9/10
Definitely Worth a Look
30 January 2014
Warning: Spoilers
In watching this film last night, instantly comparisons came to mind with the 1927 version starring Conrad Veidt.

Overall, I believe it compares pretty favorably. First of all, it's not such a downer. The Veidt version starts with a picture of his character's gravestone. It also ends with the gravestone.

This one starts with a scene in the courtyard of the college. A lot of extras were used in this scene.

Another thing this one has over the later version is it's better at explaining what's going on. In one scene, Paul Wegener's double goes to kill the girl's Wegener likes' fiancée and you have a nice title card explaining that. The later version does not.

It's also interesting to see Wegener in his pre-Golem days. I wouldn't call him handsome, but he doesn't look anywhere near as fierce.

Still another thing this version has over the latter one is the appearance of Scapanelli. Poor doomed John Gottowot looks much more like an evil presence than the one in the latter version.

Wegener's death scene is nowhere near as spectacular as Veidt's in the latter version. In fact, in watching this, I thought he had stabbed himself, but I wasn't sure until Wegener fell to the ground.

Gottowot is in the final scene and he pulls it off really, really well. I'll let you see what I'm talking about.

Overall, I liked it quite a bit, better than the Veidt version.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed