4/10
Had potential, but failed to deliver.
12 June 2013
>> MINI REVIEW << This film was just as average as the first. I was hoping it would be an improvement on the first, but I soon realized it wasn't. The story was nothing ground breaking, the "horror action" was lacking as I was wanting more blood or something, but it was like it was cut or something as every time you thought you'd see some gore, it would either pan away from the action or not show you anything. But what was I expecting when the film is only rated PG-13. My fault I guess. But this movie could have been something better if they had made it a higher rating and showed more carnage in my opinion. So I was disappointed by this film, so all I can give it is a 4 out of 10, because it had potential.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed