Right, well with a movie named "Triassic World" and with a movie company like The Asylum standing behind its creation, we all know what we are in for here. Yes, another mockbuster, and this time let's guess it must be on the "Jurassic World 2" movie, just a hunch eh.
I would definitely be one of the first to raise an eyebrow and be suspicious of a movie such as this. But then again, every now and again does The Asylum actually put out a fairly entertaining movie, regardless of the cash-in on whatever movie they were toying with.
"Triassic World" actually turned out to be better than anticipated. Was it a predictable movie? You betcha. But there was just something fundamentally cheesy to the movie which actually made it worth watching.
And The Asylum really upped their game here in terms of special effects. I will say that, for the most part, then the dinosaurs actually looked quite decent. There were the occasional moment where it was blatantly just downright horrible CGI, but most of the time it was convincing enough. And that impressed CGI part actually brought a lot of value to the movie.
The acting in "Triassic World", however, was rather wooden and rigid, and was every bit as to be expected from a movie such as this. People were just not overly convincing throughout the movie.
"Triassic World" is the type of movie that you watch once and never again. Provided the fact that you actually can endure these type of shameless cash-in on upcoming or potential blockbuster movies from other huge movie companies.
I would definitely be one of the first to raise an eyebrow and be suspicious of a movie such as this. But then again, every now and again does The Asylum actually put out a fairly entertaining movie, regardless of the cash-in on whatever movie they were toying with.
"Triassic World" actually turned out to be better than anticipated. Was it a predictable movie? You betcha. But there was just something fundamentally cheesy to the movie which actually made it worth watching.
And The Asylum really upped their game here in terms of special effects. I will say that, for the most part, then the dinosaurs actually looked quite decent. There were the occasional moment where it was blatantly just downright horrible CGI, but most of the time it was convincing enough. And that impressed CGI part actually brought a lot of value to the movie.
The acting in "Triassic World", however, was rather wooden and rigid, and was every bit as to be expected from a movie such as this. People were just not overly convincing throughout the movie.
"Triassic World" is the type of movie that you watch once and never again. Provided the fact that you actually can endure these type of shameless cash-in on upcoming or potential blockbuster movies from other huge movie companies.