Big News (1929)
5/10
1929 Was Not a Good Year for Movies
26 February 2024
I would say that 1931 was the year movies got remarkably better. By then the sound and picture quality was better and it seems the acting and the scripts made the leap forward too. 1929 was so early in the talkie stages that I don't think studios, directors, actors, or even writers were prepared for it. Because of that there were a lot of movies between 1929 and 1930 with bad plots and terrible acting.

Take "Big News" for instance. This movie was OK, but I think it would've been loads better if done a few years later.

The notable actors were Robert Armstrong and Carole Lombard. They played a married couple and both were reporters but at different newspapers. Robert Armstrong played Steve Banks, a reporter working at his sixteenth paper. He'd been fired from the other fifteen rags because of his drinking problem. When he was sober he was a decent newspaperman.

He was on the trail of a dope pusher named Joe Reno (Sam Hardy), except he couldn't stay sober long enough to gather anything on Reno. His only chance to 1.) save his marriage, 2.) break a big story, and 3.) save his job, was to sober up and do what he knew how to do.

As for a plot, "Big News" wasn't bad. The execution, however, left a lot to be desired, but I think that was the most that could be expected back then.

Free on Tubi.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed