The plot line was fine and things were flowing nicely... until...
The sting scene. Or, more accurately, immediately after the sting scene.
Sure Henry probably should have given the money for the book. And, sure, Henry probably shouldn't have risked things by taking the time to examine the book... but...
Really?? The guy escaped the scene of a police sting? And then for the police to make the statement that if Henry had just given him the money they would have captured him (and recovered the money)? And if that wasn't bad enough, Henry agreeing with that "logic" just cemented my disappointment.
What semi-intelligent viewer would really believe the "logic" of this given the suspect had just escaped being captured. Maybe we are supposed to think "well, if he'd been given the briefcase with the money he would have moved slower and then, of course, would not have escaped."
Sorry, major logic breakdown and very disappointing!
I had to stop watching after the failed sting scene. For me it ruined everything.
The sting scene. Or, more accurately, immediately after the sting scene.
Sure Henry probably should have given the money for the book. And, sure, Henry probably shouldn't have risked things by taking the time to examine the book... but...
Really?? The guy escaped the scene of a police sting? And then for the police to make the statement that if Henry had just given him the money they would have captured him (and recovered the money)? And if that wasn't bad enough, Henry agreeing with that "logic" just cemented my disappointment.
What semi-intelligent viewer would really believe the "logic" of this given the suspect had just escaped being captured. Maybe we are supposed to think "well, if he'd been given the briefcase with the money he would have moved slower and then, of course, would not have escaped."
Sorry, major logic breakdown and very disappointing!
I had to stop watching after the failed sting scene. For me it ruined everything.