Review of Ted Bundy

Ted Bundy (2002)
1/10
Tragedy of a film, and falsely covered and represented
19 May 2019
Firstly I'd like to say, that I think I may have read something somewhere that this film was supposed to be loosely based on "THE" Ted Bundy. Which is why Bundy was "Bundy" on the title. But for the soul purpose of trying to be historically correct. You don't name a film after more or less one of the biggest serial killers in history then make it a ROUGH DRAFT, or loosley based lol with a lot of very false information and pure speculation on 90 percent of events. But still follow his timeline. Literally most of this movie is fiction. Made up of what people thought Bundy was like. Or may have acted in secret. Which is literally not described in the movie as a psychopath would act. The movie more so portrays Bundy as insane in his spare time 😂. When Bundy was a calm cool collective person, which a psychopath, a real psychopath is not what many believe it to be. Rather insane. The real Bundy probably would have been quiet. Maybe a very crazy look in his eye with a little change in demeanor showing his true colors. But the screaming and acting like an idiot. Lol I think the people who made this movie are insane. They hit nut job from asylum on the head. Michael Burke don't look, sound, act nothing like Ted in the movie. And again. Most stuff is fictitious. Truthfully. This was just a poor representation all around.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed