This film will not be a masterpiece of creative cinematographic fiction. It is closer to a documentary. It is a big bang on the table of political and religious fundamentalism anywhere in the world. The problem is that it stops just before reaching the real cause of this situation in Iran.
It shows in great detail how a man and his family can become ostracized because they are confronted to a company that we understand is a private company, though it could just as well be a state company, and this company wants to buy their land - they have a fish farm - for a reason and a project that are not specified because their activities are not presented. The means this company uses to impose their control and solution is called corruption in any country in the world. They just buy with bribes all those who have some piece of authority in the police, in the administration, in justice, in the prison, and thus they can victimize those they want to get rid of. Any means is possible.
Cut the water to the fish farm. Poison the fish. Bribe the insurance company. Bribe the real estate agency that could buy the farm. Bribe the police and justice including with fake certificates. The man, Reza, ends up in prison. His wife is confronted with problems as the principal of the girl secondary school of the town. His son is provoked by the younger son of the main representative of the company, a certain Abbas. And they will go as far as burning his house down.
In this situation, some like Reza's wife's brother tells him to just play the system, play their game. He tries but any approach is taken as a sign of weakness and capitulation. Then he decides to really fight. So he has Abbas arrested on some drug charges for drugs he planted himself in his car and then tipped the police. And since he is going to go through it because it is a first offense he bribes a prison warden and has a special piece of candy delivered to the man, a piece of candy that is supposed to unsettle his stomach till death ensues.
And since everything is known anyway, he becomes a hero but he has to transform the point and that becomes possible. The company suggests he becomes their representative in the area and the political opposition to this corruption suggests he could become the mayor. But what a man of integrity who forces his wife to "borrow" a big sum from the school, under the blanket of course, who plants drugs in the car of a corrupted man for him to be arrested, and who has a poisonous piece of candy delivered to the man in prison!
Peter used to say that "Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely." Here you have a strange case of that Peter's Principle. "Since Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, to defeat that Corrupted Power you have to use Absolute Corruption."
But the film never shows the articulation between the cause of this situation which is the absolute theocracy of this Republic, not to speak of the constant provocation and isolation the USA impose onto this country with the first opium grower next door, Afghanistan, and some obvious "leaks" of opium into the country thanks to some more corruption. That's a little bit regrettable.
Thus this film is a courageous pamphlet but at the same time, it is a little bit short on the analysis of a situation it exposes perfectly.
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU
It shows in great detail how a man and his family can become ostracized because they are confronted to a company that we understand is a private company, though it could just as well be a state company, and this company wants to buy their land - they have a fish farm - for a reason and a project that are not specified because their activities are not presented. The means this company uses to impose their control and solution is called corruption in any country in the world. They just buy with bribes all those who have some piece of authority in the police, in the administration, in justice, in the prison, and thus they can victimize those they want to get rid of. Any means is possible.
Cut the water to the fish farm. Poison the fish. Bribe the insurance company. Bribe the real estate agency that could buy the farm. Bribe the police and justice including with fake certificates. The man, Reza, ends up in prison. His wife is confronted with problems as the principal of the girl secondary school of the town. His son is provoked by the younger son of the main representative of the company, a certain Abbas. And they will go as far as burning his house down.
In this situation, some like Reza's wife's brother tells him to just play the system, play their game. He tries but any approach is taken as a sign of weakness and capitulation. Then he decides to really fight. So he has Abbas arrested on some drug charges for drugs he planted himself in his car and then tipped the police. And since he is going to go through it because it is a first offense he bribes a prison warden and has a special piece of candy delivered to the man, a piece of candy that is supposed to unsettle his stomach till death ensues.
And since everything is known anyway, he becomes a hero but he has to transform the point and that becomes possible. The company suggests he becomes their representative in the area and the political opposition to this corruption suggests he could become the mayor. But what a man of integrity who forces his wife to "borrow" a big sum from the school, under the blanket of course, who plants drugs in the car of a corrupted man for him to be arrested, and who has a poisonous piece of candy delivered to the man in prison!
Peter used to say that "Power Corrupts and Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely." Here you have a strange case of that Peter's Principle. "Since Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, to defeat that Corrupted Power you have to use Absolute Corruption."
But the film never shows the articulation between the cause of this situation which is the absolute theocracy of this Republic, not to speak of the constant provocation and isolation the USA impose onto this country with the first opium grower next door, Afghanistan, and some obvious "leaks" of opium into the country thanks to some more corruption. That's a little bit regrettable.
Thus this film is a courageous pamphlet but at the same time, it is a little bit short on the analysis of a situation it exposes perfectly.
Dr. Jacques COULARDEAU