6/10
Innovative Sherlock Holmes mystery, though you have to watch the whole movie to understand why
29 January 2021
For at least two thirds of the way, this film plays more like a turkey than a triumph; the direction is static and there are incredibly long flashbacks where the narrator does not even appear in most of the events she is recounting, while Sherlock Holmes becomes a guest star in his own movie. But, in the last third, the film regains its footing with a couple of smart twists which prove that all those flashbacks served a purpose after all. Not to say much more, so that I won't spoil it for you, but this mystery uses a narrative technique that is most unusual for its time and didn't enter the "mainstream" for at least 15 more years, when a much more famous director employed it. Arthur Wontner is a very pleasurable Holmes, but like his other films, the print itself is pretty poor. **1/2 out of 4.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed