This is a well made film. Not just a good horror movie, although its that too.
The CG was not as bad as I've heard. Its used to add some blood to some things, and its use wasn't so bad to make you want to rage or write and open letter to Romero like some idiots have done.
I'm not sure what the naysayers want. Zombie movies aren't everyone's cup of tea, so if you don't like zombies of course you wont like this. Those that like Romero, zombies and horror movies and don't like this film - well those people are idiots. Lets see, Survival of the Dead had a plot with well developed characters, good direction, really nice cinematography. Other horror movies with similar budgets suck, a lot. At least this cast could actually act. It was an interesting continuation of following how a few groups of people fare once the Zombie apocalypse occurs.
For people that don't like the lack of continuity for all of Romero's 'Dead' films I say to you know better! First of all all the 'Dead' films span over 40 years in making them, and secondly that's part of the oddity of these films, Romero has intentionally never tried to keep anachronisms out of the overall timeline of when all the various films take place. Thus you see Laptops and wireless internet in this film even though it's set "six days after the dead began to walk" from the first film, which was made in 1968. Its a horror movie about Zombies, get over it, its a good well made movie.
The CG was not as bad as I've heard. Its used to add some blood to some things, and its use wasn't so bad to make you want to rage or write and open letter to Romero like some idiots have done.
I'm not sure what the naysayers want. Zombie movies aren't everyone's cup of tea, so if you don't like zombies of course you wont like this. Those that like Romero, zombies and horror movies and don't like this film - well those people are idiots. Lets see, Survival of the Dead had a plot with well developed characters, good direction, really nice cinematography. Other horror movies with similar budgets suck, a lot. At least this cast could actually act. It was an interesting continuation of following how a few groups of people fare once the Zombie apocalypse occurs.
For people that don't like the lack of continuity for all of Romero's 'Dead' films I say to you know better! First of all all the 'Dead' films span over 40 years in making them, and secondly that's part of the oddity of these films, Romero has intentionally never tried to keep anachronisms out of the overall timeline of when all the various films take place. Thus you see Laptops and wireless internet in this film even though it's set "six days after the dead began to walk" from the first film, which was made in 1968. Its a horror movie about Zombies, get over it, its a good well made movie.