El Rey de la Montaña (known as King of the Hill amongst English speaking audiences) is set in Spain & starts as a man named Quim (Leonardo Sbaragalia) stops at a petrol station to fill up, there he meets a young girl named Bea (Maria Valverde). While in the toilets they have sex & Bea steals Quim's wallet, back on the open road deep in the Spanish countryside Quim sees Bea's car & decides to go after it but his car is shot at & he himself is shot in the leg by an unknown shooter. With no phone signal Quim cannot call for help, while driving along the shooter steps out in from of his car & Quim runs them down, Quim's car is shot to pieces & continues on foot where he finds Bea stranded with a puncture. They must work together to try & survive the continued onslaught as more shooters come after them, with no transport or food the odds seem stacked against them...
Not to be confused or anyway associated with the animated TV series King of the Hill this Spanish thriller was edited, co-written & directed by Gonzalo López-Gallego & feels like a backwoods brutality flick without the brutality. The basic set-up of some crazed killers shooting innocent people in some remote wooded location is fairly unoriginal King of the Hill doesn't strive for the excesses of the genre, the violence is minimal & there's no torture & next to no gore. The script mainly focuses on the survival of Quim & Bea, the script focuses on their struggle to overcome the odds in a harsh & unforgiving landscape while being hunted down like animals. The entire script is minimalist, we never find out either Quim or Bea's last names, what they do for a living, the precise details of why they were driving there in the first place or any significant personal information that might have fleshed them out a bit, I am sure many will like this but as a consequence I found it hard to like or relate to either of them & considered them not much more than cardboard cutouts. However, during these scenes where Quim & Bea are fighting for their lives & being hunted King of the Hill is a fairly effective thriller with a few tense set pieces & an unrelenting pace although it's not perfect, while Quim was handcuffed in the back of the police jeep why didn't the killers shoot him then? Did they not notice his hand & arm cuffed to the grill? Why didn't they shoot Bea when she went out to get the key for the cuffs from the dead cop? Then there's the ending, while some again might like it I found it rather silly. It seems two teenage boys are playing some sort of game, a game where everyone they kill they gets points & the one with the most points is the winner. Other than that there's no great reason behind it, we never know why these kids are playing such a game or who Quim ran down with his car. I quite liked King of the Hill as a tense little backwoods survivalist thriller while the focus was on Quim & Bea but as soon as the shooters are introduced it fell apart from & the obvious computer game references stood out a mile. Is that what King of the Hill is trying to say? That violent computer games turns kids into killers? That was the impression I was left with. Of course films such as King of the Hill are perfectly fine & it doesn't matter that they show young kids shooting people for fun as part of a game...
The final fifteen minutes switches the focus from Quim & Bea to the two killers & there are so many shots that replicate first person shooter games it gets silly, the classic one is the first person perspective shot with the gun in the bottom right hand corner of the screen pointed forward, or the reloading shot or the sniper shot seen through the telescope as they cover their backs & wander around like little soldiers. The violence & gore is minimal, a couple of people get shot & that's about it. In fact the body count is rather restrained too. The locations are suitably remote & harsh while the photography is very nice. Although the camera doesn't move that much director López-Gallego frames his shots very well with some striking imagery & makes use of the natural terrain.
The film certainly has nice production values & is well made but the locations used help a lot. Filmed in Spanish & subtitled in English the acting seems OK but you can never quite be sure what they are saying or how they are saying it.
King of the Hill is alright when it's a straight backwoods survivalist thriller but falls apart when it tries to say something, the computer game parallels may not be obvious to all but anyone who has ever played a first person shooter will notice them immediately. It has it's moments I suppose & is well made but overall I can't say I liked it that much.
Not to be confused or anyway associated with the animated TV series King of the Hill this Spanish thriller was edited, co-written & directed by Gonzalo López-Gallego & feels like a backwoods brutality flick without the brutality. The basic set-up of some crazed killers shooting innocent people in some remote wooded location is fairly unoriginal King of the Hill doesn't strive for the excesses of the genre, the violence is minimal & there's no torture & next to no gore. The script mainly focuses on the survival of Quim & Bea, the script focuses on their struggle to overcome the odds in a harsh & unforgiving landscape while being hunted down like animals. The entire script is minimalist, we never find out either Quim or Bea's last names, what they do for a living, the precise details of why they were driving there in the first place or any significant personal information that might have fleshed them out a bit, I am sure many will like this but as a consequence I found it hard to like or relate to either of them & considered them not much more than cardboard cutouts. However, during these scenes where Quim & Bea are fighting for their lives & being hunted King of the Hill is a fairly effective thriller with a few tense set pieces & an unrelenting pace although it's not perfect, while Quim was handcuffed in the back of the police jeep why didn't the killers shoot him then? Did they not notice his hand & arm cuffed to the grill? Why didn't they shoot Bea when she went out to get the key for the cuffs from the dead cop? Then there's the ending, while some again might like it I found it rather silly. It seems two teenage boys are playing some sort of game, a game where everyone they kill they gets points & the one with the most points is the winner. Other than that there's no great reason behind it, we never know why these kids are playing such a game or who Quim ran down with his car. I quite liked King of the Hill as a tense little backwoods survivalist thriller while the focus was on Quim & Bea but as soon as the shooters are introduced it fell apart from & the obvious computer game references stood out a mile. Is that what King of the Hill is trying to say? That violent computer games turns kids into killers? That was the impression I was left with. Of course films such as King of the Hill are perfectly fine & it doesn't matter that they show young kids shooting people for fun as part of a game...
The final fifteen minutes switches the focus from Quim & Bea to the two killers & there are so many shots that replicate first person shooter games it gets silly, the classic one is the first person perspective shot with the gun in the bottom right hand corner of the screen pointed forward, or the reloading shot or the sniper shot seen through the telescope as they cover their backs & wander around like little soldiers. The violence & gore is minimal, a couple of people get shot & that's about it. In fact the body count is rather restrained too. The locations are suitably remote & harsh while the photography is very nice. Although the camera doesn't move that much director López-Gallego frames his shots very well with some striking imagery & makes use of the natural terrain.
The film certainly has nice production values & is well made but the locations used help a lot. Filmed in Spanish & subtitled in English the acting seems OK but you can never quite be sure what they are saying or how they are saying it.
King of the Hill is alright when it's a straight backwoods survivalist thriller but falls apart when it tries to say something, the computer game parallels may not be obvious to all but anyone who has ever played a first person shooter will notice them immediately. It has it's moments I suppose & is well made but overall I can't say I liked it that much.