The first thing I have to say is that as a film it seems like a simple movie, without any aspiration. It is not good for planning, photography, or anything special. The only good thing is the actors that at least make it credible. To those interested in the explanation of the title in the spoiler.
Spoiler:
As a movie for people who do not even dedicate themselves to the movies or have to do it seems to me that it is a movie that can be seen. Although I do not agree with his message, I have to say that as a movie it is worth it.
It seems to me a film for the last century because there are all the ingredients, the totalitarian trade unionist, the boss who goes in the back, the employees less subservient to Leninism and then the clerks, who all over the world branded entrepreneurs and are mere currants. The trick comes when the prepared person arrives and it is not based on nonsense if not in today's world, liberal and raises things to see if they work, although this proved the 35 hours failed in France for not being competitive, without bias ideological. I saw his point well until, as it has not led to an ideological point, nothing reasonable and totally sentimental. It is clear that today you have to update whether you or your father.
By the way I am amazed at the lack of freedom that the film asks for and only one critic has commented, when you are forced to go on strike, why does not it look like the free choice to work or strike, does anyone oblige to strike? Nobody realizes that at the end of the film, if the second part were done, if the strike had lasted a long time, they would all be unemployed by bankruptcy and if it had not lasted, they would all be unemployed, because of bankruptcy and That the costs today are unbearable.
What the driver of errands would say when I passed him, the same thing but it is called evolution and you have to assume it. I hope not to disturb anyone with what I say, but to see if we have already evolved
Spoiler:
As a movie for people who do not even dedicate themselves to the movies or have to do it seems to me that it is a movie that can be seen. Although I do not agree with his message, I have to say that as a movie it is worth it.
It seems to me a film for the last century because there are all the ingredients, the totalitarian trade unionist, the boss who goes in the back, the employees less subservient to Leninism and then the clerks, who all over the world branded entrepreneurs and are mere currants. The trick comes when the prepared person arrives and it is not based on nonsense if not in today's world, liberal and raises things to see if they work, although this proved the 35 hours failed in France for not being competitive, without bias ideological. I saw his point well until, as it has not led to an ideological point, nothing reasonable and totally sentimental. It is clear that today you have to update whether you or your father.
By the way I am amazed at the lack of freedom that the film asks for and only one critic has commented, when you are forced to go on strike, why does not it look like the free choice to work or strike, does anyone oblige to strike? Nobody realizes that at the end of the film, if the second part were done, if the strike had lasted a long time, they would all be unemployed by bankruptcy and if it had not lasted, they would all be unemployed, because of bankruptcy and That the costs today are unbearable.
What the driver of errands would say when I passed him, the same thing but it is called evolution and you have to assume it. I hope not to disturb anyone with what I say, but to see if we have already evolved