The Great Mr. Handel (1942) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
If not for him we would be stuck with Dr. Arne and William Boyce!
theowinthrop16 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a great film but it is an interesting one for what it attempts to show. Movies that really dig deeply into the creative processes that lead to great music are rare, because the time and innovative ideas that are needed don't transfer well into 90 to 120 minutes of film. We are shown people rattling off rhyming words and lines as though that is the process for song - it isn't. Yet Sammy Cahn, one of the best of song writers, for years would demonstrate how he composed, and even with the best of his intentions it looked like a set-up job for his audience.

The story here is about one of the giants of music, George Frederick Handel (Wilfred Lawton). Handel was a contemporary of Johann Sebastian Bach, but while Bach flourished in Dresden, Saxony, Handel was in the backwaters of the petty German states. He headed for Great Britain, and settled in London. Soon his series of operas, like Judah Maccabeus, were hits with the public. But he was a thorough artist and not a sycophant. He wanted quiet from his audience to listen to his music, and to the singers in his pieces sing. So when he found that the then Prince of Wales (Frederick, son of George II and father of George III)(Max Kirby) only went to see his singer, Elizabeth Cibber (Elizabeth Allen), at Covent Gardens theater, he showed his anger at Prince Fred's talking out loud and annoying Ms Cibber. Handel would finally (in the middle of a performance) bang the pianoforte or harpsichord he played to stop the music until His Royal Highness shut up. Prince Fred disliked this kind of lack or due regard to him (due to his position as heir to the throne).

The film follows the ploys used by Fred, due to his social position, in trying to ruin Handel and force him back to Germany. Fred threatens to boycott Vauxhall Gardens (the elite met there in the evenings for fun) unless music by others were played (he recommends Gay's THE BEGGAR'S OPERA). He and his friends have gangs of noisy troublemakers bang objects and play instruments badly outside the theater to prevent the customers from hearing the music of Mr. Handel. They certainly succeed in preventing him and his theater friends from prospering at all. Then, just as Handel finds a goal for him to strive to recover his prosperity (he wants to build a foundling home) he suffers a serious illness.

At this bleak time he gets a commission for a new piece, called THE MESSIAH. An oratorio on the life of Christ and it's meaning to the world, Handel realizes this is the type of music that will finally establish his talent with a worthy subject. Deeply religious, we watch Handel drive himself without food to write and compose the piece that we know gave him immortality. And at the end we see it's successful premiere in Dublin in December 1742 and in London in March 1743. King George II of Britain established the custom (still observed today) of rising at the repeat of the Hallelujah Chorus. Even a stymied Prince Frederick had to rise if his father did.

How true is it? I don't really know the full story, although I am certain the movie does well in showing the difficulties in putting on 18th Century opera in several scenes. It also shows the precarious position of artists (even great ones like Handel) in keeping fiscally sound due to the problems of patronage or the problem of official dislike. As such the film serves a good purpose. These topics are rarely touched on in movies.

But how serious a threat was Prince Fred to Handel? I read a biography of Prince Fred twenty years ago. His parents hated him (the Hanovarian monarchs had problems between fathers and sons from George I in 1714 to George III and George IV in 1795). Fred was the son in the chain who never got the throne (his son is George III, raised by his mother and her friend/lover Lord Bute). Fred may have used his influence against Handel (for whom...Dr. Thomas Arne with his best known piece "God Save the King/Queen" or the symphonic composer William Boyce?), but his father was there as a corrective - and George II liked Handel's music. Also, given the dates of this film, within three years of the London performance of THE MESSIAH, Fred and his father were both worried about the possibly imminent arrival from Scotland of their Stuart cousin and enemy Bonnie Prince Charlie. That was a really major issue of the day to face up to. Fred died in 1752 - he was fatally injured in a tennis game. If this story was really true, Handel probably heard the news with a quiet smile, thinking "the Lord works in mysterious ways."

Lawton is best recalled as "Alfred Doolittle" in the 1938 PYGMALIION, or as the decrepit old servant "Peacock" in THE WRONG BOX. He is pretty good actually in showing an artist striving to perfect his work in a far from perfect social world. He also is good showing his religious intensity while composing his masterpiece. Kirby does well with Fred, but the character's flaws are not pushed beyond typical snobbery and self-absorption. Allen does well showing how an opera aria was performed in 1742. It was mores static than today. Her voice was quite charming too.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great Handel; Flawed Movie
boblipton22 August 2017
For the first Technicolor feature produced by his organization, Rank went to his WHV production arm; this was the group that did movies on sacred subjects. The subject was George Frideric Handel and how he came to write his MESSIAH.

The best part of this movie is the cinematography. Two men are credited: Claude Friese-Greene, who had more experience with color camera work than anyone else in Britain -- he and his father had developed Biocolor, which was never commercially successful. This turned out to be his last completed movie. His co-cinematographer was Jack Cardiff, whose painterly vision is very apparent here. The whole thing looks like a series of paintings from Handel's era. The music, being Handel's, is beautiful. The story, of how Handel (played by Wilfred Lawson), grown unfashionable, continues on, supported only by Elizabeth Allan as Mrs. Cibber and his faithful servant, played by Hay Petrie, is adequate to the task.

Were these the only considerations, this would be fine movie. Unfortunately, while Mr. Lawson's performance is great (he plays Handel as someone who has not quite grown used to speaking English; his language is that of the orchestra) and Hay Petrie speaks his lines as he always does, which is why he was such a successful character actor, the other performers talk as if they are amateurs reading their parts off the script for the first time. Given the long and successful careers of many of these performers, this is an annoying puzzlement.

A talking movie is more than pictures and score. The dialogue is the glue that holds the pieces together and tells the story. The failure here leaves the movie-goer looking at a beautiful and sometimes very interesting effort (when it is just Lawson and Petrie, or when Handel's music is being performed -- although none of the actors are very good at faking their playing of instruments -- but ridiculously dull at other moments. The result is a movie that is definitely worth watching, but not more than once.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Propaganda for the Good
philip-davies319 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This film was in 1942 a timely piece of what we might call 'propaganda for the Good' and in the face of the well-produced but disturbing Nazi film propaganda emanating from Germany was deemed worthy of being filmed in the then expensive and rare Technicolor system. Just in 1940 alone Goebbel's Reichsfilmkammer influenced and supported the release of many films of loathsome import but of consummate technical virtuosity, notably 'Der Ewige Jude' and 'Jud Süß', interspersed with brutally gung-ho military documentaries, escapist pap and the sort of stridently hero-worshipping biopic of genuine German cultural icons intended to be taken as vindications of the romanticised Hitler of 'Triumph of the Will'.

The lavish period drama produced in 1942 at the Denham Studios by Lord Rank's G.H.W. Productions Ltd., to demonstrate that British culture was in no way inferior to Nazi perversions of Germanic 'kultur', was 'The Great Mr Handel'. The film is essentially a bildungsroman of Handel's struggles in later life to rise above adversity through his Lutheran faith, and by means of the religious genre of the oratorio. We see him leave behind what is portrayed as the vanity of his secular operas and the petty politics of aristocratic society and dedicate himself to this more democratic and thoroughly Christian mode of artistic expression.

Essentially a moral drama of redemption through good works, as in his crucial support for Thomas Coram's Foundling Hospital, and religious devotion, as triumphantly shown in his movingly portrayed creation of 'Messiah' while in extremely poor health, the film presents Christian values and glorifies an Oratorio which had become in Britain an institution, being continuously performed since that time by professional and amateur resources alike. 'Messiah' was loved and cherished throughout Britain and was regarded as one of our most valued and established traditions.

The British film industry could hardly have spent it's money more wisely in the interest of representing to British people and to the world certain moral and humane values that were sustaining the country in it's time of trial. Though the Blitz was smashing up London, Coventry and other great cities in terror raids, this fine film, superbly produced in all departments, rose above the hellish wreckage, like the dome of St. Paul's Cathedral, with a sense of imperishable hope.

Among the many felicities of this film are the conceit of the window facing Handel's writing desk becoming filled by the intensity of his vision, as in a theatre of the ideal. The authentic trader's cries of Old London which intersperse the street scenes outside the door of 25 Brook Street, where Handel lived, and which were still recalled by Londoners of the 1940s, would have served to remind wartime audiences of a depth of shared popular history, thus acknowledging and accepting that high art and folk art are spiritual neighbours; there is nothing pompous about this film other than the contemptible nature of the aristocratic society portrayed in all it's arrogance and shallowness.

But perhaps the bravest and the subtlest example of a 'Propaganda for the Good' in this film is the frank and open treatment of an obvious German as a fine and decent human being. The point is made in an opening scene, when Handel has to defend himself from a xenophobic English boor who resents his foreignness, 'You are only English by an accident of birth; while I am English by an Act of Parliament', he ripostes. This film, made at the height of Nazi ferrocity against civilisation, insists upon remembering a better German.

By remembering the civilised past, hope for the future is kept alive in time of war. It was fitting that this humane view was held up in opposition to the miasma of Evil that reeked from the Nazi super-productions, in which apalling murder and mayhem were extolled as civic virtues. However, Nazi propaganda films are now, thankfully, only of interest to historical specialists, whereas 'Messiah' is still today a moving and uplifting experience, which continues to be appreciated by anyone who enjoys the music of Handel, and admires the composer's struggles in adversity to complete what is regarded by many as his finest work.

I hope this review can at least somewhat redress the too often condescending views of this fine film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Story of the Man and His Famous Work
BridgeBuilder200626 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Handel's Messiah has been a favorite of millions of people for centuries. It has been sung and performed all over the globe, especially during the Christmas and Easter seasons.

This movie tells the story behind the writing of that masterpiece. The first two thirds sets the context of the man and his struggles. Then most of last third is spent showing what it may have been like to compose that immortal work of art.

At the end there was a short segment of the grand performance of the Hallelujah Chorus.

Out of personal hardships and illness came this amazing work that has endured. A few other people played a huge role in bringing this to past.

There is an indication of how his personal fellowship with God influenced him during this creative process.

Plus the period costumes and antique like sets give a beautiful visual history lesson.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Worth watching
martin-fennell15 October 2017
A biopic that is different than usual. How much of it is true, and how much invented by screenwriters, I have no idea. What makes it different is the absence of romance. Also when Handel turns to writing the messiah, he actually does write, and for more than a few minutes. The only real criticism, i have is that the religious visions could have been left out. In the title role, Wilfred Lawson is excellent.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
George Fridrich Handel 1685-1759
bkoganbing19 December 2013
One thing Winston Churchill and Adolph Hitler had in common was their belief in the power of film as a medium. Hitler had Joe Goebbels cranking out propaganda films for the morale and Churchill gave generously to the British film industry for certain films he deemed important. One of them was Laurence Olivier's Henry V and another was J. Arthur Rank's production of The Great Mr. Handel.

For those who don't remember their history the United Kingdom at the point our story begins was ruled by George I of Hanover who spoke no English, but was the closest unquestioning Protestant heir. George was Duke of Hanover and held a nice chunk of German real estate in the middle of that then geographical expression called Germany. A lot of Germans were able to emigrate to Great Britain to seek their fortune and composer George Fridrich Handel was one of them.

George I dies and George II whose native tongue was still German was now king. But his lack of English and boorish conduct in general like his father didn't near and endear him to many. His son however Frederick the Prince Of Wales had his own following.

Most of this film is taken up with a rather stupid quarrel that Handel has with the prince and Frederick's attempts to ruin him artistically. Back then artists of all kinds depended on the patrimony of the wealthy and getting out of favor with royalty was not something the wealthy wanted. And Handel was an irascible stubborn guy who was not about to kowtow to anyone even for his art.

Wilfrid Lawson plays Handel and Max Kirby the Prince of Wales. Elizabeth Allan is the actress/singer Mrs. Cibber who sang much of Handel's work. It's interesting to compare Lawson's Handel with another film about Handel where Trevor Howard plays the German expatriate composer from his deathbed as he reminisces about some focal points of his life. I think Howard caught the man a lot better, his raspy voices was made to play curmudgeons.

Still classical music fans will like this film.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Marvellous recreation of the Georgian era in this paramount film of music
clanciai20 March 2021
This is a grossly underrated film about music, so it is basically directed towards musicians, and they will understand it and know how to appreciate it, not just for the music, but there are many other credits as well. Above all it is gorgeously photographed in technicolour (of 1942!) with a very admirable reconstruction of the Hanoverian or Georgian age with a splendid wardrobe in flashing colours. The language is also worth remarking on as it captures the Georgian spirit and imitates the Hanoverian style. The actors are all good enough, there is no real star here, and Wilfred Lawson's rendering of the Handel character could be found somewhat lacking and unconvincing at first, but he gives a wonderful interpretation of Handel's crisis and its ordeals, which is more than convincing: he had already proved his extraordinary abilities at impersonating human sufferings and ordeals in "Pastor Hall" (two years earlier in 1940), and here he shows the same depths. Above all, the script is as well composed as Handel's music. The film becomes truly interesting as the orphans enter the story, he goes to find an ailing old musician of his and finds nothing but his four orphans, as the oboist has died of starvation. Thus the film enters on his extensive philanthropic engagements. Of course, the story of the "Messiah" crowns the film, and the rendering of his visions and dreams while being arduous at work (for three weeks without interruption) are wondrously well contrived, while the final touch is given by its first performance in London, where his arch enemy finally at the Hallelujah chorus rises to his feet, while all the audience follows suit, which I believe has been a tradition ever since at every performance. However, Handel wrote any number of Hallelujah choruses, and this was just one of them.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A sort of lame propaganda
Ana_Banana10 July 2005
This movie seems to sum up the dull, pompous Victorian view on Handel. It focuses on his premiere of "The Messiah" (Dublin, 1742), with all the virtuous clichés that have transformed for a while that masterpiece and the untamed Handel in a sort of propagandistic stuff. In war-time, it was understandable England's desire for something stimulating and "British". Ironically enough, Handel was a German, remember? Why didn't they represent him more vigorous, irascible, jolly and enthusiastic (this was also one of his faces, especially while dealing with music, I suppose)? Who knows... Such castrated and didactic views are repelling young people from the great music and the great figures of the past. Too bad. The leading actor was so melancholic all the time!
7 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Beautifully photographed but dull
malcolmgsw20 January 2017
This is a dreadfully dull biopic in an era of stodgy biographical stories.Probably made for propaganda purposes.The best aspect of this film.The sort of colour that seemingly could only be achieved by early three strip Technicolor.Jack Cardiff receives a credit as one of the cameramen.Wilfred Lawson plays the title role with a truly dodgy German accent.This film really represented the pinnacle of his screen career,partly due to his alcoholism.By the fifties he had slipped well down the cast and was playing character parts with that rich fruity voice.Sadly this is a very dull film whose narration is partly explained by lengthy interrupted.In truth this film is only likely to find favour with fans of his music.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed