As another reviewer has pointed out, "The Raiders" is a movie which takes what might be called a broadly neo-Confederate position about the years following the American Civil War. This position, which has been called the "Myth of the Lost Cause", holds that the Confederate cause during the Civil War was a just one, that the war had little if anything to do with slavery and was instead a "war of Northern aggression" which ended in the supposed injustices imposed on the defeated Southerners during the Reconstruction Era.
The main characters are a group of Texas ranchers, left financially destitute by the war. To avoid being exploited by corrupt Northern carpetbaggers, they attempt to drive their herds from Texas to the nearest rail-head in Kansas, but lose their cattle to attacks by bandits and hostile Indians. Despite having no cattle to sell, they ride on to Kansas where they demand that the Kansas and Pacific Railroad build a new railway line into Texas. When the railroad management refuse to comply with their demand, they (all seven of them!) form themselves into a guerrilla army to fight the railroad and prevent its westward expansion into Colorado. Despite the illegal nature of their activities, which today would probably be characterised as terrorism, the ranchers are presented as the heroes of the film, and the US Army officer (a Northerner, of course) who tries to stop them as the villain.
The film also features three legendary figures of the Old West- Wild Bill Hickok, Calamity Jane and Buffalo Bill Cody- shown as taking part in adventures very different from anything they did in real life. A similar device, using the same three characters, along with a fourth, General Custer, was used in Cecil B de Mille's "The Westerner". Hickok is here normally referred to as "Jim", probably to distinguish between himself and Buffalo Bill. (Hickok's real name was James, but he was normally known by his nickname Wild Bill). The real Calamity Jane would only have been a teenager at the time of the events shown here, but the character played by Judi Meredith, who would have been 27 in 1963, is rather older. She wears tight leather trousers, in a style more that of the 1960s and 1860s. The makers of Westerns occasionally tried to make them sexier by dressing attractive young female characters in twentieth-century fashions which no nineteenth-century woman would have worn. (Think of Marilyn Monroe's equally tight jeans in "River of No Return").
This is a film with little going for it, quite apart from its objectionable political stance. The acting and the script are undistinguished. The ranchers' demand- that a publicly funded railroad should, on their say-so, divert its finances into the construction of an unauthorised branch line several hundred miles long- is both unrealistic and unreasonable, something the film-makers blatantly overlook. They also overlook the ridiculous nature of the idea that seven, mostly elderly, men- the most unlikely guerrilla army since Citizen Smith's Tooting Popular Front- could present any sort of serious threat to American military power. A plot like this one could, just about, have served as the basis for a comedy spoof Western like "Blazing Saddles". That the film-makers used it as the basis of a supposedly serious movie defies belief. 3/10.
The main characters are a group of Texas ranchers, left financially destitute by the war. To avoid being exploited by corrupt Northern carpetbaggers, they attempt to drive their herds from Texas to the nearest rail-head in Kansas, but lose their cattle to attacks by bandits and hostile Indians. Despite having no cattle to sell, they ride on to Kansas where they demand that the Kansas and Pacific Railroad build a new railway line into Texas. When the railroad management refuse to comply with their demand, they (all seven of them!) form themselves into a guerrilla army to fight the railroad and prevent its westward expansion into Colorado. Despite the illegal nature of their activities, which today would probably be characterised as terrorism, the ranchers are presented as the heroes of the film, and the US Army officer (a Northerner, of course) who tries to stop them as the villain.
The film also features three legendary figures of the Old West- Wild Bill Hickok, Calamity Jane and Buffalo Bill Cody- shown as taking part in adventures very different from anything they did in real life. A similar device, using the same three characters, along with a fourth, General Custer, was used in Cecil B de Mille's "The Westerner". Hickok is here normally referred to as "Jim", probably to distinguish between himself and Buffalo Bill. (Hickok's real name was James, but he was normally known by his nickname Wild Bill). The real Calamity Jane would only have been a teenager at the time of the events shown here, but the character played by Judi Meredith, who would have been 27 in 1963, is rather older. She wears tight leather trousers, in a style more that of the 1960s and 1860s. The makers of Westerns occasionally tried to make them sexier by dressing attractive young female characters in twentieth-century fashions which no nineteenth-century woman would have worn. (Think of Marilyn Monroe's equally tight jeans in "River of No Return").
This is a film with little going for it, quite apart from its objectionable political stance. The acting and the script are undistinguished. The ranchers' demand- that a publicly funded railroad should, on their say-so, divert its finances into the construction of an unauthorised branch line several hundred miles long- is both unrealistic and unreasonable, something the film-makers blatantly overlook. They also overlook the ridiculous nature of the idea that seven, mostly elderly, men- the most unlikely guerrilla army since Citizen Smith's Tooting Popular Front- could present any sort of serious threat to American military power. A plot like this one could, just about, have served as the basis for a comedy spoof Western like "Blazing Saddles". That the film-makers used it as the basis of a supposedly serious movie defies belief. 3/10.