The First Men in the Moon (2010 TV Movie)
1/10
What's the point in doing something much worst than the 1964 version
21 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I cannot find the reason to do such a horrible thing like this. Poor production, horrible effects, bad acting, terrible screenplay, lost directing and so on... The 1964 version is thousands times better than this one, including the effects, so what's the point about doing this? Poor H.G Wells. I read his book in which this thing is based. So many wonderful ideas lost. The changes in the story did it worst so why to change something that was already good and known? I am a screenwriter and a director and I think we can change, adapt, specially old stories, but in order to make it better not worst which is the case here. This movie looks like to have been made by a film student of the first year that missed all the classes. One is too much, I give it zero.
8 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed