1/10
Imagine calling yourself a scientist...
28 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
...and carrying on with that rubbish. Honestly, I'm embarrassed for them. The way that evidence and data is treated is an absolute joke. All of the evidence to do with their cattle is rubbish. The camera directly on the alpaca was mysteriously down during the attack, and people were close enough to throw a stick at the creature attacking it, but couldn't see what it was? The ranch isn't really that remote: a quick look on google maps shows it's surrounded by other farms and fracking wells. There's zero proof that any of the light phenomena they "observed" were anything other than man-made. There's absolutely no evidence that any of the injuries they laboured over were caused by radiation or anything unusual. The drilling into the earth showed absolutely nothing. Anyone who has watched ten minutes of Time Team knows that's not how you do underground geological mapping. The gear on the weather balloons gave out or disappeared, or showed nothing of interest? And the rockets showed nothing? What a waste of air time. The visualisation of the microwaves and the discussion in the last episode is so unsubstantiated and unscientific I am shocked anyone calling themselves a scientist would give it any credence. The "craft" in the sky? Why did you have nothing that was tracking them? Not even any decent images! I believe there are phenomena that should be investigated with hard, rigorous science. Shows like this that claim to use scientific methods do nothing other than set back the cause. Y'all should hang your heads in shame. Oh, and if you have the temerity to make a second season, for the love of all that is holy, no one gives a toss what the security guards or the station managers think: we want THE SCIENCE.
99 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed