Crush (II) (2009)
4/10
Left with more questions than the movie answers
7 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
(2009) Crush DRAMA/ PSYCHOLOGICAL HORROR

Written and co-directed by John V. Soto Top student and overall great athlete of martial arts tournaments, Julian played by Christopher Egan does a favor for an acquaintance to look after someone's luxurious house full of security cameras. But before the family goes away for a vacation, the father then notifies him that he's expecting his niece to stop by for a swim without even telling him her name. One day, Julian sees this teenage girl Anna (Emma Lung) he assumes is the niece sunbathing by the pool, and he becomes infatuated with her even though he already has a girlfriend. His life then goes into a downward spiral as a result of being infatuated with her. The movie starts off okay since it's like a reminiscent of a 1993 movie starring Alicia Silverstone also called "Crush" until it goes further, which some viewers might be able to figure out the irony even before it happens. Upon watching this film it reminded me about a bad dream with inconsistencies, and hard to ignore them such as if Anna wasn't related to the family since she also carries the family keys, what the hell is she doing in all of those pictures- the movie never addresses this. Also, how come he never uses his martial arts on her since she was coming after him with a knife. What's the deal about this particular Australian household also needing keys from the inside and not just the out. Why wasn't Anna also pursuing the family or family members and just random strangers or was she someone he could create from the figment of his imagination! Had Julian ever viewed the security cameras at all to see if Anna ever come up, and how come he doesn't invite his other friends to show them what this Anna look like? This movie raises more questions then it gives us any answers.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed