Traces of Death is a cult classic, shockumentary, that provides footage of all sorts of death. People that are ranking this movie with a low ranking, i don't understand what did you expect from this movie? It's a shockumentary about death, what else could of you expected? If you can not watch extreme movies or more specifically shockumentaries real-life footage of death, why bother? This was made for specific people that can appreciate death and that can swallow the fact of a deceased. I will say that there's a lot of medical footage without any explanation, it would of been better if somebody went out of their way to explain what are we seeing in the long autopsy segments, because it is kinda hard to exactly understand what they are doing, and why. This was made in 1993, and to this day is a movie that loads of people still cant stomach. I want to clarify i have seen all other parts of Traces of Death from one to five, and if you enjoyed the first one, you most likely will enjoy the others too. You won't get bored at all in this shockumentary, except the long autopsy scenes might slow the movie down a bit for you.
Review of Traces of Death
