DeMille extravaganza, maybe the best one he ever produced and directed. Unlike his religious films or his historical films, this film is a nice tribute to an American institution, the Ringling Brothers&Barnum&Bailey Circus and as such it does not attract the controversy of some of his other films.

The Best Picture Oscar for 1952 that this film won was more of a tribute to a Hollywood institution. Cecil B. DeMille in fact directed the first Hollywood made film, The Squaw Man, forty years earlier and this Oscar was essentially a tribute to him for the work of a lifetime. Not the first time or the last time the Motion Picture Academy has done that.

This is DeMille spectacle at it's best. The circus as a cinema subject, so full of color and life, is ideal for a DeMille production. Wonderful camera work marks this film, both of the circus acts and the reaction shots into the crowd of the children of all ages.

Cecil B. DeMille himself narrates portions of the film showing the work involved in putting on the Greatest Show on Earth. His was a familiar voice to the American public because for 10 years DeMille came into American households via radio narrating the Lux Radio Theater. In fact until Alfred Hitchcock got his own anthology TV series, DeMille's voice was probably the most known to the American public of a film director.

And only his name and that of Walt Disney's of people behind the camera were guaranteed box office in the days of the Hollywood studio system.

Spectacle was his thing and DeMille was the master. As a director of players and a judge of good modern writing, DeMille left a lot to be desired. Because of the nature of the subject, no great historical or religious events, the grandiloquent dialog present in so many DeMille films is kept to a minimum here.

This was Charlton Heston's first big break as a star and his second film under a Paramount contract. He had done a film called Dark City, a good noir thriller that got good reviews, but did little for him personally. DeMille saw the six foot two Heston walking on the Paramount lot one day and just said to himself that this was to be the circus ramrod for this film.

But Heston was fourth billed behind Betty Hutton, Cornel Wilde, and Gloria Grahame, all better known than him at the time. Wilde and Grahame were independents as was James Stewart who played a clown with a hidden past.

Stewart in fact had always wanted to play a clown and took this supporting role with smaller billing just for the opportunity. At the time he agreed to do this, his wife Gloria was pregnant with their twin daughters. Stewart had it in his contract a clause that gave him permission to leave the film temporarily to be with Gloria when her time was near. In fact Gloria McLean Stewart had a rough time with the birth and Jimmy exercised that option and totally enraged DeMille who had to shut down production for a few days. He and DeMille did not get along after that though Stewart finished the film and was great in it.

Gloria Grahame may not have been the most beautiful woman in Hollywood, but she was the most seductive operating in 1952. That was a banner year for her. She got a Best Supporting Actress for The Bad and the Beautiful on top of this DeMille film. As the elephant girl she attracts the unwanted attentions of Lyle Bettger who plays an elephant trainer.

Bettger was a great player at that time who played a lovely variety of psychopaths on the screen. He pulls out all the stops here and its his unwanted attentions to Grahame that set up the final scenes.

Dorothy Lamour was here also in a supporting part and she gets to sing Lovely Luawanna Lady in sarong and the reaction shots of the crowd focus on a couple of familiar faces who panted after her in a few Paramount films.

The story itself is a standard four sided triangle involving Heston, Hutton, Wilde, and Grahame with Bettger horning in. You have to see the film to find out who winds up with who.

However the high point of the film involves a circus train wreck. DeMille got a lot of notice for wrecking a train in Union Pacific back in 1939. So he doubles the excitement and wrecks two trains here with circus animals pouring out of busted cages. Great stuff.

Betty Hutton was coming close to the end of her film career. This and Annie Get Your Gun would be her biggest triumphs. Given DeMille's limitations on directing players, Hutton is surprisingly subdued here and effective. She also sings a couple of nice songs here as she bids adieu to Paramount in her next to last film for them.

When The Greatest Show on Earth came out and was doing great box office, Charlton Heston related a story that DeMille came over to him on the Paramount lot and gave him a newspaper clipping and said he would never get a better notice ever, no matter how long a career he had. Heston read the thing and the critic from some small town paper praised all the actors like Stewart, Wilde, Hutton, Grahame, and Lamour said they were great, but that C.B. DeMille must be the greatest director in the world to get a performance out of that circus ramrod.

For all of DeMille's faults here, he created a circus picture that set the standard for any to follow.
77 out of 88 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Truly Good Film
gata8627 April 2011
This film has the reputation of being the least deserving of the "Best Film" Academy Award winners, and that may be true (though I personally think "Oliver!" deserves that designation). However, don't conclude from that that this is a bad movie. In fact, it is a very good movie.

At the end of the day, "The Greatest Show on Earth" succeeds primarily because it's good entertainment. Cecil B. DeMille knew how to do spectacle, and there is plenty here to please the senses: fun songs and costumes abound and the circus tricks bear up even by today's standards.

The film's many solid casting choices don't hurt either. Charlton Heston is perfect as the brusque workaholic circus manager, succeeding in remaining likable and sympathetic. Betty Hutton tackles the extremely difficult task of being girlish, enthusiastic, and breezy without being annoying. Both Hutton and Gloria Grahame provide some good drama and are thoroughly convincing as circus performers. Dorothy Lamour provides some nice comic relief, and James Stewart is (of course) right on target, giving a melancholy aspect to the tale. It's a pity the creators thought it necessary to have Cornel Wilde fake a French accent; otherwise, his performance is quite good.

It's also refreshing to see actors (especially from this time period) doing their own stunts, actually touching the animals, and otherwise throwing themselves into their roles.

While the romantic subplots flirt dangerously with cheesiness, they do succeed in building genuine romantic tension.

My biggest complaints are the stock villains and the deus ex machina resolution of one of the love triangles.

Still, this is good solid entertainment. Movie lovers will find plenty to interest them including Jimmy Stewart shown exclusively in clown makeup, Charlton Heston's first star role, and cameos from Bob Hope and Bing Crosby.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Greatest Show On Earth (1952)
stephaniebrown9 September 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The Greatest Show On Earth takes us behind the scenes of a travelling circus. Through the eyes of the fictional characters, we're shown what a circus of a time gone by was like.

The trouble is, maybe we're shown a bit too much. What makes this movie watchable for me is the character driven moments, but just when things are getting interesting and you want to learn more about characters, the story cuts away and we're lumbered with a ridiculously long parade scene that will have you itching to press the fast forward button. Although some of the circus scenes aren't so bad and are to be expected in a movie that's about the circus, there are some that are almost pointlessly long.

As for the plot itself, it's hardly complex, but it's a decent enough storyline for a movie of its type and time. Most of the story revolves around Holly, a flying trapeze performer, and Brad, the man who runs the show. Holly is struggling to deal with the fact that Brad's more obsessed with the show than her and when Brad's new headline act, The Great Sebastian, comes along, Holly finds her own attentions drifting, even though Holly and Sebastian try to out-do each other show after show because Holly's desperate for audience attention. There is also rivalry over Sebastian's affections between Holly and Angel, another circus girl, while Brad obviously has feelings Holly even if he doesn't always show it in obvious ways.

A lot of the animosity towards this movie appears to stem from the fact that it won a Best Picture award at the Oscars, beating films like High Noon. While I agree with those who don't think it deserved a best picture award, I can't dismiss it as a bad film. Putting it together, filming and setting up those circus scenes, must have been painstaking, and although I moan about the overly long parades and circus moments, it does look grand and impressive. These days a movie like this would probably be bogged down with CGI special effects and stunt people. What I especially like about this film is the actors did a lot of their own stunts. The movie has heart and feels like a very genuine and raw portrayal of old school circuses.

If it has a real negative flaw it would be the acting. Most of the performances are treading an extremely thin line from just about watchable to bad. Betty Hutton is near to appalling in most of her scenes and overacts so much it stands out even in a movie like this. Heston is okay, but the character is wooden so his performance could be perceived as that too. One of the better performances comes from Cornel Wilde as the arrogant Sebastian, but the show stealer is undoubtedly James Stewart as Buttons, a clown who is on the run from the police and is using the circus as a means to hide. Stewart's performance is warm and sensitive and quite underplayed, and it works beautifully.

As a whole, the movie is worth seeing if you're a circus fan or like movies from this era, but I think to most modern audiences the acting, overly long circus scenes, and the rather corny and dated love story would be a turn off. If you do choose to watch the film, go in with an open mind and don't expect too much. For what it is, it's enjoyable enough. And if you get really bored you could always play Spot The Guest Celebrity Star in the scenes that focus on the circus audience!
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Greatest Circus Movie on Earth
ozthegreatat423309 April 2007
Epic director Cecil B. DeMille manages to direct the greatest filming of a circus movie in the history of motion pictures. This film, like so many others shows that he was not just another director but a craftsman as well. Charton Heston's third film and first major leading role gives a hint of the long and illustrious career to follow. You really get the impression that he knows, loves, lives and breathes the circus. Cornell Wilde, Betty Hutton and Dorthy Lamour live up to their roles as well, along with Gloria Graham, all of them were required to actually perform the stunts that their characters did in the film. Of course Jimmy Stewart helped make the picture memorable even though hidden beneath the clown make-up all the way through. But the real stars were the hundreds of people from the Ringling Brothers, Barnum and Bailey Circus and their endless dedication to making it truly "The Greatest Show on Earth."
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good film if you like circuses or have an interest in classic films
slthompson224 April 2005
This film does a good job of showing the behind-the-scenes lives of circus performers, as well as showing circus performances. It is not filled with thrills and constant excitement, but it is an entertaining film that leaves one feeling sentimental for the days when the circus really was the "greatest show on earth." I would recommend this film to circus fans, Betty Hutton fans, and Jimmy Stewart fans (Jimmy is really charming in this as "Buttons the Clown"). Also, it is fun trying to spot the cameos in this film. Look closely during one of the show scenes and you'll see Bob Hope and his favorite adversary watching Dorothy Lamour.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I Can See How This Has Earned Its Notorious Title of Worst Best Picture Winner
alexkolokotronis30 January 2009
This may not be the worst movie to ever win best picture but its up there. Well on second thought this is probably the worst film to ever win best picture. Still though you would expect it to be a worth while film. That in fact though if questionable as well. The film contains almost no depth and is just "fun" after "fun" if you want to call it that. At first its very interesting but it seems as if everything is exaggerated on so many levels.

The acting was not spectacular to watch but it was quite interesting seeing Charlton Heston in his first lead role. I found many of the characters like the tone of the movie annoying after awhile. Who I did like a lot was James Stewart as the philosophical clown. He to me saved the film in that he gave it a much needed extra layer. Sadly though after Stewart there was not much else.

The directing of the much respected Cecil DeMille was non existent to me. I found the movie corny at times and his use of Betty Hutton was a mistake. The look of the movie was very good at times but it did not generate that magical feeling that classics need to have. The writing was actually pretty good considering how shallow much of the movie was.

From movies like this did the term "Hollywood Trash" come up. There is no depth, no valid attempt at drawing emotions out of the audience and simply no artistic value to the film. Then of course the many holes in the plot throughout. This movie was consistently annoying and frustrating. I even had a sense through this film that much of what I was watching was not only and inaccurate depiction of circus life but instead the opposite of how it really is. Why this won best picture is beyond me but its not like the first or the last time the Oscars will and have made a mistake.
25 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining from start to finish!
sjtom4919 July 2001
An All Star Cast, Director of epics and of course the many circus scenes make this Best Picture film of 1952 well worth watching. For the most part this movie shows a part of Americana that's, sadly, long gone. 10 out of 10!
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Overblown De Mille malarkey, but Stewart & Wilde are great
JimB-410 June 2005
Most everything that needs to be said about this film has been said: that it is typical Cecil B. De Mille hokum, that it is wondrously undeserving of the Best Picture Oscar it nabbed for 1952, that it manages to capture a world that doesn't exist anymore, etc., etc. And a great deal has been said about James Stewart's fine understated performance in perpetual clown makeup. Charlton Heston has been a fine, sometimes brilliant actor, but here he was very early in his career and hadn't quite worked out the use of nuance in the tough leading man role, and in the nuance department, not many people compete with Jimmy Stewart. Stewart makes every moment real, even though his character takes some suspension of disbelief. (Years in the circus without ever taking off his makeup and he has aroused neither suspicion nor terminal eczema?) But seeing this thing again after many years, I was quite surprised to see how Cornel Wilde absolutely leaps off the screen. Though I've long been a fan of his, nothing prepared me for the charisma that he radiated in every frame. He's not the actor Stewart is -- maybe not even that Heston is -- but if he had been an unknown when he made this film, it would have made him a star the way "Thelma and Louise" made Brad Pitt a star. Though some have quibbled with his accent, apparently not aware that Wilde was fluent in French, German, Hungarian, and several other European languages, it is the sheer dazzling quality of his presence that is now for me the most memorable part of this movie. As the movie started, I was surprised to realize that Wilde has top billing among the male actors. But moments after his entrance, I realized why.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
solid movie
Ajtlawyer25 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The general claim is that "The Greatest Show on Earth" is the worst Best Picture Oscar winner of all time. I just finished seeing it though and I think it is a good. It beat out "High Noon" for the top award, thus the debate.

"The Greatest Show on Earth" is a solid movie though. I enjoy movies which take me into a world and to places that I would never otherwise get to know. This movie takes you behind the scenes of the circus when it was in its hey-day and, sadly, on the way to being marginalized as an entertainment spectacle. I appreciated the fact that the movie wasn't depicting some fictional circus but instead was showcasing the real Ringling Bros., Barnum & Bailey Circus. Nearly all of the acts in the show were real circus acts and most people my age or older will recognize the immortal clown, Emmitt Kelly---and be startled to see him without his clown-face on after the train wreck.

The plot is essentially a soap opera set against the backdrop of the circus. Charlton Heston is Brad, the relentlessly driven circus boss who has sawdust in his veins. Holly (Betty Hutton) is the trapeze artist who loves Brad and wants the center ring. But Brad gives the center ring to the greatest aerialist in the business, Sebastian (Cornel Wilde). Holly and Sebastian begin to try and one-up each other and Sebastian seeks to add Holly to his roster of romantic conquests. Angel (Gloria Grahame who won an Oscar that same year for another movie) performs with the elephants and is also smitten with Brad and she is also one of Sebastian's former lovers. Jimmy Stewart rounds out the cast as Buttons, a clown who never takes off his whiteface make-up and who has a dark, secret past that he's running from.

You'll have to watch the movie to find out who ends up with who while the circus moves from town to town like an unstoppable army. I found the narration by Cecil B. DeMille to be silly but the movie is very handsome and must've looked spectacular on the big screen. The acting is solid although Betty Hutton's singing is pretty bad. This is the movie that catapulted Heston to stardom and a couple years later he and DeMille teamed up for "The Ten Commandments." I may be mistaken but this may have been the only Best Picture winner that Jimmy Stewart was ever in. That an actor of his stature would take a supporting role says a lot about the depth for the cast and Stewart obviously enjoyed the role enormously. More impressively, Hutton and Wilde, do much of their own trapeze stunts which were dazzling. Wilde looks great, every inch the glamorous, hunk circus star who has women falling all over him.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Definitely not Best Picture material.
cutter-1224 December 2001
The movie which criminally took the Best Picture Oscar of '52 when John Ford's The Quiet Man and some other notable entries were much better and are better remembered now. Cecil B. De Mille, along with producer David o. Selznick, was the most brash showman and the worst artist in Hollywood. I've never been a fan of his movies which always offset impressive spectacle with contrived and cheesy fluff. Here it is no different, though of all DeMille's pictures this is probably his most entertaining and fitting. Some eye catching circus acts and detail highlight a bloated epic which degenerates in the last hour, climaxing with a disastrous Lionel Train pile-up. In the aftermath everything but Mickey Rooney and Ronald Reagan is thrown at us in an attempt to get the show up and running on time. Because of the highly realistic dearth of ambulances, firefighters, and police getting in the way this goal is accomplished with a maximum of DeMillian hokum. A shame as the picture could have been much better if a real director had taken it on.

Acting wise, Chuck Heston is quite solid as the Boss man in an early role looking like Indiana Jones in his fedora and leather jacket and walking capably around like a young John Wayne. Betty Hutton on the other hand gives a terrible performance aside from her well done trapeze antics. Cornel Wilde is hit and miss with a one dimensional character and Jimmy Stewart fools no one, then or now, under all that clown make-up he wears throughout the movie.

Dorothy Lamour never was a very good actress, all her best moments were with Hope and Crosby and here they drop by to get a laugh in a brief cameo.

A watchable picture well worth the time invested to watch it but a semi-classic at best and FAR from being the best picture of the year!
11 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Buttons the Clown
caspian197827 June 2001
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know about you, but I feel sad for Jimmy Stewart's performance as Buttons the Clown. Its a happy ending for the circus, but Button goes to jail for a crime he didn't mean to commit many years ago. He performs a good deed by helping somebody live after the train wreck. Still, Jimmy must go to jail to pay for his crimes. (In the 1950's) Sending a good message to all criminals out there who are running from the law. I wonder how this film would have ended with Button's character if it took place 40 years later in the 1990's. Maybe a more realistic and truly happy ending.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Maybe it didn't deserve an Oscar but it's still a classic
Okonh0wp1 June 2007
I am entirely unfamiliar with Cecille B. DeMille's work or even what the public reaction was to his career although I've heard a few negative things, and I've heard a lot more negative things about this picture's Best Oscar win (since it won over such AFI top 100 entries as High Noon and A Place in the Sun).

The film is somewhat metacinematic: It brings the joys of the circus to the viewer in the same way that it does for the audience in the film. With authentic circus acts thrown into the mix, these scenes are very exciting. But the film extends beyond just bringing footage of the circus to a movie audience as it effectively captures the drama backstage and brings you into a unique world.

The film is slightly more spectacle than story, in the sense that it sometimes feel like the story is secondary to the lions, tigers, and other circus acts. The plot bobbles through multiple story lines, but mainly centers around circus manager Brad (Charlton Heston), trapeze primadonna Holly (not much of a circus name, I know), and a womanizing Frenchman named Sebastian who becomes the circus' new headline trapeze artists and hopes to steal the heart of the woman she stole the spotlight from. Also featuring heavily into the story are Angel (Gloria Grahame), a past flame of Sebastian; Klauss, an elephant tamer with an obsessive desire for Angel; and Jimmy Stewart as a wise old clown who has been hiding a couple of secrets.

Among the cast, Heston, Grahame, and Stewart really stick out for excellent performances. Heston's circus manager is a man of very strong character who you come to empathize with because he's got the careers of thousands of people on his backs and is willing to sacrifice his personal relationships, his health, and his ego (when dealing with cocky people like Sebastian) to see to it that the show is a success. Gloria Grahame brings such wit and sass to one-line jabs and insults that it makes a convincing character out of what would otherwise have been a two-note shill. Lastly, Stewart is classic Stewart but he delivers that Midwestern persona underneath a veneer of make-up and in a supporting role.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The film would be vastly improved by cutting the plot entirely...
CubsandCulture20 October 2018
I guess I ultimately like this film but boy does the story keep getting in the way. The pseudo-documentary of how that dying industry of the 3 ring circus worked as well as footage of the various circus acts is a really stellar entertaining stuff. The film is at its best when DeMille is just letting the circus spectacular fill up time. And a lot of the circus stuff is really fun and very colorful. It makes for a great evening of campy pleasures.

Unfortunately, DeMille felt the need to structure the circus footage around 3 different plots, each more melodramatic and sillier than the last. The main one is an awful love triangle and the battle for the center ring. It is pitched, stilted and highly predictable. Betty Hutton turns in a very annoying performance and what the weak writing does not kill she does. The weirdest one is the Button's story, through this is one of few slightly morally ambiguous characters Stewart played. His performance is charming but feels like it should be in a much better film. Finally the elephant trainer/mob (?) story is wholly unnecessary and has by far the silliest scene in any best picture winner.

This is often cited as the worst best picture winner. I am actually mostly good with it winning best picture. For all its faults it is very much a DeMille film and that Oscar is a good way to honor his legacy. However, someone must have sold their soul to win a writing Oscar (Best Story). It is utterly inexplicable that happened.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Greatest Snooze on Earth
kenjha21 November 2009
In a year when "Singin' in the Rain" and "High Noon" were released, this overstuffed turkey somehow won the Oscar for Best Picture. Half the film is nothing more than circus performances. The other half is soap opera and melodrama. Heston and Wilde both overact, although they are models of restraint compared to the annoying Hutton. Playing a self-centered trapeze artist, Hutton acts like an overzealous high school student in a badly produced school play. Grahame is the only cast member to turn in a decent performance. DeMille has no interest in telling a good story, only in creating an overlong spectacle, no matter how dull.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Greatest Show On Earth
StevenKeys28 June 2021
Brad: "Women are poison; Angel: It's a wonderful death"

This one's got it all. Even as Show's top competition, The-Quiet-Man, is a personal favorite, I take no issue with the Academy's choice for Best-Picture of 1952. The guts are glorious in their colorful pageantry, charming odditites, romantic wrangle, heroic animals, clever dialogue, subtle to serious humor, cute crowd vinettes, strong sentiment, terrific action (a train wreck so exciting it makes The-Fugitive's "Casey Jones" almost pale in comparison) and moral message on mercy (Dr Buttons) that doesn't feel moralizing. Maybe the greatest director on the planet, Cecil B. DeMille provides narration throughout, opening wide a window into the joy, drama, tireless teamwork and sheer enormity that was the circus, truly the greatest show on earth (3.5/4).
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
From an English view
gray-3924 February 2005
An English guy of a 'certain age'. I am exploring the movies my sister took me to see at a very tender age. Train mad, I remembered the wreck; a huge steamer with streamlined coaches ramming the fancy Yankee car and then ploughing into the back of the stationary train. A model? Who cares, I still enjoy it. More though. I agree with am earlier comment about the 'raising of the top' sequence (the only black people in the whole film)and the street sequences as 'Americana' of a very precise period.

However from my perspective now, the animal sequences - especially, the elephants, sickens me.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Absolutely Horrible!
druid-spam30 June 2008
Not only did this picture not deserve to win the best picture Oscar, no human being should be forced to sit through this 2.5 hour monstrosity.

In a vain attempt to create an over the top spectacle Cecil B. DeMille fills half the movie with circus acts and parades. As a boy I loved the circus as much as anyone, and even now I have great respect for the amazing athletic ability of circus performers, but if I wanted that I would watch Cirque de Soleil.

Granted, Charlton Heston does a fine job playing circus boss Brad, but comes nowhere close to saving this mess.

Jimmy Stewart definitely drops a few pegs in book for his boxy portrayal of Buttons The Clown.

With such legendary movies as High Noon and Singin' In The Rain also made that year, The Greatest Show On Earth had no business even being nominated.
16 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed