Rhythmus 23 (1923) Poster

(1923)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
An unoriginal sequel
Horst_In_Translation4 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
I was still a bit more generous with my rating on Hans Richter's "Rhythm 21" but I cannot be the same here. It is basically the same, black-and-white geometric shapes, mostly squares move all over the screen. This was not a good film, not even for 1920s standards and the only somewhat positive aspect here is that it only runs for 3 minutes and still begins to drag at this point. This was done pretty early in Richter's career, so I am positive he managed to step things up and give his works a more creative touch. This silent film here is not worth the watch as the first film already was pretty forgettable and, by no means, justified a sequel. Not recommended.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Much more activity than Rhythmus 21
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki30 May 2014
Many more shapes and faster movements. I suppose audiences had matured quite a lot since Rhythmus 21? Here, the shapes are not just simple geometric shapes, they are complex lines and bars overlapping to form new shapes.

We watch white shapes dancing on black background, which changes when the white shape fills up the screen completely, and black lines and figures bounce around on the now white background.

Grey tones look like shafts of light cascading onto the floor from an open doorway.

There are times when the mind tries to find shapes in all of this chaos, like looking for faces in clouds.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More Moving Cubism
Tornado_Sam7 April 2021
In the second of the Rhythm series, "Rhythmus 23", (the first being No. 21 and the last being No. 25) Hans Richter utilizes the same concept that was the focus of the first one: Cubism as motion pictures. Richter, a painter from the 20th century, was also a member of the Dada movement (aka nonsense art), and most of his pictures preceding this were painted in modern conceptual styles such as Supremism. Richter would later go on to use live action in his films; it is these earlier works (primarily this series) that he described as being intended paintings. For him, film was no different than canvas whatsoever; the same functions could apply to both, but with film, he could go a step further and move his images.

"Rhythmus 23" illustrates this, as having seen supremist and cubist paintings, I can see how this bears a resemblence to these art movements which Richter was influenced by. Like the first one in the series, it consists of a lot of squares, rectangles and lines shrinking, growing and moving. There is a lot more going on than that previous film however, which seemed to first be testing how to create such animations on film, while this one takes such animations to their highest potential. As such, a more engaging film for me, with some interesting effects and ideas being put to good use; a step up for one who would later become an even greater artist.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed