My main reason for seeing 'Dive Bomber' was for the cast. Particularly for Errol Flynn in a departure role, or at least in this particular period in his career where he was best known for his heroic roles in swashbucklers. That didn't bother me one bit, there have been plenty of actors in film history that take on atypical roles at least once in their careers and fare extremely well. Have also liked Fred MacMurray and Ralph Bellamy in other things.
While not a must see, 'Dive Bomber' is recommended by me or just about. Not just for the cast, but it also has very impressive aerial sequences and everything with the aircraft fascinates. 'Dive Bomber' is not a perfect film by all means, but anybody wondering as to whether Flynn could do more dramatic roles in more serious films and doubt it should see this. Was not sure initially myself, but it did surprise me and did remind me of his later roles where his acting did mature.
Am going to mention the not so good things first. Do have to agree that the humour is really not great (painful at its worst actually), very corny and forced with nothing being particularly funny. Also thought that for a film like 'Dive Bomber' it was not necessary, likewise with the very contrived subplot it features heavily in. Allen Jenkins did get on my nerves and felt out of place.
The pacing also isn't perfect, with it taking quite a while to get going. It runs on for a little too long perhaps as well.
However, a lot of things are great. It looks good, with some ravishing Technicolor that really shine in the action, the aerial shots absolutely astonish and the sets while simple don't look cheap or too claustrophobic. While still having that feeling in atmosphere. Max Steiner's score is typically stirring and lush, while not descending into melodrama. Michael Curtiz (another interest point, with him having directed two of my favourite films, 'Casablanca' and 'The Adventures of Robin Hood') directs with an assured hand on the most part, floundering only with Jenkins' subplot and to be honest it would have taken a miracle for anybody to make that subplot work.
Excepting Jenkins' subplot (sorry to go on negatively about this but that's how badly done it was and how much it stuck out), the dialogue intrigued and thought provoked. The story was far from perfect, but on the whole it engaged. The aerial action is enough to make the jaw drop and everything with Flynn and MacMurray anchors the film beautifully. Keeping personal life subplots to a minimum (generally) was a wise move, despite it meaning that Alexis Smith is underused. The acting on the whole is very good, with only Jenkins being bad. Flynn is really quite excellent and shows no sign of being taxed. Despite his acting style being very different to Flynn, MacMurray actually wasn't a mismatch and they are entertaining together. Smith does wonders despite being underused, but the best supporting performance comes from suitably stern and perfectly cast Bellamy.
Despite being far from a classic and having some big issues there are more than enough strengths to recommend it. 6/10.
While not a must see, 'Dive Bomber' is recommended by me or just about. Not just for the cast, but it also has very impressive aerial sequences and everything with the aircraft fascinates. 'Dive Bomber' is not a perfect film by all means, but anybody wondering as to whether Flynn could do more dramatic roles in more serious films and doubt it should see this. Was not sure initially myself, but it did surprise me and did remind me of his later roles where his acting did mature.
Am going to mention the not so good things first. Do have to agree that the humour is really not great (painful at its worst actually), very corny and forced with nothing being particularly funny. Also thought that for a film like 'Dive Bomber' it was not necessary, likewise with the very contrived subplot it features heavily in. Allen Jenkins did get on my nerves and felt out of place.
The pacing also isn't perfect, with it taking quite a while to get going. It runs on for a little too long perhaps as well.
However, a lot of things are great. It looks good, with some ravishing Technicolor that really shine in the action, the aerial shots absolutely astonish and the sets while simple don't look cheap or too claustrophobic. While still having that feeling in atmosphere. Max Steiner's score is typically stirring and lush, while not descending into melodrama. Michael Curtiz (another interest point, with him having directed two of my favourite films, 'Casablanca' and 'The Adventures of Robin Hood') directs with an assured hand on the most part, floundering only with Jenkins' subplot and to be honest it would have taken a miracle for anybody to make that subplot work.
Excepting Jenkins' subplot (sorry to go on negatively about this but that's how badly done it was and how much it stuck out), the dialogue intrigued and thought provoked. The story was far from perfect, but on the whole it engaged. The aerial action is enough to make the jaw drop and everything with Flynn and MacMurray anchors the film beautifully. Keeping personal life subplots to a minimum (generally) was a wise move, despite it meaning that Alexis Smith is underused. The acting on the whole is very good, with only Jenkins being bad. Flynn is really quite excellent and shows no sign of being taxed. Despite his acting style being very different to Flynn, MacMurray actually wasn't a mismatch and they are entertaining together. Smith does wonders despite being underused, but the best supporting performance comes from suitably stern and perfectly cast Bellamy.
Despite being far from a classic and having some big issues there are more than enough strengths to recommend it. 6/10.