Helen of Four Gates (1920) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
A fascinating relic of the later work of a British pioneer of cinema. Hepworth's film is a melodrama in the classic 19th century literary mould,
gtjgw11 June 2010
When comparing some of the early work of British film pioneer Cecil Hepworth with that of some of his European and American peers, it is easy to dismiss them as inferior. Georges Melies' 'La Voyage De la Lune' was an extraordinary piece of work. Edison and Porter's 'The Great Train Robbery' practically invented a genre that would go on to rule Hollywood for many decades.

The truth of the matter, however, is that each of these great creators was different. Each experimented with what they knew and developed their techniques in a different way. Hepworth created some fascinating effects using filming and editing techniques to trick the amazed early cinema viewer in films like his 'How it Feels to be Run Over' and 'Explosion of a Motor Car' and the very first adaptation of 'Alice In Wonderland'. Hepworth, of course, practically invented a genre himself with the Lassie-style creation of 'Rescued By Rover'.

Naturally, his ambitions grew over time as he moved on to creating longer narrative films, often based on literary classics by the likes of William Shakespeare and Charles Dickens. It is in this bracket that 'Helen of Four Gates' fits.

An original 35mm copy of the film was discovered to have survived in Montreal, Canada, and was brought back to Britain and publicly screened for the first time in around 90 years to a sold out 500 person audience at one of the oldest surviving Picture Houses in the UK in Hebden Bridge, the town above which 'Helen of Four Gates' was filmed. This was a truly special event, especially when considering that Hepworth Manufacturing Company went bust in 1924 and his films were melted down for the silver nitrate content. The vast majority of these early cinematic treasures are tragically lost forever.

Based on a novel that launched with immense success at the end of WW1 by an ex-mill girl named Ethel Carnie Holdsworth, Hepworth's adaptation opens with a prologue that doesn't exist in the book, laying down the motivation behind the despicable actions of Abel Mason. Hepworth clearly felt that the hatred and violence inflicted upon the titular Helen by he who is supposed to be her father required explaining.

We are launched, then, into the life of the grown-up Helen, named after her mother whose rejection caused so much grief and anger to swell in Abel Mason's heart. I will reveal no more than this. What follows is a Bronte-esquire story of vengeance, jealousy and love set against the bleak yet beautiful backdrop of the Pennine moors.

The contrasting nature of the pennine moors is important. The harsh, bleakness of it perfectly represents the harshness with which Helen is treated. By contrast, the wild, elemental beauty of it is represented perfectly by the beauty of Helen, who shines amidst the tortures bestowed upon her. This may be stretching it, but the vividness of the image that Hepworth has created may represent this very contrast in the story. Light and dark are beautifully rendered in the shots.

When viewing silent films of the time, it is always important to expect lots of animated gesturing in the acting. In 'Helen of Four Gates', this is particularly evident during the prologue sequence. Afterwards, the acting in 'Helen of Four Gates' is often surprisingly subtle in comparison to other films of the time. I may, however, just be getting more used to it.

It is interesting to see such an old film depicting violence towards women, in light of some recent articles examining the fascination cinema seems to have with such depictions. It would be very interesting to learn what feelings and reactions were drawn from audiences both men and women when viewing the film's more violent moments 90 years ago.

It is important to mention that all the caption text is written in old Yorkshire dialect, taken directly from the novel, and is slightly difficult for Yorkshire folk even now to follow. There is often enough time to read through it twice, and that is mostly enough to get the general idea.

In criticism, I would say there are a number of scenes that could have been shorter. A number of shots linger too long and test the viewer's patience but this is not a major problem and much of the film is quite well paced for a melodrama. The story is perfectly adequate and plotted well, but it pales in comparison with some of the European classics of the time. The underlying alleged family madness that causes the sequence of events that leads to all the hard feelings doesn't stand up particularly well, but is reasonably believable for the time. The depressing nature of much of the story is quite jarring, but this is not a major criticism, more a warning that there's very little light along the way. The main characters, even the lovers, have dubious elements that do not endear them wholly to the audience.

Overall, it was a wonderful experience to see this film in the packed old Picture House with live accompaniment by a brilliant pianist in Hebden Bridge, above which it was shot. I, in fact, grew up just along the road from the farms and valleys in and around which the film was mostly shot and to see these locations 90 years ago was a joy. I may have a certain biased outlook towards the film but it is well worth checking out if possible.

It may not be on the same level as the German 'expressionist' silent classics of Weimar Germany, or the innovative silent classics emanating from the USSR, but as a relic of our own British cinema history, of which there is precious little at the time of it's creation, this film is worth cherishing.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wild and Wonderful
drednm21 March 2015
The wild and wonderful scenery of England's Pennine Moors is a gorgeous backdrop to Cecil Hepworth's excellent melodrama HELEN OF FOUR GATES, based on the 1917 novel by Ethel Carnie Holdsworth.

Alma Taylor stars as Helen, raised by a brutal father (James Carew) with a secret. He's set out to make the daughter as unhappy as he has been since he found out his bride was already pregnant.

She falls in love with a man (George Dewhurst) but he is driven off by the father with tales of family lunacy. He then cruelly bribes a tramp to marry the girl. But the father is dying and the boy comes back. How will it all end? Taylor is sensational as the wild child Helen with her gypsy beads and long hair blowing in the endless wind. Perched beside a brook or on a rocky crag, she is the personification of the countryside, and Hepworth superbly films the rolling hills and dales as a backdrop.

As noted, the intertitles are taken from the book and are in a dialect a little hard to read, but the viewer will catch on. Sadly this may be one of only four surviving features from Hepworth's silent film career. The film is a true treasure.
18 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Who Says Hepworth Made Primitive Films?
boblipton8 February 2018
This is one of the rarely seen features produced and directed by Hepworth in the 1920s. It puts to the lie the claim that his later work, like the short subjects he produced during the War years, was primitive. It's a rural melodrama about how James Carew is rejected by the woman he loves. When she dies with her infant daughter in her arms, he agrees to adopt her, but decides on revenge. When the child grows up to be Alma Taylor, he drives away George Dewhurst, whom she loves, and tricks her into marrying cruel John MacAndrews, all to punish a dead woman.

Now, normally, at this point in the story, I would raise my eyebrows and wander off. I can see holding a grudge for a few decades, but I can't see many people devoting their lives to it. However, given the level of acting, the details of the storytelling, and the overall excellence of the camerawork -- a lot of the movie is shot outdoors in beautifully verdant, mountainous country -- the fate of the unhappy Miss Taylor held my attention for the full movie.

Given this level of movie-making, what happened to Hepworth? I suspect the 1920s. In the Post-War era, the capital to modernize and keep up with the American film makers wasn't available; and the taste for this sort of bucolic story lost the public attention. People didn't want to see rustic maids, they wanted to see flappers, and Hepworth, like D.W. Griffith in America, lost his way.

If, however, you have a taste for this sort of story, or you wish to see if all the "experts" who claim that the British couldn't make good films in the silent era were right -- they weren't -- this is one for you.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed